by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 43,147 - 43,186 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
ou tried to brag that you were an "expat," a specfic use of the term that is popular among the various local Chambers of Commerce overseas where the organizers wish to commingle both the western citizenship holders and the ones who actually have legally expatriated.
Now I know you have been taking lessons from the captain in creating incoherent posts.
The term expat is used around the world to describe people who have retired abroad or professionals working abroad (as opposed to laborers who are referred to as immigrant workers). It's got nothing to do with giving up citizenship (although expats can obviously do that if they have another citizenship) and it certainly has zero to do with chamber of commerce. Everyone understands the term and usage except you for some reason. That's really odd as you are trying to claim you've worked abroad, I don't think so.
Because you can carry enough of it in a small bag that will feed your family
for a year.
Your family eats gold?
Of course it did:
Oil going from $10/bbl (2001) to $140(2007), to $40(2009), to $100 (now) meant:
dollar going from 1/10bbl to 1/140bbl to 1/40bbl, to 1/100bbl at those time points.
Simple arithmetics.
I'm curious what relevance that has to a comment about gold not being a stable store of value.
Good grief. I said no-one I'd ever met had spouted the sort of economic viewpoints you favour on here. Of what relevance is a bunch of economists' books to that comment?
You have not met me in person either. What do the people you have met in person have any relevance anyway?
I wasn't shown anything by you. You were and are the one trying to misrepresent what I said. I know no-one who espouses your views. That's just a statement of fact on my part. What has that got to do with what I know or don't know about a school of economics that you believe in? And where exactly did I try to 'brag' about being an expat? And expat is common terminology around the world for people working abroad. Your nonsense about Chambers of Commerce has little to no relevance to the day-to-day usage of the word.
If you really know no-one sharing my views, then you are just proving your own ignorance regarding various economic thoughts. While I don't agree with Keynesianism, it would certainly be proof of ignorance if someone claims to have never heard of the basic tenets of Keynesiansim.
You bragged about yourself being "expat" for 20 years. "Expat" in your so-called "day-to-day usage" signifies a privileged position in the local economy promoted by the local "expat" Chambers of Commerce around the world.
No, you responded to a post where I said I neither worked with or for the chamber of commerce by playing a very obvious and childish game of saying 'oh but I didn't say FOR, did I? I said you worked WITH it.' Your stupid little gotcha game doesn't wash.
There was no game involved. I used the correct preposition, and you insisted on misinterpreting it and accuse me of something that I never said.
Out of interest, you aren't Homeboy, are you? You seem to have a very similar approach.
No. Homeboy and I had several debates on his favorite subject on healthcare.
You don't discuss those topics with friends? I can relate to avoiding discussion of religion, but people talk constantly about politics over here. As for in depth conversations about economics, well I guess that entirely depends on what you are referring to.
Politics are only touched in polite company when both parties know they already share the same view . . . hence my earlier reference to "echo chamber." If you think your shared view is the only one out there, you'd be sadly mistaken. Friends do get into heated debates on politics from different views don't stay friends for long.
Really? Maybe for new arrivals or people staying for a short time. Once you make actual friends rather than mere business acquaintances, you discuss what you find important to you, do you not? The locals here don't sit around diwaniyas for hours on end avoiding contention. They bloody love it.
So why don't they have fights on religion? See comment above.
I never implied anything, I just posted the exact same article link that you
did,
Sorry loser, but you TRIED to post links (but they are all dead links) from
January news releases instead of February.... There is a difference...
LOL, I did a search with 'Businessweek homebuilder confidence' and those(obviously many others too) came up and all I did was copy and paste them here in my post. There's one from 1/2013, one from 1/2014, and one from 2/2014. I posted them to annoy you, and it did, mainly because you read numerous things into it, and all I said was that they all used the same source(NAHB homebuilder confidence poll), which they did. Idiot.
So, if they're dead links, how the heck did you click on them then to start off on (another)your insinuating rant? Do you even BOTHER to think before you type?
Hmmm, you also need spell check, but that's even above your pay grade...
You're right, and it's because I don't know how to type, so if there was a way that I knew about to do spell check, I surely would do it because it's annoying to even me. Thanks for stating the obvious, dipshit.
