by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 78,458 - 78,497 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
APOCALYPSEFUCK_is_ADORABLE says
Uber is a typical FUCK! EVERYONE! IN! THE! ASS! Silicon Valley race to dump the lie on the ASSHOLES! at the IPO
When you say it, it sounds much cooler; ThomasWong1986 used to say the same thing, albeit not specifically about uber.
APOCALYPSEFUCK_is_ADORABLE says
Take a cab and encourage the driver to flip the bird at Uber drivers with you while shouting "Travis sucks my dick! Hey!"
Yes Travis is much worse than the russian mobsters who bought most of the medallions in NYC with ill-gotten cash.
"No. You are, via trump and your tax dollars..."
I think you meant "we are" and "our tax dollars"
"Nevada - there's no way to verify because they don't check for ID at the polling booth"
And.... that's BS. They typically ask for an ID and always ask for a signature. A signature is good enough to prove ID for legal papers, credit cards, checks, etc.
I guess a signature is not good enough to prove ID to vote though?
And.... that's BS. They typically ask for an ID and always ask for a signature. A signature is good enough to prove ID for legal papers, credit cards, checks, etc.
JJJ: No ID, picture or non-picture ID, is required to vote in Nevada. If you know they are asking people, it ought to be reported to the state because it's not legal.
https://ballotpedia.org/Voter_identification_laws_by_state
"I'm all for voter ID, but it has to be done Legally."
JJJ: No ID, picture or non-picture ID, is required to vote in Nevada. If you know they are asking people, it ought to be reported to the state because it's not legal. https://ballotpedia.org/Voter_identification_laws_by_state "I'm all for voter ID, but it has to be done Legally."
It's done. But you didn't address the main point. Why doesn't a signature suffice as an ID?
And.... that's BS. They typically ask for an ID and always ask for a signature. A signature is good enough to prove ID for legal papers, credit cards, checks, etc.
I guess a signature is not good enough to prove ID to vote though?
If you've ever bought a car or a house (which I doubt) you'd know that getting a loan for either requires you prove your identity usually with a state issued ID or a passport. Signatures are just a way to certify agreement of the details of a contract. They've never been a form of ID, too easy to fake!
, North Carolina, et. al, they've found huge issues with voters illegally purged from the registered voting rolls
You mean like the Democrats did to Brooklyn voters right before the New York primary? And the media reporting a Clinton win before California primary voting day to discourage Bernie voters from voting? For every sketchy Republican voter tactic I'll give you two outright frauds committed by Democrats, usually against their own.
Get off the plantation, joey! You're a good House ( )igger and all, but yo' massah don't appreciate you!
No, I meant "you".
I picked that up from your original comment below. See what you started?
"No. You are, via trump and your tax dollars..."
I think you meant "we are" and "our tax dollars"
But you're going to put iris scanning in every polling place in the US?
If you have to ask this question, you don't deserve an answer...
But you didn't address the main point. Why doesn't a signature suffice as an ID?
It's done. But you didn't address the main point. Why doesn't a signature suffice as an ID?
How do you know who is signing it? Since you neither need to show picture or non-picture ID, what do they have to compare it to?
Maybe if you sign your DMV forms, you don't need to carry your driver's license. If you sign your employee form, why do you need to show a badge? They can just ask you to sign!
Let's do this at the TSA Check-in. "I don't have picture ID, but I can sign something."
"You mean like the Democrats did to Brooklyn voters right before the New York primary? And the media reporting a Clinton win before California primary voting day to discourage Bernie voters from voting? For every sketchy Republican voter tactic I'll give you two outright frauds committed by Democrats, usually against their own.
Get off the plantation, joey! You're a good House ( )igger and all, but yo' massah don't appreciate you!"
Yep--exactly like that. It was wrong when it happened in the NY primary and it's doubly wrong when it happens in NC and FA during a Presidential election. How about we both agree that this practice sucks and keep it from happening again? And admit that it's a much bigger problem than supposed illegals voting.
As to the media--I think the opposite is true. Reporting a Clinton win will keep lazy Clinton voters at home because they think she doesn't really need their vote.
Hey JJJ, should we allow signatures for buying beer and cigarettes?
"Sure, I'm 21 Mistah. Lookee, I can sign my very own name"
"Good enough for me, young fellah. We take people at their word here. After all, this ain't Putler Land, but 'Murica, the good ol' US of A. Eat your oatmeal and avoid diabeetus."
Are you required to show the id every time you make a payment?
False analogy! The bank doesn't care who makes the payment as long as they get paid!
Using your vote is more like using your bank account. It's a right that belongs to you and nobody else with your voter Registration. If someone else accesses your bank account and withdraws your money you'd said fraud! Same when someone uses your vote.
Honestly this is such a DUH issue I'm amazed you butt holes have the stones to present such a lame argument! But then I've heard that Leftist thought causes brain damage.
"Individual votes don't count if they're illegal aliens."
Yep. And recounts in Nevada, Michigan, and everywhere else they've ever done them has found ZERO evidence of any measureable amount of illegal alien voting. But, in Florida, North Carolina, et. al, they've found huge issues with voters illegally purged from the registered voting rolls.
If you want to point at voter fraud, you should be point at Republicans.
Do a recount in California.
We require gov't ID to drive, buy alcohol, enter a bar/casino, etc., but not to vote? Anyone who argues against that is fucking retarded. It makes me embarrassed to be human.
The concept of the electoral college is a check and balance to protect against one way of retarded groupthink dominating the country. A great example of this is California, where so many residents are brainwashed into certain Leftist thinking that makes no sense as CA tries to build a dependent, socialist society. Lazy humans will take the easy way out and will vote Left to ensure their welfare lifestyle continues, and upper class liberals will vote Left out of media-imposed guilt and trendiness. As more residents move to California, more and more people are infected with this brainwashing thereby yielding more popular votes in favor of such ridiculousness.
