Comments 1 - 30 of 30        Search these comments

1   Onvacation   2024 Aug 21, 5:34pm  

There goes the deep state plan to siphon votes from Trump.

Beside communists, cucks and cat ladies, does anyone support Harris?
2   HeadSet   2024 Aug 21, 6:01pm  

Onvacation says

Beside communists, cucks and cat ladies, does anyone support Harris?

Black women.
3   AmericanKulak   2024 Aug 21, 6:03pm  

Excellent.
4   DOGEWontAmountToShit   2024 Aug 21, 6:07pm  

Pedo butt boys?


5   DOGEWontAmountToShit   2024 Aug 21, 9:25pm  

Shannahan is definitely in charge of setting the stage:


i
6   DOGEWontAmountToShit   2024 Aug 21, 9:52pm  

Ohhh...she is fucking PISSED. Red Pill City!

Nicole Shanahan, Robert F. Kennedy Jr's running mate in his independent presidential bid, discussed how the Democratic Party shut them out of the primary process during an interview on the "Impact Theory" podcast.

"I did not put in tens of millions of dollars to be a spoiler candidate, I put in tens of millions of dollars to win and do the right things," she said. "ClearChoice, this DNC-aligned PAC that was created specifically to take us out, has spent millions of dollars to take us out. They have turned us into a spoiler. We didn't want to be a spoiler, we wanted to win. We wanted a fair shot. The DNC made that impossible for us. They have banned us, shadowbanned us, kept us off stages, manipulated polls, used lawfare against us, sued us in every possible state, they've even planted insders into our campaign to disrupt it and create actual legal issues for us. The extent of the sabotage they've unleashed on us is mind-blowing, we're still learning new ways they have sabotaged us. I really wanted a fair shot at this election, and I believed in the American that I pledged allegiance to as a little girl. And that is not where we are today, and it is not because of the Republican Party taking us out, it is the Democratic Party taking us out. And I am so disappointed I ever helped them, I am so disappointed I helped Chuck Schumer in that Georgia runoff, to secure the [Senate] majority. It is probably one of the biggest mistakes of my life."

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2024/08/21/rfks_running_mate_nicole_shanahan%20.html
7   AD   2024 Aug 21, 10:37pm  

We will see Friday morning if this is true, or one big psych ops orchestrated by the DNC.

I remember Perot dropping out in 1992 and then coming back to run again, and I still believe he stole votes more from Bush then Clinton with his wanting to increase war on drugs, balance the federal budget, Trump-like economic nationalism.

And Perot was very vocal criticizing President Clinton especially in regards to Clinton's proposed healthcare policies.
8   Ceffer   2024 Aug 21, 10:43pm  

What did they expect from KommieKunt-Globalist organized crime known as the Democratic Party? A fair and square treatment?
10   Eric Holder   2024 Aug 22, 4:23pm  

What? People didn't like the idea of "voting for joy"? Assholes!
11   AD   2024 Aug 22, 4:48pm  

So RFK and the Libertarian candidate take more votes away from Trump than Harris ?

At 48%, Trump is at essentially the same percentage in 2020 and he barely lost Wisconsin, Georgia, and Arizona, and was very close in Pennsylvania and Nevada.

Just saying that even with all this pro-Harris media blitz, it seems like she should be doing a lot better in the polls.

And Harris was at around 54% betting odds to win , now Trump is up on betting odds at the end of the Democrat convention; so the polls one week from now show Harris back at 54% ?

https://www.realclearpolling.com/betting-odds/2024/president

.



.
12   AmericanKulak   2024 Aug 22, 5:25pm  

Convention, Replacing Biden, New Status, this is the best she should be.
13   AmericanKulak   2024 Aug 22, 5:25pm  

Eric Holder says

What? People didn't like the idea of "voting for joy"? Assholes!

I want to be unburdened by the Obama that was.
14   DOGEWontAmountToShit   2024 Aug 22, 5:25pm  

AD says

So RFK and the Libertarian candidate take more votes away from Trump than Harris ?


In states like NY the Dems felt otherwise.
15   DOGEWontAmountToShit   2024 Aug 22, 5:42pm  

I am starting to like her:


16   DOGEWontAmountToShit   2024 Aug 22, 6:02pm  

Hell hath no fury...