LOL, I post the exact same article link that YOU did, and NOW it's useless. This is after you claim the drastic weather this year has had no impact on anything, then you go and post the OP that it confirms that it has, and then today you contradict yourself AGAIN, and try and claim that it hasn't. Idiot.
DO you even have the slightest clue as to WHY home building shuts down in the winter/freezing temps other than it's just cold to work in and employee production drops?
I doubt it, but give it a shot anyway, I need some Friday entertainment.
You have not met me in person either. What do the people you have met in person have any relevance anyway?
Do you have a point? And they obviously have relevance to my comment about never having MET anyone who holds your views...
If you really know no-one sharing my views, then you are just proving your own ignorance regarding various economic thoughts.
It's doing no such thing. I've never met a Roman before, but I know quite a lot about the history of that time. I've also never met a nazi, but I've read a great deal on that particular period in history as well, and on and on I could go. You appear to be conflating 'never met' with 'never heard.' They aren't the same thing, are they?
There was no game involved. I used the correct preposition, and you insisted on misinterpreting it and accuse me of something that I never said.
Err, I didn't misrepresent it at all. I made a point of remarking about exactly what you were doing by capitalizing the FOR.
Politics are only touched in polite company when both parties know they already share the same view . . . hence my earlier reference to "echo chamber." If you think your shared view is the only one out there, you'd be sadly mistaken. Friends do get into heated debates on politics from different views don't stay friends for long.
You must live a very sheltered life.
So why don't they have fights on religion? See comment above.
Why do you think I don't discuss religion? I live in the Middle East. Are you seriously that naive?
You bragged about yourself being "expat" for 20 years. "Expat" in your so-called "day-to-day usage" signifies a privileged position in the local economy promoted by the local "expat" Chambers of Commerce around the world.
Er, all foreigners are second class citizens in the Arab world. And there you go again about the local Chambers of Commerce. You seem to have tunnel vision.
You bragged about yourself being "expat" for 20 years. "Expat" in your so-called "day-to-day usage" signifies a privileged position in the local economy promoted by the local "expat" Chambers of Commerce around the world.
You have absolutely now clue what you are talking about.
OK, I'll give it a shot....
Just as I thought, you're f-n clueless.
Try again, though without the circle-jerk theatrics.
The original Patnet forum was day by day, blow by blow, response to that moron's shenanigans.
Did you ever hear of Copy and Paste???
Hey genius, did you read the part where I said that I copied and pasted the results of the search?
You really are dense, aren't you.
Do you even BOTHER to think before you type?
You know, I really wonder that about you????????????
I asked previously, and you just provided an excellent example of not thinking before typing. Way to go, you showed me.
The term expat is used around the world to describe people who have retired abroad or professionals working abroad (as opposed to laborers who are referred to as immigrant workers).
It's got nothing to do with giving up citizenship (although expats can obviously do that if they have another citizenship) and it certainly has zero to do with chamber of commerce.
"Expats" and "expat" chambers of commerce have been in existence since long before "retirement" became a part of life for most people.
Everyone understands the term and usage except you for some reason. That's really odd as you are trying to claim you've worked abroad, I don't think so.
I understand the term quite well, both the legal meaning of it and how the chambers of commerce overseas promote it. I worked abroad, then the "abroad" became my home country, then I have worked several different "abroads" of various durations, including some to my country of birth as "abroad" because my home country changed. You can say that I actually expatriated from my country of birth in the legal sense.
You have not met me in person either. What do the people you have met in person have any relevance anyway?
Do you have a point? And they obviously have relevance to my comment about never having MET anyone who holds your views...
Why did even bother to bring up what you have met in person? If your point was strictly about what you have met in person? We are not meeting in person. You were obviously trying to make the point that my points of view were strange. In that case, your lack of exposure to them only signifies your ignorance.
Homebuilder Confidence in U.S. Slumped in February
How shocking! Builders need to counter the "Bankers/Investors" nexus.
You must live a very sheltered life.
Very funny. I have been living on my own (often having to provide shelter to others) since when I was 14years old.
So why don't they have fights on religion? See comment above.
Why do you think I don't discuss religion? I live in the Middle East. Are you seriously that naive?
Because you only mentioned the locals love to discuss politics when I mentioned the usual taboo on debating religion and politics in polite company. How often do you engage in civilized debates on religions with your friends? Is that an echo chambers or guns blazing, literally?
Er, all foreigners are second class citizens in the Arab world. And there you go again about the local Chambers of Commerce. You seem to have tunnel vision.
"Second class citizens" is a very highly privileged position when the society has 4-5 different classes, with only the ruling class as the first class citizens. The average (non-monopolistic) local traders would be below you, the average local laborers would be lower still, then the women, then the imported laborers from 3rd world countries.
"Second class citizens" is a very highly privileged position when the society has 4-5 different classes, with only the ruling class as the first class citizens. The average (non-monopolistic) local traders would be below you, the average local laborers would be lower still, then the women, then the imported laborers from 3rd world countries.
You don't know what you are talking about. Expats are second class citizens to ALL Kuwaitis. Obviously, you can then sub-divide the respective locals and foreigners, but that wasn't my point.
Why did even bother to bring up what you have met in person? If your point was strictly about what you have met in person? We are not meeting in person. You were obviously trying to make the point that my points of view were strange. In that case, your lack of exposure to them only signifies your ignorance.
No, it doesn't. It signifies that of the people I know and have met none of them hold your particular economic views.
Because you only mentioned the locals love to discuss politics when I mentioned the usual taboo on debating religion and politics in polite company. How often do you engage in civilized debates on religions with your friends? Is that an echo chambers or guns blazing, literally?
What are you blathering on about? I'd happily talk about religion (and have) with foreigners in other parts of the world. Here not so much for reasons that should be obvious to you.
"Second class citizens" is a very highly privileged position when the society has 4-5 different classes, with only the ruling class as the first class citizens. The average (non-monopolistic) local traders would be below you, the average local laborers would be lower still, then the women, then the imported laborers from 3rd world countries.
You don't know what you are talking about. Expats are second class citizens to ALL Kuwaitis. Obviously, you can then sub-divide the respective locals and foreigners, but that wasn't my point.
So are you required to cover your face in public? Were people like you not allowed to drive a car before 1991? (women in Kuwait). 2/3 to 3/4 of the people living in Kuwait are not Kuwaitis! Like I said, "2nd class citizen" in that society means you are above the next 3-4 different classes, second only to the ruling elite.
Why did even bother to bring up what you have met in person? If your point was strictly about what you have met in person? We are not meeting in person. You were obviously trying to make the point that my points of view were strange. In that case, your lack of exposure to them only signifies your ignorance.
No, it doesn't. It signifies that of the people I know and have met none of them hold your particular economic views.
Since we are not meeting in person, why did you bother to bring that up? Except as a way of saying how strange my economic views are. They are strange to you because you are ignorant.
What are you blathering on about? I'd happily talk about religion (and have) with foreigners in other parts of the world. Here not so much for reasons that should be obvious to you.
So how many religious debates have you (presumably a Christian or agonostic/atheist??) had with the local Wahabist tribesman? Zero? Why do you think that's the case?
So are you required to cover your face in public? Were people like you not allowed to drive a car before 1991? (women in Kuwait). 2/3 to 3/4 of the people living in Kuwait are not Kuwaitis! Like I said, "2nd class citizen" in that society means you are above the next 3-4 different classes.
Let me guess, you are now going to 'educate' me about life in present day Kuwait. Don't bother. And I know how many foreigners there are. I live here. And what has driving a car before '91 got to do with anything? Oh, and obviously I'm not going to list every sub group and say this person is socially higher than that person, so don't waste your time going down that path. It was obvious what I meant. Foreigners are considered to be beneath the local citizens. Certain foreigners are obviously more 'privileged' than other foreigners but as a group we do not have the rights, influence or power that any Kuwaiti can call upon in this society. You would understand that if you lived here, but instead you google a few facts and then think you can tell me what life is like in a country that I've lived in for more than a decade. Like I said, don't waste your time.
Oh, let me guess, you are now going to 'educate' me about life in present day Kuwait. Don't bother. And I know how many foreigners there are. I live here. And what has driving a car before '91 got to do with anything? I'm not going to list every sub group and say this person is socially higher than that person, so don't waste your time going down that path. It was obvious what I meant. Foreigners are considered to be beneath the local citizens. Certain foreigners are obviously more 'privileged' than other foreigners but as a group we do not have the rights, influence or power that any Kuwaiti can call upon in this society. You would understand that if you lived here, but instead you google a few facts and then think you can tell me what life is like in a country that I've lived in for more than a decade. Like I said, don't waste your time.
"Local citizens" in Kuwait means 1/4 to 1/3 of the population. Half of that small fraction are women, which makes them second class to men in that society's tradition. You are not going to bamboozle me with "all foreigners are 2nd class citizens in Kuwait" because I know that the overwhelming majority of the population in that country are "foreigners." I did a research paper on that country just before Saddam Hussein invaded it. I don't need to waste time googling.
So how many religious debates have you (presumably a Christian or agonostic/atheist??) had with the local Wahabist tribesman? Zero? Why do you think that's the case?
Are you deliberately being a moron? That is the bloody point I've been making. I DON'T discuss religion here for bloody obvious reasons. Exactly how many times have I now said that? Do I really need to spell it out for you?
Since we are not meeting in person, why did you bother to bring that up? Except as a way of saying how strange my economic views are. They are strange to you because you are ignorant.
Really. So because I find your economic views strange, I'm ignorant. Is that right? So presumably because I view support of fascism to be strange, I'm ignorant. Or religious fundamentalism, or...
Since we are not meeting in person, why did you bother to bring that up? Except as a way of saying how strange my economic views are. They are strange to you because you are ignorant.
Really. So because I find your economic views strange, I'm ignorant. Is that right? So presumably because I view support of fascism to be strange, I'm ignorant. Or religious fundamentalism, or...
There is nothing strange about religious fundamentalism or fascism. They are distasteful and repugnant, but not strange. Both have been practiced and even made into main stream in numerous countries on numerous occasions. What do you think the government sponsored corporatism is? It is fascism.
"Local citizens" in Kuwait means 1/4 to 1/3 of the population. Half of that small fraction are women, which makes them second class to men in that society's tradition. You are not going to bamboozle me with "all foreigners are 2nd class citizens in Kuwait" because I know that the overwhelming majority of the population in that country are "foreigners." I did a research paper on that country just before Saddam Hussein invaded it. I don't need to waste time googling.
What difference does it make how many foreigners are here? Foreigners are second class citizens to Kuwaitis. Just as foreigners are lower down the food chain in all the other Gulf countries. And what was the topic of the paper? Apparently not the status of foreigners in Kuwait.
There is nothing strange about religious fundamentalism or fascism. They are distasteful and repugnant, but not strange. Both have been practiced and even made into main stream in numerous countries on numerous occasions. What do you think the government sponsored corporatism is? It is fascism.
Why don't you give your pedantic little word games a rest?
I ask you this:
upisdown says
DO you even have the slightest clue as to WHY home building shuts down in the
winter/freezing temps other than it's just cold to work in and employee
production drops?
I doubt it, but give it a shot anyway, I need some Friday
entertainment.
You then respond with:Call it Crazy says
Builder confidence declined in all four U.S. regions, led by a 14-point
plunge in the West to the lowest level since June.(I guess snow in CA can
cause that) The index dropped nine points in the Midwest to 50, the weakest
reading since May. In the South, the measure decreased to a nine-month low of
46, while sentiment among builders in the Northeast fell eight points.
Hmmm... "led by a 14 point plunge in the West to the lowest level since
June"...
Yeah, it's really tough to build in those western and southern states because
of the snow and cold.... (that snow in June sucks too)...
You freely admit above(although by a lame attempt at being sarcastic) that apparently there's no snow and aparently no freezing temps in California.
So, I then posted the response below to give you another chance at showcasing your vast amounts of housing knowledge:
Try again, though without the circle-jerk theatrics.
And this is what you post:
Are you going to continue today to show us how much of a true asshole you are
with these fucked up comments of yours???
OK, I'll give it a shot....
Just as I thought, you're f-n clueless.
Try again, though without the circle-jerk theatrics.
I rest my case....
So, beyond any shadow of a doubt, you have absolutely NO idea why home building shuts down in the winter, or at the very least to a crawl, because of the bitter cold and freezing temps, do you?
C'mon, at least a wild guess or maybe even making something up and running with it non-stop like you do about everything else. Hell, I'll even give you a big hint.......moisture, or lack of.
