Comments 1 - 36 of 36 Search these comments


Really? This word, is it n.i.g.g.e.r?
Rochester Man Who Filmed Mom Using N-Word (NIGGER) Toward Child Was Previously Arrested for Sex Abuse of Minor ...
The video, which triggered an avalanche of backlash, was recorded by Sharmake Beyle Omar — a man who local left-wing officials and media eagerly applauded for confronting Hendricks. ...
However, Omar has a disturbing past of his own, including being arrested for criminal sexual conduct with a minor.
The charges stem from allegations that Omar and another man named Mohamed Hussein Omer, engaged in sexual activity with an underage girl who had run away from her foster care assignment in Farmington, Minnesota.
According to KAALTV, the 16-year-old girl reported to law enforcement that she was sexually assaulted by multiple men in the Rochester area.
KIMT News 3 further reported that when medical personnel examined the victim, she was found to be severely sleep-deprived, dehydrated, and had not eaten in some time.
However, in March 2025, the Olmsted County Attorney’s Office dismissed all charges against both Omar and Omer.
Court records indicate the case was dropped “in the interest of justice.”
Scrolling junkies will surely, by now, be familiar with the fiery digital inferno of hot-takes burning their way across social media this week. Once the involved woman started a GiveSendGo, corporate media dropped the story like a soiled covid mask. But local and second-tier media are having a field day. People Magazine ran its outrage! article on Sunday headlined, “Woman Who Appeared to Hurl a Racist Slur at a Child in a Viral Video Has Raised Over $600,000 in Donations for Herself.”
Four days ago, before media made Shiloh Hendrix a successful fundraising martyr, NBC ran the breaking story under the tiresome and predictable headline, “Police investigate after white mother used racist slur at Minnesota park.” The details are nearly irrelevant at this point, but I’ll cover the basics for our Portland readers.
Late last week, a few unpleasant people got into a playground argument in Rochester, Minnesota. Single-mom Shiloh Hendrix apparently found some kid she didn’t know rummaging through her child’s diaper bag. The kid, who was black, has been reported to be anywhere from four to nine. Anyway, Shiloh scolded the child and impertinently dropped the N-word, enraging a nearby man who was not the child’s father.
The man whipped out his phone and followed Shiloh around, videoing her and demanding she admit she’d uttered the forbidden word. She gave him a predictably obscene response, and the clip ends with the man saying forbodingly, “okay, we’ll see what the Internet thinks about you.”
NBC reported the man and the child were Somali immigrants, part of a large group “relocated” into Rochester during President Autopen’s scribbly reign of terror.
What followed was not news, not to anyone paying attention for the last twenty years, anyway. A vast, furious online doxxing campaign started, leading to all the usual outcomes— attempts to get Shiloh fired, publication of every sketchy detail of her troubled life, death threats, and demands that the local police immediately arrest her for ‘hate speech’ — mob outrage that the Rochester police promptly undertook to satisfy, with all the enthusiasm woke police always keep in store for “investigating” unprosecutable verbal violations.
In response to the clamor for her death and destruction, Shiloh started a fund-raising page. She asked for donations to get herself and her child out of Dodge, moving somewhere safer than New Somalia. News spread like wildfire, and small donations soared past $600,000 in four days. That’s when corporate media conveniently forgot about the story, and everyone else became mesmerized.
GiveSendGo has been swamped with fake Shiloh accounts. Don’t bother trying to find the right one, it’s too late. The search feature also seems to have been gimmicked to make it impossible to find. Shame on GiveSendGo. (Patrick says: False! It's this one: https://www.givesendgo.com/ShilohHendrix )
Shiloh’s incendiary story sits squarely at the intersection of immigration politics, “white supremacy,” race relations, cancel culture, and white guilt. But the racial components are not nearly as unambiguous as critics would like.
First of all, Shiloh Hendrix is a poor candidate for being a white supremacist. Among other inconvenient facts from her past, doxxers and foreign media reported she’d previously dated a black man, apparently even adding him to her profile picture in 2011. So there’s that.
