« First « Previous Comments 4 - 43 of 57 Next » Last » Search these comments
So I would support a Supreme Court decision which makes student debt once again like any other kind of debt.
At first, in the 1970's,
stereotomy says
At first, in the 1970's,
That classic thread, somewhere on here, needs an update.
Hey Patrick, do you remember the name of that thread about 1972 or 1973 being "The Year" where everything started to go to shit.
Hey Patrick, do you remember the name of that thread about 1972 or 1973 being "The Year" where everything started to go to shit.
Hey Patrick, do you remember the name of that thread about 1972 or 1973 being "The Year" where everything started to go to shit.
AmericanKulak says
Hey Patrick, do you remember the name of that thread about 1972 or 1973 being "The Year" where everything started to go to shit.
AmericanKulak
Why yes, it's one of my pinned threads:
https://patrick.net/post/1341417/2021-09-20-wtf-happened-in-1971
AmericanKulak says
stereotomy says
At first, in the 1970's,
That classic thread, somewhere on here, needs an update.
Hey Patrick, do you remember the name of that thread about 1972 or 1973 being "The Year" where everything started to go to shit.
I don't know the thread, but it went to shit in 1971, when the US abandoned convertibility to gold.
Loans are the wrong product. It should be an annuity sold by the schools to the investors. Students pay no tuition and get a small stipend for living expenses. In exchange, students agree to pay a percentage of their income to the school for a period of time post graduation. That income stream funds the annuity the school sells.
pudil says
Loans are the wrong product. It should be an annuity sold by the schools to the investors. Students pay no tuition and get a small stipend for living expenses. In exchange, students agree to pay a percentage of their income to the school for a period of time post graduation. That income stream funds the annuity the school sells.
I love this idea, but universities will hate it because it would force them to be responsible about providing a useful education instead of merely exploiting students.
One can always take their edumacation and move overseas. No need to repay anything then.
One can always take their edumacation and move overseas. No need to repay anything then.
RWSGFY says
One can always take their edumacation and move overseas. No need to repay anything then.
Only if you don't plan on coming back and don't plan on getting social security. Your US credit will be ruined and the DoE will garnish your social security checks when you 'retire', specifically.
The goal isn't to forgive student debt, the goal is to prolong the dangling carrot con of student loan debt forgiveness for the entitled yute vote.
The guy who wants his tax dollars sent to Ukraine must be a Soviet citizen, LOL. Because it's Soviet money which are being spent to repel the Red Army. The question is: why the fuck he is not deported to his native open abortarium of a country.
What are we going to do with a military that big? What are purple-haired baristas with gender studies degrees gonna do in that military?
« First « Previous Comments 4 - 43 of 57 Next » Last » Search these comments
I was working at Wells Fargo in I think 2006 when student loan debt was made non-dischargable as a gift to banks and their lobbyists. Even then I thought that it was unfair to make this one kind of debt especially onerous.
And this gift to the banks has had the desired effect of trapping millions of naive students with debt for life, debt that a lot of them can never realistically hope to repay.
My argument is that student loan debt should be treated like any other debt, as the Constitution has this:
One could argue that they meant uniform across states, but one could also argue that they meant uniform across all kinds of debt.
So I would support a Supreme Court decision which makes student debt once again like any other kind of debt.