Appropos for Mother’s Day, a quiet March jab study made the rounds this week. The study, published in the Journal Vaccines, was blandly titled, “Impact of mRNA and Inactivated COVID-19 Vaccines on Ovarian Reserve.” Scoffers complained it was “only” a rat study, but it was another iron nail in mRNA’s coffin.
image 7.png The truth is: it was more terrible news for the jabs. The slow trickle of truth emerging in the scientific journals is reaching a cacophonous crescendo. This newest study confirmed the worst suspicions of many folks who’ve long suspected a link between plunging worldwide fertility rates and the simultaneous worldwide deployment of the mRNA vaccines.
For heterodox experts who’ve long warned, “Something this widespread with this kind of novel platform could have unintended reproductive effects,” this study landed like a flashing red light. It doesn’t settle the debate— but it clearly shifts the burden of proof. The dismissive “safe and effective” mantra now looks a lot less like a conclusion and more like a placeholder awaiting serious investigation.
This new peer-reviewed animal study raises questions that demand answers about the human effects of covid vaccines —especially the mRNA types— specifically on female fertility. The researchers gave rats human-equivalent doses of either Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine or Sinovac’s inactivated spike vaccine. A few weeks later, they checked the furry little volunteers’ ovarian tissues.
What they found was extremely sinister. Both vaccines disrupted normal ovarian function, both reducing the number of healthy egg follicles and increasing the number of dying or damaged ones. Hormone levels tied to fertility, particularly “anti-Müllerian hormone” (AMH), dropped significantly— and most sharply in the mRNA group. In plain English: the rats had fewer eggs and significant signs of reproductive stress.
image 8.png ‘Follicles’ are the functional core of a woman’s reproductive system— they’re tiny fluid-filled sacs in the ovaries that each contain an immature egg. Every menstrual cycle, a woman’s body selects a few of these follicles to mature. Ideally, one of them releases a viable egg during ovulation. But here’s the catch: women are born with a fixed number of follicles, and once they’re gone, that’s it. No replacements; you get what you get. This finite supply is called the ovarian reserve, and it determines both a woman’s reproductive lifespan and her fertility potential.
While rats aren’t humans, the biological mechanisms are close enough to be terrifying. Rats have ovarian follicles and reproductive hormones remarkably similar to humans, which is why they’re widely used in reproductive research. While there are some differences in timing and hormonal cycles, the fundamental biology is the same.
Not only did the study show damage to the follicles themselves, but it evidenced that vaccination —especially with mRNA— disrupts hormone signaling related to fertility, by reducing the AMH hormone that indicates how many viable eggs remain. That single finding could plausibly explain the widespread reports of disrupted menstrual cycles following covid vaccination.
The study didn’t look at direct ‘fertility outcomes’ (actually getting pregnant), but it showed clear changes to the structures and hormones that make fertility possible in the first place. The findings don’t prove the vaccines harm human fertility— but they demolished the idea that there’s no evidence of harm.
There is now conclusive evidence of harm, even if not conclusive proof. And the evidence is strong, consistent, biologically credible, and peer-reviewed.
This study suggests the FDA skipped a critical step: before mass deployment, this kind of reproductive impact should have been studied in depth. Instead, it’s only being belatedly noticed by independent researchers after the needled horse is out of the barn. More research in human women is urgently needed— not to create panic, but to finally take the question seriously.
💉 Global fertility rates have been declining for years, blamed largely on socioeconomic trends like delayed childbearing, urbanization, and falling marriage rates. But what’s grabbed everyone’s attention was the sharp acceleration in the decline during 2021–2023— a period that coincides almost exactly with the worldwide rollout of mRNA covid vaccines.
In some countries, birth rates dropped 7%–15% year-over-year, far beyond typical demographic variation, and without any clear alternative explanation.
For example, here’s a March, 2024, headline from The Lancet:
image 9.png This rat study didn’t prove causation, but it showed a plausible mechanism: vaccination-induced follicular loss, reproductive hormone disruption, and increased ovarian apoptosis (cell death). If a similar effect occurred in women —even temporarily— it could reduce fecundity (the ability to conceive) during at least that window.
And since conception is already a narrow, monthly biological opportunity, small disruptions across large populations could have macro-level fertility effects— especially in low-replacement societies already teetering below 2.1 births per woman. A global birth rate collapse would be a slow-motion extinction event. It would creep up until some awful tipping point was reached and then it would quickly be game over.
💉 The study resolved a critical question: is this possible? The next question demanding an answer now is, why aren’t public health authorities urgently conducting large-scale reproductive follow-up studies on women of childbearing age, using easily detectable markers like AMH and antral follicle counts?
