by AmericanKulakMaximumTrumper ➕follow (10) ignore (3)
« First « Previous Comments 384 - 423 of 718 Next » Last » Search these comments
Iwog, is that you?
DeficitHawk is a pretty classic example of a troll, pretending to be rational while deliberately offending, just for the enjoyment of causing as much anger as possible.
Iwog, is that you?
Could also be paid by the DNC, or be AI.
DeficitHawk is a pretty classic example of a troll, pretending to be rational while deliberately offending, just for the enjoyment of causing as much anger as possible.
Iwog, is that you?
Could also be paid by the DNC, or be AI.
But if you don't confront them, and you let them become a long term resident, eventually they are considered a tenant and you have to go through eviction proceedings to get them out.
DeficitHawk is a pretty classic example of a troll, pretending to be rational while deliberately offending
Only is some retarded states like California.
All states have squatters rights. And all states have tenants laws. No state would allow you to evict a tenant or long term squatter by force without some eviction process being followed.
Iwog, is that you?
I am citing the law, and the constitution, and the supreme courts rulings on relevant cases. I'm also saying my opinion is more or less the same as SCOTUS on these topics.
All states have squatters rights. And all states have tenants laws. No state would allow you to evict a tenant or long term squatter by force without some eviction process being followed.
I just gave you an example of transient squatters being removed without needing a Judge. Chapter 82 of Florida State Law allows removal of squatters at the satisfaction of the Sheriff, no Judge required.
Yep, and SCOTUS has previously decided that FORMER membership in another time and place of certain organized groups, criminal or political, allows deportation in and of itself
Without due process? Can you cite the SCOTUS case?
Each year, over 363, 279 – 83 percent – of deportations from the United States are ordered by immigration officers, not judges. Those deported in "summary removal" processes do not get a hearing or a chance to present evidence, or call a lawyer, or even say goodbye to their families before they are banished, sometimes for life.
Each year, over 363, 279 – 83 percent – of deportations from the United States are ordered by immigration officers, not judges. Those deported in "summary removal" processes do not get a hearing or a chance to present evidence, or call a lawyer, or even say goodbye to their families before they are banished, sometimes for life.
Can you cite the SCOTUS case?
Is that offensive to you? I cant imagine why it would be.
He's just going to keep playing you. Round and round. Just watch.
Right, the feigned sincerity and ignorance is part of the game.
"Who, me? What did I do?"
Yep. hey MolotovCocktail, what's the thread for Trump Achievements?
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/342/580/
He's just going to keep playing you.
Not even I - when I am in Troll mode - am even that assoholicly manipulative.
This ruling DOES NOT say the immigrants aren't entitled due process... SCOTUS specifically reviewed for, and found no violation of due process in how the lower courts and immigration officials managed the cases. It did not invalidate the right to due process, it says they DID get due process.
It is pertinent to observe that any policy toward aliens is vitally and intricately interwoven with contemporaneous [342 U.S. 580, 589] policies in regard to the conduct of foreign relations, the war power, and the maintenance of a republican form of government. Such matters are so exclusively entrusted to the political branches of government as to be largely immune from judicial inquiry or interference.
...
We think that, in the present state of the world, it would be rash and irresponsible to reinterpret our fundamental law to deny or qualify the Government's power of deportation. However desirable world-wide amelioration of the lot of aliens, we think it is peculiarly a subject for international diplomacy. It should not be initiated by judicial decision which can only deprive our own Government of a power of defense and reprisal without obtaining for American citizens abroad any reciprocal privileges or immunities. Reform in this field must be entrusted to the branches of the Government in control of our international relations and treaty-making powers.
We hold that the Act is not invalid under the Due Process Clause. These aliens are not entitled to judicial relief unless some other constitutional limitation has been transgressed, to which inquiry we turn.
Im not playing anyone. Im not trolling, moving goalposts, being offensive or anything like that.
Read it again. Specifically in reference to Due Process, SCOTUS concurred that...
We hold that the Act is not invalid under the Due Process Clause. These aliens are not entitled to judicial relief unless some other constitutional limitation has been transgressed, to which inquiry we turn.
He's only doing that to sucker those of you who keep being pulled in to continue doing so.
This doesn't mean that the people are not entitled due process..
Don't continue with his trolling bullshit, AmericanKulak
At least AmericanKulak is citing some real SCOTUS rulings in his response which I appreciate, although I can not understand the conclusions he reaches by reading the rulings.
It seems that the 90% of illegals that simply skip their scheduled immigration hearings had their due process but forfeited it.
LOL, it's literally addressing why they don't need judicial review as part of Due Process and the decision of the Executive following a law of Congress is enough.
Yep, and the Obama-Biden Activists will "decide" that voluntarily skipping your due process means you still didn't get it. Not that you voluntarily forfeited your due process.
citing some real SCOTUS rulings in his response which I appreciate, although I can not understand the conclusions he reaches by reading the rulings.
People can think this has turned into a right leaning site.
WookieMan says
People can think this has turned into a right leaning site.
Interesting what is now considered "right wing." Most on this site are against the mass import of cheap labor and are for tariffs to protect American jobs. Those are two classic Dem ideas that have been adopted by Trump.
« First « Previous Comments 384 - 423 of 718 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,309,503 comments by 15,534 users - AmericanKulakMaximumTrumper, Bd6r, goofus, MolotovCocktail online now