patrick.net

Patrick says

But maybe one or two cigarettes at the beginning of a viral respiratory disease is actually quite effective in stopping it.

Best to research WHY smoking cures reparatory infections and develop an inhaler of some sort that cures without the dangers of tobacco.

HeadSet says

Patrick says

But maybe one or two cigarettes at the beginning of a viral respiratory disease is actually quite effective in stopping it.

Best to research WHY smoking cures reparatory infections and develop an inhaler of some sort that cures without the dangers of tobacco.

There's no money it that. Well, at least not as MUCH money anyway.

Lol, totally right.

Cheap cures are invariably ignored or disparaged in favor of the most expensive possible cures.

This is why HCQ, ivermectin, and zinc were all disparaged during the scamdemic.

It sort of makes sense like sterilizing effect of smoke when out in the woods for your socks and stuff.

The nicotine shareholders thank you for your support and participation.

GNL says

There's no money it that. Well, at least not as MUCH money anyway.

It could turn out that it is the nicotine, not the smoke.

Then maybe nicotine gum would work.

But I lean toward the idea that smoke simply kills things. Your own cells, but also viruses. Maybe it's a worthwhile tradeoff at times.

I haven't had a respiratory virus in decades, aside from the mildest COVID I got that lasted maybe 2-3 days.

It's the nature of illness that we tend forget our previous illnesses when well. It's kind of a built in defense mechanism, instead of dwelling on them.

I kept a log for a while about all the various afflictions and I was surprised at how many of them I forgot. Basically, most of them. We concentrate on the current thing while generally forgetting the past things.

It is also normal for those with dependencies to justify and defend their dependencies in myriad ways. I wouldn't rely on the smoking thing in any kind of double blind study, and historically, doctors have generally said the opposite.

One thing about the generalized disgrace of medicine, it opens up the field for the old bogeys of health claims and manipulations, along with the good naturopathic stuff.

I agree it would be bad to become dependent on cigarettes.

I read that type o negative blood seemed to protect people. I have never had Covid, however let me clarify I am basically a hermit these days. The world is too peopled with Dumb fucks and stumble fucks for my liking.

I agree that it was horribly disappointing to find out how profoundly retarded most people are when they literally lined up to get some unknown genetic slime injected into themselves and their children. And demanded that I inject it too.

Wow. I'm still not recovered from the disappointment at that stunning proof of just how incredibly low the general intelligence level is. Even today, I saw some absolute moron wearing a mask, driving alone in her car.

On the other hand, the millions of deaths from that stupidity have culled some of the idiots in a wave of natural selection, and many of the others have had a glimmer of awakening as they noted relatives and friends die from following the global toxxine campaign.

I try to get out though. Not good to remain at home too much.

This thread reminded me of the 1950s ads where doctors pushed tobacco.

@HeadSet If you put a moustache and beard on that guy, it's pretty close to how I look.

Can you change "Lung Infection?" to "Wuhan Virus?"

How about a little older an left handed?

Maybe also a white coat and stethoscope to stay with the traditional tobacco advertising?

@HeadSet

Not a leftie, but it's great!