by Patrick ➕follow (61) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 78,932 - 78,971 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
besides the FAKE party narrative...
You're pretty far gone when what all intelligent informed people consider to be the truth is a "fake party narrative" and Russian propaganda is what you trust .
Did I hear you say again " Where is the proof" Ah, see the CIA report at . For your convenience keep on repeating this loop forever
Nowhere in the report does it definitively prove Russia hacked the elections, hell it's not even what the report is really about.
Yep, no Proof. It's substantially about Russia Today. In fact part of it is a recycled 2012 report.
CNN and MSNBC and Fox and Breitbart interfere with our Election. Every tweet from some Euro SJW saying "Never Trump!" and "Remain!" is interfering with others' elections.
Obama interfered with Brexit and Israeli 2015 Elections - openly.
The FBI never saw the DNC Server - it relied wholly on the Contractor the DNC hired after the leaks came out - Crowdstrike's analysis. The CIA apparently has not seen the server.
You may also remember the DNC rejected the FBI's offer to provide security earlier on in the campaign, BEFORE the DNC leaks came out.
The Democrats - with GOPe permawar advocates Graham, Ryan, and McCain - are desperate to distract from their failure of a campaign, and blame Russia for more Warbucks, since the US Public deosn't want more MENA intervention and Big Business doesn't want Chinese imports stopped.
We could start a war with Germany...
Why argue with Marcus? If you win, he will just put you on ignore and learn nothing whatsoever. He's the stupidest fuck who ever fucked a stump.
The election is over. Enough of this shit.
Anyone wanna go in half on a Cessna with me?
At this point Obama would spit on our faces, he's that little man now, that does petty things.
Who are you going to believe the Guy who exposes corruption or the Organization that has been mind fucking the world for 80 years.
Thank you TPB.
Hahahahaha. Would leaking of the debate questions qualify as hacked by the Russians?
At this point Obama would spit on our faces, he's that little man now, that does petty things.
Sadly this is true. I thought there was a chance he would go out with class. Then he resorted to hissy fits and tantrums. Class act all the way.
Why should a fellow human's cough make me sick? Especially when they are 8000 miles away.
But if the hacking by our ardent enemy does not make you sick to the stomach
And you really love Trump or hate Obama to the core. But if the hacking by our ardent enemy does not make you sick to the stomach, you are not American but you are a Russian troll ( as seen from the CIA report) . Prove it to me that you are in America.
Where in the report did they say Russians changed the election results?
By how many points in which states? Where is the hard evidence, not "Oh, Russia uses Phishing attacks (like literally ALL other hackers)."
Did the intelligence agencies personally investigate the server, or are they reliant from a 'report' from a DNC Contractor?
Just a parting gift from Clap-off, like an asshole kicked out of a party, he's gotta break some shit or slash some tires on the way out.
Prove it to me that you are in America.
Prove it to me this isn't a McCarthyist Witch Hunt, pony up some non-circumstantial evidence.
I watch RT. Goodness gracious, Thom Hartmann is on RT. Max Keiser, too. Pointing out that the USA is run by banksters is not high treason. In fact, quite the opposite.
Did you read the report Russian, We have you guys now. You will run out of money in 2017
You sure haven't, or you wouldn't be pushing people to read it.
"RT sympathetically reported on Occupy Wall Street years ago. It's PROOF the Russians hate America and hacked the 2016 Elections!"
Jesus, how much sympathetic reporting was there about Pussy Riot for trespassing in a church, assaulting the Clerics, screaming obscenities, etc.?
Left out was the Frozen Chicken up the Vagina in a Public Supermarket and the time they booked a space under false pretences in the Biology Museum to have an orgy in front of the Public. If Americans had known that, they would have been like "Oh, they're just Russian version of our anarcho-feminist SJW hysterical asshole types."
In LibbyWorld, calling someone a "monkey" is racist because either "a", libbies are science deniers not accepting evolution makes monkeys of us all, or "b", they are ashamed of their ancestral heritage, having been spawned from the hairy shit stained loins of jungle vermin...
Given that libbies have declared anyone born american guilty of slavery that occurred over 200 years ago, I'm putting my money on "b"...
So it's ok to call Trump an orangutan, but calling obama a monkey is racist?
Oh Marcus, you're the perfect example of believing in Unicorns:
Idiot doesn't get it, unless the media he reads successfully regulates the internet, the MSM is going to have to get better st telling the truth.
Marcus is a moron who pretty much quotes articles from MSM outlets verbatim and never asks questions like: what are they failing to disclose?
So it's ok to call Trump an orangutan, but calling obama a monkey is racist? These damn PC rules are confusing.
