▲
7
0
▼

Deep state elimination of democracy is now undeniable: Trump disqualified from the Colorado ballot for the 2024 election


 invite response                
2023 Dec 19, 5:08pm   12,388 views  176 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (60)   💰tip   ignore  

https://sashastone.substack.com/p/colorado-supreme-court-bans-trump/comments


It’s funny that the Democrats think that this is the best way to defeat Trump. All it does is make him more popular. On Twitter, the Left is cheering, as though this wasn’t an assault on our Democracy. Oh, history will not be kind.

From the Daily Caller:

Former President Donald Trump has been disqualified from the Colorado ballot for the 2024 election over the 14th Amendment’s “insurrectionist” ban.

The Colorado Supreme Court ruled in a 4-3 decision Trump violated the 14th Amendment’s “insurrectionist ban” and is ineligible to be on the ballot in the state. The ruling is on hold pending an appeal to the Supreme Court until Jan. 4, CNN reported. The issue must be settled by Jan. 5, which is when the statutory deadline is to set the list of candidates for the Republican primary, according to CNN.

The state’s supreme court ruling found Colorado courts do not need an act of Congress to remove Trump from the ballot and the Jan. 6 riot amounted to an insurrection that Trump allegedly “engaged” in.

Chief Justice Brian Boatright, who dissented, argued Colorado’s election law “was not enacted to decide whether a candidate engaged in insurrection,” according to CNN.

“In the absence of an insurrection-related conviction, I would hold that a request to disqualify a candidate under Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment is not a proper cause of action under Colorado’s election code.”

Trump campaign spokesman Steven Cheung slammed the ruling as “un-American.”


It is not only un-American, it is literally the elimination of democracy for the benefit of the CIA, NSA, and the corporations which run them and benefit from their treason and subversion.

I hope to be in the front row with a big bag of popcorn when the deep state criminals are hanged for their crimes.




« First        Comments 166 - 176 of 176        Search these comments

166   tanked   2024 Mar 4, 3:24pm  

UkraineIsFucked says

tanked says


There is 0 chance this will stand after review by the SCOTUS. All the Colorado supremes did was embarass themselves. Perhaps this can now start an impeachment process on them.


Everything is going to shit. So don't count on it.

BTW

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/maine-elections-official-disqualifies-trump-presidential-primary-ballot-2023-12-28/


This was obvious it would happen. Colorado was so bad even the SCOTUS libs didn't stand for it.
167   DOGEWontAmountToShit   2024 Mar 4, 3:28pm  

tanked says


UkraineIsFucked says


tanked says


There is 0 chance this will stand after review by the SCOTUS. All the Colorado supremes did was embarass themselves. Perhaps this can now start an impeachment process on them.


Everything is going to shit. So don't count on it.

BTW

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/maine-elections-official-disqualifies-trump-presidential-primary-ballot-2023-12-28/



This was obvious it would happen. Colorado was so bad even the SCOTUS libs didn't stand for it.



You:

tanked says

Perhaps this can now start an impeachment process on them.


Me:

UkraineIsFucked says

Everything is going to shit. So don't count on it.


Colorado SC justices won't be impeached. Just as as I said. Has no bearing at all on how SCOTUS ruled, either.
168   tanked   2024 Mar 4, 4:13pm  

UkraineIsFucked says

You:

tanked says

Perhaps this can now start an impeachment process on them.

Me:

UkraineIsFucked says

Everything is going to shit. So don't count on it.

Colorado SC justices won't be impeached. Just as as I said. Has no bearing at all on how SCOTUS ruled, either.


Why would you say "don't count on it" to what I said "perhaps" about. If I was counting on it I wouldn't have said "perhaps". So what you said only made sense if you were referring to the SCOTUS striking down the Colorado decision and you were saying don't count on it. Even though it was obvious it would happen.
169   DOGEWontAmountToShit   2024 Mar 4, 4:38pm  

tanked says

Why would you say "don't count on it" to what I said "perhaps" about. If I was counting on it I wouldn't have said "perhaps". So what you said only made sense if you were referring to the SCOTUS striking down the Colorado decision and you were saying don't count on it. Even though it was obvious it would happen.


Not my problem if you cherry pick the wrong part of what you wrote that I wasn't replying to.
170   tanked   2024 Mar 4, 4:43pm  

UkraineIsFucked says

tanked says


Why would you say "don't count on it" to what I said "perhaps" about. If I was counting on it I wouldn't have said "perhaps". So what you said only made sense if you were referring to the SCOTUS striking down the Colorado decision and you were saying don't count on it. Even though it was obvious it would happen.


Not my problem if you cherry pick the wrong part of what you wrote that I wasn't replying to.


not my problem if you make no sense
171   DOGEWontAmountToShit   2024 Mar 4, 4:48pm  

tanked says


not my problem if you make no sense


I make perfect sense. Not my prob you can't fucking comprehend what you yourself wrote:

You:

tanked says


Perhaps this can now start an impeachment process on them.


Me:

UkraineIsFucked says


Everything is going to shit. So don't count on it.


Unless you still want to jack off over the fantasy that CO SC justices will be impeached over this.
172   tanked   2024 Mar 4, 5:11pm  

UkraineIsFucked says

tanked says



not my problem if you make no sense


I make perfect sense. Not my prob you can't fucking comprehend what you yourself wrote:

You:

tanked says



Perhaps this can now start an impeachment process on them.


Me:

UkraineIsFucked says



Everything is going to shit. So don't count on it.


Unless you still want to jack off over the fantasy that CO SC justices will be impeached over this.


What I thought you meant, was dumb. But it turns out what you actually meant was even dumber, including what you just said, since I put the word perhaps in that idea right in the very beginning. Thanks for clarifying.
173   DOGEWontAmountToShit   2024 Mar 4, 5:15pm  

tanked says


What I thought you meant, was dumb. But it turns out what you actually meant was even dumber,


^^^^^ don't do drugs while posting on PatNet, kiddies. You'll come across as a Libtard...or just don't come across as anything at all.
174   tanked   2024 Mar 4, 5:24pm  

UkraineIsFucked says


tanked says


What I thought you meant, was dumb. But it turns out what you actually meant was even dumber,


^^^^^ don't do drugs while posting on PatNet, kiddies. You'll come across as a Libtard...or just don't come across as anything at all.



Don't count on the Colorado Supremes getting overturned.... uh oh OH no I meant don't count on them perhaps possibly getting impeached. Yeah that's it
175   DOGEWontAmountToShit   2024 Mar 4, 5:58pm  

tanked says

Don't count on the Colorado Supremes getting overturned...


I didn't say that. Not my problem you IMAGINE that I did.

tanked says

don't count on them perhaps possibly getting impeached. Yeah that's it.


Exactly. Not my problem your reading comprehension skills suck.

You tried to troll me over something that you claim that I said but didn't, got caught fucking that up and now can't handle it.

#Libtard

« First        Comments 166 - 176 of 176        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste