3
0

Menstrual Abnormalities Strongly Associated with Proximity to COVID-19 Vaccinated Individuals


 invite response                
2024 Dec 10, 7:32pm   159 views  5 comments

by Patrick   ➕follow (59)   💰tip   ignore  

https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/113


In Spring 2021, MyCycleStorySM launched a secure online survey to which 92.3% of 6049 respondents self-reported menstrual irregularities occurring after the rollout of the COVID-19 injectables. Each respondent served as her own control because prior to the rollout of COVID-19 vaccination, the vast majority had regular menstrual cycles. A subgroup of 3390 respondents were only indirectly exposed to COVID-19 vaccines or the SARS-CoV-2 virus. This subgroup reported 1) being unvaccinated for COVID-19; 2) having had no COVID-19 symptoms; and 3) no positive test for COVID-19, yet a substantial majority of these women, who were only indirectly exposed to COVID-19 injectables or COVID-19 infections still had many of the same menstrual abnormalities as the 2659 women who were directly exposed to a COVID-19 injection (798), or had COVID-19 symptoms (1347), or tested positive for COVID-19 (514). Generalized linear mixed modeling was used to examine the association (not assuming causation) between abnormal menses experienced after the COVID-19 vaccine rollout by respondents who were only indirectly exposed by some degree of proximity to persons. Chi-Square, Student’s t, Kruskal-Wallis or ANOVA tests were used to assess the statistical significance of the similarities of menstrual irregularities reported by the directly exposed and indirectly exposed groups. The mean age of the entire cohort was 37.8 ± 0.1 years. The percentage of the indirectly exposed participants who reported being within 6 feet of a COVID-19 vaccinated person was 85.5%. Of these, 71.7% had irregular menstrual symptoms within one week and 50.1% had irregular menstrual symptoms within ≤3 days after exposure. When comparing daily proximity to a vaccinated person, the categories of “daily within 6 feet outside the household” versus “seldom/sometimes/daily outside 6 feet” had the highest relative risk at 1.34 (p<0.01) for heavier menstrual bleeding, early menses at more than 7 days early with a relative risk at 1.28 (p=0.03), and extended bleeding for more than 7 days with relative risk at 1.26 (p=0.04). Indirect exposure to COVID-19 vaccinated persons was significantly associated with the likelihood of the onset of menstrual irregularities. This study provides additional data to complement a growing body of evidence raising concerns regarding the safety of mRNA vaccines.


So merely being near someone contaminated with the death jab serum is enough to cause serious symptoms.

We must all write all our representatives and call in public for a complete ban on the death jabs and the prosecution of everyone involved in creating the virus or mandating the injections.

Comments 1 - 5 of 5        Search these comments

1   Patrick   2024 Dec 10, 7:34pm  

https://slaynews.com/news/major-study-confirms-covid-vaxxed-cause-side-effects-unvaccinated-people/


The researchers assert that their findings show that materials from the mRNA “vaccines” are passed from one person to another, causing harm in the unvaccinated.

In their paper, the researchers conclude:

“Our findings suggest possible indirect transmission of ingredients or products of the COVID-19 vaccines, presumably through shedding, from people who received one or more of the COVID-19 injections.”

The bombshell findings come as thousands of doctors, scientists, and academics have signed a petition calling on governments around the world to ban Covid mRNA injections.
2   WookieMan   2024 Dec 10, 8:05pm  

Patrick says

So merely being near someone contaminated with the death jab serum is enough to cause serious symptoms.

I told you guys here this as I witnessed it. It doesn't get better either. I still love her but it's changed my wife dramatically. I begged her not do to it. Problem with people that took it is they're too embarrassed to say, shit this is fucked up. I made an error. You can't walk back a vaccine.

I've also noticed men that took it are off mentally as well. No clue if it made them infertile or something. It's not political either as everyone was freaked out at the time. I just have a long standing practice of not taking drugs of any kind so I disagreed with anyone that took it left or right.

I agree with Patrick 100% on his vaccine posts. Problem is it's water under the bridge at this point. Criminal intent is impossible to prove with the vaccine. Sucks, but eventually the dead horse you're beating is dead. There will be no consequences. They kept Trump out of office for 4 years and made the GLOBE paranoid now. A flu bug is the LAST thing you should be worried about. This isn't the 1500's with no sanitization or anything. You'll be fine.
3   Patrick   2024 Dec 11, 9:50pm  

WookieMan says

Problem is it's water under the bridge at this point.


No, everyone needs to push for prosecution no matter how long it takes.
4   Patrick   2024 Dec 16, 8:09pm  

https://oldschoolcounselor.substack.com/p/since-covid-vaccine-shedding-is-real


It has long been perceived that toxic shedding can occur from close personal contact like sexual relations or blood/saliva secretions. Blood transfusions from COVID vaccinated to unvaccinated persons are obviously concerning. Now we have proof that shedding can also occur when a contaminated person simply breathes on another.

This is frightening. ...

Can you imagine the pressure that could be put on the biopharmaceutical industry and their government accomplices in crime if people started boycotting relationships and environments to whom and at where they were concerned they could be victims of toxic exposure? It may be time that we exert such pressure on our acquaintances, and the environments we inhabit. The result might be that more people would eschew the COVID vaccines completely and governments would finally ban them.
5   Patrick   2024 Dec 22, 5:52pm  

https://jupplandia.substack.com/p/so-it-turns-out-that-social-distancing


So it turns out that Social Distancing did make sense-for the unvaccinated seeking to protect themselves from the stupidity of the vaccinated

The only people it might have protected were the people who don't fall for State mandated experiments.

So it turns out, in a way, that I owe Social Distancing an apology. Since the heady, crazy days of 2020 I’ve been describing social distancing as useless, irrational, tyrannical and stupid. ...

But it turns out that, as I said at the start, I owe Social Distancing an apology. Because there is one group of people who might have actually benefited from it.

The unvaccinated.

The people who didn’t pump an experimental and dangerous gene therapy into themselves on demand or for a free doughnut or because the TV doctor told them to or because they were desperate for a week in Benidorm.

Today, Peter McCullogh and John Leake at Courageous Discourse share a Substack article by Nicholas Hulscher titled New Study Finds Concerning Evidence of COVID-19 ‘Vaccine’ Shedding. This article in turn discusses the study mentioned, which is titled Menstrual Abnormalities Associated with Proximity to COVID-19 Vaccinated Individuals.

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste