« First « Previous Comments 34 - 73 of 197 Next » Last » Search these comments
The only question that is relevant is this: If Trump were a Democrat, would he be indicted?
I don't blame her for buying votes, but for my community it was a good move to help us. So I voted for her. Again, totally biased as it helps my property values.
our military is always working to start a new war.
I guess he’ll go unscathed on the massive 600,000+ American dead toll from Trump’s malfeasance or criminal incompetence connected to COVID-19
What the specifically was the indictment for anyhow? I know he was indicted - FOR WHAT?
I haven't heard yet. Anybody know what the specific charge is?
What the specifically was the indictment for anyhow? I know he was indicted - FOR WHAT?
I haven't heard yet. Anybody know what the specific charge is?
richwicks says
our military is always working to start a new war.
US Constitution only calls for an active Navy. The Navy can be used to deploy an air force and strategic weapons, as well as satellite systems. It also has a ground force (i.e., US Marines).
There is no need for a standing army. Can use the national guard or reserves which could be trained by US Marines and supplement the US Marines in times of conflict.
Founding Fathers envisioned that we needed a military for national defense, but not a military industrial complex.
.
ad says
richwicks says
our military is always working to start a new war.
US Constitution only calls for an active Navy. The Navy can be used to deploy an air force and strategic weapons, as well as satellite systems. It also has a ground force (i.e., US Marines).
There is no need for a standing army. Can use the national guard or reserves which could be trained by US Marines and supplement the US Marines in times of conflict.
Founding Fathers envisioned that we needed a military for national defense, but not a military industrial complex.
.
Why have any kind of armed forces at all? Costa Rica has none and is doing fine. And if somebody foolishly decides to invade we can always come out of our farm gates with shotguns loaded with the ultimate s...
There is nothing wrong with having a strong military with the latest and greatest tech and personnel. Many technological innovation changing the future came out of the military. However you need laws that prohibit starting a war and enforce the rule of law so that the MIC doesn't enrich themselves by killing and impoverishing and destabilizing other nations. Only congress can declare war (special very targeted operations may be possible via EO but very limited). The US should not be anywhere in the world right now.
mell says
There is nothing wrong with having a strong military with the latest and greatest tech and personnel. Many technological innovation changing the future came out of the military. However you need laws that prohibit starting a war and enforce the rule of law so that the MIC doesn't enrich themselves by killing and impoverishing and destabilizing other nations. Only congress can declare war (special very targeted operations may be possible via EO but very limited). The US should not be anywhere in the world right now.
How do you have latest and greatest mil toys without military-industrial complex? Buying them from somewhere else? Like from Swiss, who'd gladly sell you cannons during the peacetime but then refuse to sell shells once you're in war, because it "violates their neutralitay"?
And I'm pretty sure that without our (and their) MIC and presense of our ...
Why have any kind of armed forces at all?
And if somebody foolishly decides to invade we can always come out of our farm gates with shotguns loaded with the ultimate stopper - birdshot - and put the kibosh on that silliness.
How do you have latest and greatest mil toys without military-industrial complex?
And I'm pretty sure that without our (and their) MIC and presense of our troops countries like, say, South Korea would be much more impoverished and destabilized
Trump INDICTED by Manhattan Grand Jury
Trump accountable for the crooked money to cover rape related criminality , but reality is again going to wash over Trump world when he gets called to explain the Russian money laundering connection to Putin and the side deals investing in Russian pipeline related.
Take a good fucking look. That's what we did in Iraq.
richwicks says
Take a good fucking look. That's what we did in Iraq.
Everyone is distracted by the Soviet Show Trial of Trump.
Notice any mention of Biden's bribes from the Chicoms is now not mentioned in news cycle. No more mention of Durham's investigation either.
