by RWSGFY follow (4)
« First « Previous Comments 98 - 110 of 110 Search these comments
RWSGFY says
Misc says
Trump's chest thumping is right out of "The Art of the Deal".
He wants peace and thinks the Iranians may give up if given an untenable position. He would prefer no US attacks on Iran.
Wait, so puppy eyes and waggy tail and 2 weeks on repeat does not work and is not prescribed in the book? Interesting.
ROTFLMAO:
President Trump in a statement:
Based on the fact that there is a significant opportunity for negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision regarding whether to go to war or not within the next two weeks.

But Lil Marco still thinks negotiating from a position of weakness is the way to go:
I
RWSGFY says
But Lil Marco still thinks negotiating from a position of weakness is the way to go:
I
sanctions against Russia didn’t work. we cut them off from swift, they were fine.
- First, demand the maximum, do not meekly ask but demand.
- Second, present ultimatums.
- Third, do not give one inch of ground because there will always be someone in the West that will offer you something maybe half that you did not previously have.
Problem with art if the deal is that after 2-3 times no one takes your ask seriously if they know your strategy.
Trump screams for something, everyone knows he’s bluffing ultimatums and asking for the moon and will settle for less.
Well yeah, there are no bargaining chips. What do we have to offer? What do you want Witkoff to offer?
Gromyko strategy
The Gromyko strategy, named after Soviet Foreign Minister Andrei Gromyko, refers to a hardline, uncompromising diplomatic approach designed to exhaust and outlast opponents rather than achieve genuine compromise. Known as “Mr. No” or “Mr. Nyet” in the West, Gromyko used prolonged negotiations, rigid positions, and procedural dominance to stall talks and wear down adversaries.
Key elements of the Gromyko strategy include:
Dragging out discussions with endless technicalities, monologues, and digressions.
Refusing to concede ground, even symbolically, to maintain a position of strength.
Flooding negotiations with false or irrelevant information, forcing the other side to waste time correcting inaccuracies.
Reframing aggression as self-defense and accusing the West of hypocrisy to create moral confusion.
Interpreting Western offers of compromise as signs of weakness, encouraging further demands.
FortWayneHatesRealtors says
Well yeah, there are no bargaining chips. What do we have to offer? What do you want Witkoff to offer?
Apply pressure, duh. They did gave away every carrot from the start, being the fucking realtard masters of negotiatins they are, so it's time for proper sticks. Witkoff is a fucking clown and needs to take a hike. Rubio should take over.
« First « Previous Comments 98 - 110 of 110 Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,363,655 comments by 15,741 users - Al_Sharpton_for_President online now