patrick.net

Blondi says the FBI is watching child porn:

https://x.com/QTHESTORMM/status/1942168028256305346

RWSGFY says

Blondi says the FBI is watching child porn:

https://x.com/QTHESTORMM/status/1942168028256305346

Yes, so what about these "hundreds of victims?'' I cannot see the public letting that go.

It's nice to know Bill Gates is not a pedo after all.

Suckers!

They were NEVER going to release that list. NEVER.

https://babylonbee.com/news/pam-bondi-confirms-ark-of-the-covenant-sitting-on-her-desk-waiting-to-be-reviewed

DoJ legalese: "There is no incriminating client list"

But there are thousands of VIDEOS of powerful men fucking underaged girls.

They could make a list of those guys, and then there would be an incriminating client list.

Start with Bills Clinton and Gates.

MolotovCocktail says

They were NEVER going to release that list. NEVER.

Never is a long time, but I agree, there is no political reason to expose this corruption which likely involves many people who even now support the globalists efforts to implement the new world satanic global government.

Besides, isn’t the outrage a little hypocritical? Everyone has done things they aren’t proud of. I’m not justifying statutory rape, trafficking or prostitution all of which seem to have happened here and are wrong and worthy of condemnation. But it is easy to point out others faults, isn’t it? It’s hard to admit our own. Some people like to point out others faults to avoid dealing with their own. Corrupting our youth is a heinous crime, but the schools, Many churches and media/music/Hollywood have been doing that for decades.

https://www.public.news/p/this-is-a-total-fucking-disaster

“This is a total fucking disaster”

Congress must demand, and the Trump administration must provide, the Epstein Files and seek transparency and reform of the Intelligence Community ...

The strongest argument against the existence of a secret government run by the deep state was the re-election of Donald Trump in 2024. If agencies like the CIA, FBI, and Department of Homeland Security truly exercised covert and unchecked control over American politics, it is difficult to explain how their most outspoken critic, and avowed enemy, returned to power. Trump did not merely criticize the intelligence community; he ran on a platform promising its reform. He vowed to purge partisan operatives, dismantle what he called politically weaponized agencies, and hold officials accountable for a pattern of lawless interference. And despite his direct confrontation with the national security establishment, Trump defeated Kamala Harris decisively, winning 312 electoral votes and a narrow popular vote majority.

But now the Trump administration is attempting to sweep the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking scandal under the rug, with the Justice Department claiming that there is no client list and that no further disclosure is warranted, even though Attorney General Pam Bondi explicitly stated publicly that there were “tens of thousands of videos” which means the ability to identify the individuals involved in sex with minors, and that anyone in the Epstein files who tries to keep their name private has “no legal basis to do so.”

Patrick says

They could make a list of those guys, and then there would be an incriminating client list.

Or, as long as they do your will, and save America by blackmailing them to stop being Globalists.

Yes, Kash said that:

https://x.com/bennyjohnson/status/1737167456374862197

Kash Patel on why congress is blocking the release of the Epstein client list:

“Simple, because of who’s on that list—Put on your big boy pants and let us know who the pedophiles are.”

https://mypatriotsnetwork.com/12-2-24-remember-kash-patel-fbi-biden-pardon-watching-3-movies-illegals-get-lawyers-pray/

You say that the FBI has Epstein’s list. They’re sitting on it. That doesn’t seem like something you should do. You’re protecting the world’s foremost predator. That seems like an evil thing to do regardless of who may be embarrassed in the release of that list. Why is the FBI protecting the greatest pederist, the largest scale pederast in human history. Simple. Because of who’s on that list. You don’t think that Bill Gates is lobbying Congress night and day to prevent the disclosure of that list.

And why is it that the Senate, you know, and good for Senator Blackburn to try to get it out, but then Dick Turbin comes over the top and says, no, we’re not going to release the names. I don’t care about the list itself. But he released the names, right? What the hell are the House Republicans doing? They have the majority. You can’t get the list. You’re going to accept Dick Durbin’s word or whoever that guy is, as to who is on that list and who isn’t and that it can and can’t be released. Put on your big boy pants and let us know who the pedophiles are.

https://www.newsweek.com/kash-patel-jeffery-epstein-p-diddy-lists-fbi-1994053

Donald Trump's pick for FBI director, Kash Patel, has advocated for the Jeffrey Epstein and the Sean "Diddy" Combs lists to be released, and has said the American public deserves to know all of the names on them.

