patrick.net

original link

original link

https://www.kunstler.com/p/santa-please-bring-me-a-war-for-christmas

The theory I lean toward is the notion that “Joe Biden” (meaning the DC blob) is desperately seeking some way to obstruct or fend-off the January 20th inauguration of Mr. Trump. Because, well, to put it bluntly, a whole lot of blobistas are worried about going to jail when the likes of Kash Patel, John Ratcliffe, Tulsi-G, and Pam Bondi get their mitts on the levers of power and start opening up the files. They’ve got thirty-five days to. . . to do something! (Somebody, please do something!!!)

I thought we were going to be treated to a spectacular, Cinerama blue beam show, complete with acrobatic UFOs blasting rays and horrible aliens instead of some limp biscuit DOD drone fiasco.

Deep State will mount effort to initiate continuity of government under their auspices with the drone infiltrations to displace Trump under the usual attempted false flag emergency? It seems that at some point kinetics within the military becomes inevitable i.e. white hats vs. the Pentagon beribboned Satanist MIC fags who are mercenaries of the British Raj.

Was this the 'alien card'?

https://t.me/qthestormrider777/25423

AI's are like pitched battle Sumo gaming wrestlers trying to gain finger holds against each other?

https://t.me/QTSR2/259

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/brevity-and-witlessness-tuesday-december

A reporter asked Trump what he thought about the New Jersey mystery drones. Trump said he thinks the government is lying:

"The government knows what is happening. Look, our military knows where
they took off from; if it's garage, they can go right into that garage. They
know where it came from and where it went," Trump told reporters in his
most extensive comments to date on the topic.
"And for some reason, they don't want to comment. I think they'd be better
off saying what it is," he continued. "Our military knows, and our president
knows, and for some reason they want to keep people in suspense."

... The much more interesting development is the clear consensus that nobody believes the government. Over and over, federal officials have downplayed the drones, trotting out the tired old UFO playbook and claiming people are just seeing commercial aircraft flying out of normal traffic routes, weather balloons decorated for Christmas, flocks of birds carrying landing lights, and other perfectly innocent explanations.

It’s you, not us.

But nobody, not the local police, the state officials, or even corporate media reporters, seems to believe the federal explanation. That signals a massive loss of trust in general, which is a big problem for government. Governments not trusted by the majority of their citizens don’t last.

We wondered what their false flag Trump delaying tactic was going to be, so now we know? Will they zap some gas stations with DEWs to get the martial law party going?

Here we go. The false flaggers are lining up their knee jerk lying sacks of shit to pimp the fraud.

https://t.me/gatewaypunditofficial/59659

Ceffer says

We wondered what their false flag Trump delaying tactic was going to be, so now we know? Will they zap some gas stations with DEWs to get the martial law party going?

Drones are not subject to FAA tracking nor much regulation.

So the Deep State does this and WHAM! the public gets scared into supporting more regulation. Drone's will have to have GPS reporting like planes do. Drone operators will have to be registered and maybe licensed, etc.

Of course, indy media types will be shut out of drone operation. A lot of government misconduct will not get reported.

Guess why we haven't had another Ruby Ridge or WACO for a while? Drones with cams would record that shit and blast it on the the interwebs, is my guess. It ain't sure as shit because ATF and FBI are such good guys now.

Drones weighting more than 0.55 lbs are already regulated and registered by FAA. If flown for hire they must have a transponder. If flown as a hobby, no transponder required (but most of newish ones already have it anyway). The hobby pilots are required to pass so-called TRUST cert exam (easy and costs something like $5), commercial must pass FAA Part 107 cert (kinda hard and almost $200). Both are required to post their lic# on the aircraft.

Can't go higher than 400 ft AGL (with few exceptions), can't go beyond line of sight and farther than 3 miles.

I don't see this angle, honestly: the shit is already regulated AF.

