« First « Previous Comments 17 - 56 of 57 Next » Last » Search these comments
Loans are the wrong product. It should be an annuity sold by the schools to the investors. Students pay no tuition and get a small stipend for living expenses. In exchange, students agree to pay a percentage of their income to the school for a period of time post graduation. That income stream funds the annuity the school sells.
pudil says
Loans are the wrong product. It should be an annuity sold by the schools to the investors. Students pay no tuition and get a small stipend for living expenses. In exchange, students agree to pay a percentage of their income to the school for a period of time post graduation. That income stream funds the annuity the school sells.
I love this idea, but universities will hate it because it would force them to be responsible about providing a useful education instead of merely exploiting students.
One can always take their edumacation and move overseas. No need to repay anything then.
One can always take their edumacation and move overseas. No need to repay anything then.
RWSGFY says
One can always take their edumacation and move overseas. No need to repay anything then.
Only if you don't plan on coming back and don't plan on getting social security. Your US credit will be ruined and the DoE will garnish your social security checks when you 'retire', specifically.
The goal isn't to forgive student debt, the goal is to prolong the dangling carrot con of student loan debt forgiveness for the entitled yute vote.
The guy who wants his tax dollars sent to Ukraine must be a Soviet citizen, LOL. Because it's Soviet money which are being spent to repel the Red Army. The question is: why the fuck he is not deported to his native open abortarium of a country.
What are we going to do with a military that big? What are purple-haired baristas with gender studies degrees gonna do in that military?
Susan
51 mins ago
I still have student loans, I looked at my statement recently, as I had put on automatic payments, but it only appeared to be for one of the loans, which I did pay off, but have others. When I looked at the federal website for my loans, it shows they are in deferment until 2033 and 2043. Just so you all know, I didn't ask for that, they just up and did it. If the world (or me) doesn't end this next year, I still hope to pay it off.
The nature of a student loan is it's based on
1. zero credit
2. zero collateral
3. zero assets of the student
There is no way that such a loan should be forgiven at taxpayers expense.
Also, banks should not get fucked over because they lent money to a loser.
Banks are a business with shareholders who don't deserve to get fucked by the losers.
The exception is medical and law which are highly protected by regulations so you gotta spend 2-4 extra years wasting your time before you can be of actual use. But anyways, those professions are on the way out.
Student loans are ridiculous. With the internet, anyone should be able to get a bachelor level education for less then 1K.
Medical and Law professions are on the way out?
's not worth the time or money to be a doctor anymore. They don't pay that well. Not joking either.
« First « Previous Comments 17 - 56 of 57 Next » Last » Search these comments
I was working at Wells Fargo in I think 2006 when student loan debt was made non-dischargable as a gift to banks and their lobbyists. Even then I thought that it was unfair to make this one kind of debt especially onerous.
And this gift to the banks has had the desired effect of trapping millions of naive students with debt for life, debt that a lot of them can never realistically hope to repay.
My argument is that student loan debt should be treated like any other debt, as the Constitution has this:
One could argue that they meant uniform across states, but one could also argue that they meant uniform across all kinds of debt.
So I would support a Supreme Court decision which makes student debt once again like any other kind of debt.