What difference does it make how many foreigners are here? Foreigners are second class citizens to Kuwaitis. Just as foreigners are lower down the food chain in all the other Gulf countries.
It makes a huge difference: "second class citizens" in the context of Kuwait means #2 ranking in a system that has 4-5 different ranks on the power pyramid. Western "expats" have been the technocrats running those societies on behalf of the ruling elite for a century now.
And what was the topic of the paper? Apparently not the status of foreigners in Kuwait.
It's hard not to touch upon the unusual demographics and the political/economic ramifications of "foreigners" in Kuwait. "Foreigners" make up for the vast majority of the population in that country.
There is nothing strange about religious fundamentalism or fascism. They are distasteful and repugnant, but not strange. Both have been practiced and even made into main stream in numerous countries on numerous occasions. What do you think the government sponsored corporatism is? It is fascism.
Why don't you give your pedantic little word games a rest?
Words convey meanings; they also reflect the knowledge and capacity of the person who put those words together.
I did a research paper on that country just before Saddam Hussein invaded it.
Are you sure it wasn't a book report? Did you have to stand up in front of the class?
Words convey meanings and reflect the knowledge and capacity of the person who put those words together.
Indeed, and this is an online forum where the general intent of what a person means doesn't need to be parsed in the manner that you seem intent on doing. You play silly little word games while seeming to be oblivious to the fact that much of what you're arguing is simply wrong.
It makes a huge difference: "second class citizens" in the context of Kuwait means #2 ranking in a system that has 4-5 different ranks on the power pyramid. Western "expats" have been the technocrats running those societies on behalf of the ruling elite for a century now.
Oh, give me strength.
Reality says
And what was the topic of the paper? Apparently not the status of foreigners in Kuwait.
It's hard not to touch upon the unusual demographics and the political/economic ramifications of "foreigners" in Kuwait. "Foreigners" make up for the vast majority of the population in that country.
I'm not sure what relevance that response has to what I said. What exactly do you think your remark demonstrates and what was your paper on?
I did a research paper on that country just before Saddam Hussein invaded it.
Are you sure it wasn't a book report? Did you have to stand up in front of the class?
No. It was a term paper. I had to go through more than a dozen books to write the paper.
I did a research paper on that country just before Saddam Hussein invaded it.
Are you sure it wasn't a book report? Did you have to stand up in front of the class?
No. It was a term paper. I had to go through more than a dozen books to write the paper.
A term paper. A dozen books. What was it on?
Words convey meanings and reflect the knowledge and capacity of the person who put those words together.
Indeed, and this is an online forum where the general intent of what a person means doesn't need to be parsed in the manner that you seem intent on doing. You play silly little word games while seeming to be oblivious to the fact that much of what you're arguing is simply wrong.
I use precise words to convey precise meanings. I do not use phrases like "2nd class citizen" to mislead people, who general do not know #2 is a high ranking in a society that has 4-5 different ranks on the pyramid.
And what was the topic of the paper? Apparently not the status of foreigners in Kuwait.
It's hard not to touch upon the unusual demographics and the political/economic ramifications of "foreigners" in Kuwait. "Foreigners" make up for the vast majority of the population in that country.
I'm not sure what relevance that response has to what I said. What exactly do you think your remark demonstrates and what was your paper on?
The paper was on Kuwait. Writing a paper on Kuwait naturally had to cover its unusual demographics of 2/3 - 3/4 of the population being foreigners.
The class was on society, culture and religions of the Middle East. Each student was allowed to pick a different country and write the term paper on that country. I happened to have picked Kuwait (because someone had beat me to claiming Israel), a few months before Kuwait was invaded and became headline news day and night every day!
BTW, if you want to know what _debating_ politics would be like among real life friends, take a look at the "dislikes" dished out around here.
The paper was on Kuwait. Writing a paper on Kuwait naturally had to cover its unusual demographics of 2/3 - 3/4 of the population are foreigners.
The class was on society, culture and religions of the Middle East. Each student was allowed to pick a country and write the term paper on the country. I happened to have picked Kuwait, a few months before it was invaded!
Hmmm, naturally...
And the demographics aren't especially unusual for the Gulf. Only 17% of the population are locals in the UAE for example.
« First « Previous Comments 43,147 - 43,186 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,249,074 comments by 14,896 users - Onvacation, zzyzzx online now