0
0

💉🚼🧠♿️🧑🏼‍🦯💰🔄🖤 The longstanding industry of infant vaccination programmes is a baseless fraudulent enterprise of exploitation. 长期以来,婴儿疫苗接种计划的行业是毫无根据的欺诈企业。


 invite response                
2025 Jan 31, 2:37pm   19 views  0 comments

by HANrongli   ➕follow (0)   💰tip   ignore  

💉🚼🧠♿️🧑🏼‍🦯💰🔄🖤
The longstanding industry of infant vaccination programmes is a baseless fraudulent enterprise of exploitation. 长期以来,婴儿疫苗接种计划的行业是毫无根据的欺诈企业。

Thank you for featuring my report that concludes: "The longstanding industry of infant vaccination programmes is a baseless fraudulent enterprise of exploitation"感谢您介绍我的报告,该报告得出结论:“婴儿疫苗接种计划的长期行业是毫无根据的欺诈企业”

https://open.substack.com/pub/metatron/p/no-vaccine-has-been-proven-to-save

Incredibly, there are lots of people who still believe the egregious lies being published in peer-reviewed journals about vaccine efficacy that rely entirely on counterfactuals. In other words, you get out of the model exactly what assumptions you put in1.
Even though Ferguson clumsily revealed this con trick in his original COVID spread modelling, it didn’t stop the perpetrators of the plandemic using the same methodologies to make the falacious claim that the jab saved millions of lives.
Opinion: Invalidity of counterfactual models of mortality averted by childhood vaccination 令人难以置信的是,许多人仍然认为,在同行评审的期刊上发表了有关疫苗功效的谎言,这些期刊完全依赖于反事实。 换句话说,您完全摆脱了1个假设。
即使弗格森(Ferguson)笨拙地在他的原始卷式传播建模中揭示了这种骗局,但它并没有阻止富豪的肇事者使用相同的方法来表达出恶意的说法,即jab挽救了数百万人的生命。
意见:反事实模型的无效死亡模型避免了儿童疫苗接种

In this comprehensive essay, Denis Rancourt explains the magnitude of the problem. It is well worth reading. In fact, it ought to be compulsory reading for anyone in Govt but someone might have to rewrite it with simpler words for them. 在这篇全面的文章中,丹尼斯·兰库特(Denis Rancourt)解释了问题的幅度。 值得一读。 实际上,对于政府中的任何人来说,应该是强制性阅读的,但有人可能必须用更简单的话来重写它。


no comments found

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions   gaiste