patrick.net

"I Have a Dream" speech: "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the Melenin content but by the content of their character".

Keep it fair for all.
Europeans specially whites from north Europe were black migrants from.africa who turned white due to lack of sun. Half a continent.

Now they are in 4.5 out of 6 continent. North,soth america, australia, Europe, half of Asia, and even parts of Africa. Great progress, give it 200 years n sun will do its thing then start again.

KgK one says

"I Have a Dream" speech: "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the Melenin content but by the content of their character".

Keep it fair for all.
Europeans specially whites from north Europe were black migrants from.africa who turned white due to lack of sun. Half a continent.

Now they are in 4.5 out of 6 continent. North,soth america, australia, Europe, half of Asia, and even parts of Africa. Great progress, give it 200 years n sun will do its thing then start again.

Nobody was black and turned white, that’s foolish to think. Not one black turned white. Not one white turned black. Just like not a single monkey turned human. Evolution is a hoax.

If evolution is hoax then what do you belive in? -4th day sun was created, how did they count first 3?
-Adam n eves inbred kids populated the earth, shoulnt we all look same?

Back to science,Amount of sun will determine level of melenin.

FortWayneHatesRealtors says

Great progress, give it 200 years n sun will do its thing then start again.

And the upper classes will remain white, just because upper class men tend to pick light-skinned women as wives.

This is especially true in India.

A little race baiting from Arthur C. Clarke - "Reunion":

https://xpressenglish.com/our-stories/reunion-clarke/

KgK one says

Great progress, give it 200 years n sun will do its thing then start again.

Boers have been in Africa much longer that 200 years, and the Boers are no darker than the Dutch who stayed in Europe. Same with the pure blood Spanish in Mexico City and other Latin areas. Did the unbroken British blood lines in India darken up?

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/2014523840869585035

HeadSet says

KgK one says

Great progress, give it 200 years n sun will do its thing then start again.

Boers have been in Africa much longer that 200 years, and the Boers are no darker than the Dutch who stayed in Europe. Same with the pure blood Spanish in Mexico City and other Latin areas. Did the unbroken British blood lines in India darken up?

South Africa is south end away from equator, its beyond tropics, so less sun. Also white men own 80% of land n rich so they are probably having kids with black women on side also to mix it up.
Not sure what pure blood means , is it vampire term. When you donate blood , they mix it n seperate parts, so if you are white n received blood, you probabaly have black n all other blood in you. Belive me dying man are rarely racist , they will take any organ n blood from any race. Also melenin levels are only skin deep, inside is usually same.

FortWayneHatesRealtors says

KgK one says

"I Have a Dream" speech: "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the Melenin content but by the content of their character".

Keep it fair for all.
Europeans specially whites from north Europe were black migrants from.africa who turned white due to lack of sun. Half a continent.

Now they are in 4.5 out of 6 continent. North,soth america, australia, Europe, half of Asia, and even parts of Africa. Great progress, give it 200 years n sun will do its thing then start again.

Nobody was black and turned white, that’s foolish to think. Not one black turned white. Not one white turned black. Just like not a single monkey turned human. Evolution is a hoax.

@kgk is a racebaiter and racist.

The ONLY way he will EVER believe in melanin fairness is in a homogenous society.

Diversity = Satan.

How am I racist, just pointing out what sun does.
And also said keep it fair for all. Are you saying asking for fairness for all is racist?



Satan n God is different topic ,you belive whatever facies you. Most white people were not even Christians. You can see how brown middle Eastern man spread it. And Christians are very diverse in thir belives, 45,000 sects of Christianity.

KgK one says

Not sure what pure blood means

Are you race baiting? Pure blood as I wrote it clearly means a race that did not mix with the others. That is, Western Europeans that did not mix with the locals. Pure blood Black would be Blacks who did not mix with Asians or Europeans.

KgK one says

Also melenin levels are only skin deep, inside is usually same.

Nonsense. Melanin does not determine race, bone structure does. When they do a dig around here in colonial Williamsburg and uncover a grave, they determine whether the colonist was Black or White from the skeleton. Same with an Algonquin.

HeadSet says

KgK one says

Not sure what pure blood means

Are you race baiting? Pure blood as I wrote it clearly means a race that did not mix with the others. That is, Western Europeans that did not mix with the locals. Pure blood Black would be Blacks who did not mix with Asians or Europeans.

I thought it meant Unjabbed - aka didn’t take covid shot, mark of the beast.