Second, it strains credulity that America suffers from endemic racism if it becomes national news whenever a random single mom in a Rochester playground drops the “N” word. If it happens all the time, how could it be news? The excitement over the story proves the reverse is true. It’s rare.
That said, there is unquestionably a racial component to the public’s response. Shiloh’s successful fundraiser followed closely behind the also-successful fundraiser for Karmelo Anthony, a black middle-schooler who stabbed a white student to death after stealing his tent. Anthony then raised half a million for his “defense.” Citing free speech, GiveSendGo defiantly refused to shut down the comments to Anthony’s fundraiser even though they were filling up with slogans like “Death to White People!”
When I tell you the Anthony comments were off the chain, believe it. Here’s one example of many:
And I hope we help you raise 1 MIL! These white
people can die mad like they ancestors did
whites have been obsessed with black people for
yearsssss. It's 2025 the hate is embedded into
their DNA at this point. They don't know if they
love us or hate us lol, too bad we don't care.
Jacob Wells, GiveSendGo’s CEO, steadfastly defended people’s right to say nasty things about white folks, citing principles of free speech (not hate speech, not this time). But a month later, after Shiloh’s fundraiser hit $500,000, GiveSendGo finally closed the comments on both campaigns. This morally questionable move proved the link between the two cases. GiveSendGo clearly knows the two campaigns are related, since it has the data to confirm that.
Before the comments were abruptly closed off, Shiloh’s campaign collected many equally objectionable remarks, except going the other way. Everybody was mad.
The deplorable sum of events at this point in the story is a whole lot of people behaving badly. But there’s more to the story, as evidenced by all the social media attention to the two fundraisers — though sadly, more outrage was expressed over a single playground insult than over the plain-blooded murder of an innocent teenager.
Let us not overreact. I often wonder whether these local-cases-escalated-to-national-attention are psyops. George Floyd’s over-publicized case conveniently kicked off the 2020 Summer of Protest, even though unfortunate custodial deaths like Floyd’s happen several times a month.
In 2020, something, or someone, ensured the nation would focus on that particular case — and the result was cities burned.
It is uncontroversial that this kind of operation is part of the classic deep-state regime-change playbook, and the tactic of using race to create political change has a long pedigree. Practically since day one —when the first Soviet spy arrived here in 1916— communists repeatedly and often expressed a desire to gin up a race war to help overthrow America’s capitalist government. In the 1960s, the Soviet Union and its proxies openly funded and trained members of the Black Panther Party and other radical race groups.
Later, KGB archives (e.g., the Mitrokhin Archive) confirmed that the Soviets saw racial unrest in the U.S. as fertile ground for subversion.
Drug-addled George Floyd was an inconsequential person and an anti-hero. His status came only from his victimhood. I have never believed that the George Floyd protests were truly grassroots or organic. I believe the Summer of Protest was a soft-power operation to help elect Joe Biden. Potty-mouthed Shiloh Hendrix is equally inconsequential and is no kind of heroine. (Nor is she any kind of devil.) Her public status derives fully and only from her victimhood. And she is a victim, this time of anti-white racism and double standards. And she has now become a cancel culture martyr.
With the Trump Agenda moving full speed ahead, it seems an opportune time for some adversary to foment domestic social unrest. I’m not making any claim; but I am saying we must be extra suspicious of these kinds of “organic” social movements, especially when they aggressively invade race relations and pop up right when it would be most convenient for the deep state.
Question everything. ...
Finally, Matt Walsh found a silver lining in this story. Matt is the Daily Wire columnist responsible for the excellent anti-DEI documentary, What is a Woman? Matt hopes that Shiloh raises another $600K, because he persuasively argued the Shiloh Hendrix story represents the death of cancel culture:
https://x.com/MattWalshShow/status/1919524434014003482
Matt doesn’t defend Shiloh’s choices, but he understands how her moment of anger could have happened. He also recognizes that she does need the money, given the vitriol and powerful forces assembled against her. But he was most of all fascinated by the sudden failure of white-shaming over the forbidden “N” word, and he thinks that at least some of the donations to Shiloh’s fundraiser were motivated by public outrage at the effort to destroy Shiloh’s life just for a random overheated comment that other people don’t like.
Unlike me, Matt did find something unintentionally heroic in the story: “Shiloh Hendrix is cancel culture’s final boss,” Matt explained.
In other words, Matt has recognized the principle behind the C&C Army’s Multiplier strategy. Since 2021, you and I have been multiplying attacked conservatives. We’ve always said our main goal was to send a message to the lunatic mob that, if you try to cancel our folks, we’ll just promote them even more enthusiastically. We have done that, supplying significant donations at critical inflection points for people like: covid docs — like Peter McCullough — Moms groups, free speech advocates, anti-DEI activists like Chris Rufo, and politicians like Wyoming’s terrific Harriet Hageman.
I concur with Matt’s take on how the response to Shiloh’s case is a crushing blow to cancel culture. But I remain wary —as we must— over the details. Opposing cancel culture is one thing. Using Shiloh’s story to crack open the floodgates of pent-up complaints between people of different skin colors is something we should studiously avoid if we don’t want a change of regime.
It began with a word (and a finger), and a new icon was born. Not a particularly nice word, but maybe you can empathize. Whites have hit levels of cancellation fatigue that shouldn’t even be possible and other types of fatigue too, that certain people can just do whatever and the rest have to take it on the chin forever. Whites is tired, and liberal pieties about rejecting tribalism aren’t cutting it anymore because this only ever goes one way. They’ve even had it with the kids. Whites raised $750k to express their frustration, despite the best efforts of creepy playground filmmakers. It’s about sending a message, it’s not even about Shiloh, it’s about sticking a middle finger in the Eye of Sauron.
To the extent that they cared enough about the facts to investigate at all, everybody knew (for instance) that OJ did it — but that wasn’t the point.
The point, in their minds, was that the structure in which he stood accused was hostile and illegitimate — and since several people of that persuasion (I’m not gonna say what people, what persuasion) made it into OJ’s jury, they had material power to defy and deconstruct that system, and get Their Guy out of trouble.
Shiloh’s fundraiser demonstrates that a large number of people now view the structure in which she stands accused as fundamentally hostile and illegitimate.
They aren’t weighing in on the details of her case, except to compare it to other cases: in particular, comparing her use of a bad word to the murder of Austin Metcalf by Karmelo Anthony, on which the Anthony family raised $518,000.
A decade ago, the discussion would have been about what is Okay and Not Okay to say to unattended five-year-olds at the park.
But now, at least in the minds of many, the propriety of her specific behavior is irrelevant. The topic of discussion is now:
What kind of public behavior is tolerated from white people versus black people
Which parties are permitted to organize around “systemic” grievances
Who gets to sit behind the camera and direct the apparatus of social judgment and financial coercion
Viewed in those terms, people are reaching very different conclusions than they would have under the old paradigm. ...
In other words, the state’s method of punishing social media dissent has served as a massive gain-of-function experiment for its own opposition.
Shiloh Hendrix’s offense against the civil rights regime is about as high-visibility and eminently punishable as possible — probably the least-optical way to transgress against the liberal consensus without committing an actual crime.
Whatever punishments the regime can inflict, Hendrix will get with both barrels — but unless they can come after her kids (she needs to get out of Minnesota immediately) or convince some “rogue element” to attack her physically, there’s basically no way that the consequences outweigh the payout she is about to receive.
She’ll likely never have a W-2 job as long as the 1964 regime endures; but this kind of person usually doesn’t mind becoming Professionally Online, and if she has even moderately competent assistance, she’ll almost certainly be better off.
This suggests that the gain-of-function experiment has reached its conclusion: the most potent “cultures” are now completely treatment-resistant. All sorts of less-extreme violations of the 1964 regime now feel, not only survivable, but potentially profitable. ...
You may not like what Shiloh Hendrix did — and that’s the point. A person can now be exposed to tens of millions of people, doing something most of them think is reprehensible, and it’s just not up to them to decide what becomes of her.
That’s a major driver of the enthusiasm: it’s a rebellion against this apparatus of punishment and the people who wield it.
A very important episode about the Wyrd fate of Minnesota.
Mandatory viewing for all Americans.
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,349,919 comments by 15,721 users - stereotomy online now