Comments 1 - 15 of 15 Search these comments
The Qualifications Clause set forth in Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 requires the President to be a natural-born citizen, at least thirty-five years of age, and a resident of the United States for at least fourteen years.
The Framers appear to have adopted the requirement that citizens be natural born citizens to ensure that the President’s loyalties would lie strictly with the United States. By barring naturalized citizens from the presidency, the requirement of being a natural born citizen, as Justice Story explained, protects the United States from ambitious foreigners, who might otherwise be intriguing for the office; and interposes a barrier against those corrupt interferences of foreign governments in executive elections, which have inflicted the most serious evils upon the elected monarchies of Europe.
Constitution of the United States is clear - any President needs to be born on US soil.
What's happening to your doll. Is Clare OK with it.
Find good school district in usa where they won't turn your child into lgbtq n u be all right.
I'm not sure if this is a feasible solution these days. If one tries 'too hard', then you're labelled a child abuser. In a world like ours, parents need to be in charge and raise their kids to be citizens of a western world which came to an end, somewhere between 1970 and 1995.
with the sex doll in the house
Rural public schools are fine
Congratulations on the Rin bouncing baby of the future.
which many thought was in a foreign country but was resolved as at the time of his birth was a US exclave (similar to US embassy overseas) as his father was one of the top US Navy officers holding a navy command in the Panama Canal Zone. In terms of passing citizenship (not POTUS qualification), the historical US precedence was giving more credence to maternal parentage than to paternal parentage (largely due to the children allegedly fathered by US troops stationed in overseas bases with local women outside marriages).
That way you can avoid a lot of the hassles that mother's right-to-change-mind / emotional instability will have on the child in the future. Your making the lady independently wealthy before the child is born gets in the way of that as most women would use your help getting her where she is as negotiating leverage against you instead of being appreciative like a man usually would assume.
As of now, everyone knows that I'm involved with a Welsh woman and we spend an inordinate amount of time in her home country and that's the way she likes it which is fine for me.
https://patrick.net/post/1382120/2024-09-21-i-think-it-s-time-that-ceffer-a-o
Now, let's say that the 'Unspeakable' happens ... Rin and Claire settle down and have a child together. Here's my concern, I'm perfectly fine raising a child in Wales as we could settle in some small town, homeschool our kid with the local council's housekeeping seal of approval, and thus, he/she would be raised w/o a bunch of sociopathic Tik-Tokers ruining his/her childhood and mental health.
With that stated, I've realized that even though our child would have dual citizenship, only in the UK, is it 'ok' for a potential PM to be born abroad as the British have always had an overseas Empire and routinely sent families across the oceans to manage the Empire's dominions. In contrast, most Americans will never accept Rin Jr nor Claire Jr as an authentic American and thus, it would hurt his/her chances for a Presidency w/o everyone crowding into Cambridge MA's dank city hall records, catching all kinds of molds and diseases to verify that Rin Jr was in fact, descended from Rin Sr as a natural born American. So my idea is that I know folks near Norfolk-to-Virginia Beach VA area and they have great pre & post-natal care centers where Claire and I could temporarily live, if she has a child. Is this a good idea or should I say ... f'k the American Presidency, if my child wants it, she'll have to get her own campaign manager not me.