patrick.net

sqt,
you are not wrong.
Sorry, but it's a sell out.

Want to fix things?
Step #1) Vote in a full set of CONSERVATIVE folks from County Supervisor on up and things will get better. Much better. And Bush aint nearly conservative enough for my taste. Mike Savage would work.

yeah, that would fix things alright. well and truly. conservative? what do they want to conserve? the forests?

by a coincidence:

'We should not be exporting uranium because you are exporting cancer'

by paediatrician and anti-nuclear activist dr helen caldicott

see also Helen Caldicott - Books

e.g.
'THE NEW NUCLEAR DANGER: GEORGE W. BUSH'S MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX '

THE NEW NUCLEAR DANGER: GEORGE W. BUSH'S MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX

"A timely warning, at a critical moment in world history, of the horrible consequences of nuclear warfare." Walter Cronkite

On September 18, 2001, one week after the World Trade Center disaster, Lockheed Martin, the country's leading manufacturer of conventional weaponry, nuclear delivery systems, and national missile defense, took a full-page ad in the New York Times echoing JFK's famous call to "pay any price to assure the survival and the success of liberty." The ad offered an unusually public display of what is typically the invisible hand and muscle of the arms industry guiding American sentiment and government.

In her uncannily timely new book, Dr. Helen Caldicott looks at the indebtedness of the Bush Administration to the arms industry and warns of the incredible dangers inherent in allowing weapons manufacturers to dictate foreign policy. Recounting the history of government collusion with industry, Caldicott shows how the merging of weapons firm in the 1980s created hugely powerful "death merchants," including Lockheed and others, ready to lobby politicians and manipulate public opinion on behalf of their corporate interests.

Now, with unprecedented acts of terrorism fueling the American public's willingness to grant its government broad power to wage war, the constant pressure from weapons makers to use military force -- and by extension, buy more of their weapons -- poses the very real threat of nuclear war. Enumerating, as a physician, the medical consequences of such a war, Caldicott demonstrates conclusively that the notion of nuclear survival is a complete fantasy, and that nuclear victory is an oxymoron.

In the same way that a generation embraced Caldicott's hugely influential Nuclear Madness and Missile Envy, The New Nuclear Danger stands to educate, alert, and mobilize millions of young people and concerned citizens, who must understand the planetary threat posed by overly aggressive nuclear scientific establishments and weapons industries in a volatile world.

SQT -

I agree with you on the links, but if anyone here wants to post a wordpress site where everyone can blog, let us all know, and we can link it to a page with housing links on it.

Actually, I could do that...

Bap33-

Boy, ‘ol B33 sure dont mind flapping his lips about America while swatting flies in Death Valley. Aint there a political CA blog that needs your attention B33? Just kiddin’.

If it is good for America the repubs will attack it and hate it. No matter what “it” is. If it is bad for America repubs will support it and protect it. No matter what “it” is. Is that simple enough for ya pardner?

Mirror image, why not, I'm right and you're squat.

The road trip was good. I wish I took a pair of Tevas along and hiked more slot canyons. Let me know if you want to see pictures.

Sure. I always like pictures of roadtrips.

I have a question for some of the other Patrick.net regulars. Am I wrong in being a little annoyed that Patrick now wants to charge for the housing article links?

I am not annoyed. However, I think a donation button (like the one on Ben's blog) may also be effective.

I will admit I have spent less and less time authoring threads as it’s a completely thankless task most of the time. But I have authored quite a bit more than Patrick and I guess I am feeling a little put out.

I personally thank you, SQT. If you have a subscription service, I will probably subscribe too. ;)

But then I’d have to pay you too, you do at least as much.

No, I probably have to pay you to read my silly threads.

My contribution is not much beyond huh, duh, and doh.

I just make silly comments to compensate.

Huh? Okay, you are going to author the next thread.

If I can think up a decent topic, sure.

Be creative. Think outside the housing bubble. ;)

How about best women in the world?

How about best wine you've had for under $100?

How about best wine you’ve had for under $100?

Pinot Noir, Robert Sinskey, 2001

I do not drink much. So please forgive my ignorance.

New Topic

Do people move more often when prices are rising? It seems to me that people can move to a larger house when their old one sells quickly.

When prices are falling, people must stay put for much longer. Even if they want to buy a bigger but cheaper foreclosure they cannot, because the sale of their old house won't even cover what they owe on the mortgage.

What are your thoughts Hobbson?

It seems to me that people can move to a larger house when their old one sells quickly.

It is easier to move up when

1. there is significant price compression
2. the move-up house is priced above the said compression, and
3. credit is easy and cheap

does anyone here own mexican real estate?

only if they live in california, texas or new mexico...

Anybody realize that their rent is actually paid with after tax dollars?

So, in essence, your real rent is about 1.4X what you’re paying now to get your gross rent wherease homeowners have their interest and their profits subsidized by the gov’t?

My rent 2K, 2K X 1.4 = 2800, house is "worth" ~850K, just the fucking mortgage payment is > 5K, not including insurance, property tax, maintainence etc. So tell me you small dick maggot fucking troll, why the fuck would I buy? Oh, yeah, I forgot so i can flip the house in 2 years because it only goes up. Hmmm, seems $anta Barbara is down 9.44% so far, and there are 44% more listings that this time last year. do me a favor you 5'3" piece of shit, go back to wishing your fucking big assed whore of a wife would put down the fucking ben & jerrys and turn american idol off so you take in her fat assed glory.

SX,

Wrong calculation. Only the interest & tax part of your house payment is sunk money. The principal payment should be treated as saving. Of course you should factor in the opportunity cost of the principal payment that you could've otherwise used in productive investments (i.e., CDs in Iceland just prior to the crash of Icelandic krona).

But, 850K x (6% mortgage interest + 1% real estate tax) = roughly 60K. Take away tax deduction. Your net payment is 42K. That's about 35K/year and 3K per month.

3K is still 50% more than 2K rent. Not worth it. Castrate that 5'3" guy's dick.

look, guys, we could actually start a joint effort site fairly cheaply that uses more sophisticated and still free blogging php software, i.e. one that includes a text editor toolbar, the ability to edit own posts, no posting problems, proper member profiles, a chatroom (god help us), etc. i've already had a discussion with patrick about that, and if he had more time he would look at it. there's no reason we can't put something together, and include patrick's links or similar.

e.g. http://www.phpbb.com/

i'd do it, except i'm trying to raise my own site in time for a state election, which i keep putting off...

oh shit… tammy bruce the lesbian republican is basically saying that WE ARE GOING INTO IRAN. Fuck that stupid bitch. I am sick of this stupid terrorist shit.

you should write to her and let her know... politicians are amazed when constituents actually write to them and engage in a democratic political process...

This Tammy chick looks quite masculine. I like her (as a person or a man).

It's funny. These days in Amerika, men look feminine and women look masculine.

Boy, ‘ol DS sure dont mind flapping his lips about America while swatting flies in rooville.

actually, aussies own about half of america right now... do a google search on 'what rupert murdoch owns' and look up frank lowy and westfield in wikipedia. that's right, the westfield shopping mall chain in NoCal and SoCal -- $42 bn in assets... owned by an aussie... and rupert murdoch own half your influential press and Fox, and makes and breaks govts on a whim...

and guess who leased out the WTC retail space 6 weeks before 9/11? westfield america...

all your base are belong to us....

it has nothing to do with the land, its the government’s fruits that they covet.

i bet if the mexicans realised what the gold and oil was worth in 1848 they would've put up more of a fight...

All your shopping mall and newspaper belong to us...

SQT Said:

I have a question for some of the other Patrick.net regulars. Am I wrong in being a little annoyed that Patrick now wants to charge for the housing article links?

But as one of the blog moderators, I spend easily as much time per day, checking in, clearing the spam from the moderation queue and watching threads when I have them. And now I’m thinking it’s not worth the effort if the guy who created the blog finds the task to onerous without pay.

I too had the exact same response. I can sort of understand Patrick charging readers or occasional posters, but thread moderators/authors? It's not as though we're getting compensated for our time (and drawing eyeballs with our brilliant topics & commentary :-) ). I don't mind donating considerable time because I thoroughly enjoy the debate and company here (and occasionally learn a useful thing or two), but now I've got to pay for links?? Hmmm...

FYI: Farm program pays people who don’t farm - Federal subsidies to owners of old, unused farmland top $1.3 billion

Your tax dollars at work... or non-work.

My favorite "money quotes":

"This was an unintended consequence of the farm bill," said former representative Charles W. Stenholm, the west Texas Democrat who was once the ranking member on the House Agriculture Committee. "Instead of maintaining a rice industry in Texas, we basically contributed to its demise."

"The original intent was to make a step in the direction of eliminating farm programs," said then-House Majority Leader Richard K. Armey (R-Tex.), who led an unsuccessful fight in the 1990s to trim the subsidies. "By 1998, there was no zeal left."

Instead of cutting, Congress ended up expanding the program, now known as direct and countercyclical payments. A program intended to cost $36 billion over seven years instead topped $54 billion.

I can sort of understand Patrick charging readers or occasional posters, but thread moderators/authors?

he will start MLM blogging next... woops, he already has :lol:

Shmend Rick Says:
http://rebubble.ning.com

that was quick, rick

build it and they will come...

HARM Says:
FYI: Farm program pays people who don’t farm - Federal subsidies to owners of old, unused farmland top $1.3 billion
Your tax dollars at work… or non-work.

the face of pure evil... CONSERVATIVE republican congressmen doling out upper class welfare and dispossessing tenant farmers... we need more CONSERVATIVES in power from top to bottom...

i didn't realise tammy bruce is just another ann coulter, except uglier... not even a politician, just another rupert murdoch stooge...

SQT Says:

"I have a question for some of the other Patrick.net regulars. Am I wrong in being a little annoyed that Patrick now wants to charge for the housing article links?"

Yes and no.

Yes, because he's built a great site and deserves as much $$$ as he can get.

No, because one of the things I liked about this site was checking out the daily articles with my coffee. I won't pay for them, though.

Just my two cents.

:o~~ The Mouse

surfer-x Says:

'My house is...“worth” ~850K...'
_____

Exactly!

Nice parenthesis around the word "worth."

Says so much with so little.

"Worth" my ass! Maybe in Monopoly money or bubble bucks.