patrick.net

British left india with 90% poverty rate.
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DQotVzUkmmL/

What amazing place it used to be

What amazing smoke and mirrors from the Indian expats here. Vedic cultural remnants are somehow Dravidian, despite dravidians having no written language until 1000 years ago. (The Vedic peoples were steppe invaders. Tarim Basin of western China also had Sanskrit writers, and their mummies were red-haired, tall, and European genetically. The 5-25% of modern Indian DNA that clusters with Lithuanian end members comes from this period.)

Mughals built the Taj Mahal, in a style from Samarkand, but dravidians claim it. They also claim the Indus Valley culture, despite the DNA excavation showing proto-Iranian genetics similar to the Elamites (east Caucasus migrations down through the Iranian plateau 4500y ago).

Indians also claim incredible trillions “stolen” from a country with Bronze Age weaving, metallurgy, and subsistence farming. You’re welcome for the modern infrastructure. The introduction of thermodynamics alone is worth more than all the exported cloth, tea, and rice of India. Credit Borlag’s green revolution for enabling, via fertilizers and pest control, India’s swollen population. Modern India wouldn’t exist without western technology, and even then the country is squalid.

Goofs, you must not have known but india had trade n one of the richest till 1820 when British took over.

Top 2 oldest language are indian. 3500 old, they have thousands of books. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanskrit

Indus vally is how india got its name. Iran is next to it so people will exchange ideas n culture there.

India had 2 of the most fertile land and Asia almost always held 60 to 70% of world population. So it was some what hard to do famine unless British forced it.

1st diamond mine was in india. Next trip to London or DC museums, you can see how many diamonds are from.india.

The boat that British came to india was built by Indians. Dutch lost first battle in india.

Moguls built Taj mahal using indian labor n money. Also there is whole theory that it was built by Indian king n they modified it. Muslims don't build mosuleums for their 3rd wife. Have you seen any building that looks like that in middle east even 100 years ago before oil discovery.

Not only indians , even British historian claim that they stole it. Look up Yale university creator how he got rich n created yale.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DLCsaInSf4d/

We should not argue about which culture is better because Europeans and northern Indians are cousins on the male line. This is why we speak related Indo-European languages.

Did the various peoples of the Indian subcontinent get raped for 1,000 years by the musselman? - yes.

Did the British East India Company (later the British Raj) kill millions of Indians? - yes.

Was India ever meant to be one country, given its caste/cultural/geographic divisions? Probably not.

The peoples of the Indian subcontinent would have been better served by multiple independent governments like Europe before the globohomo takeover. I understand why India in aggregate was created - it was a massive bulwark against commie China in the early Cold War.

stereotomy says

I understand why India in aggregate was created - it was a massive bulwark against commie China in the early Cold War.

That never occurred to me, though I've often thought that India has as many different languages and cultures as Europe does.

Who decided that India should be one country?

Patrick says

Who decided that India should be one country?

The British drew the lines on the map for a reason. They also didn't like Kurds, so didn't give them a country.

True, the British were evil in drawing boundaries. The boundary between Northern Ireland and the Republic was drawn specifically to make Protestants the majority in the north, a kind of gerrymandering.

KgK one says

So it was some what hard to do famine unless British forced it.

India had many famines before the Raj, as recorded by Indians themselves

Patrick says

stereotomy says

I understand why India in aggregate was created - it was a massive bulwark against commie China in the early Cold War.

That never occurred to me, though I've often thought that India has as many different languages and cultures as Europe does.

Who decided that India should be one country?

Now you're asking the right questions.

Look at how the Sykes-Picot agreement carved up the former Ottoman Empire. None of the "nations" manufactured at the point of a pen were anywhere near viable - so the frogs and the english set up the minority population as the leaders, so that they would be dependent on colonial powers to maintain their rule.

India was and is a kaleidoscope of cultures for the past 2000 years or so. There was constant war in the Indian subcontinent first between rival kingdoms, then against the musselman invaders, then against the East Indian mercenaries, then against the english raj,

India as a nation is inherently ungovernable - by design.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DKBBPPIzMwy/

KgK one says

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DKBBPPIzMwy/

Sorry.

