patrick.net

Dem-Foreign Talking Points are out, and the word is: SCRUB

'Scrub' means of course detoxifying the faked information placed by the Intels and FBI as booby traps. The bots snag on to the current botswarmed 'magic word' to promulgate under the names of the Mockingbird stooges.

Now that those booby traps are out of issue, the only remaining info will be poison to the Dems?


https://x.com/mjtruthultra/status/1990854382402015340?s=46

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2025/nov/18/house-vote-jeffrey-epstein-files-donald-trump-republicans-democrats-us-politics-live-news

Senate agrees to automatically pass bill to release Epstein files as Trump claims to not care

Except for classified files, meaning the interesting files.

I remember several years ago when the Epstein stuff was erupting, there was a vid alleging to be from Epstein Island of little girls in those crinoline dress things climbing on a big round couch in a waiting room. I have never seen it since, didn't save it, don't know if it was ever verified as being from Epstein Island, except that it was totally depressing to see.

Allegedly, Jizzlaine brought the really young ones in on her submarine into an underground mooring spot. She learned to pilot the small submarine for just that purpose (Terramar?).

Dollar Store Obama's handlers hit up Epstein for donations and invited him to dine with Hakeem Jeffries, nephew of Prof "Ice People" Leonard Leffries.

This was after Epstein's trial

FuckTheMainstreamMedia says

You think it’s a good thing that a former livin GB US president is caught up in a sex with underage girls scandal?

You think Donnie T gives a fuck about that?

Eric Holder says

FuckTheMainstreamMedia says

You think it’s a good thing that a former livin GB US president is caught up in a sex with underage girls scandal?

You think Donnie T gives a fuck about that?

I actually do. I think he’s a true patriot and he’s done things to attempt to preserve the dignity of the office.

Eric Holder says

a former livin GB US president

What does GB mean here? George Bush?

Did they allow the Clintons to skip on the first subpoena date to allow the Epstein files to drop first? One would hopium.

Stupid? Maybe the handshake clubs have become so arrogant and chafing at the bit to humiliate and wring society's neck that their bloodthirsty actions translate into effective stupidity. The baleful forces came out of the closet when they should have stayed out of the light. Will they win? I suppose it's still possible.



https://x.com/thestormredux/status/1990925536974061609

Patrick says

Eric Holder says

a former livin GB US president

What does GB mean here? George Bush?

Fat fingers. Should read “former, living US president”.

LOL! For somebody who claimed the Epstein files didn't exist, Trump has suddenly become rather loquacious on the topic.

He still hasn’t given away more names. Just Larry Summers. There’s a lot more to it.

I wonder if Intel agencies trying to throw away one sacrifices to appease the public and hide the rest of their operation.

https://techcrunch.com/2025/11/19/openai-board-member-larry-summers-steps-down-amid-epstein-file-revelations/

Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers has resigned from OpenAI’s board days after Congress released an extensive cache of emails with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, which included details of intimate affairs.

Didn't even know he was on OpenAI’s board.

But I don't see anything horrible in the emails released so far. So he wanted to sleep with some daughter of a CCP official and asked Epstein for advice. Meh.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/slow-then-all-at-once-wednesday-november

https://www.bostonglobe.com/2025/11/18/metro/epstein-summers-wife-emails-harvard/

Harvard reported millions in
donations linked to Epstein. But it
didn't mention a major gift to Larry
Summers's wife.

I’ll interrupt the headlines with the email from Lisa New (Summers’s wife) to Jeffrey Epstein in December 2015—well after his sex-trafficking conviction. Epstein gave her a bunch of money for poetry. Behold:




Harvard did a whitewashing investigation and report on itself in 2020, absolving the school from any financial ties to Epstein. But the Boston Globe reported that the major gift from Epstein to Larry Summers’s wife, creating a “major” Harvard poetry project, wasn’t mentioned in the 2020 report at all. “The omission,” the Globe said, “raises new questions about the thoroughness of that investigation, which Harvard has repeatedly cited when asked about its connections to Epstein.”

Whoops. Another Harvard scandal.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/nov/18/new-york-times-larry-summers-epstein-email

Publication said it will not renew former treasury secretary’s contract in latest fallout after release of emails

On Tuesday, Charlie Stadtlander, the New York Times’ executive director for media relations and communications, said: “Lawrence Summers was a contributing writer for New York Times Opinion on a one-year contract beginning in January 2025. We do not intend to renew this contract. We thank him for his contributions.” ...