Charlie on physical differences
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DT36u3SCCyl/

Jaw theory is estimate.
Electon,Proton, neuron all same. Look for betterment of humanity before we all destroy each other with nukes n other things.

Does anyone here “believe” that the races are the same/similar to breeds? There are different monkeys, cats, dogs etc etc.

Of course races are similar to breeds. It's obvious reality. Different sizes, colors, facial features, aptitudes, inclinations. Everyone see this every day everywhere on earth, but it gives the far-left the sads, so they deny it.

"The Party told you to ignore the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - Orwell, 1984

The real issue is that the left wants to blame all differences in accomplishment by group on their beloved "racism". Blaming racism is a religion with them, completely immune to facts or reason.

There's a famous quote by some Englishman, like "There are different breeds in the animal man just as there are different breeds of dog." But it has been very thoroughly suppressed by all the search engines I tried, which all kinda desperately and plaintively deny the reality of race and also tell me that no such quote exists.

The genetic divergence between the dog's ancestor and modern wolves occurred between 20,000 and 40,000 years ago, but there are groups of people which have been isolated from each other for longer than that. The Andaman Islanders, for example, were isolated for at least 50,000 years. The is no doubt that they have evolved a bit differently in that time, as all isolated populations do.

It's not good or bad, it's just a fact.

https://patrick.net/post/1287976/2015-12-27-race-is-real

Glock-n-Load says

Does anyone here “believe” that the races are the same/similar to breeds? There are different monkeys, cats, dogs etc etc.

Yeah, but it's more like we're all a different kind of chihuahua because humans are all inbred. There are white chihuahua's (not so barky) and black ones etc.

This wasn't always the case, 30-60K years ago.

Africans (on the continent, not in the US) are the least inbred, Native American's the most.

Yes, the genetic differences among African groups are enormous, while whites and Asians are much more homogenous within their races, and American Indians (as they call themselves) the most homogeneous. Unless you count Jews, who are so inbred that all Ashkenazi Jews are the equivalent of 2nd or 3rd cousins with all others.

Interesting: linguistic diversity of a racial group is approximately proportionate to its genetic diversity. Wildly different languages in Africa, not as much in Europe or Asia, and very little in the Polynesian languages. Though American Indians have quite a bit of linguistic diversity somehow.

As one small group buds off of a larger parent group over time, that subset, being smaller, happens to not include some of the genes of the parent group, and loses some of the linguistic forms as well. The clicks of Xhosa never made it out of Africa. The Polynesian languages lost so many consonants that they have to have longer words to make up for it. The Hawaiian language contains only 13 letters, so they end up with words like Humuhumunukunukuapua'a and Lauwiliwilinukunukuʻoiʻoi.

Patrick says

genetic differences among African groups are enormous

Which means you have a scattering of inbred tribes that rarely go outside their group.

Patrick says

Though American Indians have quite a bit of linguistic diversity somehow.

Small population spread over a vast area that kept to themselves. Notice you can tell a tribe from the "family resemblance." Also, note that in medieval Ireland one need only to walk 10 miles or so to come across folks speaking an unintelligible language.

Patrick says

very little in the Polynesian languages

That is what amazed Captain Cook. He noted that a Tahitian native could talk to a Hawaiian native even though those places are separated by 8,000 miles of ocean.

HeadSet says

Which means you have a scattering of inbred tribes that rarely go outside their group.

Yes, those African groups must have been quite separate for a very long time.

At one point "science" had established that "chromosomal Adam" was only 20,000 years old, and all males must be descended from that guy. Then 50,000 years.

Then Y chromosome A00 was discovered in a black American named Albert Perry in South Carolina, and others with that same chromosome found in West Africa. It is about 340,000 years removed from all other humans.

HeadSet says

Also, note that in medieval Ireland one need only to walk 10 miles or so to come across folks speaking an unintelligible language.

Even modern Ireland!

OK, not quite unintelligible, but very different dialects of Irish Gaelic are close to each other because the people have just stayed put in one place for so long. My father's family spoke the Connact dialect of Irish, so I figured that I could attend an Irish language class on Inisheer, which is just off the Galway coast, and learn that dialect. Nope. When I arrived, I found that they speak Munster Irish there (southern). The line runs between Inisheer and Inish Maan, the next island northwest, visible from the shore. And the dialect of Inish Maan is recognizably different from that of the next island up, Inish Mor, even though there are only a few hundred speakers of each.