That's called liberal logic.
So then that makes her untruthfulness, dishonesty, lying about it to the news media, and perjury to Congress OK, since "most" aren't aware???
That is what he believes but he's such a pussy that if asked point blank he will deny or attempt to change subject
s this just your brand of click-bait or are you really afraid? Afraid for your life? Afraid of losing some money (numbers on a screen)? Afraid of losing your "freedoms"? What exactly are you afraid of? It would help us better understand you.
Many theories abound, my personal theory is he can't comprehend how iron man got best of him I. Predicting this election.
One guy was using polls; the other was showing how the polls were lying through the use of oversampling.
One completely ignored social media and 'fake news' and the other showed that Clinton was heavily propped up by DNC long before any conclusive evidence came up, as evidenced by social media presence and turnout at events for both candidates
One completely ignored social media and 'fake news' and the other showed that Clinton was heavily propped up by DNC long before any conclusive evidence came up, as evidenced by social media presence and turnout at events for both candidates
Don't forget the pitiful attendance at her rallies, which was pointed out endlessly and dismissed as 'no indicator' endlessly. Apparently it was one.
She also had very high negatives, with the added baggage of being a politician. You could point to her mistakes, inactivity, big Saudi and Bankster cash donations, etc.
hahahaha--so that's it now. Just stop whining?
How does TL Lips feel about this?
I'm not a Russian troll but am OK with the hacking and subsequent release of internal Party emails.
This is a similar service RT plays, holding a mirror to our system to see unpleasant realities.
That the Republicans could run such a dirty campaign and win, well, that's the real problem.
Take Wisconsin, the electorate their returned that scumfuck Ron Johnson back by a ~100,000 vote margin, over Russ Feingold, one of the finest Senators we've ever had (voted against PATRIOT and the 2003 AUMF).
There's waaay too many stupid people in this country for us to have a functional democracy.
My recommended fix is simply, Move.
Republican Red State Alaska can't secure America from a terrorist.
Republicans' TSA can't protect americans in just one state.
Republicans' message to Terrorist:
Don't transport you weapon of TERRORISM, we'll deliver you a TERRORIST WEAPON
to the scene of the crime.
Don't you find it just a bit strange that all these LEO agencies had contact with this guy, knew his past records, knew he was hearing voices in his head about ISIS, but still let him go and gave him his handgun back??
Why did two Republican RED STATES allow this tragedy?
I removed the username from the tweet to give a bit more space to the comment. People will figure out who the comment is by if they click on the link in the tweet. Now you should be able to post comments that are up to 115 chars. You can use the counter in the edit box to see how bit your tweet is.
And anyone can tweet anyone else's comment. No restrictions.
If anything was learned from the election, it was the following:
Trump supporters hated everything about the Republican and the Democratic party.
Trump haters on the other hand now fear they won't be guaranteed free stuff anymore.
Maybe I should show the tweet link only if the comment is within the size allowed?
Bigger comments would get truncated.
Why the change of heart ?
Beginner trolls don't have much experience removing their foot from their mouths
but they are constantly trying with each change in their delusional thinking.
( I support Bush in 2000)
Now we know another co-conspirator that allowed 9/11
& didn't find the WMD.
"For the record I have voted both for Democrats and Republicans"
Great reason to apply Capital Punishment to save america.
Good. Now let's see if he's capable of really hitting back hard to discourage such shenanigans in the future.
Trumpligula will invite Putin to the White House and spank Ivanka's naked bottom in front of him and say that will happen to him if he ever hacks IHLlary's campaigns again.
Jesus. The only person whining is you. It's insufferable. Finally, Trump admits we were right all along, and you are still whining about everybody else. Curiously strange behavior, that.
Love these new Trump tweets. He's finally starting to say it like it really is.
SHUT THE FUCK UP.
Guess we can add shouting to the whining. What's next? Temper tantrum?
No it did not and nor should it investigate the effect on the election
Why not? If it's such a big deal, we should definitely investigate. Starting with the DNC Servers by a Government Agency letting us know all the actors that hacked into those servers, if possible.
I await their report.
Of course not.
The Democrats only want to use this as the excuse why they ran a boring, uninspiring, campaign with the worst candidate they could have run, and lost, lost, lost. I hope they double down on 2016 and run the same kind of campaign they did this year in the 2018 elections. Maybe they'll blame North Korea next time.
Perhaps to keep the bait agreeable among members, something would be set up that would require several predetermined members to agree the the bait comment before it goes live?
Without this, I see it getting out of hand lol
« First « Previous Comments 78,932 - 78,971 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,249,764 comments by 14,902 users - The_Deplorable, WookieMan online now