by Patrick ➕follow (60) 💰tip ignore
« First « Previous Comments 83,496 - 83,535 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
This does not mean they disagree. It means they havent confirmed or denied anything. It means nothing.
Its almost as if you dont read these articles you post
No, on the contrary. What it means is that you have no idea if Trump is under investigation or not. So, it definitely is NOT a fact that he isn't under investigation.
I'm 100% correct. Again.
This does not mean they disagree. It means they havent confirmed or denied anything. It means nothing.
Its almost as if you dont read these articles you post
No, on the contrary. What it means is that you have no idea if Trump is under investigation or not. So, it definitely is NOT a fact that he isn't under investigation.
I'm 100% correct. Again.
Are you suggesting trump is under some double secret investigation? Um yeah I wouldn't know anything about that. Neither would you. By the same rationale I can't 100% rule out my dog as a target of FBI investigation.
Please share your evidence that trump is under investigation.
Please share your evidence that trump is under investigation.
I have no idea if he's under investigation and neither do you. Comey has said the Trump campaign/Administration IS under investigation. And seeing as Trump is a part of the Trump campaign and Trump Administration, it's a LOT more likely Trump is under investigation than your dog.
The point is you and Lips keep saying that it's a fact that Trump isn't under investigation and that's a lie.
We are all under investigation and we are all not.
Glad you cleared that up...
joeyjojojunior says
No, on the contrary. What it means is that you have no idea if Trump is under investigation or not.
People are sick of this shit.
So, what are you saying ? That if she had some emotional problems that people weren't so sick of they would have been better at deescalating the situation ? And simply gotten her out of the store without making themselves look bad (to many people that are going to see her video). No they wanted to trigger her, which is fine. But it's too easy.
They're trying too hard to be the next Hugh Mongous. But they don't know how to do it without being assholes.
We are all under investigation and we are all not.
Glad you cleared that up...
Are we all part of the Trump Administration?
Yes the chance that all dirtskins have been waiting for is to act out violently towards whites. Been their ambition and motivation since the first one swam across the river. This antifa bullshit should be a major wakeup call for what happens when you allow this many latin american and muslim terrorist into our country. I'd love to leave ca but its the same everywhere except in inhospitable places but their showing up their also. If you never want to see another shitskin Mexican or Muslim ever again, and deal with their uncivilized approach to life, you have to move out of the country.
Investigate what? Congress will hear available recordings, they wont find anything they dont already know... how many investigations can you justify w zero evidence?
Investigations don't start because you HAVE evidence, investigations start because you have enough credible cause TO investigate to FIND evidence one way or the other.
It is actually unknown if Trump is under investigation or not. Standard operating procedure for the FBI is not to reveal to a suspect if they are investigating them. Words on paper from Trump, saying he isn't being investigated, followed by "the Russia thing" as the reason behind firing in the NBC interview, leads us where?
Right here:
If Trump WAS innocent, he would be the first asking for an independent investigation to exonerate him.
Firing people isn't a crime.
It can be. My company spends huge amounts of money training hiring managers on hiring and firing. Reasons for firing and reasons for not hiring must be ethically correct, or they are criminal.
Yes.
It takes a village. You cannot deny your membership...
joeyjojojunior says
Are we all part of the Trump Administration?
Libbies have labeled trump a low information president.
If so he would not have the capacity to do what you state below...
Rew says
If Trump WAS innocent, he would be the first asking for an independent investigation to exonerate him.
You cannot deny your membership...
Cute. Being part of the administration means you are in the select group of the President's officials, performing a role for the office of the president. Average joe citizen does not fall within that group definition.
I can't believe you said that. I'm glad you started reading Econ 101.
They don't teach that in econ 101. I know because I actually took economics in college. College 101 courses are very basic.
Libbies have labeled trump a low information president.
If so he would not have the capacity to do what you state below...
So just to be clear, your defense of Trump's actions are: "He is too stupid to know better." That's fine if the AG wants to defend him on that basis.
It sucks. It's cowardly. It's unprofessional. It's immature and unmanly. It's incompetent. It's uncivilized, it's low-class, it's deplorable and it's alt-right.
I agree. What she did was wrong, but she's a customer, a member of the public. Their place is not to retaliate or counter strike. They need to be operating as you suggest, in a professional manner as hard as that might be. It really shouldn't have been that difficult with her. Let her make a fool of herself. Tell her you understand her position and you'll pass it on to the boss. Don't take it so personally, as she was so arrogantly doing. Instead, they decided to hate on her and get just as political and arrogant as she was. Worse really, becasue they repeatedly tried to push her buttons until they succeeded.
Stfu and take it Marcus. You're an employee of the state so you don't get a say. You work for me so I will berate you as I please!
Not so palatable now, eh?
Loser.
I agree. What she did was wrong, but she's a customer, a member of the public. Their place is not to retaliate or counter strike. They need to be operating as you suggest, in a professional manner as hard as that might be.
Is that some kind of rule or law now? That one must be nice to customers? If a person invests his own money in a business, such as a store, is that owner obligated to be nice to people? Just askin.
credible cause
WTF does credible cause mean? You cant just investigate whoever you want. There must be a reason.
If Trump WAS innocent, he would be the first asking for an independent investigation to exonerate him.
This is silly. Its the FBI's job to investigate this. You cant question their integrity w/o cause. Its certainly not going to happen because of a mass temper tantrum.
Who would you expect is the unbiased party who would choose the independent investigator? There is no such person. Trump was elected as POTUS. WE THE PEOPLE want Trump choosing the FBI director, not some kangaroo court nonsense.
