patrick.net

MolotovCocktail says

Alleged smallness does not seem to affect reproduction...

HeadSet says

Alleged smallness does not seem to affect reproduction...

Probably because younger Indian females are smaller making penetration easier. They get thicker as they get older of course, but I'm guessing that's why Indians are a touch rape(ish) for younger women. A small dick starts failing at 160-180+lbs woman. Hence why black women get slammed all the time. Gorilla cock.

I read an interesting article a few years ago, claiming that the penis is a semen removal device.

The unusual shape of the penis head is superior to a smooth dildo-like shape in removing semen by pumping action. The argument is that over evolutionary lengths of time, it was an advantage for men to pump out the semen of the previous guy before inserting one's own semen. So the current penis shape and size was selected for.

This is also why, once you come, you lose the erection. It doesn't make sense to work against yourself, pumping out your own semen.

But the size advantage was useful only when fucking women who had been fucked by some other guy a few minutes before. Women who were under strict control by their husbands were not a reproductive problem in that way. So in cultures with very strict control over the women, men did not need as large a penis to reproduce. And what is not needed for survival and reproduction tends to go away.

I think it could well be true that men in cultures with well-controlled and/or non-slutty women have smaller penises. Maybe India falls into that category, and China.

Black women are notoriously slutty. Sorry, but it's true and there is plenty of evidence about that. So black men would have needed to evolve larger penises to compete with the other guys who had just fucked a woman. Whites are in the middle, between Asians and blacks.

It's also true that testicle size varies in the same way. Guys who need to compete with other men who just fucked a woman were better off with bigger balls which produced more sperm. And measurements show the same ranking. Black guys have the biggest balls, then whites, then Asians.

When the other guy's sperm starts dribbling out of her nose during doggie, you know you have a successfully evolved penis.

Patrick says

it was an advantage for men to pump out the semen of the previous guy before inserting one's own semen.

So, the pecker evolved in a society where immediate sloppy seconds or pulling trains was the norm?

WookieMan says

Gorilla cock.

Ironically, gorillas have a very small penis.

MolotovCocktail says

KgK one says

It's happening, india building it's own apps. If they can build in usa , why not in india.

Who fucking cares? India doesn't need apps. It needs decent sanitation and streets not filled with mud and shit.

Thank you molotov for your concern about india n other human beings with more melanin than you. Almost all indians would agree with you that sanitization, n muddy road needs improvement. Also not sure why you are concerned about indian dick. if you are gay, n want large dick go to Africa.

India has monsoon, which means it rains 3 months, roads become river, so some road are going to break. India has surpassed the United States to become the country with the world's largest road network, reaching over 6.6 million kilometers. For a smaller sized country thats impressive.

India has installed 90 million toilets , though they can be better and people need to keep clean. I agree that civic sense needs improvement.

KgK one says

Also not sure why you are concerned about indian dick. if you are gay, n want large dick go to Africa.

I am not concerned about Indian dick. You are the one trying to deflect from India's Turd World conditions by claiming so.

KgK one says

India has installed 90 million toilets , though they can be better and people need to keep clean. I agree that civic sense needs improvement.

Can you flush toilet paper? Or do you have to throw it in the waste basket? That's what you do in Costa Rica which is semi considered a first world country. It's gross and unsanitary. I highly doubt India's sewer system can handle it.

When my kid was a toddler he threw an entire roll of TP in the toilet. I wasn't fishing it out and flushed it, the whole roll. It went down without issue. I just laughed and said America. Comparing India to America is like rotten plums to fresh apples.

90 million toilets doesn't mean it's sanitary or nearly cracks the issue. I currently have 6 toilets for 5 people. 90M toilets vs 1B people clearly is a shortage. Sure there were probably existing toilets, but as a country to be sanitary you'd need at least 3-4B toilets when you factor in public establishments. So I wouldn't boast about 90M toilets. And this again assumes you sanitary sewer system can handle it. I also have the ability to access about another 6-8 public toilets in my small town. That's a 1:12 ratio of human to toilets in my house or within 1 minute.

