by Patrick ➕follow (61) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 81,007 - 81,046 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
YUP, jets been seeding (clouding?) the skies for a while. God knows what HAARP had done in it's history to the ionosphere. They knew something was gonna happen and has once again set us up for more profits to their wallets. The cooling effect they produced, if it does, will be systematically incurred by momma SOL and the "state" this solar system is at. Oh Ya, "We succeeded in stopping warming" so the evening news will mantra. But maybe we need to charge you more "for did and dat", because of did and dat".
How MANY "cycles' have recently been verified, statistically, that few can keep up with including me. Momma SOL and the belief state we are in tells the momentary tale. Imagine
I found piggy's wife. She's calling him.
That should be titled Pig calling her fellow piggies!!!
I have thick skin.
Those are callouses from banging sheep.
He must have a lot of callouses in his ass.
what the hell...of all the blacks in CA this woman is the best they can send to rep them?
at least Sara Palin was a MILF. this woman???
APOCALYPSEFUCK_is_ADORABLE says
DID RUSSIAN AGENT PRECEDENT FUCKFACE Von CLOWNSTICK DIRECT FLYNN TO SUCK OFF THE RUSSIANS AND HIDE THE BLOW JOB FROM PENCE?
The real question is when will this be on pay-per-view.
You're too much of a little child to understand adult conversations and should consider staying on topics you know something about.
You have a civility score of 100% Ironman! Try and keep it. You can do it!
Is she a muppet? Seriously, what's the deal with her face?
What's the deal with her wig? Isn't that called cultural appropriation?
Patrick,
If everyone could read these type of threads & comments
patrick.net could become the "Center for Human Trash".
Just think, millions of followers.
Add separate category labeled "ASSHOLES"
People would flock here by the BILLIONS.
You can still make a Thunderdome post and flop around in whatever slop you choose there. Calls to remove the free speech banner, or that "free speech" is dead here, I find pretty laughable.
Ask me if I care..
How much you preserve your score will tell me exactly how much you care.
What's the deal with her wig? Isn't that called cultural appropriation?
You can tell what her ethnicity is!?
Note that this is ad hominem against Trump, but since he's not on patrick.net (yet!) it's not a violation of the rule against insulting other users.
I thought he did a good job of grabbing Stephanopolous' pussy and giving it a twist.
Do you really think for a millisecond it matters to me what YOU think or that your opinion matters for anything?
Very much so.
Doesn't the fact that you just dinged your civility score, in the face of my challenge, kind of prove the point?
In my opinion, I believe you have a preoccupation with approval. Here on Pnet that has manifested in measuring likes/dislikes/ignores and also being very adversarial with those that not only just don't share your opinion, but that you can tell sway opinion, and ARE valued on PNet. That's just pure observation over the past year+.
What else explains a thread like this, and your reaction to the ad-hom' button? I interpret that as you feeling threatened in a way that does matter to you. Why else post like this?
I am actually a little sorry you get picked on so much. It's not really constructive or beneficial to anyone dishing or taking. (Rew's libby care bear side)
Before I decided to ignore you, I felt there were little glimmers/sparks of reasonable argument in you, but eventually I decided that rational debate with you was a fools errand. It just continued to descend into the abyss. I was happy to have the forums returned to a more balanced state of article and opinion too. So, I gave up on saving the "Darth Vader" of Pnet. (My favorite villain!)
;) Notice you are off ignore now. I'm so curious where you go from here. (eating popcorn) You can continue as you are, no change, or you could decide to give a more civil tone a chance. I don't really think there are high odds of that ... but ... #hope
If you want to be taken seriously with a thread or post, you should just try and find a better source than WaPo.
Trump is a billionaire who talks like a construction worker. If you are an elitist liberal, this would offend your sensibilities, which you can shove up your ass.
Either is WaPo, AP, NYT...
AP : centrist
http://www.allsides.com/news-source/associated-press
NYT, WaPo, left lean ... which is different the hard right.
http://www.allsides.com/news-source/new-york-times
http://www.allsides.com/news-source/washington-post
So who do you think leaked this information?
US intelligence agents, or there is some evidence to think may be our allies spy agencies. We shall see.
