patrick.net

Another liberal lost his job over this:

This was the best I could do with several attempts using Grok AI:

That's 15 people, so far...

The egregore arisen and animated, ready for magic tricks, like flushing out the Libby Lint.

FuckTheMainstreamMedia says

Wow. Dad turned him in!

This is actually excellent news for America's future.

People willing to uphold the law, even when their own relatives are the criminals, are a sign of a healthy culture, one that has a great future ahead.

Patrick says

One reason that Rome rose to power was the dedication of its citizens to Rome, even to the degree that they had a famous story about a Roman general who had his son executed for disobeying military orders:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Titus_Manlius_Imperiosus_Torquatus

The early Romans were famous for their impartial justice. This is why many countries willingly submitted to Roman rule. They knew the Romans would be fair.

Now we can't even get the flagrant long-term Epstein pedo ring prosecuted. Trump hides the video evidence to protect them.

I never listened to a thing Kirk ever said, just because I have too much other homework.

Even if the assassination a psyops, it couldn't have been more effectively staged or timed. The Dems have been shooting themselves in the cunt for a while in public with their synthesized struggle session sanctioned psychos. They have turned from empowered deputized amoral subversives to a shambles of florid mental illness. It's interesting to see the standard Kommie model of infiltration and propaganda having a limited shelf life and an extinction phase.

If it is not successful in gathering the central power to murder its way into permanent occupation, it leaves these dysfunctional hordes of whackos, useful idiots and criminals as a bathtub ring.

So, their iron isn't hot any more, it is becme fatiguing and stale acting out. I don't agree with aggressively getting them fired unless they are in certain sensitive public responsible jobs, because that is First Amendment territory. I suppose firings could be the mildest form of purge.

Illuminati wars are interesting.

Dr. Strange Trump is in junkyard dog mode against the Satanists? His egregores can defeat and consume theirs?

The "I'm not Nancy" actress chips it into the sand trap for the CIA. Or, is it the CAA? I'm confused.

What's really a low blow, it was fired on 'dress like a tranny Friday'.
Booger says

LOL! Ya think?

https://t.me/followsthewhiterabbit/116718

https://rumble.com/v6yuj8w-governor-cox-gives-details-on-alleged-shooter-tyler-robinson.html

LOL! Is Ben the beneficiary of Kirk's life insurance policy quadruple indemnity? How 9/11 and Larry Silverstein of him.

The Israeli blame magnet is a bogey. Maybe Charlie is on a Tel Aviv beach with Jeffery and Jizzlaine? That would be a great conspiracy theory.

Points to Charlie as a decommissioned agent because the purchase would have been arranged ahead of time.

MolotovCocktail says

AD says

Too late as you have a more honest FBI (not a Biden Regime FBI) who interviewed first hand witnesses who said this guy was severely radicalized and made threatening statements about Charlie Kirk.

That's not SM, tho.

Better believe his Bluesky shit has been scrubbed.

But I hope I am proven wrong.

Looks like the Left is in overdrive:

https://patrick.net/comment?comment_id=2206713

Ceffer, how do you maintain sanity going down unhinged rabbit holes?

Not even remotely the same persons.

Charlie Kirk had publicly called for the release of the Epstein files. In a video posted on September 8, 2025, just two days before his death, Kirk stated:

“The DOJ should immediately move to unseal all the Epstein… Every file should be released to the public”

Q: My condolences on the loss of your friend Charlie Kirk. How are you holding up?





TRUMP: I think very good. And by the way, right there you see all the trucks. They just started construction of the new ballroom for the White House, which is something they've been trying to get for about 150 years. And it's gonna be a beauty. It'll be an absolutely magnificent structure.

MolotovCocktail says

This is what’s called gaslighting. I know you know that. It’s being used in every issue.

MolotovCocktail says

Damn you aspies. Damn you all! Maybe they heard that Charlie was scheduled to be assassinated that day, so they turned it into a psyops to retire him with honor and like Trump's 'assassination' they turned it on the demons. Same guy at both psyops.



https://x.com/vladtheinflator/status/1966251361059897453?s=46

I have to admit all the Charlie lionization and over the top encomiums designed to amplify the egregore are a bit cloying. Two extremes here, one extreme of sadistic brainwashed laughing for their Joker masters, or canonization at the other extreme.

