by TheAntiPanicanLearingCenter follow (9)
« First « Previous Comments 150 - 166 of 166 Search these comments
No. Watch the video from rear quarter of the car: the wheel was clear of the shooter and moving further right, away from him. He was never in the path.This is the only angle that matters and in a jury trial it will seal the deal
RWSGFY says
No. Watch the video from rear quarter of the car: the wheel was clear of the shooter and moving further right, away from him. He was never in the path.This is the only angle that matters and in a jury trial it will seal the deal
Watch this video. The one that proves you're full of 100% Grade-A Bullshit.
MolotovCocktail says
RWSGFY says
No. Watch the video from rear quarter of the car: the wheel was clear of the shooter and moving further right, away from him. He was never in the path.This is the only angle that matters and in a jury trial it will seal the deal
Watch this video. The one that proves you're full of 100% Grade-A Bullshit.
That’s his cell phone jerking, it proves nothing. Another video has better angle from another officer.
FortWayneHatesRealtors says
it proves nothing.
It proves nothing?
She fucking drove into him and hit him.
WHY DO YOU PERSIST in posting fucking bullshit here?
You do it in the Ukey threads too.
MolotovCocktail says
FortWayneHatesRealtors says
it proves nothing.
It proves nothing?
She fucking drove into him and hit him.
WHY DO YOU PERSIST in posting fucking bullshit here?
You do it in the Ukey threads too.
Watch BW video from his partner. It shows whole thing. Tim Pool covered it in slow motion.
18 USC § 1512(d)(3)
Whoever intentionally harasses another person and thereby hinders, delays, prevents, or dissuades any person from ... arresting or seeking the arrest of another person in connection with a Federal offense ... or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 3 years, or both.
https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=%28title%3A8+section%3A1357+edition%3Aprelim%29
In bad news for the narrative, yesterday CBS ran a story headlined, “ICE agent who shot Renee Good suffered internal bleeding, officials say.”
According to DHS officials, the ICE agent who fatally shot Renee Good last week in Minneapolis, Jonathan Ross, suffered internal bleeding after the incident, was treated at a hospital, released, and is now recovering.
The obvious point, which nobody is saying out loud, is that if the officer was treated for any injuries, mild or serious, then he was struck by something. Like Ms. Good’s SUV, for instance. Progressives are mostly in denial, with comments on BlueSky in disbelief that the agent was injured at all, and suggesting that DHS is making it all up. Of course, hospital records would prove one way or the other, so going with denial carries some risk.
If there was any contact between agent Ross and Ms. Good’s SUV, then most sane people will agree the shooting was justified. But the legal analysis of excessive force will turn on whether Ross reasonably feared ‘serious’ bodily injury, and whether he may have deliberately put himself in harm’s way, as some Democrats argue.
CBS mentioned that agent Ross is now receiving death threats. The story was very fair, especially by corporate media standards. Most other corporate media ignored the announcement of Ross’s injuries.
I have to say, I’m liking the looks of the “new” CBS.
« First « Previous Comments 150 - 166 of 166 Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,360,083 comments by 15,742 users - FortWayneHatesRealtors, stfu, Tenpoundbass online now