But this is a thread about India. Not about Using The Brits As An Excuse For India Being A Shithole.

Booger says

British all at fault!

But least they had electricity.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DQ9G5Qbk14h/

https://www.indiatimes.com/trending/social-relevance/maharaja-jam-saheb-digvijaysinhji-and-world-war-ii-polish-refugees-story-549242.html

He ruled Nawanagar from 1933 to 1947 when Nawanagar was merged into the United State of Kathiawar, after which he held his title nominally. In the midst of World War II, Jadeja is personally credited for saving around a thousand Polish orphans between 1942 and 1946, following the Invasion of Poland.

Also no one was asked convert their religion.

Patrick says

But it's also true that Jews have a disproportionate involvement in financial crime, and blacks in violent crime. Obviously not all of either group, just provably disproportionate, and it's legitimate to ask exactly why that is.

Eliyahu "Eli" Weinstein, a convicted Ponzi schemer, was previously sentenced to 22 years in prison for a real estate investment fraud scheme that caused $200 million in losses, and later received an additional 24 months in prison for defrauding investors in connection with the Facebook IPO and Florida real estate deals, bringing his total sentence to 24 years.

His 24-year federal prison term was commuted by President Donald Trump in 2021, allowing his release.

After his release, Weinstein was convicted of a new fraud scheme in which he defrauded over 150 investors out of $41 million by falsely claiming their funds would be used to purchase Covid-19 masks, baby formula, and first-aid kits bound for Ukraine, when in fact the money was used for gambling, real estate, luxury watches, and to repay earlier investors.
On November 14, 2025, he was sentenced to an additional 37 years in prison for this new fraud.

https://x.com/ObviousRises/status/1989957710708961553?s=20

Booger says

This is worlds highest selling biscuit/ cookie. You can see how its made. Racist people belive anything to make themselves feel better.
https://youtu.be/P9cWLC2r6cc?si=OSImZGIuhvoq6m8I

The world's highest-selling biscuit is Parle-G, an Indian brand manufactured by Parle Products. It has held this title since at least a 2011 Nielsen survey. Parle-G is sold in over 100 countries globally.

Yes sometimes there is shady manufacturing also just like all countries. Plenty of pink slime , GMO, cancer food dyes, used in US also.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DQ97juvE8bJ/

Yes, but Indians also fought on the Nazi side.

Patrick says

Yes, but Indians also fought on the Nazi side.

Where do you think the swastika came from?

True, but doesn't the Nazi version go the other direction?

Swastika is defamed by nazis. Hitler swastic is different.

The swastika is a 3,000-12,000-year-old symbol in the form of an equilateral cross with four legs bent at 90 degrees. It served as a religious and good luck symbol for many different people. It was appropriated by the German and Austrian Nazis in the 1930s as a symbol of Aryan fascism.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swastika
Hitler was devout Christian also who killed 6 million jews n many others and he had eagles on his emblem. He was also allied with Japanese, brown Italians, and Africans. Cant stop people using symbols.

Gandhi promoted non violence but asked indians to fully support fight for England in return for freedom in ww1. Indian troops sent millions of troops in ww1 but Freedom never materialized.

After betrayal in ww1, during ww2 still about 2 million indian joined British. Some people decided to fight british in india after British stole food and starved 4 millions to death. People have right to fight their enslavers, robbers, forced converters.

I explained before let me explain again about nazi symbol.

Hitler called it Hakenkreuz. Which means hooked cross. It is a christian symbol.

But NYT editor in 1930's didn't want his religion to be maligned so he called it swastika.

White christian still continue the lie to this day because we know what they are -bastards.

The Nazis still got it from the Indians no matter how much bullshit you try to spin it with.

indc says

I explained before let me explain again about nazi symbol.

Hitler called it Hakenkreuz. Which means hooked cross. It is a christian symbol.

But NYT editor in 1930's didn't want his religion to be maligned so he called it swastika.