Booger says

"Another liberal lost his job over this:..."

Booger, what did I just watch? Can you summarize it in plain English for me?

Heartbreak to Heartbreak

When Americans openly celebrate the death of a man engaged in debate and discourse, we are in danger of losing our way.

Disagree with a man's views. Even abhor them.

But have no doubt: he would've fought to the end for your right to hold those views and to declare them as loud as you wanted. He even provided microphones for those who disagreed with him, so that they could publicly challenge him.

When Americans openly celebrate the death of a man engaged in debate and discourse, we are in danger of losing our way.

It adds heartbreak to heartbreak.

Even the founding fathers had vicious disagreements, but they battled with words and, in the end, even pledged to each other their lives, fortunes, and honor to establish a country where freedom of expression was possible.

The act of a lunatic can't break us. But openly celebrating the murder of someone because of divergent views can, as it threatens to tear apart the sacred bond that we are many and different, but united in moving forward through debate and discourse. Not through violence.

The_Deplorable says

Booger says

"Another liberal lost his job over this:..."

Booger, what did I just watch? Can you summarize it in plain English for me?

Some guy reads some first names and claims he caused all these people get fired. Anybody can make such video for clicks, shits and giggles. 🤫🤭

I didn't like Charlie Kirk, but I love what he did.
I think two things stood out as to why I didn't "like" Charlie Kirk. I didn't dislike him as a person, I just wasn't a fan of his movement.
He just struck me as the type of guy that if he was my neighbor.
The only time we would ever see each other was if the mailman mixed up our mail.
Other than that, he sure did pop up in my anonymous YouTube feed. I liked what he did, I just didn't connect with him as a political leader.
Funny now that he's been assassinated, YouTube is not suggesting him in my Anonymous feed.(I never sign in).

I do find it strange how his death is effecting people politically profoundly as JFK's assassination did.
May the Leftist commie pinko pukes, choke on the fact that he has been martyred in as much as JFK's and MLK's death immortalized them.

I think also I I never connected with him because he could debate politics with a rabid psycho Liberal lunatic and not lose his shit.
I resent people who possess that ability, as at 50 something, I still have not mastered that skill when dealing with a brainwashed commietard.
But I am at awe to watch them maintain their composure and manage to do what I am not able to do.

His murder will inspire people to develop his skill and honest sincerity.

Final thought I was thinking about today.
I don't think the global international reaction to this assassination would have been as widespread had it had been Tucker Carlson or Sean Hannity.
I'm sure it would have been a 5 day new cycle for sure, but there wouldn't have been South Korea, and UK vigils on their behalf.
There wouldn't have been talk about them being martyrs, I don't think they would have been as profound as Andrew Breitbart IMO.

Tenpoundbass says

he could debate politics with a rabid psycho Liberal lunatic and not lose his shit

I think this is exactly why he was murdered. At some level, the left knows that they are wrong. One only has to have an open sincere debate with them to clearly show it.

They will do anything to avoid that open sincere debate, including murder.

This is also why so many leftists ostracize relatives who aren't buying the leftist line. They do not want to hear any rational argument, out of fear that they could themselves be converted away from leftism.

Patrick says

Tenpoundbass says

he could debate politics with a rabid psycho Liberal lunatic and not lose his shit

I think this is exactly why he was murdered. At some level, the left knows that they are wrong. One only has to have an open sincere debate with them to clearly show it.

They will do anything to avoid that open sincere debate, including murder.

This is also why so many leftists ostracize relatives who aren't buying the leftist line. They do not want to hear any rational argument, out of fear that they could themselves be converted away from leftism.

Patrick, this is like idolatry or a cult mentality, like trying to convert some militant Muslim to Christianity. You could end up getting physically harmed.

One thing for sure, the Left shares with Islam some "political jihad" mentality.

Either you keep your mouth shut, or you suffer harm and its because my AntiFa cult or religion justifies it in the name of stopping "hate" and blasphemy.

.