RWSGFY says

Drones weighting more than 0.55 lbs are already regulated and registered by FAA. If flown for hire they must have a transponder. If flown as a hobby, no transponder required (but most of newish ones already have it anyway). The hobby pilots are required to pass so-called TRUST cert exam (easy and costs something like $5), commercial must pass FAA Part 107 cert (kinda hard and almost $200). Both are required to post their lic# on the aircraft.

Can't go higher than 400 ft AGL (with few exceptions), can't go beyond line of sight and farther than 3 miles.

I don't see this angle, honestly: the shit is already regulated AF.

So, all these drones are flying legally, the government knows exactly who is doing it or the government would be out enforcing its laws, AMIRIGHT ?????

Another day, another psyops. When UFO fanatics say they aren't UFOs, then what's the caper? Greer seems to know.

https://youtu.be/vhRKKgIdSAc?si=TTd9-W1yuhBVLHY3

https://t.me/Forbidden_History_tg/913

Trump seems impatient or irritated at this Blob-psyop or Trump-trap:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7E9uMZYTMU8

(The quoting is broken so I won't bother with it).

Even if some of what hysterical observers perceive as illegally flown drones really are that, the gubmint for sure doesn't need additional regulations. All it needs is to start enforcing existing ones.

What kind of "space weapons" are we talking about here?

Misc says

If flown for hire they must have a transponder

Yes, commercial drones. But the majority are amateur, right?

RWSGFY says

(The quoting is broken so I won't bother with it).

Works for me.

Ceffer says

Greer seems to know.

Greer is s UFO huckster.

DOGEWontAmountToShit says

Misc says

If flown for hire they must have a transponder

Yes, commercial drones. But the majority are amateur, right?

The same Mavic can be either commercial or amateur depending on how it's used. If you film your sister's wedding for free with it - it's amateur, if you film some house for a Realtard and being paid for it - it becomes commercial. Everything between 0.55lbs and 55 lbs is like that. Dual-use, if you will. Above 55 lbs is a whole 'nother game with way tighter regulations (but I'm not exactly well-versed in these). Below 0.55 lbs - it's a free-for-all as in "no licensing". (Still can't fly into restricted airspace, of course).

RWSGFY says

The same Mavic can be either commercial or amateur depending on how it's used. If you film your sister's wedding for free with it - it's amateur, if you film some house for a Realtard and being paid for it - it becomes commercial.

Right. Like that can be enforced as things are now. Not.

DOGEWontAmountToShit says

Greer is s UFO huckster.

Part ufo hustler, part legit. A mixed bag, as are most of the various pundits. I guess they have to make a living. Many of the alternative pundits get involved in merchandising and financial advisements from dubious sources and schemes to stay afloat. Anonymous, voiceless saint or survival thrive-al with a platform seems to be their mantra.

Caveat Emptor, but oddly Greer has the ear of somebody because he has held Congressional symposiums.

Ceffer says

Part ufo hustler, part legit

No. 100% huckster. He lost all credibility when he did this bullshit:

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/tiny-alien-humanoid-among_n_3017854

UFOology is rife with fraud and hucksters and hustlers and fake sightings. There are a core in individuals who are quite rigorous, but it seems the various secret agencies want the noise to drown out the signal, so the hucksterism is widely promoted.

Greer's noise to signal ratio is hard to estimate, because there is ALWAYS noise. He has done some good work, though, particularly with his various disclosure interview series.

RWSGFY says

Drones weighting more than 0.55 lbs are already regulated and registered by FAA. If flown for hire they must have a transponder. If flown as a hobby, no transponder required (but most of newish ones already have it anyway). The hobby pilots are required to pass so-called TRUST cert exam (easy and costs something like $5), commercial must pass FAA Part 107 cert (kinda hard and almost $200). Both are required to post their lic# on the aircraft.

Can't go higher than 400 ft AGL (with few exceptions), can't go beyond line of sight and farther than 3 miles.

I don't see this angle, honestly: the shit is already regulated AF.