The reluctance to blame jab makers and government jab pushers is a poor reason to delay urgently needed research. It’s not just “water under the bridge,” or as Hillary might ask, “at this point, what does it matter?” The point is that, if we can identify the cause, we can start working on the cure.
image 10.png The longer we tiptoe around the possibility that mass vaccination campaigns might have played a role in plummeting fertility, the longer we delay both accountability and solutions. Because if the shots are indeed part of the problem, then understanding how they affect reproduction is the first step to developing interventions, reversals, and informed screening. This isn’t (only) about blame; it’s about basic public health triage: find the bleeding artery and clamp it, even if it clobbers the credibility of a few cockroach-like public health experts.
Our public health experts are obviously corrupt, sold-out, and useless. Hopefully, President Trump’s new HHS will notice this study and fund more research stat.
Have a wonderful weekend! Moms— please enjoy a richly deserved day of rest and joy tomorrow for Mother’s Day. We will reconvene on Monday morning to kick off the new week the best C&C way.
Upgrade to paid Share
Don’t race off! We cannot do it alone. Consider joining up with C&C to help move the nation’s needle and change minds. I could sure use your help getting the truth out and spreading optimism and hope, if you can: ☕ Learn How to Get Involved 🦠
mRNA疫苗接种诱导的卵泡损失 生殖激素破坏和增加的卵巢膜 对生育的影响
https://open.substack.com/pub/coffeeandcovid/p/mrna-mayhem-saturday-may-10-2025
💉💉💉
Appropos for Mother’s Day, a quiet March jab study made the rounds this week. The study, published in the Journal Vaccines, was blandly titled, “Impact of mRNA and Inactivated COVID-19 Vaccines on Ovarian Reserve.” Scoffers complained it was “only” a rat study, but it was another iron nail in mRNA’s coffin.
image 7.png
The truth is: it was more terrible news for the jabs. The slow trickle of truth emerging in the scientific journals is reaching a cacophonous crescendo. This newest study confirmed the worst suspicions of many folks who’ve long suspected a link between plunging worldwide fertility rates and the simultaneous worldwide deployment of the mRNA vaccines.
For heterodox experts who’ve long warned, “Something this widespread with this kind of novel platform could have unintended reproductive effects,” this study landed like a flashing red light. It doesn’t settle the debate— but it clearly shifts the burden of proof. The dismissive “safe and effective” mantra now looks a lot less like a conclusion and more like a placeholder awaiting serious investigation.
This new peer-reviewed animal study raises questions that demand answers about the human effects of covid vaccines —especially the mRNA types— specifically on female fertility. The researchers gave rats human-equivalent doses of either Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine or Sinovac’s inactivated spike vaccine. A few weeks later, they checked the furry little volunteers’ ovarian tissues.
What they found was extremely sinister. Both vaccines disrupted normal ovarian function, both reducing the number of healthy egg follicles and increasing the number of dying or damaged ones. Hormone levels tied to fertility, particularly “anti-Müllerian hormone” (AMH), dropped significantly— and most sharply in the mRNA group. In plain English: the rats had fewer eggs and significant signs of reproductive stress.
image 8.png
‘Follicles’ are the functional core of a woman’s reproductive system— they’re tiny fluid-filled sacs in the ovaries that each contain an immature egg. Every menstrual cycle, a woman’s body selects a few of these follicles to mature. Ideally, one of them releases a viable egg during ovulation. But here’s the catch: women are born with a fixed number of follicles, and once they’re gone, that’s it. No replacements; you get what you get. This finite supply is called the ovarian reserve, and it determines both a woman’s reproductive lifespan and her fertility potential.
While rats aren’t humans, the biological mechanisms are close enough to be terrifying. Rats have ovarian follicles and reproductive hormones remarkably similar to humans, which is why they’re widely used in reproductive research. While there are some differences in timing and hormonal cycles, the fundamental biology is the same.
Not only did the study show damage to the follicles themselves, but it evidenced that vaccination —especially with mRNA— disrupts hormone signaling related to fertility, by reducing the AMH hormone that indicates how many viable eggs remain. That single finding could plausibly explain the widespread reports of disrupted menstrual cycles following covid vaccination.
The study didn’t look at direct ‘fertility outcomes’ (actually getting pregnant), but it showed clear changes to the structures and hormones that make fertility possible in the first place. The findings don’t prove the vaccines harm human fertility— but they demolished the idea that there’s no evidence of harm.
There is now conclusive evidence of harm, even if not conclusive proof. And the evidence is strong, consistent, biologically credible, and peer-reviewed.
This study suggests the FDA skipped a critical step: before mass deployment, this kind of reproductive impact should have been studied in depth. Instead, it’s only being belatedly noticed by independent researchers after the needled horse is out of the barn. More research in human women is urgently needed— not to create panic, but to finally take the question seriously.
💉 Global fertility rates have been declining for years, blamed largely on socioeconomic trends like delayed childbearing, urbanization, and falling marriage rates. But what’s grabbed everyone’s attention was the sharp acceleration in the decline during 2021–2023— a period that coincides almost exactly with the worldwide rollout of mRNA covid vaccines.
In some countries, birth rates dropped 7%–15% year-over-year, far beyond typical demographic variation, and without any clear alternative explanation.
For example, here’s a March, 2024, headline from The Lancet:
image 9.png
This rat study didn’t prove causation, but it showed a plausible mechanism: vaccination-induced follicular loss, reproductive hormone disruption, and increased ovarian apoptosis (cell death). If a similar effect occurred in women —even temporarily— it could reduce fecundity (the ability to conceive) during at least that window.
And since conception is already a narrow, monthly biological opportunity, small disruptions across large populations could have macro-level fertility effects— especially in low-replacement societies already teetering below 2.1 births per woman. A global birth rate collapse would be a slow-motion extinction event. It would creep up until some awful tipping point was reached and then it would quickly be game over.
💉 The study resolved a critical question: is this possible? The next question demanding an answer now is, why aren’t public health authorities urgently conducting large-scale reproductive follow-up studies on women of childbearing age, using easily detectable markers like AMH and antral follicle counts?
The reluctance to blame jab makers and government jab pushers is a poor reason to delay urgently needed research. It’s not just “water under the bridge,” or as Hillary might ask, “at this point, what does it matter?” The point is that, if we can identify the cause, we can start working on the cure.
image 10.png
The longer we tiptoe around the possibility that mass vaccination campaigns might have played a role in plummeting fertility, the longer we delay both accountability and solutions. Because if the shots are indeed part of the problem, then understanding how they affect reproduction is the first step to developing interventions, reversals, and informed screening. This isn’t (only) about blame; it’s about basic public health triage: find the bleeding artery and clamp it, even if it clobbers the credibility of a few cockroach-like public health experts.
Our public health experts are obviously corrupt, sold-out, and useless. Hopefully, President Trump’s new HHS will notice this study and fund more research stat.
Have a wonderful weekend! Moms— please enjoy a richly deserved day of rest and joy tomorrow for Mother’s Day. We will reconvene on Monday morning to kick off the new week the best C&C way.