Yes, and the 'unease' will never be resolved, especially if it a psyops. It'll just become another small chapter in the fake history books. There will be no proper forensics or forensics will be falsified. Once the egregore is alive and well, then any actual in depth examination becomes a threat to its utility. That's why so many associated with JFK were killed. Any Charlie-gate will wind up in the land of NADA. Amateurs will spitball it but have no official cogency as usual usual.

"Unease Grows Over Charlie Kirk Shooter Footage | Key Details Don't Add Up

Posted By: Namaste [Send E-Mail]
Date: Friday, 12-Sep-2025 13:39:06
www.rumormill.news/259350

https://mysterylores.com/news/charlie-kirk-shooting-book-published-before-incident/

Unease Grows Over Charlie Kirk Shooter Footage | Key Details Don't Add Up

By

Emilie Jensen

Sep 12, 2025, 05:29 PM

Edited By

Ethan Larson

3 minutes of reading
Footage showing the scene where the alleged shooter is seen, highlighting inconsistencies in the escape.
popular

A new analysis of the Charlie Kirk shooter footage raises questions, as viewers report inconsistencies in the events captured on video. Observers are puzzled by the apparent lack of a firearm during a critical escape moment, with many noting that key details seem misaligned.
Details of the Escape Footage

The surveillance video shows a man running across a rooftop, dropping about a full story onto the grass before fleeing through a park. However, investigators later reported finding an old .30-06 bolt-action hunting rifle in the woods, distant from this escape route.

Interestingly, the shooter seemed to have no visible weapon attached when he leaped off the rooftop. “How did he get it from the roof to the woods?” asks a concerned viewer, highlighting the anomalies in the scene.
The Rifle and the Man Behind It

Commenters noted that if the man carried the rifle on him, the drop could have resulted in severe injury.

One keen observer mentioned, "The rifle doesn’t fit the escape footage, and the camera tracking feels a little too perfect." This sentiment resonates with many who have reviewed the footage, suggesting there might be more to the story.
Is Camera Movement Genuine?

The continuity of the camera following the suspect closely has also come under scrutiny. Some claim it appears to be manual tracking, sparking speculation about whether the footage was edited post-event. One forum comment criticized the clarity of the video: "It’s poor quality, but he is clearly setting something down and picking it up again."
Community Reactions and Concerns

Comments on various user boards indicate mixed emotions about the incident:

Confusion over the rifle: Several users were baffled by how the rifle was found far from where the suspect landed.

Skepticism about the camera footage: Observers are questioning the legitimacy of the video recording process.

Responses vary: While some users criticized the post’s critical thinking, others provided insights that supported the raised concerns.

"To be fair, the panning and zooming was likely done after the fact," shared one responder, echoing doubts about the footage's authenticity.

Key Takeaways

📌 Escape Anomalies: No visible weapon during rooftop jump raises questions.

🌟 Rifle Recovery Mystery: Found rifle in the woods creates doubt on how it got there.

🔍 Camera Footage Scrutiny: Close tracking has users questioning editing processes.

The discourse surrounding the Charlie Kirk shooter footage highlights the need for clarity as details continue to emerge. As discussions evolve, many are left wondering—what else might be hidden in this case?
What's Next for This Case?

Experts estimate there's a strong chance that further investigations might reveal more inconsistencies surrounding the Charlie Kirk shooter footage. As authorities review the evidence, including the scrutiny of the surveillance video, we could see calls for deeper analysis of the footage's authenticity and the origins of the rifle. Given the current skepticism and the divide in community opinions, it's probable that forums and social media discussions will intensify. Many observers demand transparency and clarity, which could lead law enforcement to release more information or even conduct public briefings as they work to address the growing concerns.
A Historical Reflection

In 1996, the Dunblane shooting in Scotland stirred public debate and media frenzy that echoed this current situation. Much like now, a key piece of footage presented conflicting details that fueled speculation and concern among the community. The controversy surrounding how information was presented and what was omitted led to changes in gun legislation. This serves as a reminder that, in the face of perplexing events, society often seeks answers that drive broader discussions on accountability and the narratives spun around them.
EmailTwitterDiggRedditFacebook"