by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 1,085 - 1,124 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
Sorry all, I had a great one. The post (above) didn't go through. I don't have the heart to type it again. Have a Good One,
I've been doing the same actually, except it's been since 1997 when I saw housing starting to bubble :(
Granted, now I have a few hundred k liquid, but it's going to take a few more years so save enough to buy outright in the bay area.
Either way, I'm not touching anything. This market is ridiculous and is ripe for a fall.
I should add "this housing market and our economy" is ripe for a fall. I really have a bad feeling the next 10 years + are going to suck something fierce.
Decreasing prices in electronics is not deflation. Prices of electrons have steadily decreased for about 50 years, despite 50 straight years of inflation.
Can't argue with prices and Laptops, PDA's by top manufacturers as well as HDTV have never been more affordable and for the most recent models.
Oh jeez, another soothsayer that knows how EVERYTHING pans out in the next couple of years. who wins the Superbowl in 2012 ? Ok , that is three years but still valuable info regardless. Please say
Decreasing prices in electronics is not deflation. Prices of electrons have steadily decreased for about 50 years, despite 50 straight years of inflation.
LOL! Sarcasm.. thats good.. here is a blast from the past.
It cost $9K back in 89, of course it also paid everyones salary. Now the same product (netbooks) are a tiny fraction. There is no one in SV who can control prices.. not even Google or Oracle.
"TOKYO (Reuters) -- Sony Corp. posted a loss for the fourth consecutive quarter, hit by sluggish cellphone sales and as it cut prices of its PlayStation 3 game gear, but trimmed its full-year loss forecast close to market expectations.
Sony's mobile phone joint venture with Sweden's Ericsson saw its sales tumble and losses balloon as it has lacked a strong smartphone offering to rival Apple Inc.'s (AAPL, Fortune 500) iPhone and Research in Motion's (RIM) Blackberry." (which are also cheaper than a cup of Starbucks coffee)
So that's not Deflation, then what is your definition?
What is wrong with not WANTING OR NEEDING to buy crap? Can someone please tell me what is wrong with deflation? I like the fact that my dollars will buy more, even if I don't NEED what it is they can buy for less. As for houses falling in price, what is wrong with that? Don't people NEED houses? Why must houses be expensive? We need food, and yet we don't like it when that costs more; we need gasoline for our cars, and we're always whining about how expensive it is (it still seems cheap to me, but then again, I don't drive much). If a nation cannot or will not live within its means, then it gets what it deserves, and from where I sit, this whole deflation thing is a nonstarter.
Tenounce, deflation is the loss of pricing power throughout the economy. Usually happens after a credit bubble as people tighten their belts, buying fewer and fewer goods and services. Firms then lay off people and reduce production, but then there is even less buying, and then firms cut markups down to the bone from the factory to the truck to the warehouse to the point of sale… everybody hoards cash… no spending… no jobs. Company is making so little per product sold at all levels they can barely afford to service their obligations (if at all).
You rip those lines off the front news page today and yet talk about it, like it's another era.
Computers falling in price has to do with technological innovation and the increased economy of scale in production costs that comes when manufacturers are increasing supply. It’s not deflation.
My dear Thunderlips, we didnt scale production, far from it. Silicon Valley did all it could to keep prices high to rack in revenue and keep industries going given there were few players and sky high demand for information products, we certainly had incredible profits and huge demand for labor/skilled labor. Once the Japanese figured on their own to create microprocessors, harddrives, mother boards, mainframes and minis... that was it for our pricing power. The Europeans were not far behind them. You can be as 'innovative' as you like but you still have inherit deflation in tech products.
As such Japan/Taiwan/Korean entered the US markets and dropped prices forcing us to exit markets and/or ship jobs creating plenty of deflation.
Look up the last point on Japans deflation on Wiki:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deflation#Major_deflations
"Imported deflation: Japan imports Chinese and other countries' inexpensive consumable goods, raw materials (due to lower wages and fast growth in those countries). Thus, prices of imported products are decreasing. Domestic producers must match these prices in order to remain competitive. This decreases prices for many things in the economy, and thus is deflationary."
Not even Moor's law foresaw deflation. In fact "technological innovation" requires considerable amount of new capital and retooling which is expensive. As such to keep up with innovation requires cheaper labor and materials because pricing pressure still remains. We haven't had price inflation goods/services in decades.
"If that was the case, then cars are really deflated. A $360 Model A Ford is about $20k in modern dollars. For less than $20k, you can buy a Camry today. The former does not come with power windows, 10-CD changer, airbags, seatbelts, interior heating, etc. etc."
And yet, Detroit's mistake was to increase costs in labor in face of competition with lower prices from Japan.
High Tech product SV produced also had high labor costs, but they have pay limits with limitless layoffs/restructuring over the past decades.
Can you compare pre-war Toyota car prices to Toyota today without add on features?
My dear Thunderlips, we didnt scale production, far from it. Silicon Valley did all it could to keep prices high to rack in revenue and keep industries going given there were few players and sky high demand for information products, we certainly had incredible profits and huge demand for labor/skilled labor.
My dear Thomas-- Of course you scaled production. Regardless of what you can sell your product for, you still want to produce for as little as possible. So you can reap the "incredible profits" that you mention.
@nomograph
“But waitâ€, you cry. “Investments are risky!†Well, life is risky and there are no guarantees. There will always be winners and losers. Try not to be a loser.
“But waitâ€, you cry. “I read on Patrick.net that America is toast and that there will be rioting and the economy will never recover, so I’m putting all my savings into gold!†Congratulations, you are well on your way to being a loser.
I agree, however, we can all take steps to reduce our personal risk. Now is the time to reduce debt, increase savings for when those opportunities arise if your not already in a position to do so.
I'm gonna take a loan against my home and invest in real estate. Real estate ALWAYS goes up.
I agree, however, we can all take steps to reduce our personal risk. Now is the time to reduce debt, increase savings for when those opportunities arise if your not already in a position to do so.
+1
More so than since shortly after the Depression, will there have ever been a greater opportunity for "Two Mules and Goat" stories. I think with in the next year and onward for a few years, those that managed to save. Will be in an extraordinary position to find cheap niche opportunities in almost every Brick and Mortar business, as well as other private investment opportunities, that will make the fantasy Real Estate market look like a suckers bet.
The trick is going to be, having a Mule and Goat to start with. Because the banks aren't going to be in the business of actually loaning money anymore. They will just have schemes and complex financial investment vehicles that allows banks to prosper and grow, on the ebb and flow of the myriad of Zombie banks siphoning off profits through losses.
"Regardless of what you can sell your product for, you still want to produce for as little as possible. So you can reap the “incredible profits†that you mention."
Clearly you don't have any financial background and haven't worked in an competitive enterprise.
I tried to find the Steve Martin line from "let's get small" (recorded at the boarding house in San Francisco) where he talks about charging thousands of dollars per seat for his show, culiminating in the statement, "One show, I'm out."
...or some variation thereof. But I couldn't find it. It would've applied here.
« First « Previous Comments 1,085 - 1,124 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,248,949 comments by 14,891 users - AD, HANrongli online now