patrick.net

Absolute grounds for recusal and self recusal.....and yet???? Are they engaging in ritualized mockery of the people again?

Daughter AND son in law infiltrating the Guv with the frauds? Knew about the daughter, but treason must be a family tradition.

Ceffer says

Absolute grounds for recusal and self recusal.....and yet???? Are they engaging in ritualized mockery of the people again?

Dems NEVER recuse themselves even in the most egregious conflict-of-interest situations. I'm pretty sure they work behind the scenes in order to get involved in those cases, because abusing power is what powermongers do.

I wouldn't be surprised if they justified setting up his daughter as the judge.

It's also precious the way they claim that the selections are 'randomly assigned'. Yeah, randomly assigned by the local Freemason bosses.
Karloff says

I wouldn't be surprised if they justified setting up his daughter as the judge.

When you watched the Senate hearing and when Senators like Senator Graham asked Comey questions, they wanted to know what Comey knew as far as who leaked the info.

Comey testified he did not authorize anyone in the FBI to leak the info.

Comey at least lied by omission or deceived the Senate as Comey "authorized himself" to leak that info to his friend, who then leaked it to the media.

Comey will get an OJ jury (i.e., jury nullification) in a federal court in the Washington DC metro area.

https://babylonbee.com/news/democrats-warn-prosecuting-political-enemies-may-set-dangerous-precedent

The very worst that would happen to Comey is that he gets Epsteined. You know a fake staged death and then he's off relaxing on a beach somewhere. Remember "Nobody's above the Law".

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/fbi-agent-relieved-duty-over-refusing-comey-perp-walk-four-people-familiar-say-2025-10-03/

Looks like a protege of McCabe and Strozk. How much of the DOJ and FBI are compromised with Democrat loyalists ? As much as the federal court system ?

Nothing is said about security measures for Comey, if he turned State's evidence in some kind of plea. If he did, he would require a LOT of security.

I remember all those Law & Order shows where the police and DA reassured witnesses that 'We can protect you' only to see the witness killed by the end of the episode. It was almost a staple and I used to laugh every time the cops said 'We can protect you' because the witness may as well have had 'dead meat' printed on their forehead.

Muh Rank and File!

Pundits were using Comey's gentle treatment as an indication he was singing like a canary.

After all, all of Trump's wingmen were rousted in the wee hours and frog marched with the most humiliating arrest publicity possible.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/gold-fingered-friday-october-10-2025

Comey broke tradition and demanded a speedy trial —his constitutional right— and his judge speedily set trial for January 5th. It’s a bold and unusual move that pressures both the DOJ’s and his own lawyers.

Nearly every criminal defendant (99%+) waives their right to a speedy trial. On balance, I think it was a good move, but it also means less time for Comey to try to dismiss the case (he’s mentioned scads of reasons) or to try to disqualify the prosecutor, Lindsay Halligan. There’s only so much his lawyers can do at one time, and they must also now prepare for his trial during the worst time of year: the holidays.

I didn't know that defendants could waive their right to a speedy trial. Is there some legal definition of speedy?