patrick.net

突發新聞：

美國兒科學會受到聯邦RICO的打擊

疫苗訴訟

安全欺詐

AAP被指控經營長達數十年的敲詐勒索計劃，該計劃欺騙了美國疫苗安全，以獲得最大的利潤。

BREAKING:
American Academy of Pediatrics Hit With Federal RICO
Lawsuit for Vaccine
Safety Fraud
AAP accused of operating a decades-long racketeering scheme that deceived America about vaccine safety for maximum profit.
NICOLAS HULSCHER, MPH
TODAY AT 00:34

https://open.substack.com/pub/petermcculloughmd/p/breaking-american-academy-of-pediatrics

by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
For decades, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has been treated like an untouchable authority on child health — the gold standard that parents, doctors, schools, and lawmakers were told to trust without question. But today, that image collapses. Children’s Health Defense (CHD) and multiple plaintiffs just filed a federal lawsuit alleging the AAP spent decades running a racketeering operation that sold parents false safety assurances about the childhood vaccine schedule.

This isn’t another “vaccine debate” lawsuit. It’s a RICO fraud case—the same legal weapon used against organized crime and the tobacco industry. The allegation is blunt and devastating: the AAP allegedly manufactured false certainty around vaccine schedule safety, shut down legitimate scientific scrutiny, and promoted sweeping assurances that were never validated through rigorous real-world safety testing—while operating within a system shaped by vaccine-manufacturer funding and financial incentives tied to high pediatric vaccination rates.

One of the most explosive points in the complaint is what it forces into the open. The cumulative childhood schedule has never been safety-tested the way any reasonable parent would assume it has. The lawsuit points to Institute of Medicine findings from 2002 and 2013 calling for more research and acknowledging the lack of proper vaccinated vs. unvaccinated comparisons. Yet the AAP continued portraying the schedule as thoroughly tested and unquestionably safe, shaping pediatric care nationwide through repetition, authority, and pressure—not proof.
The complaint also describes what parents have learned the hard way. This system doesn’t merely recommend vaccines. It demands compliance. Physicians who questioned the schedule or deviated from AAP protocols were professionally targeted, disciplined, and financially crushed. The message was clear: follow the script, or lose your career.
The lawsuit further argues that the AAP’s public reassurances were built on “theoretical” talking points that became institutional doctrine, including the infamous claim that infants could tolerate an extreme number of vaccines at once. According to the plaintiffs, this wasn’t evidence—it was marketing disguised as medical authority, repeated in clinics to silence questions and keep the assembly line moving.
Then there’s the part that makes it all make sense: money. The complaint highlights conflicts of interest and financial entanglements with vaccine manufacturers and aligned institutions. The AAP presents itself as independent and science-first, while operating in a world of corporate sponsorships, incentives, and industry relationships that would be unacceptable in any genuinely transparent public health organization.

This is why the lawsuit matters. It’s not about a single product. It challenges the entire protection racket that has propped up the pediatric vaccine industry for decades. AAP’s model has relied on one rule: the schedule is safe because we say it’s safe—and anyone who demands real proof gets smeared, censored, or destroyed.
The lawsuit seeks financial damages for the families and physicians harmed, demands disclosure of the lack of comprehensive safety testing behind the cumulative schedule, and aims to stop the AAP from making blanket, unqualified claims that the schedule is “safe and effective” as if that question has already been settled.
If this case advances, discovery alone could expose what the public has been denied for decades—and that would be a historic victory for medical transparency, informed consent, and accountability in pediatrics. For years, parents were told to “trust the experts,” while legitimate safety questions were mocked, censored, or punished. Now those questions are headed to the one place the system can’t silence them with talking points: federal court.
…

作者：尼古拉斯·赫爾舍爾，MPH

幾十年來，美國兒科學會（AAP）一直被視為兒童健康方面的不可觸及的權威——父母、醫生、學校和立法者被告知毫無疑問要信任的黃金標準。 但今天，那個形象崩潰了。 兒童健康辯護（CHD）和多名原告剛剛提起了聯邦訴訟，指控AAP花了幾十年時間進行敲詐勒索，向父母出售關於兒童疫苗時間表的虛假安全保證。

這不是另一場「疫苗辯論」訴訟。 這是一起RICO欺詐案——與針對有組織犯罪和菸草業的法律武器相同。 這一指控直言不諱且具有破壞性：據稱，AAP製造了對疫苗時間表安全性的虛假確定性，關閉了合法的科學審查，並促進了從未透過嚴格的現實世界安全測試驗證的全面保證——同時在疫苗製造商的資金和與高兒科疫苗接種率相關的財政激勵措施形成的系統中運作。

投訴中最具爆炸性的一點是它強迫公開的內容。 累積的童年時間表從未像任何理智的父母認為的那樣經過安全測試。 該訴訟指出了醫學研究所2002年和2013年的調查結果，呼籲進行更多研究，並承認缺乏適當的接種疫苗與未接種疫苗的比較。 然而，AAP繼續將時間表描繪成經過徹底測試且毫無疑問安全的時間表，透過重複、權威和壓力而不是證據來塑造全國的兒科護理。

投訴還描述了父母以艱難的方式學到的東西。 這個系統不只是推薦疫苗。 它要求合規。 質疑時間表或偏離AAP協議的醫生在專業上受到攻擊、紀律處分和經濟上崩潰。 資訊很清楚：遵循劇本，否則就失去你的職業生涯。

該訴訟進一步辯稱，AAP的公眾保證建立在「理論」談話要點之上，這些談話要點成為機構理論，包括臭名昭著的說法，即嬰兒可以同時耐受大量疫苗。 根據原告的說法，這不是證據——這是偽裝成醫療權威的營銷，在診所重複，以壓制問題並保持裝配線的運轉。

然後是讓這一切變得有意義的部分：錢。 該投訴強調了與疫苗製造商和相關機構的利益衝突和財務糾纏。 AAP將自己表現為獨立和以科學為先，同時在一個企業贊助、激勵和行業關係的世界裡運作，這在任何真正透明的公共衛生組織中都是不可接受的。

這就是為什麼訴訟很重要。 這與單一產品有關。 它挑戰了幾十年來一直支援兒科疫苗行業的整個保護性騙局。 AAP的模型依賴於一條規則：時間表是安全的，因為我們說它是安全的——任何要求真實證據的人都會被抹黑、審查或銷燬。

該訴訟要求為受害家屬和醫生提供經濟損失，要求披露累積時間表背後缺乏全面的安全測試，並旨在阻止AAP一攬子、無條件地聲稱時間表是「安全和有效的」，就好像這個問題已經解決了一樣。

如果此案進展，僅憑發現就可以揭露公眾幾十年來被剝奪的東西——這將是醫療透明度、知情同意和兒科問責制的歷史性勝利。 多年來，父母被告知要「相信專家」，而合法的安全問題則被嘲笑、審查或懲罰。 現在，這些問題正指向一個系統不能用談話要點壓制他們的地方：聯邦法院。
…