White christian still continue the lie to this day because we know what they are -bastards.

That famous Christian editor, Arthur Sulzberger, defending the religion (he’s Jewish) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Hays_Sulzberger

Your symbol comes from the Vedic groups who were genetically “white.” The only group of ancient Sanskrit writers still able to be sequenced show as much: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarim_mummies
Speaking of “bastards,” the caste system reflects how much invader DNA you have.

MolotovCocktail says

The Nazis still got it from the Indians no matter how much bullshit you try to spin it with.

Again:

The Nazis still got it from the Indians no matter how much bullshit you try to spin it with.

Patrick says

Yes, but Indians also fought on the Nazi side.

OK, so they did one good thing.

indc says

White christian still continue the lie to this day because we know what they are -bastards.

I think pretty much the same thing happened in Europe as in India. The Indo-European invaders from what is now southern Russia moved in over centuries, setting themselves up as masters and taking local women as wives, ultimately completely displacing the previous languages, except in the case of Basque.

But hey, this means that most Europeans and a lot of Indians are cousins on the paternal side, and this is proven by genetics, because most of Europe and northern India are in the R1a or R1b haplogroups (the Y chromosome, passed down from the father).

And the main European languages are related to Hindi because they have a common origin.

And the Indo-European religions are related. I saw a mapping of Norse gods to Hindu gods somewhere. Christianity is a fusion of the Indo-European religion with Judaism.

https://cohna.org/swastika-is-not-hakenkreuz/

Explains how hitlers haukenkrauz is not swastika.

Hitler didn't even know its called swastika.

And the journalist was James Vincent Murphy. He was irish but worked for American publishers.

indc says

https://cohna.org/swastika-is-not-hakenkreuz/

Explains how hitlers haukenkrauz is not swastika.

Hitler didn't even know its called swastika.

And the journalist was James Vincent Murphy. He was irish but worked American publishers.

Doesn't matter how you fucking spin it. It's the same thing and came from the same source, India.

Regarding invasion from steppe to indian subcontinent: there is a discussion happening on X.

https://x.com/yajnadevam/status/1990820031001690464

The picture shows that no eurasian sites were found till now in indian subcontinent.

perplexity.ai

The Nazis got the idea to use the swastika as their symbol from a combination of factors rooted in 19th-century German nationalist and racial theories. The swastika, an ancient symbol of good fortune, was discovered by archaeologist Heinrich Schliemann in the 1870s during his excavations at the site believed to be ancient Troy. Schliemann and others saw the swastika as a "purely Aryan symbol," associating it with the mythical Aryan race, which German nationalists believed themselves to be descendants of.

German nationalist and antisemitic groups, such as the Reichshammerbund and the Bavarian Freikorps, began adopting the swastika as a symbol of Aryan identity and superiority. Adolf Hitler, attracted to this symbolism and its nationalist associations, personally chose the swastika for the Nazi Party in 1920. The Nazi flag combined the swastika with the colors of the old German imperial flag (red, black, and white), linking the movement symbolically to Germany’s imperial past.

The "mythical Aryan race" is definitely not mythical. Iran is named for it. Maybe you can argue that the term "race" is not correct, but there were people of a specific linguistic, genetic, and religious grouping you could call Aryan. Since the Nazis gave the term a bad reputation, it's considered more polite to just call them "Indo-European".

Again was it called swastika by the nazis is the question.

Not what we call it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swastika

The word swastika comes from Sanskrit: स्वस्तिक, romanized: svastika, meaning 'conducive to well-being'.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/swastika

Learned borrowing from Sanskrit स्वस्तिक (svastika), from सु- (su-, “good, well”) + अस्ति (asti), a verbal abstract of the root of the verb "to be", स्वस्ति (svasti) thus meaning "well-being" — and the diminutive suffix क (ka); hence "little thing associated with well-being", corresponding roughly to "lucky charm". First attestation in English in 1871, a Sanskritism that replaced the Grecian term gammadion.

Booger says

The British Who Left 78 Years Ago forced the cow pissee to do that, though.