The President-elect nominated Patel, an America-first advocate who has often spoken out against what he and Trump call the "deep state," to head the FBI on Sunday. Many people, including Elon Musk, who is running the advisory Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) have posted about Patel's previous calls for the Epstein and Diddy lists to be made public.

Patel has said he wants to expose what he sees corruption of the "deep state" and restore faith in Federal agencies by allowing full disclosure with the public, and the world is waiting to see how far he will go to achieve this.

An X account called "Has Kash Patel Released the Epstein List?" has been set up solely for the purpose of updating people on whether Patel has updated the Epstein list.

Kash has failed. I wonder what it took to get him to betray America. Threats? Bribes?

Why would you tip people off until a year or so (minimum) of prepping the case?

And give them a year or two of finding assassins?

It may just be timing and 'the cure can't be worse than the disease'. Releasing the tapes it appears would gut the government and the Roberts SCOTUS. We still need the legislators, perverted or not, until they are organically voted out. Maybe some other 'mysterious' third party will 'release' the Epstein biz later like a blizzard. I think if Trump has leverage for the time being, all the better to get things off the launching pad. The time for vindictive public humiliations will come.

It is unfortunate that they decided to make up lies because we are so weary of politicians lying to our faces. It winds up just being more demoralization.

The civil war between Trump and the SES/CIA is the most important thing to resolve, along with the election fraud.

JPMorgan's $290 million settlement with Epstein accusers approved by US judge

The settlement covered more than 100 women, led by a former ballet dancer known as Jane Doe 1, who said Epstein abused them. Simone Lelchuk, a lawyer appointed to oversee the distribution of the funds, said in court that 191 people had applied to the fund, though "probably a few" did not have legitimate claims.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/us-judge-weigh-jpmorgans-290-million-settlement-with-epstein-accusers-2023-11-09/

Patrick says

This is a total fucking disaster”

Congress must demand, and the Trump administration must provide, the Epstein Files and seek transparency and reform of the Intelligence Community ...

Kash took money from the
Kremlin cunts - it's a known fact. He is compromised and now it has been openly manifested.

WTF?!

AmericanKulakMaximumTrumper says

I had to confirm because it's so surprising. Yes, Elon really did tweet that:

https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1942634205407764710

Multiple ways people are compromised. They are part of it, they and their families lives are threatened, and finally they are using it as blackmail.
I dont believe anything the government is saying including Trump. If they are not raping kids then they are protecting the rapists which in my opinion is even worse. I also dont think this is just about some older teens having sex with a few rich and powerful. Maybe it is so bad that if we all found out the truth we would want to burn the government down and that is why we won't hear the truth.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/semi-transparent-tuesday-july-8-2025

I doubt Pam is smiling much this morning. Furious conservatives are rhetorically tearing her a new digestive orifice in an inconvenient spot. “Pam Bondi looked the American people in the eye and said she had Jeffrey Epstein’s list. Now she says there never was a list,” conservative radio host Erick Erickson said on Twitter yesterday. “Pam Bondi should be fired for lying to the American public repeatedly.”

She’s one step away from being compared to Hitler— or even that cockroach, Fauci.

Ms. Leavitt, indulging in Orwellian Washingtonian doublespeak (rare for her) (1:55), mostly just regurgitated meaningless talking points from the memo itself. She did not explain why the memo was leaked to Axios instead of being published to the DOJ website. She did not explain why the memo looks different from normal DOJ memos,* or why it was undated and unsigned, and didn’t even include a contact name for press inquiries. (* E.g., DOJ doesn’t usually include hyperlinks in the text, but puts them in footnotes).

It's a ghost memo! Maybe Casper wrote it.

But wait— it gets crazier. To set the table, can we all just agree this is a major story? Ugh, I hate to do this to everyone, but let’s first examine how WaPo handled it.

Despite repeatedly referring to the strange DOJ memo and quoting it extensively, WaPo never linked to the source document. Where is it? Outer space? The Dark Web? Biden’s garage? That’s not a joke; can it be found anywhere on the DOJ’s website?

Next, what hellish office did the foul missive issue from? There’s no quote from any DOJ spokesperson confirming who wrote the memo or even which agency. The paper didn’t even say —get this— when (what date) it actually issued. It leaned into the passive voice so hard it would make my old grammar teacher blanche in horror: “the memo was released.” By whom, idiots?

It makes my brain hurt. Hello, WaPo— remember the fundamentals? Who, what, when, where why? Journalism 101, first day.

WaPo treated the memo as if it fell out of a random chemtrail into Axios’s lap in a pool of blue water. Oh well, it’s just unverifiable. What can they do? Well, they could have asked Pam. But the story never quoted the Attorney General a single time. Bondi, despite being the center of the controversy, said nothing in her own voice or even through a DOJ spokesman.

Why hang poor Leavitt, the White House press secretary, with this? She speaks for the Oval Office, not the DOJ.

More than 25% of WaPo’s article was devoted, not to the memo or the response, but to attacking critics as “right-wing pundits,” “conspiracy theorists,” and “Trump supporters.” It was unremarkable narrative framing, but notably, the paper spent more time discrediting doubters than explaining the memo’s findings or the actual news.

That’s a diversion tactic. Talk about who is angry, not why they’re angry.

Tellingly, WaPo never, not once, mentioned a single disputed fact that riles the critics. There are so many facts, but how about the dozens of accusers, some of whom testified under oath that powerful men were involved? Or the conflicting autopsy findings, including Epstein’s broken hyoid bone? (In forensic pathology, a fractured hyoid bone is strongly associated with manual strangulation.) Or the sleepy guards, the broken cameras, the inexplicable decision to pull Epstein off the suicide watch right before he self-deleted, and on, and on, and on.

I suppose we can understand why the memo was unsigned. Nobody wanted their name attached to this monstrosity. But they didn’t attach any facts to it, either. The memo sanctimoniously opens with “As part of our commitment to transparency…” and then immediately descends into murky bureaucratese, as if transparency means burying the lede under six feet of institutional disclaimers, passive voice, and privacy hedging. It’s like saying “I promise to be honest” and then handing you a 12-page EULA written in ancient Hebrew.

The memo, which begins with a smug “commitment to transparency,” proceeds to ignore every single inconsistency that fuels public doubt. Not just the conspiracy theories, but the hard, forensic, undisputed facts. If DOJ has, in fact, “fully reviewed” the file, then where are the satisfying answers? Instead, the memo scoldingly advised, “Perpetuating unfounded theories about Epstein serves neither to combat child exploitation or bring justice to victims.”

Unfounded? Is that a joke? Multi-volume books have been written about Epstein. (See, e.g., Whitney Webb.) Are we supposed to be satisfied with one-and-a-half pages of conclusory dismissal? Trust us, we looked into everything.




... Don’t hold your breath waiting for expanded answers. “It is the determination of the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation that no further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted,” the memo stated coldly. But “appropriate” and “warranted” are not legal standards. They are subjective vibes disguised as policy. The memo cited no statutes, no FOIA exemptions, no specific risks. Just vague hand waving at prosecutorial discretion, with all accountability diffused across two massive agencies.

But … we live in a time of social media. What do the parties themselves say? So far— bupkis. ...

Bondi’s last post was four days ago, a generic Independence Day puff-tweet. Same with Kash Patel. Bongino last posted on July 6th about a dumb NY Times hit piece, but then silence (except for re-tweets about unrelated stuff). It feels coordinated. Are they under a gag order? Did they all agree to wait for the flames to die down before commenting? Surely they know this is indefensible. Parroting bureaucratic boilerplate won’t cut it this time.

Is a rebellion unfolding inside the Trump Administration? Are Patel, Bondi, and Bongino refusing to comment?

One can almost feel sympathy for the trio of new law enforcers, each brought in with reputations as truth-tellers, fighters, and narrative-breakers. Now they’re being asked to stand silently behind a curt, faceless, undated, intellectually calorie-free memo that waves away the entire Epstein saga with lawyerly euphemisms and without a single name attached. ...




Maybe Epstein really was just doing all his ‘friends’ generous favors by flying them around and nothing happened except Epstein’s own dalliances. Maybe his fixer, Ghislaine Maxwell, convicted of sex trafficking, ran the operation to satisfy Epstein’s voracious appetites and not those of his pals, ‘investment clients,’ and bankster donors. Perhaps he hired all those teenage girls because he was frugal about paying wages.