You mention monsoon season as well. I highly doubt the storm water sewer system is up to par. So any piss and shit on the streets is getting flushed into streams, rivers and lakes. That means the water is filth and a lot of it gets into ground water.

Not claiming to be an expert, but in my wife's line of work these are the types we hang out with and i pick their brain because it interests me. I've met Aussie's, Dutch, Brits, Germans, Italians, etc. at national conferences. Never have seen or met an Indian at one. So by anecdotal default I have to assume Indians don't care about sanitation. Same for Chinese and African countries so I don't seem biased. Certain countries just don't care. Dislike my take but it's my experience and reality.

Despite small pockets in cities that I despise, if you live in the US, it's a top 3 country sanitation wise. Smaller Euro's might do better, but that's a scale thing. Let me know when India does this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wQNKEiQxTE Love or hate Chicago, it's a marvel of the engineering world that people from all over come to see.

Most city n middle class alredy had toilets. They built 90 million extra toilets in 10 years, guiness book of record. Except for poor areas, this problem is solved. More are built as money comes thru.
City malls are amazing. They get bidet, n toilet paper choice. Most of Asia uses bidet, way cleaner.

No one wants to see or use public places to such.

Poverty is the root cause. You may not notice but sanctions, tarrifs, cia espionage, 800 us bases in other countries or us puppets are used to keep poverty in other countries.

KgK one says

You may not notice but sanctions, tarrifs, cia espionage, 800 us bases in other countries or us puppets are used to keep poverty in other countries.

Excuses. Does India have a problem with illegal immigration? H1-B type visas? Student/tourist visa overstays? My guess is no. The US supports a lot of population that wasn't born here and did nothing to build it. Stay home. Build your own country. Don't steal from us.

And again 90M toilets in a 1B plus county is a drop in a mostly empty 5gal bucket. It was a world record because of population density. Nothing to do with better sanitation. They use bidets because they cannot build proper sewer sanitation. I don't mind bidets, but Indian sewer systems cannot manage TP in the pipes and if they even have treatment plants.

Yes india has illegal immigrants. 20 to 30 million Bangladeshi n other come to india. They are stealing their jobs lol

Steal from us? Are you native american -guessing no. Let's not get into who stole. whole usa , australia, newzealand..stolen from native. Usa continously steals oil n minerals by installing puppet in small countries. Usa wasnt magical as you were told, ww1 n ww2 made industry to come to usa n it became prosperous. Even today 60% people live on pay check to paycheck.

Yes immigrants built this country Chinese did railways, many other.
Usa market cap is mostly top 10 IT companies and indian contribute significantly more for being 1-2% of population. Doctors ,hospitals, shipping containers, pharma colleges professors they contribute lot more. Even taxes they pay lot more than average usa person. Lot of contribution.

Let's not get into redneck whites , n AA population contribution. Also significant amount of us drug addicts are whites.

I agree to you point that if there are no jobs for us citizen we don't need to import. But you may not like it but h1 was created n used due to shortages. Due to elderly, there is upcoming nurse n doctor shortage. Farm laborer is another one, lot of crops will go to waste n inflation will grow so u have to import Mexicans. Those Mexicans land was originally taken by Spanish n then usa took Texasn other land from Mexico. Kicked out Mexicans, another stolen land.

KgK one says

Yes india has illegal immigrants. 20 to 30 million Bangladeshi n other come to india. They are stealing their jobs lol

Tell me there hasn't been huge political battles and demonstrations about this in India. I know there has.

Also, many of the Bangladeshis fleeing the country recently are HINDUS, so there is co-religion feeling.

But some are not, and they have been turned away or expelled by authorities (not that I blame India for expelling Muslims)

Just like Americans prefer to take in South African Protestant Boers rather than Pakistani Muslims or Haitian Santeria-Voodoo Cat-eating CINO* types.

*Catholic In Name Only

India is a worker-exporter, not worker-importer country, so it wants their workers abroad sending in remittances, and knows that so few foreigners are ever hired in India.

If India was responsible for all the world's IT, Indian Employers and Politicians would fight to keep Indian IT workers at home, to keep their competitive low-wage advantage. By encouraging them TO work abroad, it basically acknowledges it does not have the capability to hire them all.

But the few times India has experienced an influx, it hasn't been without major reservations. There are many Pakistani Muslims sneaking back into India and nobody wants that.

KgK one says

Poverty is the root cause. You may not notice but sanctions, tarrifs, cia espionage, 800 us bases in other countries or us puppets are used to keep poverty in other countries.

Oh please. Cut the constant victim hood crap.

MolotovCocktail says

Poverty is the root cause.

The area that is now India was massive poor except for the rulers when Alexander conquered it, and same when the Mongols conquered it, same the Portugues took parts, and same when the British conquered it.

It is the concept that the fruit of a man's labor is his and his alone that built the Western World.

Every other area wallowing in poverty and misery is like that precisely because the successful cannot say "NO" when grifters from one's own family seek to appropriate the fruits of one's labors.

stereotomy says

Every other area wallowing in poverty and misery is like that precisely because the successful cannot say "NO" when grifters from one's own family seek to appropriate the fruits of one's labors.

Also, because when one is a serf, all productivity is taken by the overlord and increasing production just makes the ruler increase your quota.

Yes, the cause of poverty is always some form of corruption by the elite imho.

When people have a fair chance and can keep what they've worked for, societies flourish.

Some ways people get fucked by an elite and give up:

- Communism. Doesn't matter how much you work, the elite take everything.
- Highly concentrated land ownership. Doesn't matter how much you work, land rent will take everything. India may have this problem.
- Debt slavery. Doesn't matter how much you work, interest will take everything. The key is to stay out of debt.
- Mafias. Doesn't matter how much you work, the mafia will take everything. Russia was like that until recently, maybe still is.
- Foreign military conquers the country and makes everyone serfs, paying "tribute" back to the winners.
- Replacement by a more desperate population of workers and/or outsourcing of your job to a place with more desperate workers. The US right now.

Leaders who fight against those things are risking their lives because they are messing with the unjust profits of the elite.

Caesar proposed land reform and debt forgiveness and got killed because of it.

Trump is working on deportations and tariffs, and got shot because of it.

HeadSet says

MolotovCocktail says

Poverty is the root cause.

The area that is now India was massive poor except for the rulers when Alexander conquered it, and same when the Mongols conquered it, same the Portugues took parts, and same when the British conquered it.

Disagree with HeadSet.
India was not poor even till 1820, so much evidence to prove this.

Alexander barely conquered what is now pakistan(king porus). His horses no match agaist elephants, he turned around n died on the way back. Next kingdom was 10 stronger so would have not survived.



Here is map of world gdp, india had hugh portion till 1820 till british started stealing industry, gold, diamonds. Taj mahal was built using indian labor n money. Queens crown jewel is indian, gifted by india wink wink.



First Portugese documents show they arrived at prosperous country.



https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hampi

Spice trade was very lucrative.

HeadSet says

The area that is now India was massive poor except for the rulers when Alexander conquered it

Can you show proof of this statement?

I want to understand this white man's history.

India was the most egalitarian society in history of the world before the advent and spread of the Abrahamic religions.

In india when wars happened no one touched the ordinary citizens.

While wars were happening traders continued trading. Farmers were farming few feet away from the battle field. That was the reason they didn't understand how evil muslims and christians were when they attacked and occupied their lands.

I dont want to repeat myself but Britian looted 45 trillion$ according to some estimates. So how did you come to the conclusion that Indians were poor?

indc says

I dont want to repeat myself but Britian looted 45 trillion$ according to some estimates. So how did you come to the conclusion that Indians were poor

Bullshit estimates. It's always easier to use Britush colonialism that ended 77 years ago as an excuse to remain a Turd World shithole instead of addressing the real causes and deal with them.

