patrick.net

How come Pelosi hasn't pulled out her special edition CIA issued Desert Eagle and put Trump down like a rabid dog? IMPEACH TRUMP!

Oh, if Trump loses I'm going to fuck Civility in the Ass without Lube in order to return the favor.

Of course Liberals will be pushing the importance of a calm transition without partisanship just like they did right up until November 8th, when they worried Trump would contest Hillary's rigged election.

Taking punches without fighting back is George Will Wimpery.

How could Trump question the validity of analysis performed by a hostile intelligence community which was actively working to get him impeached? I mean, it’s like he has actual judgement or something, and that certainly can’t be tolerated!

undermining efforts to investigate Russia's interference in the US electoral process.

Like the Steele Dossier?

The Sentinel writers quipped, “After 2½ years we’ve seen enough,” adding, “Enough of the chaos, the division, the schoolyard insults, the self-aggrandizement, the corruption, and especially the lies. So many lies — from white lies to whoppers — told out of ignorance, laziness, recklessness, expediency or opportunity.”

I've always known that some conservatives are fully capable of taking reality in to account. Consider George Will for example.

Others will deny reality until their dying day, becasue of ego. Because they voted for him in 2016, and can't stand being wrong.

FIFY
marcus says

Others will deny reality until their dying day, becasue of ego WPWTDS.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newspaper_endorsements_in_the_2016_United_States_presidential_election

Trump received endorsements from only 20 daily newspapers and six weekly newspapers nationwide, of which only two, the Las Vegas Review-Journal and the (Jacksonville) Florida Times-Union, had circulations of above 100,000.[2] The small number of endorsements received by Trump was unprecedented in American history for a candidate from a major party.[3][4][5]

Among the United States' 100 largest newspapers by paid circulation, 57 endorsed Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton,[6] while only two, the Las Vegas Review-Journal and the Florida Times-Union, endorsed Trump. Four (the Chicago Tribune, the Detroit News, the Richmond Times-Dispatch, and the Charleston (South Carolina) Post and Courier) endorsed Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson,[7] while three other newspapers (USA Today, the Fort Worth Star-Telegram, and the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel) specifically discouraged their readers from voting for Trump.

Clinton won support from not only traditionally Democratic-leaning newspapers, but also traditionally non-political and conservative newspapers,[1][2] including those that had "...either never before supported a Democrat or had not in many decades ... or had never endorsed any presidential candidate, like USA Today."[1] Many newspapers that endorsed Clinton encouraged readers to vote for her primarily, if not solely, to prevent Trump from being elected president.

Presstitutes have lost any credibility by shilling for existing status quo, which benefits top 1%. Doubt that electorate in so-called flyover country listens to them any more.

As we know, the media is in charge of electing the President!
Such an important task should be left to the professionals whose careers are tied to their obedience to the will of their oligarch masters.

jazz_music says

US intelligence officials are purposely concealing details from President Donald Trump about a US cyber offensive against the Russian power grid, The New York Times reported.

This quote from your source Jazz is comical. Lol, they're really hiding that they are hiding something very well. This has to be a joke? They can't even hide that they are hiding something, jesus. Sorry, this is too rich. Someone's getting fired for telling the NYT this and it's probably the reporter that made it up.

jazz_music says

US intelligence officials are purposely concealing details from President Donald Trump about a US cyber offensive against the Russian power grid, The New York Times reported.

What are their names so we can confirm the story? Hahahahah

"Freakin' MAGAt Trumptards done believe everything Fox News done tells them, hyuck hyuck hyuck. Muh Intelligence is vast lee superior to theirs, I tell ye. I have unnamed sources confirming something I'd have confirmation bias on, heh heh ."

marcus says

I've always known that some conservatives are fully capable of taking reality in to account. Consider George Will for example.

hehehehe

Please list the Conservative Victories of George Will over the past few decades

Did he get rid of NYC's Gun Laws? Make abortion illegal? Do away with no-fault divorce?

Nope. At every key moment he caved, like Ghandi with the British. Revealing an Ascetic character (aka "Cuck")

People still read newspapers???

Nobody cares whom any newspaper endorses for anything.

Trump was elected despite the media, so don’t expect it to ever support him.

Newspapers are going the way of the Dodo bird for several reasons, one is we hate their views.

jazz_music says

So that’s what happens when someone says that emperor has no clothes. They go to the trash.

More like:

"What happens when the Media insists the Muslim Woman in a burka is butt naked"

jazz_music says

Weird comment there for a news non-comedy item that is featured on multiple credible sites.