This is mostly right. Newer drones have ASD-B and can be tracked. I actually think it's required. FAA part 107 is a breeze. It's mini ground school for flying real planes. I did self study and got my license while studying at night having a beer. I just paid for a book and paid for the test and fees. I think I paid $120 at the time.

I think it was 75% to pass the test. I answered the questions I 100% knew and guessed on the rest. I think it was around 90% final. I'm an aviation junkie that likely can never get a real pilots license due to health reasons, but enjoy learning about it.

Either way, most modern drones for consumers or prosumers are trackable. Licensed or not. Have a semi big general aviation (no commercial/major airlines) airport nearby and my drone won't take off if I'm too close. It's more regulated than people think, which is why you never update your drone. I'm 3-4 years from my last update. They can't brick my drone. Might be missing out on features, but I want to fly it when/where I want.

TL:DR - This drone story is stupid. No conspiracy.

RWSGFY says

Drones weighting more than 0.55 lbs are already regulated and registered by FAA. If flown for hire they must have a transponder.

I quoted it and commented already... but missed this. The FAA is not going to do anything unless you blatantly did something stupid. Like hit a plane. And even then the pilot would consider it a bird strike or just say something hit the plane. I had a deer strike on my car the other week.

It would mess with a jet engine if sucked in, but hitting the body/airframe is a nothing burger. A prop would tear that fucker up.

My record AGL is 1,900ft in MT. If a plane was flying at that level it was hitting a mountain, so it was safe to go that high even though illegal.

DOGEWontAmountToShit says

RWSGFY says

The same Mavic can be either commercial or amateur depending on how it's used. If you film your sister's wedding for free with it - it's amateur, if you film some house for a Realtard and being paid for it - it becomes commercial.

Right. Like that can be enforced as things are now. Not.

Like anything else - guns, taxes, traffic, business licensing - it will be enforced if you bring enough attention to yourself. Or tacked onto some other shit. No difference.

This guy did attract attention to himself:

RWSGFY says

This guy did attract attention to himself:

New Jersey isn't a military base. 99.9% of America's landmass isn't.

DOGEWontAmountToShit says

RWSGFY says

This guy did attract attention to himself:

New Jersey isn't a military base. 99.9% of America's landmass isn't.

If drones are under 55lbs and not flying in the restricted airspace, what's the problem? If they are over 55lbs and/or fly in the restricted aispace, then you don't need a military base - even something like a hospital helipad would suffice. I honestly don't undrestand the whole covfefe: if drones violate FAA regs - enforce, if not - don't. 🤷‍♂️

Above is an example of such enforcement for such a violation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directed-energy_weapon

A weapon often described as an "anti-drone rifle" or "anti-drone gun" is a battery-powered electromagnetic pulse weapon held to an operator's shoulder, pointed at a flying target in a way similar to a rifle, and operated. While not a rifle or gun, it is so nicknamed as it is handled in the same way as a personal rifle. The device emits separate electromagnetic pulses to suppress navigation and transmission channels used to operate an aerial drone, terminating the drone's contact with its operator; the out-of-control drone then crashes.



A Pischal-Pro anti-drone rifle, featured at the Dubai Airshow, 2019

Wonder what would happen if you shot someone with a pacemaker in the chest.

Patrick says

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directed-energy_weapon

A weapon often described as an "anti-drone rifle" or "anti-drone gun" is a battery-powered electromagnetic pulse weapon held to an operator's shoulder, pointed at a flying target in a way similar to a rifle, and operated. While not a rifle or gun, it is so nicknamed as it is handled in the same way as a personal rifle. The device emits separate electromagnetic pulses to suppress navigation and transmission channels used to operate an aerial drone, terminating the drone's contact with its operator; the out-of-control drone then crashes.



A Pischal-Pro anti-drone rifle, featured at the Dubai Airshow, 2019

How come they can't make something really useful like a remote thong dissolver?

https://babylonbee.com/cleanArticle/fbi-assures-nation-drones-just-us-government-spying-on-its-own-citizens