by Patrick ➕follow (61) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 37,173 - 37,212 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
Taxes are too low, relative to spending. And that can never resolve itself until
we pay our bills
You do realize the US didn't have income taxes for a long time? Now we tax income of even non resident citizens and scour the globe looking for Americans keeping assets in other countries. That is unless you are a corporation.
Not too surprising. Prices are back to historical averages, at least nationally.
Yep, let's raise the debt ceiling so the government can spend MORE money and write more bad checks for funds it doesn't have...
Federal Budget... we don't need no stinkin' budget!!
Or how about this: tax dividends and captical gains more so that the uber-wealthy can actually pay their fair share? Warren Buffett pays a lower tax % than you do!
Foreclosures are going up because houses in the US are TOO CHEAP®.
People refuse to pay a mortgage on something that is TOO CHEAP®.
The solution is very easy: raise property taxes on houses beyond the primary residence to triple cost. This will harm ONLY rent seekers, causing them to think twice about monopolizing the real estate market in certain urban areas. Rent seekers could get an exception to the rule by letting their properties go to rent control. They likely dump their property, thus escaping onerous taxes that eat up their rent-seeking profits, which makes housing drop precipitously. Priced-out families can now buy, and the ones who could afford to buy at higher prices have already bought, and can absorb the loss (or default as they wish).
This results in a situation like that of Texas: low housing costs for most. And THIS results in a hugely boosted economy!!!! If people weren't required to pay 30-50% of their gross income for shelter, they'd have lots more money left to buy goods and services! This would boom the economy and increase government tax receipts tremendously.
A few cuts to bloated war and NSA and we got it fixed!
If people weren't required to pay 30-50% of their gross income for shelter, they'd have lots more money left to buy goods and services! This would boom the economy and increase government tax receipts tremendously.
In a consumer spending driven economy, this would be amazing. Money could be spent on productive activities rather than finance.
How would you define the economic system under which this would take place?
A growing middle class.
Further, I just bought a new condo in Texas and have listed my house in Tucson. Should I be penalized for a slow sale of the AZ home?
If the price point was set at the market value (i.e., what someone will pay for it immediately), it would have sold before it hit the market. Once it hits the market, it has already gone through the real estate agents and is not a good buy...just waiting for the "right buyer".
Create middle class jobs by sweeping away stupid property-value protection schemes. Let people sell gum and bread out of their garage. Even in this high end neighborhood in South America, I can walk to about 5 different informal "7-11s" within 5 blocks of my house. Not to mention hair stylists and barbers. If you want to sell liquor, you just sell it. There aren't drunks walking around at all hours because they can buy whiskey in somebody's garage, which is what liquor license advocates claim.
In the US, the PVNF (Property Value Nazi Front) sics LEOs on kids selling Lemonnade or having a Bake Sale on Saturday on their driveway. Or growing tomatoes in their front yard instead of useless grass. Or having a couple of hens. Or having lawn jockeys.
The hilarious thing about PVNF is they are usually private property absolutists - until somebody does something with their property that they think 'devalues' theirs.
I deliberately look for walkable stuff near an apartment or house. I don't want to have to drive for 20 minutes just to grab eggs or bread. You have to drive, otherwise in most places you have to cross 2-3 danerous high traffic streets with 4 lanes to get somewhere. And if I can support a family-owned business instead of a corporate chain, so much the better.
Have you found someone yet to help carry that HUGE, ego driven head of yours around??
Most likely an Indonesian prostitute.
I think Republicans would argue that before they pay the bill they want the
wife to cut up the credit card.
I agree it is stupid, but it is just politics. Been going on like this (and
worse) long before you or I were born.
Wereas, the Democrats would just call the credit card company to get the
credit line raised so she could keep spending, even though they both have
minimum wage jobs at McDonalds....
While that is the conventional wisdom on the difference in parties, it is not accurate IMO. Reps spend on defense. Dems on social programs. If you look at facts, Dem Presidents increase spending at a much slower rate than Reps Presidents do.
Reps have better propaganda machines though--I'll grant that...
There are solutions: you could let inflation rise by massively taxing the
rich and spending the proceed (the Krugman solution), or you could deflate the
debt. Or a combination of the 2.
How would the money be spent and who would spend it under the proposed increased taxation?
Say hey! This was in the Wall Street Journal on March 30, 1999:
Holy cow/interesting/compelling ...!
And where is it up to date??? Right here ... see the first chart shown in this thread.
Recent Dow day is Friday, September 13, 2013 __ Level is 98.2
WOW! It is hideous that this is hidden! Is there any such "Homes, Inflation Adjusted"? Yes indeed, go here:
http://patrick.net/?p=1219038&c=999083#comment-999083
Indeed you are right, this IS like the wife spending the money then having the husband not pay it.
But what has happened is that 44% people believe that locking in the debt ceiling is the same as reducing the limit on the credit card, which is what fiscally responsible adults might do to prevent out of control spending.
So how do the American people limit the size of the shit pickle that their government is feeding them?
WellsFargo is expecting this because they havent heard there is a big recovery in housing in full swing
Yep, let's raise the debt ceiling so the government can spend MORE money and write more bad checks for funds it doesn't have...
Federal Budget... we don't need no stinkin' budget!!
Or how about this: tax dividends and captical gains more so that the uber-wealthy can actually pay their fair share? Warren Buffett pays a lower tax % than you do!
But then they will all move to Belgium or Cuba and take all their precious job creation with them. . . .
Foreclosures are going up because houses in the US are TOO CHEAP®.
People refuse to pay a mortgage on something that is TOO CHEAP®.
or if the mortgage rate is too low
Make sure when using it to spray explicit epithets from your mouth like a machine gun (technically this also is legal).
Yes it's Because of extraordinary government meddling, intervention, protectionism, fraud, lies, and more underhanded double dealing than can be mentioned that the housing market recovered before reaching market equilibrium. Who could have predicted that? Certainly I didn't see it. It wasn't until this year that I saw the system behind the system that made the second housing bubble not only likely but inevitable. There was never any doubt that the banks would not lose. That the government housing debt would not fail. That prices would have to return to bubble levels (at least in some places) so that the financial industry would get the final bail out it needed. Everything has been done. It's over.
The American people lose.
The wealthy consolidate their power, enhance their empire, and insulate themselves from future risk of any kind while creating a system of permanent impoverishment for anyone who wasn't quick enough to hop on the billionaire bus.
Certainly I didn't see it. It wasn't until this year that I saw the system
behind the system that made the second housing bubble not only likely but
inevitable.
Thank you Quigley. A reply was swimming around my head, but you put it together more eloquently.
patrick could indeed retire today if he bought a 4 bedroom home in palo alto when he was writing his book telling people what a sham buying a house is. (09? 10?)sooooooo ironic!!!!!!
Got it, so the spending continues unchecked, what happens when the ability to pay ends?
For most people there is never a link between what they want (services, wars, retirements) and the resulting debt or taxes.
There should be an official website tracking each dollar and linking each law they passed to a price tag, updated-in real time. There we would see the price of attacking Iraq. The price of social security, Obama care etc...
Its because there isn't they "buy"everything and raise the debt ceiling later
Walmart business plan is simple. Come into an area and dump products at break even or less until everyone around goes out of business.
Selling for less than cost to run competition out of business is called price dumping and I believe it's illegal in most states.
Legal or illegal, they do practice dumping cheap Chinese garbage all over the place until they run everyone out of town.
what happens when the ability to pay ends?
It doesn't, in theory. If we default on our debt we will just have to inflate even more. It's not a solution, it's macho bluster. Spending has to be reformed, but that's done outside of default.
That doesn't work anymore when the rest of the world stops buying your debt.
U.S. FORECLOSURE STARTS DECREASE 8 PERCENT IN AUGUST TO LOWEST LEVEL SINCE DECEMBER 2005
Yes foreclosures must at some point start to decrease-but just as a decrease in initial jobless claims doesn't mean any one got a job, a decrease in foreclosures doesn't mean more home sales or higher prices
http://smaulgld.com/initial-jobless-claims/
Bitter because I make enough money to buy a multimillion dollar home? Okay. Entitled because I want to get a good deal on my purchase? Okay.
some more background
http://money.cnn.com/2013/09/12/news/economy/debt-ceiling/index.html?iid=HP_LN
what happens when the ability to pay ends?
It doesn't, in theory. If we default on our debt we will just have to inflate even more. It's not a solution, it's macho bluster. Spending has to be reformed, but that's done outside of default.
That doesn't work anymore when the rest of the world stops buying your debt.
Or the Fed stops buying our debt! http://smaulgld.com/why-the-end-of-quantitative-easing-may-be-bad-for-the-dollar/
Inventories up, mortgage applications down, price reductions outnumbering price increases.
I didn't predict it either.
And there is evidence of continued "recovery" in housing?
It's over.
I was being sarcastic- I clearly predicted it back in June
Google real estate supply and demand or click here
http://smaulgld.com/the-coming-supplydemand-real-estate-inventory-reversal/
Which guy would that be, he seems to have multiple personalities??
That split personality issue is really getting out of hand ;)
It's sad to see old guys gloating about how they made like bandits by screwing the next generation, and convinced that the current outcome is a valid solution in the long term.
Imagine what shostakovich could have done with advanced technology and a drum machine
You want to be able to buy a home at a lower price.....I get it.......and you're willing to scalp the value of others' homes in order to achieve that.
The house is worth what someone will pay for it. I'm trying to "scalp" the value that is perceived by the seller.
If the price point was set at the market value (i.e., what someone will pay for it immediately), it would have sold before it hit the market.
Real estate is an illiquid highly localized commodity: it doesn't trade 24/7 on a global market like the fractional ownership of companies. There is no constant market "price" for unique custom homes like there is for an S&P contract.
But any house about to hit the market passes through the realtors' agency and his personal and business contacts. If it is set at a good investment or a good purchase price, it sells or has offers before it's even listed.
"Spraying bullets" LOL Sweet!! More Libtarb Propaganda!! Slidefire stocks have been around for years and they are lame, they look cool but that is about it..............nothing new here that is unless you are completed clueless regarding firearms...........but never the less...
I agree with Apocalype...........every ASSHOLE should have at least 12 of these "Redneck Machinegun" Stocks!
« First « Previous Comments 37,173 - 37,212 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,251,322 comments by 14,921 users - Patrick, porkchopXpress online now