« First « Previous Comments 464 - 503 of 628 Next » Last » Search these comments
Yeah because britian wanted to give conditional freedom. And India wanted to take it. I dont like this comparison but do you prefer community service or jail time?
Did you compare a small city state to a country of India's size?
I am trying to show your stupidity in your statement. Are you saying the goods looted from india are not their worth? Where did you get this logic?
Indian minister shashe tharoor said it better. Countries got railroads even without getting colonized

More Indian pusillanimousity! Do you know how pathetic you sound?
Yes. Because India had way way more when it gained independence than Singapore did. Yet Singapore leaped to glistening First World status within 25 years.
And for nations, even less so. The wealth produced in the past doesn't reflect the present or future at all, by itself.
But India didn't. The Brits built it. And the roads. And whatever damns, canals, etc.
Indians should have killed the 100,000 white men
Do you know how singapore became so rich while making nothing? It was because of tax breaks and having a port at important location for trade routes.
Yes India had way more but it had way more responsibilities. So this comparison is so silly.
I am sorry man. This just looks like rant instead of making any point. I asked you a simple question. Do you believe UK drained 45 trillion$ worth resources from India or not. I dont care if you think India was rich or poor in this regard because there is no way I can change your beliefs about this.
It's fair to fight the British military for independence, but massacres based on race are always wrong.
I'm half Irish, but do not support massacring all the British who occupy Northern Ireland.
No, it isn't. You just proved it by laying out what Singapore did. And the 'tax breaks' did build clean streets, either.
More like: You can't handle that the UK is not responsible for India being a fucked up nation for 70 years.
you are ok if indians are killed.
No need to go into killing or name calling.
Yeah india had poor masses of 300millions. So tax breaks would have been a big no-no
My question which you haven't answered yet. do you agree UK looted 45 trillion$ from India. If you say no what is your reasoning?
WTF? I never said anything even remotely like that.
Singapore had poor masses. What world do you live in?
indc says
Yeah india had poor masses of 300millions. So tax breaks would have been a big no-no
Singapore had poor masses. What world do you live in?
indc says
My question which you haven't answered yet. do you agree UK looted 45 trillion$ from India. If you say no what is your reasoning?
You didn't even read what I wrote on this.
indc has me blocked so probably he won't see this so quoting your comment. This $45T being "looted" from India is pure BS
If India was responsible for all the world's IT, Indian Employers and Politicians would fight to keep Indian IT workers at home, to keep their competitive low-wage advantage.
Were there 300million poor living in singapore?
After my explanation do you have counter explanation supporting your arguement that britian did not loot 45 tri.
https://youtube.com/shorts/MRj6VeaEv7U?si=KYlu7rcbMTnGFAUZ
In this short we can see what small changes india had in past decade under Prime minister Modi which changed indian economy
Since Molotov was talking about Singapore. Modi takes inspiration from tranformative prime minister of Singapore. Hence he is tranforming India.
Everyone complains what India did in 78yrs. India didn't have a leader like Modi who can take those transformative decisions and respecting our hindu culture.
https://youtube.com/shorts/rLK4xPvUQn4?si=6yDvYKVEiqEQ6a_G
American tourist shitting directly in a lake.
Do you think its her american mentality to shit anywhere
Or she thought since she saw all stupid street shitter posts she taught she can do that too.
https://x.com/USAmbIndia/status/1977373241577550149
US ambassador to India is saying that India will invest in USA.
Hope the heathen money is acceptable.
Have you seen slum rows in la, philly, Portland, ny. 60% of people live paycheck to paycheck. Drug issues all over, pedophiles in both parties. Worlds highest debt also.
Why can't richest country and smartest people like molotovminicocktail manage that. Why does us has 700 bases in other countries n funds war n riots all over the world, when it can't even fix its own problems.
As money comes, india has been fixing n cleaning things. Bombay largest slum is about be destroys with high rises.
This guy explains how india was made poor.
https://youtube.com/shorts/RUJyminVavo
Why can't richest country and smartest people like molotovminicocktail manage that.
KgK one says
Why can't richest country and smartest people like molotovminicocktail manage that.
US problems are due to:
1. Too much diversity, not enough unity.
2. A separate elite which divides the public so that we cannot unify to have nice things.
I visited Egypt during my sophomore year in Europe, and have to say Egypt was like that too. Trash everywhere.
The Indian Legion was a military unit raised during the Second World War initially as part of the German Army and later the Waffen-SS from August 1944. Intended to serve as a liberation force for British-ruled India, it was made up of Indian prisoners of war and expatriates in Europe. ...
Indian independence leader Subhas Chandra Bose initiated the legion's formation, as part of his efforts to win India's independence by waging war against Britain, when he came to Berlin in 1941 seeking German aid. The initial recruits in 1941 were volunteers from the Indian students resident in Germany at the time, and a handful of the Indian prisoners of war who had been captured during the North African campaign. It later drew a larger number of Indian prisoners of war as volunteers.
Though it was initially raised as an assault group that would form a pathfinder to a German–Indian joint invasion of the western frontiers of British India, only a small contingent was ever put to its original intended purpose.

Why is this?
« First « Previous Comments 464 - 503 of 628 Next » Last » Search these comments
The article goes on about how incredibly low-trust India is as a society.
True? Any people from India want to opine on this?