« First « Previous Comments 519 - 558 of 784 Next » Last » Search these comments
https://x.com/dave73es/status/1935747762219319548
Israel atacó a Irán justo después de la inauguración de la conexión ferroviaria entre Irán y China, amenaza geoeconómica existencial para USA y sus aliados La ruta elude las sanciones USA y desbloquearía la economía de Irán, como centro de transporte euroasiático clave hasta RUS
English translation:
Israel attacked Iran just after the inauguration of the railway connection between Iran and China — a geoeconomic existential threat to the USA and its allies. The route bypasses U.S. sanctions and would unlock Iran’s economy, positioning it as a key Eurasian transport hub all the way to Russia.


What peaceful purpose do 100s of pounds of 60%+ enriched uranium facilitate?

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/06/flashback-trumps-director-national-intelligence-tulsi-gabbard-testified/
Tulsi Gabbard- The dishonest media is intentionally taking my testimony out of context and spreading fake news as a way to manufacture division. America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months"
Enriched uranium is (also) used in nuclear power plants. Iran has one functioning NPP, with two more under construction.

goofus says
Enriched uranium is (also) used in nuclear power plants. Iran has one functioning NPP, with two more under construction.
What percentage does Uranium need to be enriched for nuclear power?
https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtMg%3D%3D_5735f82e-72ae-4cd7-b495-27cb3dc4c3fa
60% is a whoooooole lot more enrichment than needed even for the most "high octane" advanced nuclear reactor.
Good point about the enrichment difference. That is a bit excessive. How do they explain it?
goofus says
Enriched uranium is (also) used in nuclear power plants. Iran has one functioning NPP, with two more under construction.
What percentage does Uranium need to be enriched for nuclear power?
https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtMg%3D%3D_5735f82e-72ae-4cd7-b495-27cb3dc4c3fa
60% is a whoooooole lot more enrichment than needed even for the most "high octane" advanced nuclear reactor.
goofus says
Good point about the enrichment difference. That is a bit excessive. How do they explain it?
They don't. They dodge.
RWSGFY says
What happened to UNCONDITIONAL SURENDER and 72/48/36 hours?
The next Supreme Leader will have those same options.

So, do we have another TACO moment?

Obama's 3rd term.
https://x.com/DougAMacgregor/status/1935857394958913976
https://x.com/sahouraxo/status/1936060471531999570
"Please stop posting this clown. Seriously. This guy has literally no idea what is going on."
« First « Previous Comments 519 - 558 of 784 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,352,339 comments by 15,727 users - GNL, stfu online now