0
0

The American Academy of Pediatrics Accused: Decades-Long Alleged Vaccine Fraud Lawsuit Officially Filed in Washington D.C. Court, Reporter’s Overview


               
2026 Jan 22, 4:09am   48 views  0 comments

by HANrongli   follow (0)  




美國兒科學會 被控:數十年來涉嫌運作疫苗欺诈訴訟案在華盛頓特區法院正式提起 记者综述

The American Academy of Pediatrics Accused: Decades-Long Alleged Vaccine Fraud Lawsuit Officially Filed in Washington D.C. Court, Reporter’s Overview

Reporter’s Overview: Currently, many countries around the world are still actively promoting infant vaccines and flu vaccines for the elderly. The reporter interviewed individuals who were misled, describing their experiences after receiving appointment letters for flu vaccinations and being advised to continue receiving mRNA vaccines. / Reporter: Han Rongli

记者综述:现在,世界多国仍在极力推动婴幼儿疫苗及老年人流感疫苗,记者采访被蒙蔽的当事人叙述,接获预约信施打流感疫苗后、建议继续施打mRNA 。/ 记者:韩荣利

🔔#AmericanAcademy of Pediatrics is accused of operating an "#organized fraud scheme" for decades to mislead American families into believing that the "#CDC recommended #child vaccination schedule" is safe and reliable | The lawsuit alleges that "there are strong financial motives" behind all this #AAP accepts funding from #vaccine manufacturers such as #Pfizer, #Merck, etc….

On January 21, 2026, a high-profile federal lawsuit was officially filed in the U.S. District Court in Washington, DC.

#CHD - Children’s Health Defense, together with five plaintiffs, including several doctors and parents, filed a #RICO (#RICO) complaint against the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP).

The lawsuit alleges that the AAP has operated an "organized fraud scheme" for decades to mislead American families into believing that the childhood vaccination schedule recommended by the CDC is safe and reliable.

The plaintiff pointed out that AAP, as the main #professional organization for #pediatricians, has long repeatedly claimed that this "#vaccine schedule" is "#safe and effective" through its official publication "#Pediatrics", website, guidelines, and public statements, but deliberately ignored or concealed the lack of key safety evidence.

Specifically, they say the AAP has never promoted or supported truly rigorous controlled studies of the entire cumulative vaccination schedule (especially of #vaccinated versus #unvaccinated children).

Although the #Institute of Medicine (#IOM, now #NationalAcademy of Medicine) has repeatedly recommended the use of the #Vaccine Safety Datalink (#VSD) for such analysis many years ago, it has not yet been implemented.

The lawsuit further alleges that there are "strong financial motives" behind all this. AAP accepts funding from #vaccine pharmaceutical companies, such as #Pfizer, Merck, etc., and through its "#RedBook" and related policies, "#vaccination rates" are closely linked to "#pediatric clinics' financial performance."

"Doctors with #high vaccination rates" can receive "#financial rewards" from insurance companies or the government, and AAP is accused of playing a "core role" in this "chain of interests" through mail fraud and telecommunications fraud, thus constituting a "#racketeering model" as defined by the "#RICO Act."

Citing precedents similar to the past "#TobaccoIndustryRICOCase", the plaintiff believes that AAP's behavior is highly similar to the #TobaccoAssociation's model of covering up health risks.

CHD CEO #MaryHolland bluntly stated in a statement: AAP has become a front organization for the extortion schemes of "#BigPharma, #BigMedicine, and #BigMedia".

The plaintiffs in this lawsuit, including well-known vaccine skeptic doctors #PaulThomas, #KennethStoller, and others, claim that they or their families have also suffered harm, including increased medical expenses and health problems, because they relied on the AAP's guidance.

This lawsuit takes place in a special time and space background: Since the end of 2025, #USvaccine policy has been experiencing violent shocks.

Under the leadership of Secretary of Health #Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (#RFKJr), the CDC has significantly adjusted the "#Children's Recommended Vaccine List" from a program that originally covered dozens of doses to a model closer to that of #Denmark and other countries. Some vaccines have been changed to "shared decision-making" instead of "routine vaccination".

The AAP "strongly opposed" the changes and even filed its own lawsuit to reinstate the original recommendations. At the same time, he was accused of "his position being deeply influenced by pharmaceutical companies."

