« First « Previous Comments 66 - 105 of 105 Search these comments
Get me to the data...post a link to the data so people can verify.. .the date..... 20 years ago. 2004. Lol.
I'm just curious, why does Wookieman have to defend, or validate some useless stat he found on the internet somewhere
Do you trust every stat you come across? I sure as hell don't. At best they should be posted for commentary and critique, with or without the data.
I'm just curious, why does anyone have to defend, or validate some useless stat he found on the internet somewhere.
I do get your point, but when you're making a point about something with 2004 data, no link to the data, no updated data, you're 100% untrustworthy.
WookieMan says
Get me to the data...post a link to the data so people can verify.. .the date..... 20 years ago. 2004. Lol.
See eveyone? He even contradicts his own bullshit.
Wookie claims the image is useless shit unless someone provides his lazy ass with 'a link'...and then immediately references part of it as authority data to bitch about.
Wookie's Schrödinger's Evidence Standard: Whichever Wookie can claim to demand that preserves his fantasy 'real estate expertise' or shuts down all challenges to said bullshit, even when both options contradicts the other.
Posting bull shit on the internet is bad for society
Fact is that map is obvious. BLM, Forestry and National Parks. You can still live on it as well.
That 45 million excess is across all of the nearly 1.5 billion Indians. In specific provinces, the sex ratio disparity is approaching 70/30 M/F.
Craigslist would be second on that list were it public.
At this point MySpace is more relevant today than Craigslist. At least some people still talk about MySpace.


Every state split in half by population – the densest half and least dense half.
IT Unprofessional
@it_unprofession
Facilities just sent me an email asking why the server room temperature is set to 62°F.
They said it's "excessive" and they want to raise it to 68°F to save on cooling costs.
I replied with a six-paragraph email explaining "thermal load balancing," "equipment MTBF degradation," and "catastrophic failure risk."
I cited a "study" that showed every degree above 65°F reduces server lifespan by 15%.
There is no study. I made that up.
But I CC'd the CFO and said if Facilities wants to take ownership of a potential $200K hardware replacement due to overheating, they're welcome to adjust the temperature.
Facilities backed off immediately.
Here's the truth: the servers would be fine at 70°F. Data centers run hotter than that all the time.
But I like the server room at 62°F. It's the only place in the building where I can go to cool off and get some peace and quiet.
Plus, now I have an email chain proving that I "advocated for infrastructure longevity" while others wanted to "cut corners."
Technical decisions are rarely about what's right. They're about who's willing to use more jargon.

« First « Previous Comments 66 - 105 of 105 Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,359,914 comments by 15,744 users - FuckTheMainstreamMedia online now