Probability: 0.5%. (Rounded up from a tiny number with so many zeroes it takes too long to type.)

Possibility 2: Somebody Got to Them

Bondi, Patel, and Bongino have all repeatedly sworn that there was a blackmailing operation and that Epstein’s suicide stunk to high heaven. But once they finally clawed their way inside the marble halls of power, they may have been co-opted by irresistible forces and even their own oaths.

On this blog, I have predicted before (and I still believe), that we will never see the client list. It would take a miracle of unimaginable proportions. The list is too explosive, too politically damaging, and too valuable to just toss it out for public consumption. If, as many believe, it implicates powerful top political figures —including the Royal Family and Israeli power-brokers— including here in the U.S., it could conceivably destabilize many or most Western governments. ...




In this scenario, Bondi, Patel, and Bongino may have been hauled into the inner sanctum, and shown the full picture —intel, classified ops, blackmail counterplays, international leverage— and convinced (or coerced) to take the “higher view.” It’s the cost-benefit argument from hell:

"Look, the public wouldn’t understand. They want drama and televised arrests. But we’re doing the work— the real work. And if you go off-script, you destroy it all. Think of the greater good."

This kind of insidious moral compromise, coupled with realistic threats of personal harm, is exactly how the deep state works. ...

Trump may have found himself in possession of a treasure trove of global leverage. Not just over domestic swamp creatures, but royals, technocrats, intel assets, bankers, and foreign politicians. You can imagine the advice he’d have gotten.

Imagine what you might do with all that power.

Maybe Epstein’s death wasn’t about hiding secrets. Maybe it was about ending the operation permanently— like Old West justice in a designer prison jumpsuit. A clear message to anyone thinking about reviving the network.

Epstein is undoubtedly one of the most important stories of our generation. It’s the Rosetta Stone of elite corruption— a case intersecting nearly every electrified rail of conservative, populist, and justified MAGA distrust: globalist depravity, the deep state’s immunity, two-tiered justice, media collusion, basic right and wrong, and child exploitation— and the sickening sense that the worst people in the world are the ones setting the rules.

And all of that is even without dipping into the feverish realms of the Clinton-Obama-Podesta pedophile conspiracy swamps.

It all converges on one name: Epstein. ...




At this early date, we remain mired in the Epstein fog of war. Whatever this memo is —a brush-off, a signal, a smokescreen, or a sacrificial play— one thing is already clear: it hasn’t settled anything. It didn’t calm the waters; it launched a turbo hurricane of backlash. It didn’t silence the critics; it handed them fresh artillery. It didn’t rebuild trust; it cracked the foundation before the concrete was even dry.

If anything, the developing story confirms that the Epstein scandal still has a beating heart, buried under layers of sealed files, vanished tapes, shattered bones, and public betrayal. The memo appears to be trying to close the book, but it only turned the page— to a darker chapter, a page written in passive voice and printed with disappearing ink.

It won’t work. They know it. And we know they know. So we’ll wait, impatiently, with terrific anticipation, because something else is coming.

There is actually a link to the DOJ memo still up. This page:

https://www.justice.gov/opa/media/1407001

has a link to:

https://www.justice.gov/opa/media/1407001/dl?inline=

We have two governments in operation, both fronting agendas. The SES/CIA operating rogue with elements of Fourth Reich international corporatocracy and British and Dutch East and West Indies Criminals, acting mercenary military with DEWs and weather weapons, and even splicing in their own versions of fake Trump and fake Trump publicity to tango with the 'real Trump' to create a schizoid administration. The SES/CIA had their secret handshake candidates, fakes, and Manchurians in office for over twenty years pushing to start WWIII. Real Trump is like Dr. Strange and Atlas trying to hold back the forces of their subversions, treason and treacheries.

If the actual Trump manages to clean up the elections, a lot of the Dem installations will start flushing out like turds from the toilet bowl starting in 2026. That is priority number one.

Instead of lying like their cur opposites, they should just have said that they weren't releasing the Epstein files at this time due to the potential catastrophic nature of the revelations on the conduct and continuity of government. That's something that I could accept.

So Trump admits there are tapes of clients having sex with children and the DOJ will not prosecute these pedophiles?