The files showed that Summers maintained a years-long relationship with Epstein. In a email to Epstein on 16 March 2019, Summers discussed interactions he had with a woman, writing: “I said what are you up to. She said ‘I’m busy’. I said awfully coy u are.”

Epstein, who often wrote with spelling and grammatical errors, replied: “You reacted well.. annoyed shows caring. , no whining showed strentgh.”

In the same series of exchanges, Summers also asked for advice about when to contact the woman, to which Epstein dictated a message, saying: “Just send, happy for the time we spent together- have fun see you soon.”

Note that Summers is married to the same Lisa New mentioned in the poetry scandal, above. They married in 2005. But sketchy Mr. Summers sent his “wing man” emails seeking advice about seducing (“getting horizontal with”) his menteé— in November 2018. That is, while he was married.

Needless to say, the menteé is the daughter of a high-ranking CCP official. “U r better at understanding Chinese women than at probability theory,” Summers wrote Epstein. ...

Summers is now the highest-profile American wiped out by his Epstein connections— even with no proof of crimes. Just his gross-ness. ...

Finally, a whole raft of media heavyweights is surfacing as having wined, dined, or otherwise cozied up to the world’s most notorious pedophile after his 2008 conviction. The roster reads like a press-room who’s-who: ABC’s George Stephanopoulos, CBS’s Charlie Rose, Arianna Huffington, New York Times alum Michael Wolff, and America’s morning-show sweetheart, “perky” Katie Couric. ...

Don’t expect the media to cover it; professional courtesy runs deep. But the public is finally getting an unobstructed look at a grotesque menagerie of self-anointed elites who seem to prize money, status, and access far more than ethics. Indeed, Katie Couric herself made the point in a remarkable, Cassandra-like op-ed she posted yesterday, titled, “Why MAGA Is Obsessed With Epstein − and Why the Files Are Unlikely to Dent Loyalty To Trump.”

Couric interviewed Rutgers professor and “cultural anthropologist” Alex Hinton, who is plainly alarmed. He said, “if we go back to Pizzagate in 2016, there’s this MAGA conspiracy theory that there were Democratic elitists who were demonic forces who were sex-trafficking, and lo and behold, here’s Epstein doing precisely that.”

Professor Hinton then leaned into the theological framing: “If you look at notions of Christian morality, you also go to notions of innocence being afflicted by demonic forces. And it’s an attack on we the people by those elites; it’s a violation of rights. I mean, who isn’t horrified by the idea of sex trafficking? But again, especially in Christian circles, this is a huge issue.”

Remarkably, from the other side of the political spectrum, Professor Hinton agreed with C&C’s take: “I don’t think what is happening is indicative of a larger fracturing that’s going to take place with MAGA.” He even praised Trump’s abrupt reversal on Monday — agreeing to the Discharge Petition — as a strategic masterstroke. “He’s sort of like a chess player. He’s a couple of moves ahead of wherever, whatever’s running, and so in a way we’re always behind, and he knows where we are. It’s incredible that he’s able to do this.” ...

Did Trump know that, if he opposed disclosure, Democrats would jerk their knees and automatically take the opposite side? (Like always?)

Don’t miss this: Every single Democrat just voted to release the Epstein files. It is 100% bipartisan. So they can’t blame Trump for the collateral damage, or for doing it out of revenge, or anything else.

Interesting but not surprising that Summers was getting paid by the NY Times. They are so ridiculously far from being real journalists anymore, just Pravda for the Dem faithful.

Have to say that Epstein knew the right answers for Summers to give to that CCP woman. He must have read and understood all of https://heartiste.org/

It is starting to look like Trump's 180 on releasing the Epstein files was indeed calculated to get the Dems to unanimously demand their release.

https://sukwan.substack.com/p/november-19-midweek-memes/comment/179008777

I think their goal is to throw a few people to the media liions, and to protect many others who are probably writing very big checks right now.

Note that Bondi has opened cases on Clinton, Summers and some banker. Why now?

So that any info on them is labeled "classified" meaning these people have cover until Bondi some year from now says, case closed, nothing to see here.

Massie was quick to pick up on this, he also noted that the ONLY info that will be released is that labeled "unclassified" and he was concerned. See how that will work?

Also, just from a quick read of the emails released from/by his estate, it is clear that the sex trafficking was a small although very active part of his business. He was a world class money launder, weapons smuggler, blackmailer, seller of political favors, and above all, a top Mossad agent.

They will go to great lengths to cover up the Mossad connections and the most egregious of the sex/murders. But they have a very big problem; a great many people want those docs out, yes for the children involved, but primarily for what they reveal on Mossad.

Covering up the Mossad role will be amost impossible and THAT fact may bring down the AIPAC houseof cards. Here's hoping.

The chain of command reflex reactions between the botfarm political puppets and script readers can be predicted. Their AIs are shit for anticipation and regrouping. They are only good for venom and as lie spewing firehoses. The CIA Thesaurus for stock in trade catch phrases echoes through the botfarms and puppets. They lie louder and longer for Satan, but coherency isn't their strong suit, only hysterias.

The only real shame for the Satanists is not getting away with it. Otherwise, they are not ashamed of shit.

So, what other Dem sanctimonious frauds will wind up wearing the 'Epstein Red Letter' of doom?

LOL!

Trump only releasing unclassified files, real stuff got classified. Look at that hole.

Guess the Harvard Lawsters will still get their "Law and Edicts of Moloch" courses.

Revelation of the method is part of the method. At the end of it, they know you will understand their crimes in intricate detail, but will be powerless (and demoralized) because nothing will happen to them as a result. The perfect false flag ends with us too late knowing the false flag, but nobody gets indicted or punished because of it. You are helpless scum, they rule.

Of course, it'll just be "There's a sekrit list and other stuff held back by the Admin/Congress!" going forward.

Ceffer says

Revelation of the method is part of the method. At the end of it, they know you will understand their crimes in intricate detail, but will be powerless (and demoralized) because nothing will happen to them as a result. The perfect false flag ends with us too late knowing the false flag, but nobody gets indicted or punished because of it. You are helpless scum, they rule.

Or, just keep saying shit was held back, so you can use it as a demoralization hammer.

I want the classified files, which are apparently not going to be released.

What exactly could be a national security threat about a pedophile and tax evasion facilitator?

Patrick says

I want the classified files, which are apparently not going to be released.

What exactly could be a national security threat about a pedophile and tax evasion facilitator?

Could be Epstein talking shit about Trump which could put Trump in embarrassing circumstances dealing with the likes of Putin, Xi, etc.

Also could deal with CIA and Mossad as far as dealings with Epstein, and Epstein's clients.

My guess is Democrats like the Jewish American congressmen will try to make some deal with the Trump admin to protect Ehud Barak (a left wing former PM and Mossad operative) and Israeli interests. This would mean they cannot clamor that Trump admin is hiding the files to protect Trump.

But if they clamor then I hope Trump does release all the files which exposes Ehud Barak and other Democrats which may be a lot worse then what happened with Larry Summers.

I wonder if the exposure of Larry Summers was a warning shot by Trump.

https://ground.news/article/trump-signs-law-requiring-doj-to-release-epstein-files-within-30-days_31b725

On Wednesday, President Donald Trump signed a bill directing the U.S. Department of Justice to release unclassified Jeffrey Epstein files within 30 days.

Yup, it's all bullshit once again, and because of that, I'm 99% sure it's to protect Israel.

LOL!

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/making-lemonade-friday-november-21

There’s been much speculation about whether and how the DOJ will redact or retain documents. But remember, the discharge petition was drafted by the mercurial Thomas Massie, and it leaves Ms. Bondi with little wiggle room. You can read the one-page bill here. I’ll offer two observations.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/4405/text

Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Attorney General shall, subject to subsection (b), make publicly available in a searchable and downloadable format all unclassified records...

First, the longest section relates to what may and may not be retained (not disclosed) by DOJ, such as child sexual abuse material (CSAM), of which Epstein apparently was, not surprisingly, a collector, victims’ personal information, “properly classified” national security material, and information whose release would “jeopardize” ongoing investigations.

But —and this is key— all redactions and withholdings, for whatever reason, must be listed and explained in a separate “unclassified summary.”