Upgrade to paid
Share
Don’t race off! We cannot do it alone. Consider joining up with C&C to help move the nation’s needle and change minds. I could sure use your help getting the truth out and spreading optimism and hope, if you can: ☕ Learn How to Get Involved 🦠
How to Donate to Coffee & Covid
Twitter: jchilders98.
Truth Social: jchilders98.
MeWe: mewe.com/i/coffee_and_covid.
Telegram: t.me/coffeecovidnews
C&C Swag! www.shopcoffeeandcovid.com
© 2022, Jeff Childers, all rights reserved 💉💉💉为母亲节赞成，这是一个安静的三月jab学习本周做了一轮。 在杂志中发表的研究是强悍的，“mRNA和灭活的Covid-19疫苗对卵巢储备的影响” 斯派克抱怨它是“只有”RAT的研究，但它是MRNA棺材的另一个铁钉。 图片7.png真相是：刺戳是更可怕的消息。 科学期刊出现的真理缓慢涓涓细流即将到达一个神奇的渐强。 这项最新的研究证实了许多人的最糟糕的怀疑，这些人长期暂时怀疑在全球生育率和MRNA疫苗的同时全球部署之间的困扰之间的联系。 对于那些长期警告的异教徒专家，“这种新颖的平台普及的东西可能会有意外的生殖效果，”这项研究像闪烁的红灯一样降落。 它没有解决辩论 - 但它明显转变了证据的负担。 不屑一顾的“安全有效”的咒语现在看起来不那么多得分，更像是等待严重调查的占位符。 这种新的同行评审的动物研究提出了要求对Covid疫苗的人体影响的问题提出了答案 - 特别是mRNA类型 - 特别是对女性生育的影响。 研究人员给了大鼠人类当量的辉瑞的mRNA疫苗或Sinovac的灭活刺疫苗。 几周后，他们检查了毛茸茸的小志愿者的卵巢组织。 他们发现的是极度险恶的。 疫苗都破坏了正常的卵巢功能，两者都减少了健康蛋泡的数量并增加了染色或受损的损坏的数量。 激素水平与生育能力相关，特别是“抗Müllerian激素”（AMH），在mRNA组中显着落下，最急剧下降。 简单的英语：大鼠的卵子和生殖压力的重大迹象。 图像8.png'follicle'是女性生殖系统的功能核心 - 它们在卵巢中填充的微小流体囊，每个卵子含有未成熟的卵。 每个月经周期，女人的身体都选择了一些这些卵泡到成熟。 理想情况下，其中一个人在排卵期间释放一个可行的鸡蛋。 但这是抓住：女性出生在一个固定数量的卵泡，一旦它们走了，就是这样。 没有替代; 你得到了你得到的东西。 这种有限的供应称为卵巢储备，它决定了女性的生殖寿命和她的生育潜力。 虽然老鼠不是人类，但生物机制足够接近恐怖。 大鼠具有卵巢卵泡和生殖激素，与人类相似，这就是为什么他们广泛用于生殖研究。 虽然时序和荷尔蒙周期存在一些差异，但基本生物学是相同的。 该研究不仅表现出对卵泡本身的损害，而且证明了疫苗接种 - 通过减少剩余的AMH激素来破坏与生育能力相关的激素信号传导，这表明剩下有多少活蛋。 单一发现可以合理地解释在Covid疫苗接种后发生破坏月经周期的广泛报道。 该研究没有看直接“生育效果”（实际上怀孕），但它表现出对使生育能力成为可能的结构和激素的变化。 结果不证明疫苗伤害人类生育能力 - 但他们拆除了没有危害证据的想法。 现在存在危害的确凿证据，即使没有确凿的证据。 证据是强大的，一致的，生物学上可信的和同行评审。 本研究表明FDA跳过了一个关键步骤：在群式部署之前，应该深入研究这种生殖影响。 相反，在针刺马离开谷仓之后，独立研究人员才被独立研究人员迟到。 迫切需要在人类妇女的更多研究 - 不要创造恐慌，而是认真对待这个问题。 💉全球生育率多年来一直在下降，主要归咎于社会经济趋势，如延迟生育，城市化和婚姻率下降。 但是，抓住了每个人的注意力是2021-2023期间下降的急剧加速 - 一个几乎与全球范围的mRNA Covid疫苗卷展卷术一致的时期。 在一些国家，出生率同比下降了7％-15％，远远超出典型的人口变异，没有任何明确的替代解释。 例如，这是3月2024年3月，柳叶刀的标题：Image 9.png这项大鼠的研究并未证明因果关系，但它显示出一种合理的机制：疫苗接种诱导的卵泡损失，生殖激素破坏和增加的卵巢膜 如果女性发生类似的效果 - 维持暂时可以减少至少在该窗口中减少繁殖力（能够设想的能力）。 由于概念已经是一个狭隘的，每月生物机会，大人口的小扰动可能具有宏观水平的生育效应 - 特别是在已经在每名女性低于2.1出生的低替代社会中。 全球出生率崩溃将是一个慢动作的灭绝事件。 直到达到一些可怕的倾向点，然后它会很快比赛，这将蠕动。 💉该研究解决了一个关键问题：这是可能的吗？ 现在要求答案的下一个问题是为什么公共卫生当局不迫切地对生育年龄的妇女进行大规模的生殖后续研究，使用易于检测的标记，如AMH和Antral卵泡计数？ 责备刺戳制造商和政府刺戳推动者的不愿是延迟急需研究的糟糕原因。 这不仅仅是“桥下的水，”或希拉里可能会问，“此时，这是什么？” 关键是，如果我们可以识别原因，我们就可以开始在治疗方面。 图像10.png我们倾斜的距离围绕大规模疫苗接种活动可能在暴跌中发挥作用的可能性越长，我们延长了问责制和解决方案。 因为如果镜头确实是问题的一部分，那么了解它们如何影响复制，是开发干预措施，逆转和知情筛查的第一步。 这不是责任; 这是关于基本公共卫生分类：发现出血动脉并夹住它，即使它克服了一些蟑螂的公共卫生专家的可信度。 我们的公共卫生专家明显腐败，售罄，无用。 希望特朗普总统的新HHS将注意到这项研究和资助更多的研究统计数据。 祝周末愉快！ 妈妈 - 明天享受敬慕母亲的休息和喜悦的享受。 我们将于周一早上重新招聘新的一周最佳的C＆C。 升级到付费份额不会比赛！ 我们不能单独做。 考虑与C＆C加入C＆C以帮助移动国家的针并改变思想。 我觉得使用你的帮助让真相出来和传播乐观和希望，如果可以：☕学会如何参与🦠如何捐赠给咖啡和covid推特：jchilders98。 真理社会：JCHILDERS98。 Mewe：mewe.com/i/coffee_and_covid。 电报：T.Me/CoffeeCovidnews C＆C赃物！ www.shopcoffeeandcovid.com©2022，杰夫童人，保留所有权利