Plus: The Dems are obviously panicking over this:


18   Ceffer   2024 Aug 22, 6:24pm  

Polls are a combination of numerology comms and propaganda. I would imagine that 90 percent of them are fabricated from whole cloth.
19   WookieMan   2024 Aug 23, 5:01am  

Ceffer says

Polls are a combination of numerology comms and propaganda. I would imagine that 90 percent of them are fabricated from whole cloth.

Most likely. But I think they're doing the reverse this time to "get out the vote" for Kamala. "She's polling lower, get your mail in ballot in AND vote on election day."

If the polls are semi accurate, it will be a massive victory for Trump if there's not cheating. He was losing to Hillary beyond the margin of error in 2016. 2020 it took some obvious shenanigans for Biden to win. I simply don't think the states have the mechanisms in place to track double voting or recently deceased voters. Which is probably a lot with aging boomers. We shall see.
20   zzyzzx   2024 Aug 23, 6:56am  

Not this morning, but this afternoon / evening EST, if it even happens:
https://apnews.com/article/rfk-jr-trump-speech-arizona-a2638f89ddcb5de03edbe4574ca17d45

Kennedy is scheduled to speak at 2 p.m. Eastern time in Phoenix “about the present historical moment and his path forward,” according to his campaign. Hours later, Trump will hold a rally in neighboring Glendale.
21   Onvacation   2024 Aug 26, 9:24pm  

MAHA ( Make America Healthy Again)

23   Ceffer   2024 Aug 26, 10:52pm  

When Hunter Biden found out that RFK was a cocaine dealer, he decided to endorse Trump, too.
24   AD   2024 Aug 26, 11:24pm  

WookieMan says

it took some obvious shenanigans for Biden to win


Yes mail in ballots harvesting by paid AntiFa and Bend the Arc operatives

If you pay enough Democrat activists and operatives off, they will repeat the same playbook from the 2020 election

.
25   AmericanKulak   2024 Aug 27, 12:35am  

Joy! Joy! JOY! - Reverend Al

27   HeadSet   2024 Aug 27, 6:59pm  

Michigan and Wisconsin plan to dominion Trump votes over to RFK to keep Trump's total below Kamala's. It will only take about 5% to make it happen.
28   Patrick   2025 Jan 19, 11:04am  

https://billricejr.substack.com/p/with-a-new-administration-let-the


Alas, clear-thinking citizens know these question-and-answer sessions will be nothing but political theater.

That is, no real debate will happen and, indeed, the format will be rigged to prevent real, substantive critiques.

For example, we know from a few House hearings on Covid response (and Censorship) that speakers will probably be allowed only three minutes to respond to Senators’ questions, which usually aren’t “questions” but five-minute speeches/attacks intended to denigrate the person invited to speak at said hearing.

A few members will ask important questions, but many of the issues are so complex, there’s no way even RFK, Jr. could make his most salient points in a 3 to 5-minute response, even if he’s not constantly interrupted.

Also, invariably, the most important questions - broaching the taboo or potentially thermo-nuclear issues - won’t even be asked.

The above points illustrate the warped state of American “democracy” in 2020-2025.

In a real democracy, the public is supposed to hear all sides of important issues in “public debates” and then make their own conclusions as to which side makes the most compelling or persuasive points. ...

That is, (hypothetically) nothing is stopping President Trump or RFK, Jr. (if he’s confirmed) from creating and publicizing a series of real debates on Covid topics.

If censored experts don’t have enough time to make their best points in Congressional Hearings - or don’t get asked the most-important questions - these speakers could develop these arguments more fully in real debates held at forums across the nation over a period of several months or weeks.

These would be authentic debates as “experts” who hold opposite views would be invited to participate and would be allowed equal time to make their own points.

The public could then decide who made the most impressive arguments and reach conclusions on which speakers “won” the debate.

“Democracy” in its purest sense could perform its magic.
29   Tenpoundbass   2025 Jan 19, 2:25pm  

RFK's gambit to put glory back in the Kennedy's name, depends on him not being a push over. Just because they will try to railroad any of his MAHA efforts to sus out the dirty details and secrets to the Covid scamdemic and subsequent clot shot rollout. He can't just sit up there and eat it. Like how we're seeing with Trump's cabinet picks, He's got to beat the crab ooze out of those flippant Democrats. Turns out lies, deceit and petty political games doesn't stand up to the truth or facts. I don't think people will tolerate the Left trying to suppress testimony, and reject real evidence and discovery, while they sit up there and spout off whoppers and hyperbole. I'm sure RFK Jr, will remind the committee "Well I have 'experts' too!".

Everyone has just tolerated the Left's unhinged unreasonable hyperbole in lieu of real evidence and facts. There has never been any real push back when Adam Schift, Gerald Nadler and the other shit asses call for committee hearings just to read off gotcha questions, and make talking points for the Cable news networks.

I think we'll see a change in this administration. Those tactics won't be viable against testimony delivered by people with a higher IQ than them, and aren't under the threat of Biden's deep state, Obama's deep state, Bush's deep state. They wont have the attack dog to keep folks silent.
30   Patrick   2025 Jan 19, 6:53pm  

https://markusmutscheller.substack.com/p/will-robert-kennedy-jr-betray-us


Thanks to a number of sharp dissident observers, we learn that the new Trump administration seems to rebrand the MAHA movement as a “healthy food, anti-toxins movement” and tries to distract from or even ditch anything to do with vaccines in general, and mRNA vaccines in particular. ...

In my view, the very core of the Medical Freedom Movement (MFM) worldwide and in the USA centres around and was born because of the unprecedented events that happened during the so-called Covid Pandemic:

1. Dropping all established and written pandemic response plans in lockstep worldwide and replacing them with scientifically unfounded and unproven responses, like unreliable and manipulated PCR-tests, masks, social distancing of 1.5 m, lockdowns and banning successful repurposed drugs - pretty much the opposite of what the pandemic response plans recommended.

2. Dropping almost all decade-old safety testing and rushing through one product only: the novel and unknown mRNA vaccine, which actually wasn’t a traditional vaccine at all, because it didn’t stop transmission, the whole purpose of vaccines.

3. Therefore, the WHO quickly changed the old definition of vaccines and herd immunity to fit reality to the new product, not the other way around

4. But the biggest trigger for the MFM was the coercion and mandating of these dangerous untested substances to millions of people, breaking 75-year old international medical laws (Nuremberg Code) and long-established conducts of informed consent and many human rights. And much more, of course. ...

The obvious facts were, that Trump wasn’t secretly against the mRNA vaccines at all. He boasted and lied endlessly about how “his” Operation Warp Speed saved hundreds of millions of lives and openly declared on Rogan, that “big pharma are his friends.” ...

The final verdict is still pending (see Sasha’s article on that), but an increasing number of MFM observers anxiously notice that there is an awful lot of talk about eating healthy and toxin free and no talk about pausing, let alone banning, the dangerous mRNA vaccines.

So it is fair to ask, will Bobby betray us next, or is he deliberately holding back on the vaccine topic for strategical political reasons.

To be fair, he has a major challenge at hand to be approved by the Senate and he can’t do nothing if he is not nominated. Time will tell but I don’t have high hopes that anything meaningful will happen. ...

To stop this terrible abuse of medical freedom and human rights, the MFM formed and elected Kennedy through Trump.

They are not overly worried about processed food and toxins because they have some control over it. But they are very worried about forced and coerced vaccinations schedules for themselves and their children. That’s the only reason why they voted for Kennedy. ...

For all these reasons, many will feel that the ongoing mRNA disaster can’t be ignored and pushed aside any longer and their hope rested on Trump/Kennedy.

Time will tell but I am not optimistic.

Even the best case scenario looks dire.

The best case scenario is that Kennedy gets nominated as HHS secretary and actively tries to get the mRNA vaccines paused or banned. ...

What matters: Is he is allowed to stop them. And I don’t think his boss will allow it. I am not aware of any anti-vaccine statement by Trump whatsoever. Hence the shift to food and toxins which Trump might sanction.

And if Kennedy goes against the vaccines anyway, we all know how that will end: “You’re fired.”

So Kennedy has two choices.

He can either go along with the boss and the pro-medical and pro-pharma vibe of the majority of the Trump admin and betray and lose most of his base voters, or he stays true to his conviction and pre-election talks and uses his short tenure as HHS secretary (before he gets fired) to raise awareness about the harms of mRNA and other vaccines on another level and goes down with his integrity and reputation intact and positions himself stronger for 2028.

Anything else, like jumping on the food and toxin bandwagon and ignoring the vaccines will be seen as betrayal by the MFM.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste