« First « Previous Comments 11 - 12 of 12 Search these comments
I was thinking there may be a chance that it was torn down, but they didn't have money to rebuild it silently. This is a shortsale. They looked like they haven't had sleep for a while.
Check out SF's Department of Building website. You can track permitted work and complaints.
The new owners may have tried to evict a tenant and were ratted out.
« First « Previous Comments 11 - 12 of 12 Search these comments
Hello all,
I'm seeking the help from fellow patrick.net forum members for your expertise.
There is a property that I am considering to purchase a house that has 2 floors. The lower floor has 3 rooms that are warranted it seems because it shows up on some county records. But the bathroom and the kitchen were removed very sloppily and the owners said that the city had instructed them to remove it. The property supposedly doesn't have any more red flags with the city.
Here's the tricky part. They claimed that the city found out about it because they had two units downstairs for a total of 3 families living in it. There were 2 cable bills and 3 telephone bills all under different names, and they've added an address of 204-A, 204-B to the 204 door number on the address.
The thing is I don't know if I want to believe that that is how the city found out about it. Is that even possible? I suspect that a neighbor reported them. I too intend to make an in-law unit downstairs to rent out as well (But obviously not 2 units. That's just too much.). But I wouldn't want to get ratted on.
Anyone have any experience with this? Can it be possible that partitioning out your address like that alert the city to come check on your home? Any ways I can check if there were any complaints on the property?
Thanks in advance!