Do you not get around much?

Name the sources so I can verify the details.

The Media has been caught pushing what were later shown to be utter untruths that they claimed were "high ranking officials" or suchlike. Too much in the past 3 years to be taken at their word anymore.

Question Authority!

jazz_music says

Do you not get around much?

Jesus, it's not about the news sites reporting it. The fact US INTELLIGENCE can't even hide what they're trying to hide from the president. Do you not understand the flawed logic on giving a reporter an anonymous tip/detail about the topic? The person with whatever department just made the president aware that they're hiding information. Now he knows. Boom, mission NOT accomplished...

You don't have to like Trump, I'm personally not a fan, but I view the POTUS in a different light versus a lot of other people that put the office on a pedestal. But you're being disingenuous when you act like you don't understand the issue with what you quoted and posted. I'm sure you've come across my other comments here, I'm not running around saying "fake news" and all that. But to act like this is a legitimate source or even real is completely naive.

So much TDS.
Terminal case I think.

Let them eat homeless poo.

California is definitely not 3rd world, just drive across the border to Tijuana if you disagree. But they share more similarities than I would have imagined.

Dem Party in California has become like the old PRI in Mexico. That is, they hold an unaccountable hold on political power, and will maintain it through any means necessary. Who care if CA "voters" do not like it, who needs them? After all, the illegals will vote in local elections, and the combination of illegals with driver's licenses and motor-voter will insure plenty of illegals will vote State and National elections as well. Makes sense for the Cali politicians to pander to this rising voter base.

No Trump is expected to fire everyone, Liberals get to apologize and move on.

I don't even know why he humors those Baby Killers.

Trump has a firm grasp on the obvious fact that China eventually loses if we want to put the screws to them.

China may not love the USA but they don’t hate us; we liberated China from Japanese occupation.

Eventually it will be fine.

clambo says

China may not love the USA but they don’t hate us; we liberated China from Japanese occupation.

Eventually it will be fine.

They know they were fucking us and should be happy they got as much out of it as they did.

Praising Trump is racist

Good.

Trump is basically a failure who stumbled into the highest office in the world by spouting bullshit that low-browed morons believed. He was also helped by running against what was arguably the worst Democrat candidate in recent history, Hillary Clinton. Since he has accomplished little on his own and is a pathological liar, he feels entirely comfortable making up bullshit about anything and claiming he could or has done better. Of course, he also makes up shit to justify his failures (I cringe when he excused his failure to help one of America's colonies by claiming there was a "big ocean" in the way.)
He's a lying, megalomaniac cunt whose strong points are ignorance and a very large inheritance.

Expat01 says

Trump is basically a failure who stumbled into the highest office in the world by spouting bullshit that low-browed morons believed.

HE's been spouting that nonsense since the mid 80's.
And the Republicans bribed him into not running in 2012 as an Independent, by telling him they will let him run on the Republican ticket in 2016, If he did not run against Mitt Romney.
After that it was All Us, the Patriots pushing him more, than he was stumbling.

As my Black Friend always like to say. "Yeah... but Gaw Man! Couldn't Y'all pick Someone Better? I mean Come On!"

I say "We didn't pick him, He chose Us, while everyone else is trying to Destroy us. It's an easy choice, he's all America has got."

Excellent. Next step is break up he monopolies.

the US has already met the CPP goal for cutting CO2 emissions from power generation by 2022, and is closing in on the target for 2030

And yet signatories like China and India have not.

Yeah well that Dummy and is Fools are going to be around another four years. All the left has is "Y'alls a bunch of stupid Asses!"

It’s a step in the right direction. These tech companies have become too big to care what their users think of their practices. This is a less intrusive method of regulation before the big step of breaking them up with anti-trust proceedings.

Cuntiness is next to Godliness!

APOCALYPSEFUCKisShostikovitch says

No, cunt-eating is next to Godliness. You're making things up now!

It's fuck news, fair game these days.

It's more of an answer than a question.

How is it possible that Trump became President. How can this be explained ?

IT's because too many gullible

RafiMaas says

tRumpcucks lack critical thinking skills

A trillion dollars just doesn't go as far as it used to. If the nominal dollar value of the assets in your country is about $100 trillion and a small percentage wants out, there goes your dollar reserves trying to prop up your currency.

Kananaugh was never even accused of rape, clown. You must be thinking of Clinton, Fairfax, Schneiderman, or Ellison. And yes, those rapist do stick together so unlikely to see any real consequences.

Nancy Pelosi RAPED MY DOG!!! 20 years ago... RAPIST!!!!!