3
0

Fox Down 30% Since Tucker


               
2023 May 5, 12:48am   1,873 views  27 comments

by TheAntiPanicanLearingCenter   follow (9)  

Fox News Channel’s prime-time viewership in its first week without Tucker Carlson dropped 29.6% from the previous week.

Fox News Channel averaged 1.449 million viewers for its prime-time programming between April 24 and Sunday, third among cable networks, according to live-plus-same-day figures released by Nielsen on Tuesday. It averaged 2.058 million viewers the previous week when it did not have to face coverage of the NFL draft for two nights.

Fox News Channel had none of the week’s top 10 cable programs and only three in the 20 — two editions of “Hannity” and the first edition of “Fox News Tonight,” the network’s replacement for “Tucker Carlson Tonight” in the weeknight 8 p.m. time slot. The previous week Fox News had eight of the top 20 — five episode of “Tucker Carlson Tonight” (two of those in the top 10) and three episodes of “Hannity.” In Carlson’s final week before being fired, the final five editions of “Tucker Carlson Tonight” accounted for each of Fox News Channel’s five largest prime-time audiences.

The rest of the top 20 cable prime-time programs consisted of ESPN’s coverage of the first round the NFL draft, 10 NBA playoff games — eight on TNT and two on ESPN; Friday’s “NBA Courtside” on ESPN; two NHL playoff games on TNT; the MSNBC news and opinion program, “The Rachel Maddow Show”; History’s “The Curse of Oak Island” and “The Secret of Skinwalker Ranch.”
https://t.co/NEHMN5sLut

« First        Comments 19 - 27 of 27        Search these comments

19   RWSGFY   @   2023 Aug 25, 9:43am  

AmericanKulak says

The Big Story about the interview is that a streaming social media interview beat the shit out of a Presidential Debate on a Cable News channel in views.

Legacy media dying rapidly.


If the casts were flipped the teevee would beat the social media. It's not the vessel, it's the contents.
20   Patrick   @   2023 Aug 25, 10:36am  

Right, but the point is that now we clearly have a way around the legacy media.

That did not exist before.

One day, patrick.net could get that big! Well, in theory anyway.
21   RWSGFY   @   2023 Oct 10, 3:23pm  

Have Tucker made a Pokemon face and asked "why are giving our hard-earned money to Israel?" yet? No? He's slipping...
22   richwicks   @   2023 Oct 10, 8:21pm  

RWSGFY says


If the casts were flipped the teevee would beat the social media. It's not the vessel, it's the contents.


No, it's the vessel.

If you cannot respond to what is said, why listen to it at all? I don't see why people don't understand this. You can yell at a television all you want, but nobody will hear you.

Authoritarianism is telling you what to think, but a democratic system is being able to say "this is bullshit, and here is why". Our "leaders" are fucking liars, and they have been for a long time, and they are having a very hard time dealing with people pointing out their lies.

I have said multiple times I detest television - it tells people how to think, and what they should care about. We're bombing Yemen right now, who cares about this? Nobody, because it's not on TV. Carlson is a BABY STEP into free communication. We're going to dismantle this system.

Most people have NO IDEA that they are totally controlled. Oh, people care about Ukraine, about about Somalia? Libya? Out of sight out of mind. There's a lot of people sick and tired of this shit who KNOW that our society is entirely propagandized and we're going to destroy that ability.

The PUSSY fucking OLIGARCHS can't deal with this, so they shut down comments on their propaganda "news" feeds. That's fine, just ignore their propaganda. If you cannot comment on it, or you are censored on it, you know it's propaganda. You know how impossible it is to correct an incorrect story? It's entirely impossible. I've seen this countless times. It's been pure bullshit propaganda for about 20 years. I could reach journalists a few times in 2000, but it's impossible now. I'm published in The Guardian - 2 decades ago.
24   AD   @   2024 Jun 28, 11:27pm  

Newsmax is going public on the NASDAQ or NYSE.

Fox News is getting squeezed out by Newsmax and other independent networks like OAN.

That's why its has more Democrats on its shows, and is moving closer to the political center in order to survive and remain relevant.

My guess Fox News will end up being just right of center and let Newsmax and other networks like OAN to fill the void or gap as far as right of center.

For me I like Fox Business as a counterbalance to Bloomberg TV and CNBC.

.
26   FortWayneHatesRealtors   @   2024 Jul 29, 3:59pm  

what’s FoxNews? is that some website for fox hunters? not into that.
27   ForcedTQ   @   2024 Jul 29, 9:48pm  

AD says

Newsmax is going public on the NASDAQ or NYSE.

Fox News is getting squeezed out by Newsmax and other independent networks like OAN.

That's why its has more Democrats on its shows, and is moving closer to the political center in order to survive and remain relevant.

My guess Fox News will end up being just right of center and let Newsmax and other networks like OAN to fill the void or gap as far as right of center.

For me I like Fox Business as a counterbalance to Bloomberg TV and CNBC.

.


Epoch Times too.

« First        Comments 19 - 27 of 27        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste