In March, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in a lawsuit filed by attorneys general in Missouri and Louisiana alleging that the Biden administration colluded with social media companies to suppress the freedom of speech related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Last summer, a US district court ruled that administration officials coerced companies including Twitter and Facebook to censor content over concerns it would lead to vaccine hesitancy.
An appeals court later banned numerous White House officials, as well as the FBI, Surgeon General’s Office and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from communicating with social media companies.
The Supreme Court issued a temporary stay of the appeals court order last October until it decides the case.
These people are valuable tools in identifying what is true and what isn't. Generally, far more than 50% of the time, when they claim something is true or false, it's the opposite.
They would be useless if they were just random, but they are far from useless.
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,267,340 comments by 15,153 users - Misc online now