Comey has said the Trump campaign/Administration
An administration is what, 1000 people? Trump, himself, is not under investigation AND it is reported that they have cleared Trump's inner-circle. Every, single shred of first hand information has suggested that they have zero evidence of Trump/Russia collusion. Find the quotes from anyone asked the collusion question w firsthand knowledge. Ive posted a few in these threads.
Trump is no more under investigation that Obama was when Hillary (a top member of his administration) was under investigation for her potential treason. None of the top members of Trump's campaign are under investigation, or even accused of doing something anywhere near as serious as Hillary... In fact, there is still no established crime. Whereas w Hillary, we had an established crime. Comey reported he couldnt find intent for that crime. W team Trump there isnt even a fricken crime yet. We furthermore have no evidence to link Trump or his inner circle to this non-crime... Yet you keep pretending that Trump is somehow under investigation?
This is total madness.
CBOEtrader is claiming that Comey was investigating Trump without cause to investigate. If that were true, it would have shown up in Rosenstein's letter giving Trump a case against Comey.
There is no reason to assume that Comey has no cause to investigate, other than 'because Trump says so.'
"He is too stupid to know better."
This was literally Hillary's defense, and it worked. So... this legit may be a defense used again.
www.youtube.com/embed/0X1xOKMKX80
This is the local media lying about this incident. I'll bet they spun her as the victim w/o even watching the video first. Look at the upvote/downvote ratio. LOLZ 400 to 13k. Oh and comments are turned off. Just brilliant.
exciting Tax breaks to give,
tax breaks are for the little people. the establishment doesnt give a fuck about such things. war, arms deals, billions of cash in foreign accounts... thats their game.
Trump is doing a great job. He's done so many things that have worked so quickly to make the economy zoom. He's halted illegal immigration at our southern border, and more importantly, he's taking care of those evil muslins. You know, the thing that effects so many Americans so strongly, the tens of millions of Islamic radicals that have destroyed this country and cause so much harm to our great citizens, every day. Most importantly, I feel like Trump really cares about me, and I truly believe he wants to MAGA bigly
Nobody ever said the Republican voters were the sharpest tools in the shed.
The whole Islamic terrorist/Mexican illegal invader narrative is the same ol distraction that the ruling class has used for decades to distract the idiots while taking away their freedoms.
Parlay this with Gorsuch in the SC and I'm just going to sit back and root for them all to get their comeuppance. Really fucking hard.
American jobs? Lol
Freedom? Lol
Return to Law and Order by continuing the most Failed Loser policy of all that actually destroys any chance of law and order? Lolol
The Border Wall will stem the flow? Lololol if it ever gets built it will only have the chance of exacerbating it.
But hey, the ninnies pent up in their hovels are all worked up about some Muslim in the ME, who gives a fuck about getting our own house in order. Because freedom and small government, right?
Can you imagine being married to that hag?
Quigley ? No, Quigley's a dude. I guess the term hag might apply. He is kind of a bitch sometimes.
Is that some kind of rule or law now? That one must be nice to customers? If a person invests his own money in a business, such as a store, is that owner obligated to be nice to people? Just askin.
No. Professionalism. Common sense. Common decency. None of these things are anything close to a law. But they are good business practices.
I think that lady was an annoyance, but someone to feel sorry for, rather than hate and intentionally trigger. I'm pretty sure that puts me on the normal side of the social continuum. Not a saint. Just normal.
Teflon Trump. He will be POTUS until 2024 and Ivanka will take over from him hopefully.
Only a felony and not treason, formenting the civil war and ISIS and the holocaust too-dems are slipping.
I can hardly wait until the White House has a big price tag on a string, runs the Russian flag, and has Soros doing the oompa loompa with SJWs outiside the gates.
Im watching it.
This is far less intellectual than the weakest Alex jones conspiracy videos. This video is aimed at very low IQ people.
I'm waiting for actual evidence, none yet.
Video 45:45,Too long
Some Patnetters can only focus for 4.5 seconds.
I will watch the whole video.
I'm Psychic,already know my response.
LOCK HIM UP! FUCK HIS SUPPORTERS!
HEY YOU, He will fuck his supporters.
Trump taught HEY YOU to speak in the third person.
HEY YOU thinks HEY YOU is larger than life.
Alex jones
Alex Jone's show is aimed at people who do not have an IQ. They just have a DQ - dummy quotient.
Alex jones
Alex Jone's show is aimed at people who do not have an IQ. They just have a DQ - dummy quotient.
Considering this has less evidence than alex jones theories, what does that make those who but into it?
There is literally 100 times as much evidence for the Clinton kill list, but I'm sure all of you reject that as silly whereas you embrace this? Have some intellectual integrity.
Either you have evidence for something or you dont. Painting a picture of possible collusion across a web of rich assholes is something we can do to any billionaire/CEO/politician. I appreciate knowing the loose associations, but we cant assume to know the dirty details. I mean, how many CEO's are guilty by investment association of a Saudi Prince?
I'll summarize this video: "meet an investor in one of Trump's thousands of deals" who "most likely, probably maybe has ties to crime and most probably maybe possibly russian oligarchs" who are "obviously, maybe possibly involved in international big-time crime" and "maybe possibly, obviously associated w putin."
Um... go through the big investors of any major corporation and you can make loose connections like this.
« First « Previous Comments 83,496 - 83,535 of 117,730 Next » Last » Search these comments
patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,249,254 comments by 14,901 users - Ceffer, mell online now