At present, this "RICO case" is still in its early stages. The plaintiff is submitting charges and has not yet entered the substantive trial. Whatever the outcome, however, it could become one of the "most explosive medical and public health legal battles" in recent years:

"Challenge the power structure and information transparency behind U.S. vaccine policy."

For many parents, this is not only a legal lawsuit, but also a direct questioning of words like "expert consensus" and awareness and reflection on "blind #superstitious experts".

Source 1|Source 2
Source 3
➰➰➰➰➰➰➰➰➰
(Annie|Ima)
To support our work please subscribe to us
Earth Justice League ~ Archives
➡️ https://t.me/EarthJusticeLeague_DataLibrary
➡️ https://patreon.com/EarthJusticeLeague 🔔#美國兒科學會 被控:數十年來涉嫌運作一場「#有組織欺詐 計劃」,旨在誤導美國家庭,讓人們相信「#CDC 推薦的 #兒童疫苗接種時間表」為安全可靠的|訴訟指,這一切背後「有強烈的經濟動機」 #AAP 接受 #疫苗生產商 如 #輝瑞、#默克 等的資助….

2026年1月21日,一場備受矚目的聯邦訴訟案在華盛頓特區的美國地區法院正式提起。

#兒童健康防禦組織(#CHD - Children’s Health Defense)聯同五名原告,包括幾名醫生及家長,向美國兒科學會(AAP - American Academy of Pediatrics)提出 #RICO (#反勒索及腐敗組織法)指控。

這宗訴訟,直指AAP數十年來,涉嫌運作一場「有組織的欺詐計劃」,目的旨在誤導美國家庭,讓他們相信CDC推薦的兒童疫苗接種時間表是安全可靠的。

原告方提出,AAP作為 #兒科醫生 的主要 #專業組織,長期以來透過官方刊物《#Pediatrics》、網站、指南、及公開聲明,反覆宣稱這個「#疫苗時間表」「#安全有效」,卻刻意忽略或隱瞞關鍵的安全性證據缺失。

具體來說,他們指AAP從未推動或支持對整個累積疫苗接種方案進行真正嚴格的對照研究(尤其對 #已接種 和 #未接種 兒童的比對)。

儘管 #美國醫學研究所(#IOM,現為 #國家醫學科學院)早在多年前就已多次建議,使用 #疫苗安全數據鏈(#VSD)進行此類分析,至今仍未實現。

訴訟進一步指,這一切背後「有強烈的經濟動機」。AAP接受 #疫苗 藥廠,如輝瑞(#Pfizer)、默克(#Merck)等的資助,同時透過其《#RedBook》和相關政策,將「#疫苗接種率」與「#兒科診所 的財務表現」緊密掛鉤。

「#高接種率的醫生」能獲得保險公司或政府的「#經濟獎勵」,而AAP則被指控在這條「利益鏈」中,扮演「核心角色」,透過郵件詐欺和電信詐欺等手段,由此構成「#RICO法」所定義的「#敲詐勒索模式」。

原告引用類似於過去「#煙草業RICO案」的判例,認為AAP的行為,與當年 #煙草協會,掩蓋健康風險的模式高度相似。

CHD執行長 #MaryHolland 在聲明中直言:AAP已成為「#大藥廠(#BigPharma)、#大醫療(#BigMedicine)、#大媒體(#BigMedia)」敲詐計劃的門面組織。

這宗訴訟的原告,包括知名疫苗懷疑論醫生 #PaulThomas、#KennethStoller 等人,他們聲言自己或家人,也因信賴了AAP的指引而遭受損害,包括醫療支出增加和健康問題。

這場官司發生在一個特殊的時空背景:自2025年底以來,#美國疫苗政策,正經歷劇烈震盪。

在衛生部長 #小羅伯特·甘迺迪(#RFKJr)的領導下,CDC大幅調整「#兒童疫苗推薦清單」,從原本涵蓋多達數十劑次的方案,縮減至更接近 #丹麥 等國的模式。部份疫苗改為「共享決策」而非「常規接種」。

AAP「強烈反對」這些改變,甚至自己提出訴訟,要求恢復原有的推薦。同時被指控「其立場深受藥廠影響」。

目前,這宗「RICO案」仍處於初期階段,處於原告提交指控,尚未進入實質審理。然而,無論結果如何,它都可能成為近年來「最具爆炸性的醫學與公共衛生法律戰」之一:

