
« First « Previous Comments 214 - 253 of 261 Next » Last » Search these comments
Great Thread about the European Primitive Superstitions about Air Conditioning
Even window or portable ones used just for a few days.
"Every French person has the same story of how they got deathly ill from Air Conditioning in the USA"
"They believe that a few days of Air Conditioning is especially damaging for Global Warming, while using Electric or Gas Heat 6 months of the year"
"Air Conditioning changes your body's polarity"
This is extraordinary. For the many of you who wonder how the EU could agree to such a humiliating "deal" with Trump, wonder no more.
We have an unusually straightforward answer directly from the horse's mouth: Sabine Weyand, who's the Directorate-General for Trade at the EU commission.
As she puts its:
- "If you didn't hear me say the word 'negotiation' – that's because there wasn't one." => the U.S. dictated the terms
- "From the Commission's perspective, this was a strategic compromise, not an ideal economic solution" => they're aware this completely f*cks the EU economically
- "The European side was under massive pressure to find a quick solution to stabilize transatlantic relations – especially with regard to security guarantees" => the EU agreed to the "deal" under a protection racket
- "We have a land war on the European continent. And we are completely dependent on the United States. The member states were not prepared to take the risk of further escalation – that would have been the consequence of European countermeasures." => Europe acted out of fear, choosing economic submission because of its total dependence on the U.S. (which ironically will only worsen the dependence)
There you have it, she said the quiet part out loud: the EU is in such a terrible strategic situation and EU leaders have so little courage that they're unable and unwilling to say 'no' to even the most humiliating demands.
Great Thread about the European Primitive Superstitions about Air Conditioning


Since the mean is always greater than the median for any right skewed distibution (such as income), what is the median Dutch income? I bet, comparing apples to apples, it's lower than that of the US.
Look at this one closely:
MolotovCocktail says
Since the mean is always greater than the median for any right skewed distibution (such as income), what is the median Dutch income? I bet, comparing apples to apples, it's lower than that of the US.
Look at this one closely:
AI statistics FAIL.
To provide the median and average annual gross salaries for the Netherlands and the United States in U.S. dollars (USD), I’ll convert the Netherlands’ figures from euros (€) to USD using the exchange rate of 1 EUR = 1.18 USD (as you specified for September 17, 2025). The figures are for full-time workers, pre-tax, sourced from Centraal Planbureau (CPB) for the Netherlands and U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) for the U.S.
Netherlands
Median: €46,500 × 1.18 = $54,870
Average: €46,500 × 1.18 = $54,870 (mean aligns with median per CPB data)
United States
Median: $62,088
Average: $66,622
Using 1 EUR = 1.18 USD, reflecting today’s rate (September 17, 2025).
Context: The higher exchange rate increases the Netherlands’ salaries in USD compared to the prior 1.11 rate, though U.S. salaries remain higher due to market differences.
Sources: CPB for Netherlands (2025 estimates); BLS for U.S. (2024 data, adjusted for 2025).
Grok says it's false:
It's not so much the taxes you pay...it's what you get for the taxes.
Close to free childcare, schools, Universities, groceries at least 40% cheaper etc
mell says
Close to free childcare, schools, Universities, groceries at least 40% cheaper etc
There's nothing 'free' on that list. And the more the consumer is divorced from paying a true price for something, the more warped supply will be.
They aren't divorced from it, they are paying via taxes. You can always pay for a private institution as well. The supply is extremely ample and schools are much better on average, don't kid yourself. Europe has many problems such as mass immgration, but quality of education and childcare ain't one of them. Of course there are differnces by country, but Germany and Switzerland beat the US in that department by miles. The US is great for singles advancing their careers, working and playing hard and building their fortunes/nest eggs early on. For families, meh
The US is great for singles advancing their careers, working and playing hard and building their fortunes/nest eggs early on. For families, meh
What happen with education quality in US? Europe won't be immune. Do you think all African emigrants' children attending nonpublic school? Teachers' demographics will change as well. Just few more years.
Fuck socialism. Fuck Europe fluffers on ParNet pushing this bullshit, too.
You are better off attending school in Europe these days imo and save the tuition.
The American tax system is more socialist than the tax system of many European countries because it does not allow those who pay the brunt of the taxes (the producing earners) to access most of its benefits.
The fall of Rome was caused by an INTERNAL demographic crisis.
What is happening to Western Europe with Africa is EXACTLY what once happened to the Roman Empire when it integrated barbarian populations to solve its labour shortages.
The late Roman Empire faced a demographic and military challenge that it could not solve internally. Falling birth rates among Roman citizens, coupled with endless wars and epidemics, created a chronic shortage of manpower. To compensate, Rome began to settle Germanic and other barbarian tribes inside its frontiers.
At first, these groups were supposed to provide soldiers and farmers under imperial control. In practice, however, they retained their own identities, their own leaders, and their own laws. Rome, desperate for labor and troops, compromised its own cohesion in order to survive.
The parallels with Western Europe today are striking. Europe faces demographic decline, with fertility rates well below replacement levels. To sustain economies, fill jobs, and maintain welfare systems, European governments have turned to large-scale immigration from Africa and the Middle East.
Like the barbarians in Rome, these newcomers are expected to integrate into the host societies, adopt the culture, and contribute to the state. But in many cases, they maintain distinct identities, religious practices, and loyalties. Instead of assimilation, Europe sees the growth of parallel societies.
History shows the risks of such policies. The settlement of the Visigoths inside the Roman Empire in 376 was initially justified as a pragmatic solution: cheap soldiers in exchange for land. Yet within two years, the Visigoths rebelled and annihilated a Roman army at Adrianople in 378, a disaster from which the Empire never fully recovered.
Later, the empire relied on federated barbarian kingdoms to police its borders, but these became independent powers, carving out realms in Spain, Gaul, and Italy itself. The empire had not been destroyed by external invasion, but by its inability to control the peoples it had admitted.
Western Europe risks repeating this mistake. By importing populations on a massive scale without the cultural infrastructure to assimilate them, it creates conditions where newcomers live by their own norms rather than those of the host nation. The result is cultural fragmentation, rising insecurity, and the erosion of shared identity.
Rome discovered too late that its attempt to integrate foreign peoples had fatally weakened its cohesion. Europe may be heading down the same path, driven by the same illusion: that demographics and labor shortages can be solved by mass importation, without consequence for the survival of the civilization itself.
Civilizations do not fall overnight. Rome took centuries to collapse, but its decline began with demographic exhaustion and reliance on outsiders. Europe, by turning to Africa as a solution to its own decline, is repeating the same trajectory — not through conquest from without, but through disintegration from within.
mell says
The American tax system is more socialist than the tax system of many European countries because it does not allow those who pay the brunt of the taxes (the producing earners) to access most of its benefits.
No. That is not the definition of socialism.

« First « Previous Comments 214 - 253 of 261 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,349,557 comments by 15,721 users - floki, Misc, The_Deplorable online now