« First « Previous Comments 1,447 - 1,486 of 1,661 Next » Last » Search these comments
Who gave Bloomberg those emails?
Throwing the likes of Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, George Mitchell, Jeal Luc Brunel, Bill Richardson, Marvin Minsky, Tom Pritzker and various other John Doe sex addicts under proverbial buses is nothing more than a distraction.
At this stage of the game is the following really a major revelation?:
... The real story that mainstream media refuses to investigate is why federal judges in New York have been allowed to secret away in sealed documents the puzzle pieces to how Epstein’s network of powerful men were able to run a sex trafficking ring for two decades with the “active participation” of the largest federally-insured bank in the United States, JPMorgan Chase; and right under the nose of its Chairman, CEO and media darling, Jamie Dimon.
This is the Big Story that has been left to wilt on the vine by the likes of the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post and their peers. ...
Many of the individuals listed in Epstein’s little black book – a total of 1,571 – have had important banking relationships with JPMorgan Chase. In a court filing on July 26 of last year by the Attorney General of the U.S. Virgin Islands, which has since settled its Epstein-related case against JPMorgan Chase for $75 million, it listed the following individuals as people Epstein referred as clients to the bank: Microsoft co-founder and billionaire Bill Gates; Google co-founder and billionaire Sergey Brin; the Sultan of Dubai, Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem; media and real estate billionaire Mort Zuckerman; and numerous others. ...
The lawsuit’s theory of the case was that specific members of the Board of JPMorgan Chase “put their heads in the sand” and ignored that the bank had become a cash conduit for Jeffrey Epstein’s child sex trafficking ring because they were hoping that their own verifiable business ties to Epstein “would go unnoticed.” (We might add an attendant thesis: that Dimon takes very good care of his Board in return for them taking very good care of him.)
Mainstream media ignored the allegations that members of the JPMorgan Chase Board of Directors had business ties with Epstein and Judge Rakoff wasted no time in dismissing the case on technical grounds. (This was not the first time that a major scandal involving JPMorgan Chase received a news blackout by mainstream media.) ...
The real puzzle pieces are the thousands upon thousands of hours of videotape that Epstein recorded across all of his hidden cameras throughout his various homes and getaways. That is the most damning evidence, and it will never be released.
Former US Attorney General Bill Barr conned President Trump, ran cover for the CIA, MOSSAD, MEGA Group, and other entities that worked with Epstein. And then Bill Barr had Epstein suicided, and laughed about it during his MSM interviews.
The fact that Bill Barr’s father, author of a depraved pedo sci-fi novella, hired Epstein as a teacher in a prestigious NYC prep school is also no coincidence.
The fact that JPMorgan Chase, which aided and abetted Epstein’s sex trafficking ring for decades, is one of the owners of the Federal Reserve should give further pause as to why there is a central bank to begin with that is neither Federal nor has any actual reserves, and what deeper global financial scams are afoot leveraging powerful pedophiles.
Nope, that horse ain't dead.
Why are almost all Republicans blocking the full Epstein files from being released?

Opportunism and cowardice by Republicans here.



Patrick says
Opportunism and cowardice by Republicans here.
A fish rots from the head down. The executive branch has all the power necessary to release the files. And seeing how they act even when their authority is uncertain (cough, tariffs, cough) the argument that they suddenly need judges or the Congess to permit the release is insulting everybody's intelligence.
Can Congress Compel the Release of All Epstein Files Held by the FBI?
Yes, Congress has the constitutional authority to compel the release of investigative files held by the FBI (part of the executive branch), but this power is not absolute and faces practical, legal, and political limitations. The executive branch (DOJ/FBI) controls the files initially, but Congress can assert oversight through legislative tools, though full release may require negotiation, court enforcement, or overcoming vetoes. Below, I explain the mechanisms, limits, and Epstein-specific context.Congress's Investigative PowerAuthority: Congress's oversight stems from Article I (legislative powers) and the Necessary and Proper Clause (Art. I, § 8, cl. 18). The Supreme Court has upheld this as essential for legislation and accountability (e.g., McGrain v. Daugherty, 1927; Watkins v. United States, 1957). It includes subpoenas for documents/testimony and public release of non-classified materials.
Tools to Compel Release:Subpoenas: Committees (e.g., House Oversight) can demand files; non-compliance leads to contempt charges or court enforcement.
Legislation: Bills or resolutions (e.g., discharge petitions) can mandate release within deadlines.
Amendments: Attach to must-pass bills (e.g., defense authorizations).
Executive Branch Control and LimitsInitial Custody: The FBI/DOJ holds files and can withhold under executive privilege (e.g., national security, ongoing investigations, victim privacy).
Courts may uphold this if Congress's demand exceeds legislative needs (Trump v. Mazars, 2020).
Veto Power: Presidential veto can block bills, requiring a 2/3 override.
Practical Barriers: Political opposition (e.g., from leadership) or inter-branch negotiation often resolves disputes without full release.
Epstein Files SpecificsIn 2025, bipartisan efforts (e.g., Reps. Massie/R-KY and Khanna/D-CA's discharge petition) aim to compel full DOJ/FBI release within 30 days.
