0
0

Program Will Pay Homeowners to Sell at a Loss


               
2010 Mar 8, 6:45am   6,072 views  25 comments

by shultzie   follow (0)  

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/08/business/08short.html?srsch&pagewanted=all 

 This latest program, which will allow owners to sell for less than they owe and will give them a little cash to speed them on their way, is one of the administration’s most aggressive attempts to grapple with a problem that has defied solutions.

huh?

« First        Comments 21 - 25 of 25        Search these comments

21   thomas.wong1986   @   2010 Mar 10, 1:36pm  

tatupu70 says

Once again, I’ll remind you that TARP was passed under Bush.

Where do corporations like the ones in Silicon Valley keep their cash to pay their bills.

If you didnt have TARP where would you have received your payroll check from your employer or
your employer pay for their vendors bill ? How would your employers customer be able to pay for their
product purchase which generated revenue/cash for operations? Things to ponder on since bank accounts were impaired both personal and corporate... that is why every companies stock crashed when the first swing at passing TARP failed.

22   Brand1533   @   2010 Mar 10, 11:03pm  

Troy says: If you’re going to borrow, the money has to go towards capital investment — earnings accretion — not consumption. 42″ plasmas were not capital investments, though boob jobs arguably were.

I believe the latter is considered an infrastructure improvement. ;o

23   PolishKnight   @   2010 Mar 11, 12:22am  

Camping "gets it". You get a cookie, Camping!

Indeed, by changing the policy to helping people get out of their homes it benefits buyers by freeing up inventory AND lowering prices (the more short sales out there, the further push downward on prices) AND the greater availability of lower priced rentals which is a double push downward on prices overall.

The purpose of government policies is to benefit some particular group. They tend to favor owners/sellers because they're a bigger group to pander to (social democracy: two wolves and a sheep deciding what's for dinner) Perhaps they realize that since they can't stop prices going down and they can't "buy" votes that way, it's better to buy votes from the short sellers...

24   WillyWanker   @   2010 Mar 11, 12:33am  

Hopey~Changey. Everyone enjoy the Hopey~Changey!

25   vain   @   2010 Mar 16, 7:45am  

Paying people to leave their homes is really to increase inventory. Obama is squeezing every last drop out of the government support. You know it must be bad if even Obama wants to lock people into high debt before he withdraws government support. If everyone stays in their homes now, they will get foreclosed on when there is no government support, causing another crash then. This is all part of his exit strategy - to push everyone in before it collapses.

Obama has made it quite clear that his intent is to prop prices high since it's everyone's most expensive investment. You won't see anything from him helping buyers directly; only homeowners/sellers.

« First        Comments 21 - 25 of 25        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   users   suggestions   gaiste