HeadSet says

That is what amazed Captain Cook. He noted that a Tahitian native could talk to a Hawaiian native even though those places are separated by 8,000 miles of ocean.

Yes, and even further: Polynesian languages go through the Philippines and all the way to Madagascar, though mutual intelligibility is low between Malagasy and Hawaiian.

https://www.quora.com/What-are-some-of-the-languages-you-wouldnt-believe-are-related

Patrick says

HeadSet says

Also, note that in medieval Ireland one need only to walk 10 miles or so to come across folks speaking an unintelligible language.

Even modern Ireland!

Yes, the Irish today do love their whiskey.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/aLZm_WkU61k
Positive discrimination is one of the reasons why people immigrate to US from some countries!
Now US is going through the same issue.

Not sure if this was part of the show!
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/6X4h7lFOnb8

Blue says

Not sure if this was part of the show!

It is not part of the show. He just edited the women into a video of himself. Great way to communicate a point, though.

KgK one says

How am I racist, just pointing out what sun does.
And also said keep it fair for all. Are you saying asking for fairness for all is racist?

This map is lazy nonsense. Filipinos are not as dark as Africans. Nor are Indonesians, not even close. Filipinos and Indos are dark relative to Chinese the way Sicilians are 'dark' relative to Northern Europeans.

The Pacific Coast of Peru and Chile? LOL. It's Whiter than White Bread, just big Inca noses. There is a large concentration of Blacks on the Pacific Coast of Columbia, but not in Lima-Callao or La Paz.

Florida is wrong, the Blackest part would be the center part of the state running around Tavares to Gainesville to Tallahassee. Miami is less black than the US average (11% vs. 12-13%)

Another tell is the OK-AR-KS-WY area being "Darker" than Maine or Nebraska. If this map was accurate, the darkest part of the USA would be a crescent that runs from the Lower Mississippi and curves around from Biloxi to Birmingham to Macon to Columbia to Fayetteville.

Australia is a joke too. Take a look at the population of Darwin or Perth.

Patrick says

So much wrong with that image.

Who is genociding white people ?
No one except sun and white people do white genocide. Look it up. French German, Russian, uk , spanish, dutch,killed each more than anyone. May be far next is muslims.

May be obesity, drugs, white man mating everyone all over world including Trump n vance, also rich people have less kids.

Such a short snap shot of history. Go back 300 years n all was native not white.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DSk5O4OjN8V/
Not everyone is genocidal like Europeans were which also create large amount of European deaths e.g painter in last century.

Only thing that image proves is its more sunny in south and so natural selection took over.

Also, Ceylon is shown as brown when it should be dark black. I remember a Ceylonese exchange student in high school who was very pretty, but she looked like a European dipped in flat black paint.

That's the weirdest or most striking demographic - people with "white" features (smaller nose, prominent forehead, flatter facial featuures, smaller jaw) having almost black (as in coal black) skin complexion. It's actually quite beautiful.

Yes. For example:



She'd still be beautiful even with darker skin. So it's not just about skin color.

KgK one says

Who is genociding white people ?

I think that there is a deliberate plan of elimination of most whites via demoralization, drugs, feminism, etc and replacement by the entire 3rd world, both in the US and in Europe, because:

1. Division makes everyone easier for elites to control.
2. 3rd worlders will work for less money.
3. Certain factions of the elite just hate white people of Christian origin.

Patrick says

She'd still be beautiful even with darker skin. So it's not just about skin color.

Let's see:

Yes. Still hot. Maybe a bit hotter.

I watched 'Sinners' on Netflix last night and it exemplifies Hollywood's White Hate. The main protagonists are violent Black gangsters and the White people are all either literal demons or absurdly racist KKK. It is also very poorly constructed, it is a bad film aside from its blatant in-your-face messaging. So of course it is nominated for a record 16 Oscars.

https://substack.com/@jacobksavage/note/c-205759452

Sian Beilock, the President of Dartmouth, just wrote an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal calling to "re-center higher education on learning rather than political posturing" and to "emphasize equal opportunity, not equal outcomes."

This is disingenuous horseshit. Dartmouth was (and continues to be) one of the more discriminatory institutions I encountered in my research. Since Beilock took over in 2023, Dartmouth College has hired 51 assistant professors, of whom just four are white American men (7.8%). This isn't confined to the humanities, where everyone knows the score -- somehow it manages to span the hard and soft sciences alike.