「挑戰美國疫苗政策背後的權力結構和資訊透明度。」

對許多家長來說,這不僅是一場法律訴訟,更是對「專家共識」這類字詞,提出直接質疑,並對「盲目 #迷信專家」的覺悟和反思。

Source 1|Source 2
Source 3
➰➰➰➰➰➰➰➰➰
(Annie|以馬)
支持我們的工作請訂閱我們
地球正義聯盟~資料館
➡️ https://t.me/EarthJusticeLeague_DataLibrary
➡️ https://patreon.com/EarthJusticeLeague 🔔#AmericanAcademy of Pediatrics is accused of operating an "#organized fraud scheme" for decades to mislead American families into believing that the "#CDC recommended #child vaccination schedule" is safe and reliable | The lawsuit alleges that "there are strong financial motives" behind all this #AAP accepts funding from #vaccine manufacturers such as #Pfizer, #Merck, etc….

On January 21, 2026, a high-profile federal lawsuit was officially filed in the U.S. District Court in Washington, DC.

#CHD - Children’s Health Defense, together with five plaintiffs, including several doctors and parents, filed a #RICO (#RICO) complaint against the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP).

The lawsuit alleges that the AAP has operated an "organized fraud scheme" for decades to mislead American families into believing that the childhood vaccination schedule recommended by the CDC is safe and reliable.

The plaintiff pointed out that AAP, as the main #professional organization for #pediatricians, has long repeatedly claimed that this "#vaccine schedule" is "#safe and effective" through its official publication "#Pediatrics", website, guidelines, and public statements, but deliberately ignored or concealed the lack of key safety evidence.

Specifically, they say the AAP has never promoted or supported truly rigorous controlled studies of the entire cumulative vaccination schedule (especially of #vaccinated versus #unvaccinated children).

Although the #Institute of Medicine (#IOM, now #NationalAcademy of Medicine) has repeatedly recommended the use of the #Vaccine Safety Datalink (#VSD) for such analysis many years ago, it has not yet been implemented.

The lawsuit further alleges that there are "strong financial motives" behind all this. AAP accepts funding from #vaccine pharmaceutical companies, such as #Pfizer, Merck, etc., and through its "#RedBook" and related policies, "#vaccination rates" are closely linked to "#pediatric clinics' financial performance."

"Doctors with #high vaccination rates" can receive "#financial rewards" from insurance companies or the government, and AAP is accused of playing a "core role" in this "chain of interests" through mail fraud and telecommunications fraud, thus constituting a "#racketeering model" as defined by the "#RICO Act."

Citing precedents similar to the past "#TobaccoIndustryRICOCase", the plaintiff believes that AAP's behavior is highly similar to the #TobaccoAssociation's model of covering up health risks.

CHD CEO #MaryHolland bluntly stated in a statement: AAP has become a front organization for the extortion schemes of "#BigPharma, #BigMedicine, and #BigMedia".

The plaintiffs in this lawsuit, including well-known vaccine skeptic doctors #PaulThomas, #KennethStoller, and others, claim that they or their families have also suffered harm, including increased medical expenses and health problems, because they relied on the AAP's guidance.

This lawsuit takes place in a special time and space background: Since the end of 2025, #USvaccine policy has been experiencing violent shocks.

Under the leadership of Secretary of Health #Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (#RFKJr), the CDC has significantly adjusted the "#Children's Recommended Vaccine List" from a program that originally covered dozens of doses to a model closer to that of #Denmark and other countries. Some vaccines have been changed to "shared decision-making" instead of "routine vaccination".

The AAP "strongly opposed" the changes and even filed its own lawsuit to reinstate the original recommendations. At the same time, he was accused of "his position being deeply influenced by pharmaceutical companies."

At present, this "RICO case" is still in its early stages. The plaintiff is submitting charges and has not yet entered the substantive trial. Whatever the outcome, however, it could become one of the "most explosive medical and public health legal battles" in recent years:

"Challenge the power structure and information transparency behind U.S. vaccine policy."

For many parents, this is not only a legal lawsuit, but also a direct questioning of words like "expert consensus" and awareness and reflection on "blind #superstitious experts".

Source 1|Source 2
Source 3
➰➰➰➰➰➰➰➰➰
(Annie|Ima)
To support our work please subscribe to us
Earth Justice League ~ Archives
➡️ https://t.me/EarthJusticeLeague_DataLibrary
➡️ https://patreon.com/EarthJusticeLeague
no comments found

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste