patrick.net

I explained before let me explain again about nazi symbol.

Hitler called it Hakenkreuz. Which means hooked cross. It is a christian symbol.

But NYT editor in 1930's didn't want his religion to be maligned so he called it swastika.

White christian still continue the lie to this day because we know what they are -bastards.

The Nazis still got it from the Indians no matter how much bullshit you try to spin it with.

indc says

I explained before let me explain again about nazi symbol.

Hitler called it Hakenkreuz. Which means hooked cross. It is a christian symbol.

But NYT editor in 1930's didn't want his religion to be maligned so he called it swastika.

White christian still continue the lie to this day because we know what they are -bastards.

That famous Christian editor, Arthur Sulzberger, defending the religion (he’s Jewish) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Hays_Sulzberger

Your symbol comes from the Vedic groups who were genetically “white.” The only group of ancient Sanskrit writers still able to be sequenced show as much: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarim_mummies
Speaking of “bastards,” the caste system reflects how much invader DNA you have.

MolotovCocktail says

The Nazis still got it from the Indians no matter how much bullshit you try to spin it with.

Again:

The Nazis still got it from the Indians no matter how much bullshit you try to spin it with.

Patrick says

Yes, but Indians also fought on the Nazi side.

OK, so they did one good thing.

indc says

White christian still continue the lie to this day because we know what they are -bastards.

I think pretty much the same thing happened in Europe as in India. The Indo-European invaders from what is now southern Russia moved in over centuries, setting themselves up as masters and taking local women as wives, ultimately completely displacing the previous languages, except in the case of Basque.

But hey, this means that most Europeans and a lot of Indians are cousins on the paternal side, and this is proven by genetics, because most of Europe and northern India are in the R1a or R1b haplogroups (the Y chromosome, passed down from the father).

And the main European languages are related to Hindi because they have a common origin.

And the Indo-European religions are related. I saw a mapping of Norse gods to Hindu gods somewhere. Christianity is a fusion of the Indo-European religion with Judaism.

https://cohna.org/swastika-is-not-hakenkreuz/

Explains how hitlers haukenkrauz is not swastika.

Hitler didn't even know its called swastika.

And the journalist was James Vincent Murphy. He was irish but worked for American publishers.

indc says

https://cohna.org/swastika-is-not-hakenkreuz/

Explains how hitlers haukenkrauz is not swastika.

Hitler didn't even know its called swastika.

And the journalist was James Vincent Murphy. He was irish but worked American publishers.

Doesn't matter how you fucking spin it. It's the same thing and came from the same source, India.

Regarding invasion from steppe to indian subcontinent: there is a discussion happening on X.

https://x.com/yajnadevam/status/1990820031001690464

The picture shows that no eurasian sites were found till now in indian subcontinent.

perplexity.ai

The Nazis got the idea to use the swastika as their symbol from a combination of factors rooted in 19th-century German nationalist and racial theories. The swastika, an ancient symbol of good fortune, was discovered by archaeologist Heinrich Schliemann in the 1870s during his excavations at the site believed to be ancient Troy. Schliemann and others saw the swastika as a "purely Aryan symbol," associating it with the mythical Aryan race, which German nationalists believed themselves to be descendants of.

German nationalist and antisemitic groups, such as the Reichshammerbund and the Bavarian Freikorps, began adopting the swastika as a symbol of Aryan identity and superiority. Adolf Hitler, attracted to this symbolism and its nationalist associations, personally chose the swastika for the Nazi Party in 1920. The Nazi flag combined the swastika with the colors of the old German imperial flag (red, black, and white), linking the movement symbolically to Germany’s imperial past.

The "mythical Aryan race" is definitely not mythical. Iran is named for it. Maybe you can argue that the term "race" is not correct, but there were people of a specific linguistic, genetic, and religious grouping you could call Aryan. Since the Nazis gave the term a bad reputation, it's considered more polite to just call them "Indo-European".

Again was it called swastika by the nazis is the question.

Not what we call it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swastika

The word swastika comes from Sanskrit: स्वस्तिक, romanized: svastika, meaning 'conducive to well-being'.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/swastika

Learned borrowing from Sanskrit स्वस्तिक (svastika), from सु- (su-, “good, well”) + अस्ति (asti), a verbal abstract of the root of the verb "to be", स्वस्ति (svasti) thus meaning "well-being" — and the diminutive suffix क (ka); hence "little thing associated with well-being", corresponding roughly to "lucky charm". First attestation in English in 1871, a Sanskritism that replaced the Grecian term gammadion.

Booger says

The British Who Left 78 Years Ago forced the cow pissee to do that, though.

That woman is pretty hot though, and that's the important thing!

MolotovCocktail says

Booger says

The British Who Left 78 Years Ago forced the cow pissee to do that, though.

I can find random vids of crazy in any country. For usa, plenty of ass eaters 20%, dog fkers, there are whole websites porn of people eating n drinking nasty shit, drinking blood,pedos .. you name it.

I agree, arguments about whether India is good or bad are pointless.

India is a pretty recent invention of the British anyway. There are as many different languages and cultures in India as in Europe, maybe more.

Patrick says

India is a pretty recent invention of the British anyway

Just like Ireland.

True. Ireland was never unified until the British took it over, except that everyone was Catholic, Celtic, and spoke Irish.

It was just a collection of warring clans, but then they all found a common enemy!

Patrick says

and spoke Irish.

Not quite. Travel 10 miles and one would be among people speaking an unintelligible dialect.

I studied Irish for five years, and can say that the three main dialects (Munster, Connacht, and Ulster) are pretty different but not unintelligible to each other. It's like you're an American talking to someone from Jamaica. If he speaks slowly, you know what he's saying.

The fourth dialect is Scottish Gaelic, which is more removed, but I've read it takes only about a week for fluent speaker in Irish to pick up enough Scottish Gaelic to understand most of it.

Welsh and Breton are really different from Irish and Scottish, though I can pick up some similarities because they are Celtic. I've heard they can more or less understand each other.

I spent two weeks on Inisheer, off the west cost of Ireland, studying Irish in 2017. I picked that place they had a class, and because my father's family is from Galway and I figured that would be Connacht dialect. Nope! The line runs just above Inisheer, so it was the Munster dialect. Still learned a lot.

Booger says

asshoes!

Patrick says

That woman is pretty hot though, and that's the important thing!

I think she's a butter face. Body may be meh too. Nice clothes though so long as they don't smell like incense. That just reminds me of pot head chicks.

Patrick says

the Y chromosome, passed down from the father

Yep, that and mitochondria (maternal line) are the only things you can trace back very far. Consider an equilateral triangle. One edge is mito, the other Y, ignore the bottom. The area IN the triangle being all of the other chromosomes - they get shuffled, blended, recombined during conception, so after about 8 generations there is no trace of ancestors further back, statistically speaking.

Sometimes useful things are conserved for longer periods. I'm basically Irish and Polish (with a English last name) and 1% Chinese and 1% African. But also about 3.5% Neanderthal. So Neanderthal admixture was more useful than the two 1% Homo sapiens sapiens apparently.

Most people of European decent have a similar amount of Neanderthal (Homo sapiens neanderthalesis) vs. myself.

"The term Homo sapiens neanderthalensis was historically used to classify Neanderthals as a subspecies of modern humans, Homo sapiens.
This classification was common in the mid-20th century, particularly following a 1962 consensus among anthropologists, geneticists, and behaviorists who placed Neanderthals within our own species.
However, this view is no longer the prevailing scientific consensus.

Modern research, particularly the 2010 publication of the Neanderthal genome, revealed that Neanderthals and modern humans interbred after modern humans migrated out of Africa, with non-African populations today carrying 1–4% Neanderthal DNA.
This interbreeding, though limited, suggests that Neanderthals and Homo sapiens were not fully reproductively isolated, challenging the traditional biological species concept.
Despite this, many scientists now consider Neanderthals a distinct species, Homo neanderthalensis, due to significant morphological differences, including a longer, lower skull, a more robust build, and distinct ear and pelvic structures.
These differences indicate a separate evolutionary history that began at least 400,000 years ago, with Neanderthals diverging from the lineage leading to modern humans in Eurasia."

- we biologists can't make up our minds. The main requirement to 'be in the same species' is to have fertile offspring, so until that changes I'm old school..

KgK one says

For usa, plenty of ass eaters 20%, dog fkers, there are whole websites porn of people eating n drinking nasty shit, drinking blood,pedos .. you name it.

You do know 99% of that stuff you find online is totally fake? It's shock value and click bait. There are pedophiles, but most are a 16 with a 20 year old and they are registered as sex offenders. My wife legally is a sex offender with me. Never pressed charges as why would I? It was fun.

This argument will never come to a conclusion. India is a literal shit hole. Skid row is a shit hole, but it's in one area of one of the most prestigious cities in the world.

I haven't been to India and have no intentions of doing so. What states in the US have you been to? I'd like to hear your perspective based on experience. Name almost any city in America and I've been to it, even small ones. How many cities have you been to in India. Experience and anecdotal evidence you personally experience is huge.

I had a 17 year old girlfriend when I was 20. No one seemed to mind.

Reading thread I can tell it pissed off Indians and other fellas who like DEI. Wish you foreigners defended and loved America as much as you defend your former colony from which you came to be here.

WookieMan says

I haven't been to India and have no intentions of doing so

Same here. Going out of my way to a country that smells bad is not on my list of things to do.

If you are brain washed into thinking that whole country smells , that sucks for you. Same racists also think that Italians and Irish are stinky n dumb.

In 1500 all Europeans countries came n begged to do trade in india. Even columbus was was looking for india for spices and found USSA.

These guys known to live long life 100s of years. They slow down their heart rate. This has been mentioned in many books going back thousands of years.


https://youtube.com/shorts/bWY02buI504

https://www.businessinsider.com/longest-living-animals-2017-6

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATA57sEoLDk

Why Is There So Much Litter In India?

Comments are priceless!

Yes some places are very dirty in india. They will clean up as money comes in and civic sense improve. E.g largest slum in bombay is being taken down for highrises. Some tourist go there just to take videos of such dirty area. There are many others who go to amazing places and skip dirty area.


Donald junior n politicians from 40 countries visiting India.

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1AHvz68XA6/

KgK one says

Yes some places are very dirty in india. They will clean up as money comes in and civic sense improve. E.g largest slum in bombay is being taken down for highrises. Some tourist go there just to take videos of such dirty area. There are many others who go to amazing places and skip dirty area.

Civic sense will improve when (and only when) this peevish idea of “slave morality” disappears. Picking up after yourself, or God forbid others, is considered beneath most castes. That’s for Dalits. But living in trash cities is not beneath the self-same. Amazing.

Surely you don’t believe the cold swami on the mountain is living 100’s of years. I’ll give you that Himalayan foothills are probably not smelly — too cold.

Patrick says

Welsh and Breton are really different from Irish and Scottish, though I can pick up some similarities because they are Celtic. I've heard they can more or less understand each other.

You may be thinking Cornish and Breton. I do know that the Celtic folks in Cornwall and the Celts in Brittany routinely understand each other. Welsh is unintelligible to Breton and Cornish, as well as to Irish and Scot languages. May share some cognates and some grammar structure. Similar to English and Frisian - closely related but not mutually understandable. It sounds like you did some Welsh, so did you notice the spray talk and words that look like they have no vowels? Way different than something like "Caisleán Uí Shúileabháin."

Cornish died out though, somewhere around 1800. There are some people who deliberately try to speak it, but not many.

You're right that Welsh and Breton are not mutually intelligible, though Breton is derived from Welsh-ish speakers who moved there during the Anglo-Saxon invasions.

I never studied any Welsh, just did a vacation in Wales a few years ago. The language is definitely still alive, and I picked up a few recognizable tidbits. I can't speak Irish in spite of my study, but I get about 50% when reading it.

Patrick says

I studied Irish for five years

Impressive, I will defer to your knowledge, but I do wonder how different these Irish dialects were 200 years ago, plus all the dialects that died out since the English took over. I presume that those three surviving dialects (Munster, Connacht, and Ulster) have grown more similar today with intermixing from modern travel and communications and new vocabulary.

Yes, they are converging to some degree, since now that the Republic exists, there is an official standard Irish.

When I started, my first thought was that they really need to reform the spelling. Then I learned that what I was reading is the reformed spelling. The Scots never reformed it though, so there are even more unpronounced letters in Scottish Gaelic.

Irish spelling is consistent at least. If you see a word written out, you can be pretty sure of how to pronounce it, more so than in English.

Patrick says

Cornish died out though, somewhere around 1800

Well, I heard what I thought was Cornish, and someone I know said that the fisherman from Brittany could understand it. Maybe I am misremembering. I did spend time in Aberystwyth. and if I were to ever move to Britain, I would settle in Wales. It is beautiful and I do not know why the English bad talk it. It would be worth learning the language.

Patrick says

The Scots never reformed it though, so there are even more unpronounced letters in Scottish Gaelic.

I blame the French. The French language is riddled with unpronounced letters and they brought that crap over with the Norman Conquest. Affected both English and apparently Scottish.

I've had that same thought: "OK, Irish spelling is kind of insane, but so is French, and people don't seem to mind."

I think the Irish/Scottish spelling system is hundreds of years older than the Normal conquest. I wrote about it a while ago:

https://patrick.net/post/1323032/2019-03-12-how-to-pronounce-words-in-irish-gaelic