House Oversight released ~33,000 pages in September 2025 via subpoena, but critics say it's incomplete.
Senate votes (e.g., Schumer's amendment) failed, showing executive resistance (e.g., via Trump veto threats).
Congress can compel but may not force immediate, full release without override or court backing.In summary, Congress can compel via subpoenas or laws, but the executive retains leverage through privilege and vetoes, often resolved politically
PATEL: The estate of Epstein has a voluminous amount of information that they have not released
LIEU: Wouldn't it be great if the FBI subpoenaed the estate?
PATEL: The estate is under no obligation to provide that information
LIEU: That's just false. You're the frickin' FBI! You can subpoena information
Moskowitz: You've seen the picture of the woman's body with the president's signature—he says it's not his. Will you open up an investigation into Epstein estate for putting out a fake document?
Patel: On what basis?
Moskowitz: They put out a fake signature—a forgery of his signature.
Patel: Sure, I'll do it.
Kash Patel: "Do you know how court orders work?"
Dan Goldman: "I was a prosecutor. A real prosecutor for ten years. I want to understand what the court order prevents you from releasing witness statements that the FBI took... you are hiding the Epstein files. You are part of the cover-up."
Kash Patel: "Do you know how court orders work?"
Dan Goldman: "I was a prosecutor. A real prosecutor for ten years. I want to understand what the court order prevents you from releasing witness statements that the FBI took... you are hiding the Epstein files. You are part of the cover-up."
RWSGFY says
Kash Patel: "Do you know how court orders work?"
Dan Goldman: "I was a prosecutor. A real prosecutor for ten years. I want to understand what the court order prevents you from releasing witness statements that the FBI took... you are hiding the Epstein files. You are part of the cover-up."
And Kash Patel was a real public defender in South Florida so its not as though he does not understand this. It helps he was a public defender to understand the process on both sides.
.
Public defender is lowest of the low bottom feeders. It's totally possible he does not understand many things because his limited experience never exposed him to them.
Howard Rubin, ex-NYC financier with ties to George Soros, arrested for allegedly sex-trafficking women to ‘sex dungeon’ penthouse: feds
A retired Big Apple financier with past ties to George Soros allegedly “tortured” former Playboy models and other women in a Midtown penthouse-turned-soundproofed BDSM “sex dungeon” for years, federal prosecutors said Friday.
Howard Rubin, 70, was arrested by federal authorities at his home in Fairfield, Ct., Friday morning on charges he sex-trafficked at least 10 women between 2009 and 2019, luring them to swanky New York City hotels and the leased luxury pad near Central Park — where he restrained, beat and electrically shocked them, the Brooklyn US Attorney’s Office charged.
The famed former money manager — known as “Howie” or “H” and worth at least tens of millions of dollars — even appeared to revel in the stomach-turning encounters in text messages with his personal assistant, Jennifer Powers, who is also facing sex-trafficking charges tied to the scheme.
The Democratic National Committee (DNC) is under renewed fire after revelations that it never returned donations from Jeffrey Epstein.
Evidence has emerged showing that the DNC failed to return the money even as the late financier’s sex-trafficking case files continue to rock Washington. ...
Scrutiny over donations tied to controversial figures is standard practice in politics.
The Republican National Committee (RNC), for example, faced calls to return $1.4 million linked to its former finance chair Steve Wynn after he stepped down in 2018 amid multiple sexual misconduct allegations.
The DNC also accepted more than $90,000 from billionaire hedge fund manager Glenn Dubin, a longtime associate of Epstein who faced accusations from Virginia Roberts Giuffre.
Read sickening messages between ex-NYC financier Howard Rubin and his personal assistant as pair celebrate hurting women
Disturbing text messages between accused BDSM-crazed tycoon Howard Rubin and his longtime personal assistant were laid bare Friday as federal prosecutors charged the pair with a decade-long sex-trafficking scheme.
Rubin, 70, brazenly memorialized his twisted sexual deviances in missives exchanged with 45-year-old staffer Jennifer Powers and others — including some of his alleged victims — giddily bragging about his love of hurting women, court papers charged.
Here are some of the sickening messages revealed by Brooklyn federal prosecutors as Rubin and Powers were hit with a 10-count indictment:
In one horrifying exchange in 2015, when the retired financier Rubin allegedly told Powers that he had his way with a woman tied up to a cross.
The dedicated sidekick — who had worked for Rubin since 2011 — sent a sickening reply, the feds charged.
“I can only imagine what you did to her on that cross!!! Did you shock her p—y??” Powers allegedly wrote.
Rubin allegedly replied that he had, but bemoaned the fact that his electrocution device was losing strength, according to court papers.
Tucker and Glenn Greenwald discuss the DOJ’s decisions regarding the Epstein files
Newly discovered emails from Jeffrey Epstein’s personal Yahoo account are exposing disturbing details about how he and his associates lured underage victims.
The cache, spanning more than two decades but concentrated between 2005 and 2008, paints a grim picture of Epstein’s inner circle.