Second, I’ll quote the very last requirement in full. The DOJ must deliver a report with this:

(3) A list of all government officials and politically exposed persons named or referenced in the released materials, with no redactions permitted under subsection (b)(1).

A list! In other words, even if we never get an Epstein client list, we might get a Massie “exposed persons” list. Imagine how much interest there is now to see the Massie List.

“The justice department now has 30 days to publicly share all information from federal investigations into Epstein,” the BBC reported.

Yesterday, Attorney General Pam Bondi repeatedly told the press the Department “will follow the law” and “adhere to the 30-day requirement” after the bill’s signing, while promising “maximum transparency.” At her news conference, she confirmed the release will occur within the required 30-day window, which suggests a deadline of December 19, 2025. Just in time for everyone to digest over the Christmas holidays. ...

Finally, and I hesitated to include this little nugget, but this tiny news item blossomed all over secondary media yesterday, even making as far as MedPage, which carried the clinical headline, “Jeffrey Epstein’s ‘Lemon’ Micropenis; Rough Flu Season? U.S. Measles Status.” Wait. Go back to the lemon thing.

https://nypost.com/2025/11/19/us-news/jeffrey-epstein-victim-describes-his-penis-as-extremely-deformed-lemon-shaped/

In a recent Substack interview with Tina Brown, Epstein victim Rina Oh dished the tea. “He had an extremely deformed penis,” she said curtly.

This is almost too much information, but stick with it.

“Some people have described it as the shape of an egg,” Oh continued, but “I think it was more of the shape of a lemon, and it was really small when it was fully erect. It was probably like two inches.” Ms. Oh did not say whether she was thinking of a Meyer lemon, a Sorrento, or some other variety, perhaps even a key lime.

The New York Post seized onto the story, at least the part that it could grab, and compared Epstein to, wait for it, Hitler, who has been long rumored to have had his own genetic predisposition to a shortened schnitzel.

Throughout one’s life, one collects odd scraps of information here and there. We lawyers may be exposed to some of life’s weirdest facts, especially those related to human beings and their various and sundry complaints against one another. One bizarre (and sort of alarming) fact to which I was once exposed —not personally, thank Heavens— is that the egg or lemon shape can be caused by a botched enlargement surgery, after fat is harvested from elsewhere on the body and injected into the male member’s shaft.

Complications can then result. The fat can melt down, lumping around the base of the shaft, ironically producing a shorter pickle than when the patient started. I don’t know how this information is directly useful, except that it might explain Epstein’s preference for paying for companionship.

https://slaynews.com/news/bill-hillary-clinton-threatened-arrest-defying-epstein-subpoenas/

House Oversight Chair James Comer (R-KY) issued his strongest warning yet to the Democrat elite, declaring that Bill and Hillary Clinton will be arrested if they refuse to testify or comply with congressional subpoenas in the expanding Jeffrey Epstein investigation.

Comer’s comments came during an interview with Real America’s Voice just hours after Congress overwhelmingly passed the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which President Donald Trump signed on Wednesday. ...

When asked whether the Clintons would face consequences for stonewalling, the Kentucky Republican didn’t hesitate.

“100%,” Comer said.

“They will receive the same treatment Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro received.”

That reference wasn’t subtle.

Bannon and Navarro, both current and former Trump administration officials, were aggressively pursued, indicted, perp-walked, and prosecuted by Democrats for refusing to comply with partisan January 6 Committee subpoenas.

Comer made it clear that those standards now apply to the Clintons.

Nice to hear, but I'll believe it when I see it.

Patrick says

Nice to hear, but I'll believe it when I see it.

Ditto

https://slaynews.com/news/clintons-ordered-testify-before-congress-person-epstein-probe/

Former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have been ordered to appear before Congress next month for closed-door depositions in the House Oversight Committee’s expanding investigation into Jeffrey Epstein.

The move comes after the Clintons’ attorney attempted to avoid their in-person testimony.

In a November 3 letter, the Clintons’ lawyer, David Kendall, asked Chairman James Comer (R-KY) to excuse the Democrat power couple from appearing, offering instead to submit “a written proffer of what little information” they claim to have about Epstein.

On Friday, Comer rejected that request outright and dropped the hammer, issuing formal orders requiring the Clintons to appear.