India will always remain a TWS until it stops doing that.

indc says

I dont want to repeat myself but Britian looted 45 trillion$ according to some estimates. So how did you come to the conclusion that Indians were poor?

Then how was Britain able to conquer India with an expeditionary force? Had the general population been prosperous they would have fought the British. Like most feudal societies', the population does not care who rules them and it is all the same who taxes them.

@MolotovCocktail

Ethnic insults are not forbidden, but should go in https://patrick.net/post/1285044/2015-09-19-national-political-incorrectness-day

indc says

India was the most egalitarian society in history of the world before the advent and spread of the Abrahamic religions.

I think Indians are generally nice people, but let's not get ridiculous on claims of egalitarianism in a society that had untouchables.

The Jeet shit is out of control and comes from Qatari-paid Thai and Pak boilerrooms, the Emir of Qatar being devoted to the MB cause hardcore (which Tuqar dodged in his softball, frankly cocksucking, interview)

It's already been posted here, the chart of "Do you want people like you as neighbors" as India scored some of the highest in that category, far in excess of the west.

I'll try to track it down.

DemoralizerOfPanicans says

Lolol, the frogs!

HeadSet says

indc says

I dont want to repeat myself but Britian looted 45 trillion$ according to some estimates. So how did you come to the conclusion that Indians were poor?

Then how was Britain able to conquer India with an expeditionary force? Had the general population been prosperous they would have fought the British. Like most feudal societies', the population does not care who rules them and it is all the same who taxes them.

India has been fighting islam since 700s. 1200 they actually started taking over State by state. around 1650 they took it back from islam. There were still constant attacks by Muslims. And now pakistan is still attacking, funded by west. So it was not ever without war. Then from Southern coast around 1600s British , French, portugese n Dutch switched from trade to colonization. So now you have multi front war. India had 550 kingdoms so they also were infighting. Weakened india made it easier to take over by British. Even under British, lot of kingdoms were semi independent.

After independent india had one gandhi family ,who are like democrats, sold the country to muslims and simultaneously keeping india poor. 70 years one family rule n fake democracy.

DemoralizerOfPanicans says

I have 2 questions for you:
1) What were the questions asked for this survey?

2) This is a question on quora:
https://www.quora.com/Can-I-sue-my-neighbor-for-BBQing-meat-despite-me-repeatedly-telling-him-Im-vegan/answer/Dean-Ralph-2
Can I sue my neighbor for BBQing meat despite me repeatedly telling him I'm vegan?
------>
What could be your answer for it?

HeadSet says

Then how was Britain able to conquer India with an expeditionary force? Had the general population been prosperous they would have fought the British. Like most feudal societies', the population does not care who rules them and it is all the same who taxes them

How long do you think the EIC took to occupy whole of India?
I am not sure why you think British were occupying force fighting the locals? They were fighting the muslim Invaders hence locals helped them in Bengal area of India. Once they had the foothold the used the Indian forces with better artillery to take over whole country.

Also EIC was funded by Indian traders because they didn't know they will become their rulers:
https://www.reddit.com/r/IndianHistory/comments/1gawqpa/why_did_hindu_and_jain_bankers_give_overwhelming/

And you concur that population dont care who rules them. So why are you guys crying about caste system if it was prevalent in feudal system?

The difference between white feudalism and Indian feudalism is that population was not forced to join the fighting troops.

MolotovCocktail says

Are you a bangladeshi? This account is managed by a bangladeshi.

No one said whole of India is clean. Even I wouldn't say that. And no big country can say that. Even US is the same.

But I would like to ask you why do you think that UK did not loot 45 trillion$ worth from India?

indc says

Are you a bangladeshi? This account is managed by a bangladeshi.

1) Prove it.
2) So what?

My account is managed by an American.

indc says

No one said whole of India is clean.

And nobody is saying that.

indc says

But I would like to ask you why do you think that UK did not loot 45 trillion$ worth from India?

They didn't. India was never worth that much.

And they left India 78 years ago.

Whenever an Indian blames UK colonialism
for the shithole it is today, they automatically lose all credibility.

I mean, what an unserious position. Like BRICS.

MolotovCocktail says

1) Prove it.
2) So what?

My account is managed by an American

Just checking. Many X handles with white sounding names and indian names are managed by Pakis and Bangladeshis.

MolotovCocktail says

They didn't. India was never worth that much.

And they left India 78 years ago.

Again how did you guess India's worth? For 1500yrs India was 35% of global GDP. So how did you come to the conclusion of India's worth.
That number is calculated from the books managed by british for all the goods the shipped out of India. So it is the official number. If you want to include unofficial number it could be 2 to 3 times. But I would stick with official number.

British left India 78 yrs ago. Yes. But India got complete freedom in 2014 when it stopped being anyones dog.

Indian air force was controlled by British officers until 1955.
Indian secret service was reporting to British until 1970's.

Which shows that India was not really free.

CIvic sense is something that's missing in many uneducated and few educated Indian's. But people are trying to spread awareness and will take 2 more generations before that sets in.

indc says

Again how did you guess India's worth? For 1500yrs India was 35% of global GDP. So how did you come to the conclusion of India's worth.

You can't EITHER WAY. Esp over such time spans. And you can't apply current standards either. Like GDP. Pre-industrial agrarian societies have far less monetary transactions, for example. And that is what GDP is calculated from.

indc says

That number is calculated from the books managed by british for all the goods the shipped out of India. So it is the official number

Ditto. And goods shipped out of India doesn't translate into India's net worth, either. And what is the cost of the improvements the Brits put into India. Railroads, functional civil service, etc.? Most of which India wrecked.

indc says

British left India 78 yrs ago. Yes. But India got complete freedom in 2014 when it stopped being anyones dog.

What is that garbage mean? Did India become independent in 1947 or not?

indc says

Indian air force was controlled by British officers until 1955.
Indian secret service was reporting to British until 1970's.

So?

That was India's decision.

indc says

CIvic sense is something that's missing in many uneducated and few educated Indian's. But people are trying to spread awareness and will take 2 more generations before that sets in.

Civic sense = "Blame our shithole problems on colonialism that ended 77 years ago."

There's no excuse. India is a shithole due to India's fuckups, nothing more.

Singapore got its independence in the 1960s. Hell..it was thrown out of Malaysia. It started out as poor as India was. It started going its own way twenty years after India did. With practically zero natural resources.

What happened? Did they shit in the streets and blamed the filth on the Brits? No.

The colonialism victimhood card just doesn't fly. Its why your cities are shitholes and will continue to be. You blame the Brits so you can deflect from your own shame.

As of 2025, India's nominal GDP is estimated to be $4.19 trillion, making it the fourth-largest economy in the world. This positions India closely behind Germany and Japan, which have nominal GDPs of approximately $4.74 trillion and $4.18 trillion, respectively.

You have NO FUCKING REAL EXCUSE. None.

None.

MolotovCocktail says

You can't EITHER WAY. Esp over such time spans. And you can't apply current standards either. Like GDP. Pre-industrial agrarian societies have far less monetary transactions, for example. And that is what GDP is calculated from.

So you want to apply present standards to past 2000yrs?MolotovCocktail says

So?

That was India's decision.

Yeah because britian wanted to give conditional freedom. And India wanted to take it. I dont like this comparison but do you prefer community service or jail time?

MolotovCocktail says

Civic sense = "Blame our shithole problems on colonialism that ended 77 years ago."

There's no excuse. India is a shithole due to India's fuckups, nothing more.

India is doing it in their own country why is it causing you heart burn?