“Reading all the 2016 warnings from the Normalcy Guardians and self-professed Democracy Protectors about how there’s literally nothing more corrupt or dangerous than craving the prosecution of your political opponent — especially for trivial crimes — is really quite something.” — Glenn Greenwald
The New York Times enjoyed its long-delayed tantric Trumpgasm so much today that it rolled out the full-page banner headline format usually reserved for the commencement of world wars. (They took the banner down before seven o’clock this morning.) For many of the cat-ladies employed as “reporters” at the once-august paper, it was the first Trumpgasm they’ve ever experienced in a lifetime of emotional displacement, over-eating, and furious knitting of pink polyester hats for the crusade to root out patriarchal wickedness. ...
This oh-so-satisfying climax, of course, is brought to you by the party of hoaxes, flimflams, and mandated death shots, so it’s amusing here on the sidelines to see The Times’s op-ed writers squirm with post-coital pleasure underneath the full-page Trumpgasmic headline. The lead editorial declares: “Even Donald Trump Should Be Held Accountable”— overlooking the utter absence of accountability that has been the norm in every recent insult to the nation’s dignity from wholesale and repeat election fraud, to six years of lawless depravity in the FBI, to overt support of Antifa and BLM street havoc, to the forced, deceitful administration of deadly “vaccines.”
“How a President’s Arrest Can Strengthen a Democracy,” honorary cat-lady Nicholas Kristof opined, repeating the bad-faith trope that his legions of Wokery have an interest in political rectitude — when, in fact, they are solely preoccupied with coercing, censoring, cancelling, persecuting, punishing, and defenestrating anyone who objects to their grifts and hustles. ...
This comes at a time when that government — the “Joe Biden” regime — presides over the collapse of what’s left of America’s economy, the crack-up of the banking system, and the shocking loss of our country’s influence in the geo-political arena. All of that is manifesting as increased general hardship across the US population: a whole lot of citizens going broke, going hungry, losing their property and chattels to bankruptcy, losing their children to Woke-induced psychopathology, and — the final insult — being subjected to a medical racketeering operation that ruins and murders them when they get sick.
The Party of Chaos looks pretty smugly secure for the moment. If Alvin Bragg’s flimsy case in New York falls apart, as many expect, fellow partisans have grand juries lined up against Mr. Trump in other jurisdictions, waiting patiently to take their turns at the political assassination of this supposed “threat to our democracy.” Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi declared yesterday that Mr. Trump “has the right to prove his innocence.” She apparently forgot how our legal system is supposed to work, which is that defendants are presumed innocent and it’s the government’s burden to prove someone guilty.
As to qualifications to be president, the Constitution simply states: a presidential candidate must be a natural born citizen of the United States, a resident for 14 years, and 35 years of age or older. There is no language in Article II that might legally prevent someone convicted of a petty crime, fairly or otherwise, from running for the job. Which means that the Golden Golem of Greatness could be back … cue the cat-ladies’ righteous, wrathful meows.
Drudge Report says 30 counts related to business fraud. So who was harmed by this ? Who got defrauded such as did investors lose money ? Is this a tangible crime or a victimless crime ?
richwicks says
What the specifically was the indictment for anyhow? I know he was indicted - FOR WHAT?
I haven't heard yet. Anybody know what the specific charge is?
Drudge Report says 30 counts related to business fraud. So who was harmed by this ? Who got defrauded such as did investors lose money ? Is this a tangible crime or a victimless crime ?
.
Worth noting that while we like to laugh at TDS and think it will only mobilize more voters for Trump, which is likely true, the leftoid globalist aren't that stupid. TDS serves a yuge purpose for them.
What very well might happen is that a bunch of Powerful Private Entities are now going to freak out and run screaming to the DA/DNC to stop it, as it would open them up also to bullshit charges and civil suits.
Who is going to try them ? Any trial will would have to be in a Democrat city with a Soros distract attorney and Woke jury.
Any NYS prosecutor with a humbug against a person or company can now run wild.
IL is not nearly as bad as CA, NY, NJ.
This is a classical Royalist maneuver to get Trump into position for assassination.
« First « Previous Comments 34 - 73 of 197 Next » Last » Search these comments
Link to NYT Article:
https://archive.is/IsPTb