A true democracy doesn't exist for this very reason. Humans are insecure and needy by nature, which means they will attach themselves to what's popular in their particular circles as well as to what politically and financially serves them, vs having the courage to assess issues or candidates objectively on their merits as to what's right for the country.
If we get rid of the electoral college, we'd have to get rid of the way we have the Senate and the House because both houses are built on the same concept of keeping highly populous states and municipalities from overrunning the rest with potentially harmful ideas such as CA hating and voting to tax coal, or Ohio hating and voting to tax entertainment, or Oregon hating and voting to tax oil, or New York hating and voting to tax tech companies.
So are you saying we need to redo the way the House and Senate are structured? Based on your thesis, we should do a "Prop" system (i.e., popular vote) for all federal laws, vs the representation model.
IHL TSA Beast, fingering third world gumma with used glove and getting squirt of gushing, stinky yellow pus in eye: Priceless!
The TSA is selling the IHL gloves with the best bouquet on the open market in chilled containers with small electric bulbs to heat them again to optimal fragrance, a cigar and cognac. Shameless.
This pussy grabbing is getting out of hand. Or in hand. I'm confused.
"Despite the incident, the students from Center High School went on to win the game, 66-62"
Thank goodness. That must have been extremely satisfying.
Where are the media stories about MTV "News" running a segment telling White Guys What Resolutions to make for New Year's?
That wasn't a few guys at one schools' ballgame, but a national cable channel that primarily focuses on 12-14 year olds.
The OP isn't fake news but it's a great example of the media covering a few white rascists, but completely ignoring anti-white racism and misandry aimed at children on a major network that is utterly explicitly racist.
There was plenty of racism, mostly among the left. A little on the right, I agree. The nutty "entryist" plot of Stormfags, NeoReax, and the hard right of the alt-right went down in flames within hours of the election. Spencer only got 200 attendees despite the alt-right being a subject of big news coverage these past few months, and many of those were media.
There are fewer people in White Supremacist groups than in the Church of Satan.
There was also plenty of classism by professionals and elites against the (white) working class.
Finally, millions of whites that turned out for Obama stayed home or voted for Trump. How does the Media and Shitty Candidate Apologists explain that away by racism.
Man, bib overalls are really all the rage there right ?
Nevermind - I guess it was "farmer night" that they were dressed up for.
They do the same thing to white teams.
The Warrensburg district's superintendent Scott Patrick said in an interview with the Star that the tradition of the student section turning its back on the opposing team is a longstanding one, but that this incident was different.
This incident was different only because the legacy press is so hungry for self-justification in the face of defeat.
This incident was different only because the legacy press is so hungry for self-justification in the face of defeat.
Or maybe something about the Trump sign being held up, against an all black team, given that White supremacists, KKK etc, backed Trump. This is more than a month after the election, so what is the Trump sign supposed to mean ?
Please explain it to us Patrick.
how is trump blamed because one of the idiots brought a trump sign? how do we know the butthurt democrats or Soros didn't stage this to begin with? after all the corruption scandals that led to the republican party dominating the WH, the house and senate?
these "trump disaster" stories are getting old fast.
sounds like the media is extremely desperate and running out of materials to keep the delusional liberals occupied with fantasies of how trump is going to be a big failure.
without stupid stories like these the liberal can't function for the whole day. NEED NEW TRUMP DISASTER STORY NOW FOR MY DAILY COMMUTE NOW NOW NOW.
Let my try to explain.
It's really very simple
IGNORANT REDNECK WHITE TRASH!
What's funny about Yasmin is that she was lying to cover up why she wasn't back home in time for her Curfew.
Because the Hijab and Islam is compatible with progressive feminism, with adult women having curfews.
It's painful to see how divided this nation is. Let me be clear....
-Trump is going bend the nation over and have his way with it.
-Hillary would have also screwed the nation.. maybe somewhat slower and with more PC'ness.
Google Mark Blyth...he explains how the establishment has been screwing over Americans for the last 30 years. This includes both the democrat and republican administrations.
Meanwhile everyone continues to bicker....
ALL 62+ MILLION Trump voters are racists..
Why post something that everyone knows?
Fucking racists. Hey, some of Trump racist voters are Black.
That's not true. States would lose representation because in your fantasy land, a few states would overrun the rest. Remember what I said about groupthink? You'd also lose the competition and diversity of ideas that all 50 states contribute to.
Question for all....Do we as a country need States? why not just have counties and cities? What real purpose do States serve?
Question for all....Do we as a country need States? why not just have counties and cities? What real purpose do States serve?
Good question. I think States exist to allow different ideas and laws to co-exist under one nation. Having all laws be applied to the entire national population would create too much national bitterness and divisiveness. Today, the federal gov't has way too much power IMO, which is why the country is so pissed and divided every time a President gets elected. If we drastically reduced power at the federal level and left more power to the states and municipalities (like it used to be), the country wouldn't be so pissed.
Boy, that doesn't look like a digital photograph.
What year was this?
When was the last act of fatal terrorism committed by a KKK group?
Who and when was the most fatalities of any terror attack in US history for what reason?
Who and when took part in the worst shooting in US History for what reason?
How long ago were they?
Thanks for your answers in advance. Just want to keep things in perspective.
#4. 90% of blacks voting Democrat, regardless of the candidate because they know their check comes from a white man. The same can be said about unions.
« First « Previous Comments 78,458 - 78,497 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,248,450 comments by 14,886 users - Nebulosious online now