MolotovCocktail says

Singapore got its independence in the 1960s

Did you compare a small city state to a country of India's size?MolotovCocktail says

Ditto. And goods shipped out of India doesn't translate into India's net worth, either. And what is the cost of the improvements the Brits put into India. Railroads, functional civil service, etc.? Most of which India wrecked.

I am trying to show your stupidity in your statement. Are you saying the goods looted from india are not their worth? Where did you get this logic?

Indian minister shashe tharoor said it better. Countries got railroads even without getting colonized. This is such a stupid statement I see from many white people.
British definitely left stupid bureaucracy which is draining the country with its corruption.

indc says

Yeah because britian wanted to give conditional freedom. And India wanted to take it. I dont like this comparison but do you prefer community service or jail time?

More Indian pusillanimousity! Do you know how pathetic you sound?

indc says

Did you compare a small city state to a country of India's size?

Yes. Because India had way way more when it gained independence than Singapore did. Yet Singapore leaped to glistening First World status within 25 years.

indc says

I am trying to show your stupidity in your statement. Are you saying the goods looted from india are not their worth? Where did you get this logic?

General accounting standards. A business is worth about 2-3 times its annual income, for example. Not the total income it ever made or sold to one customer.

And for nations, even less so. The wealth produced in the past doesn't reflect the present or future at all, by itself.

indc says

Indian minister shashe tharoor said it better. Countries got railroads even without getting colonized

But India didn't. The Brits built it. And the roads. And whatever damns, canals, etc.

See the pattern? You Indians deflect even amongst yourselves the harsh truth: your country is reflective of your culture. You don't want to face this harsh truth so you engage in all this projection and deflection that defies logic, mostly. You are even quoting a minister doing the very same. Right now.

$4.19 trillion GDP... fourth-largest economy in the world.

No excuse to be such a total shit hole. Certainly not colonialism that ended 77 years ago.

And you know it.

MolotovCocktail says

More Indian pusillanimousity! Do you know how pathetic you sound?

I completely agree the system was pusillanimous. Gandhi was stupid in this regard. Indians should have killed the 100,000 white men instead of begging for freedom just like in south africa.

MolotovCocktail says

Yes. Because India had way way more when it gained independence than Singapore did. Yet Singapore leaped to glistening First World status within 25 years.

Do you know how singapore became so rich while making nothing? It was because of tax breaks and having a port at important location for trade routes.
Yes India had way more but it had way more responsibilities. So this comparison is so silly.
MolotovCocktail says

And for nations, even less so. The wealth produced in the past doesn't reflect the present or future at all, by itself.

I am sorry man. This just looks like rant instead of making any point. I asked you a simple question. Do you believe UK drained 45 trillion$ worth resources from India or not. I dont care if you think India was rich or poor in this regard because there is no way I can change your beliefs about this.

MolotovCocktail says

But India didn't. The Brits built it. And the roads. And whatever damns, canals, etc.

Where did you get all this information. Are you really a white american. I rarely see or interact with white people who have so much "authority" on what british did in India? Did you study Indian history in your schooling years?

Now coming to your point about railways.The first commercial railways was built in 1826. How would "India" would have built it if it was under british rule?

indc says

Indians should have killed the 100,000 white men

It's fair to fight the British military for independence, but massacres based on race are always wrong.

I'm half Irish, but do not support massacring all the British who occupy Northern Ireland.

indc says

Do you know how singapore became so rich while making nothing? It was because of tax breaks and having a port at important location for trade routes.
Yes India had way more but it had way more responsibilities. So this comparison is so silly.

No, it isn't. You just proved it by laying out what Singapore did. And the 'tax breaks' did build clean streets, either.

indc says

I am sorry man. This just looks like rant instead of making any point. I asked you a simple question. Do you believe UK drained 45 trillion$ worth resources from India or not. I dont care if you think India was rich or poor in this regard because there is no way I can change your beliefs about this.

More like: You can't handle that the UK is not responsible for India being a fucked up nation for 70 years.