« First « Previous Comments 35 - 44 of 44 Search these comments
I thought the Teabaggers were going to bring us all new jobs.
LIED AGAIN!
You have the "Teabaggers" mixed up with your Dear Leader. It was Dear Leader that promised "4 million new jobs" during the campaign. Too bad he didn't tell us those jobs were in China & India. Dear Leader also said "renegotiating NAFTA & GATT would be "top priority" as soon as he took office. Too bad for us that with Dear Leader, "top priority" means "two years and counting."
I thought the Teabaggers were going to bring us all new jobs.
LIED AGAIN!
Wait! Give them a chance...
Bwa-ha ha ha! nah I-I just playin' you shoulda seen your face though...
Democrats do have the PARTY OF NO to contend with after all. A bunch of crybabies who want to sabotage government. Astoundingly they manage to criticize the Wisconsin lawmakers for obstruction, while lying about the fact that they do it themselves.
Democrats do have the PARTY OF NO to contend with after all. A bunch of crybabies who want to sabotage government.
If only the GOP really were the "Party of No" to this pretender we have in the White House.
Are the Democrats of Wisconsin the "Party of No Show?"
Vicente says
Are the Democrats of Wisconsin the “Party of No Show?â€
If it's good for the goose, it's good for the gander. To pretend otherwise is .... hypocrisy.
Is the "Party of No" preventing Dear Leader from renegotiating NAFTA & GATT as he repeatedly promised during the campaign?
NAFTA and GATT are good for America, the GOP is very clear on this. He's doubtless trying to compromise and prioritize. All fiscal and social conservatives are quite clear the best thing Democrats can do for this country is compromise. So you should be very happy.
JOBS?
Massachusettes job fair canceled due to lack of jobs. More evidence that the job market is improving, at least according to Dear Leader:
http://www.boston.com/business/ticker/2011/03/mass_job_fair_c.html?p1=Local_Links
This just out: unemployment figures dip to below 9%. Unfortunately, under employment has increased to over 20%. The spin machine is working over time. I wonder if it is protected by a union?
http://www.gallup.com/poll/127091/underemployment-rises-march.aspx
« First « Previous Comments 35 - 44 of 44 Search these comments
Obama took credit today for an "improvement in the U-3 unemployment numbers. He failed to mention that a whopping 50,000 "new jobs" in the government's figures are temp jobs for the Census. Far more telling is the U-6 unemployment rate, a rate the Obama administration never even mentions. This is looking more and more like we've become Oceania and Obama is speaking from the Ministry of Truth. It won't be long before we begin to see signs like War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength.
Broader U-6 Unemployment Rate Rises to 16.9%
Posted Apr 2nd 2010 4:30PM by Connie Madon
The Labor Department issued its monthly unemployment for March. The numbers were upbeat. The unemployment rate held steady at 9.7% and 162,000 new jobs were created. This is the official number and is labeled the U-3 unemployment report. The U-3 category includes people who are without jobs and who are available for work. Wonderful isn't it? Maybe not.
Let's dig a bit deeper into the darker side of the unemployment numbers. What is rarely published are the unemployment numbers under the category labeled U-6. Most people have never heard of the U-6 category because it is rarely cited in headline news.
What is U-6? This category includes everyone in the official rate plus "marginally attached workers" -- those who are neither working nor looking for work, but say they want a job and have looked for work recently. It also includes part time workers who took part time work because they couldn't find full time jobs.
The U-6 data may shock you. It shows that unemployment actually rose 0.1% to 16.9% in March. The highest number was 17.4% in October.
#politics