Is that SOP for the intelligence agencies? To leak private conversations?
If they felt they were being ignored, or had no other channels to raise concerns to, it absolutely is SOP.
If ducky really wants to make a anti-Trump point, he should post Fox News links.
If ducky really wants to make a anti-Trump point, he should post Fox News links. Duckface Fuckface Lying Libby Pedophile has to use quotes that are pro-Trump otherwise he has to admit he's RIGGED EVERYTHING!! RIGGED EVERYTHING!! Admit it Duckface Fuckface Lying Libby Pedophile!! I demand that you admit it!!!!!!!!
The interesting thing is that this fake 'fake news' topic isn't completely off topic, because it highlights the very problem with the Trump administration.
So which is it, do they work for the "red, white, and blue", or just for the "blue" (team)?
You can't have it both ways to suit your narrative (today).
I think you wrongly assume going against Trump, de-facto, makes you part of the blue team. A good civil servant will not only support whatever factions and agendas are put forward by their leadership, they will also challenge it where they believe they need to, and in some circumstances they may be insubordinate and attempt to sabotage an agenda they believe is a threat to America.
The CIA and FBI aren't a bunch of "yes" men. Blind allegiance isn't what our Democracy values.
100% does that mean I can get a job working for the government?
Are you trying to say that a thing and its opposite cannot simultaneously be true?
That's patriarchal logic!
From Politico:
But according to an individual familiar with Harward's thinking, the former Navy SEAL who served on the National Security Council under President George W. Bush turned down the Trump offer because he did not receive sufficient assurances about staffing and autonomy. Specifically, the source said Harward wanted commitments that the National Security Council would be fully in charge of security matters, not Trump's political advisers.
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/robert-harward-national-security-adviser-trump-balks-235120
It's patently obvious Blurt man has dominated and won this exchange going away...
Trump's platform emphasizes renegotiating U.S.–China relations and free trade agreements such as NAFTA and the Trans-Pacific Partnership, strongly enforcing immigration laws, and building a new wall along the U.S.–Mexico border. His other positions include pursuing energy independence while opposing climate change regulations such as the Clean Power Plan and the Paris Agreement, modernizing and expediting services for veterans, repealing and replacing the Affordable Care Act, abolishing Common Core education standards, investing in infrastructure, simplifying the tax code while reducing taxes for all economic classes, and imposing tariffs on imports by companies offshoring jobs. He advocates a largely non-interventionist approach to foreign policy while increasing military spending, "extreme vetting" of immigrants from Muslim-majority countries to preempt domestic Islamic terrorism, and aggressive military action against ISIS. His positions have been described by scholars and commentators as populist, protectionist, and nationalist.
Trump's platform emphasizes renegotiating U.S.–China relations and free trade agreements such as NAFTA and the Trans-Pacific Partnership, strongly enforcing immigration laws, and building a new wall along the U.S.–Mexico border. His other positions include pursuing energy independence while opposing climate change regulations such as the Clean Power Plan and the Paris Agreement, modernizing and expediting services for veterans, repealing and replacing the Affordable Care Act, abolishing Common Core education standards, investing in infrastructure, simplifying the tax code while reducing taxes for all economic classes, and imposing tariffs on imports by companies offshoring jobs. He advocates a largely non-interventionist approach to foreign policy while increasing military spending, "extreme vetting" of immigrants from Muslim-majority countries to preempt domestic Islamic terrorism, and aggressive military action against ISIS. His positions have been described by scholars and commentators as populist, protectionist, and nationalist.
If ducky really wants to make a anti-Trump point, he should post Fox News links.
Fox News:
www.youtube.com/embed/fysSDYkhHlU
CBS...a story that goes straight to the toilet
bad choice to use as an example. You'll have to do better.
I see. The goal posts ever shifting. So now not only must be a right wing news outlet, it must be the 'right type of person' too? When you decide on hair color and favorite sport the media person has to have to be credible, let me know.
My impression is the only "source" you would listen to is one you agree with.
Trump's verbal diarrhoea over one state/two state was probably even worse than this latest debacle.
« First « Previous Comments 81,007 - 81,046 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,246,160 comments by 14,878 users - The_Deplorable online now