Female associates routinely sent him photos and profiles of young women, including information about their age, jobs, ethnicity, and physical appearance.
One message reviewed by Bloomberg allegedly showed Epstein dismissing a potential victim as “fat and Asian sorry.”
Everyone has been paid off. Maxwell and Epstein were caught trafficking. That's the furthest this goes. These people are rich. Once it broke these people went to their victims because they're rich. Here's life changing money, never talk about this. Hell Epstein probably had a stack of NDA's ready to go. This has been going on since the early 2000's.
Oct. 1, 2025
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, in a notable break with the Department of Justice, claimed late pedophile Jeffrey Epstein was “the greatest blackmailer ever” — and may have traded the feds video of his rich and well-connected associates getting massages from young women in exchange for a controversial 2008 plea deal.
Lutnick made the shocking allegations to The Post’s Miranda Devine on the latest episode of “Pod Force One,” out now.
The 64-year-old cabinet secretary said Epstein himself showed off his notorious “massage room” while giving Lutnick and his wife a tour of the infamous East 71st Street townhouse after the couple moved in next door to the since-disgraced financier in 2005.
“I say to him, ‘Massage table in the middle of your house? How often do you have a massage?'” Lutnick recalled. “And he says, ‘Every day.’ And then he gets, like weirdly close to me, and he says, ‘And the right kind of massage.'”
Lutnick said he and his wife quickly excused themselves and left Epstein’s home, “and in the six to eight steps it takes to get from his house to my house, my wife and I decided that I will never be in the room with that disgusting person ever again.”
When asked by Devine whether Epstein’s rich and powerful associates — including the likes of Prince Andrew and Microsoft founder Bill Gates — “could hang around him and not see what you saw, or did they see it and ignore it,” Lutnick responded, “They participated.”
“They get a massage, that’s what his MO was. ‘Get a massage, get a massage,’ and what happened in that massage room, I assume, was on video,” the commerce secretary went on. “This guy was the greatest blackmailer ever, blackmailed people. That’s how he had money.”
Lutnick added: “I assume way back when they traded those videos in exchange for him getting that 18-month sentence, which allowed him to have visits and be out of jail. I mean, he’s a serial sex offender. How could he get 18 months and be able to go to his office during the day and have visitors and stuff? There must have been a trade.
“So, my assumption, I have no knowledge, but my assumption is there was a trade for the videos, because there were people on those videos,” he also claimed.
The DOJ and FBI released a memo July 6 claiming a systematic review had found that Epstein held no “client list” of rich and powerful associates.
The Supreme Court on Monday rejected an appeal from Ghislaine Maxwell, the imprisoned former girlfriend of Jeffrey Epstein.
On the first day of their new term, the justices declined to take up a case that would have drawn renewed attention to the sordid sexual-abuse saga after President Donald Trump’s administration sought to tamp down criticism over its refusal to publicly release more investigative files from Epstein’s case. ...
The Epstein case had consumed Trump’s administration following an announcement from the FBI and the Justice Department in July that Epstein had killed himself despite conspiracy theories to the contrary, that a “client list” that Attorney General Pam Bondi had intimated was on her desk did not actually exist, and that no additional documents from the high-profile investigation were suitable to be released. ...
The announcement produced outrage fromconspiracyreality theorists and Trump supporters who had been hoping to see proof of a government coverup. That expectation was driven in part by comments from officials, including FBI Director Kash Patel and Deputy Director Dan Bongino, who on podcasts before taking their current positions had repeatedly promoted the idea that damaging details about prominent people were being withheld.
Patel, for instance, said in at least one podcast interview before becoming FBI director that Epstein’s “black book” was under the “direct control of the director of the FBI.”
But the Justice Department said its review of evidence in the government’s possession determined that no “further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted.” The department noted that much of the material was placed under seal by a court to protect victims and “only a fraction” of it “would have been aired publicly had Epstein gone to trial.”
Faced with fury from his base, Trump sought to quickly turn the page, shutting down questioning of Bondi about Epstein at a White House Cabinet meeting and deriding as “weaklings” supporters he said were falling for the “Jeffrey Epstein Hoax.”
Trump is still protecting the worst people in the world, and most likely Mossad as well.
This is a very bad look. Everyone should continue to demand true transparency instead of this bullshit.
Patrick says
Trump is still protecting the worst people in the world, and most likely Mossad as well.
This is a very bad look. Everyone should continue to demand true transparency instead of this bullshit.
I follow the kike's in Congress which means just following Jew Democrats like Congressman Goldman. And Goldman's posts about the Epstein files are only focused on Trump and acting as interference for Goldman's Israel.
« First « Previous Comments 1,447 - 1,486 of 1,661 Next » Last » Search these comments
@RudyGiuliani
🚨 BREAKING NEWS: The Jeffrey Epstein Client List is now delayed until at least Jan. 22 after the court grants Jane Doe 107’s request for a 30-day extension claiming a "risk of physical harm in her country."
Yikes. It may never come out. Expect more of this.https://x.com/RudyGiuliani/status/1742380130486321587?s=20
Can't be Gislaine, she's in prison. Who? I'd say Kamala, but she's in DC.