patrick.net

-"There's a pic for that"

Did Linda Tripp have a secret lesbian affair with Hillary and she did all that hoping Hillary would leave Bill. But 20 yrs later, Hillary is still with Bill and so she is mad??

The interview is echoing what has been said about Pennsylvanian ave since Bill got caught with his organic humidor.

CaptainShuddup says

-"There's a pic for that"

BTW dehumanizing people to equate them as vermin was Nazi propaganda 101.

Hillaries millions hard at work.

socal2 says

Dan8267 says

More importantly, there are no intelligent Republicans, voters or politicians.

"Poll Finds Tea Party Backers Wealthier and More Educated"

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/15/us/politics/15poll.html?_r=0

Polls mean nothing. What matters are scientific, peer-reviewed studies.

Psychology Today: Why Liberals Are More Intelligent Than Conservatives

Liberals think they’re more intelligent than conservatives because they are

Psychological Science: Intelligence Study Links Low I.Q. To Prejudice, Racism, Conservatism

The study, published in Psychological Science, showed that people who score low on I.Q. tests in childhood are more likely to develop prejudiced beliefs and socially conservative politics in adulthood.

Live Science: Low IQ & Conservative Beliefs Linked to Prejudice

[T]here is reason to believe that strict right-wing ideology might appeal to those who have trouble grasping the complexity of the world.

Social Psychology Quarterly: Are Liberals Smarter Than Conservatives?

The short answer: Kanazawa's paper shows that more-intelligent people are more likely to say they are liberal. They are also less likely to say they go to religious services. These aren't entirely new findings; last year, for example, a British team found that kids with higher intelligence scores were more likely to grow into adults who vote for Liberal Democrats, even after the researchers controlled for socioeconomics. What's new in Kanazawa's paper is a provocative theory about why intelligence might correlate with liberalism. He argues that smarter people are more willing to espouse "evolutionarily novel" values — that is, values that did not exist in our ancestral environment, including weird ideas about, say, helping genetically unrelated strangers (liberalism, as Kanazawa defines it), which never would have occurred to us back when we had to hunt to feed our own clan and our only real technology was fire.

But hey, don't let the facts change your narrative. Stay true to your delusions.

The two most important events in all of history were the invention of beer and the invention of the wheel. Beer required grain and that was the beginning of agriculture. Neither the glass bottle nor aluminum can were invented yet, so while our early humans were sitting around waiting for them to be invented, they just stayed close to the brewery. That's how villages were formed. The wheel was invented to get man to the beer.

These two were the foundation of modern civilization and together were the catalyst for the splitting of humanity into two distinct subgroups:
1. Liberals 2. Conservatives.

Some men spent their days tracking and killing animals to BBQ at night while they were drinking beer. This was the beginning of what is known as the Conservative movement. Other men who were less skilled at hunting learned to live off the conservatives by showing up for the nightly BBQ's and doing the sewing, fetching, and hair dressing. This was the beginning of the Liberal movement.

Some of these liberal men evolved into women. Others became known as girlie-men. Some noteworthy Liberal achievements include the domestication of cats, the invention of group therapy, group hugs, and the concept of democratic voting to decide how to divide the meat and beer that Conservatives provided.

Over the years Conservatives came to be symbolized by the largest, most powerful land animal on earth, the elephant. Liberals are symbolized by the jackass for obvious reasons.

Modern Liberals like lite beer, (with lime added), but most prefer white wine or imported bottled water. They eat raw fish but like their beef well done. Sushi, tofu, and French food are standard Liberal fare. Another interesting evolutionary side note: many Liberal women have higher testosterone levels than their men.

Most college professors, social workers, personal injury attorneys, journalists, film makers in Hollywood, group therapists and community organizers are Liberals. Liberals meddled in our national pastime and invented the designated hitter rule because it wasn't fair to make the pitcher also bat.

Conservatives drink real beer. They eat red meat and still provide for their women. Conservatives are big game hunters, rodeo cowboys, lumberjacks, construction workers, firemen, medical doctors, police officers, engineers, corporate executives, athletes, members of the military, airline pilots, and generally anyone who works productively. Conservatives who own companies hire other conservatives who want to work for a living.

Liberals produce little or nothing. They like to govern the producers and decide what to do with the production. Liberals believe Europeans are more enlightened than Americans. That is why most of the Liberals remained in Europe when Conservatives were coming to America. They crept in after the Wild West was tamed and created a business of trying to get more for nothing.

Here ends today's lesson in world history. It should be noted that a Liberal may have a momentary urge to angrily respond to this post.

A Conservative will simply laugh and be so convinced of the absolute truth of this history that it will be shared immediately to other true believers and to just tick off more liberals...

And there you have it. Let your next action reveal your true self.

I'm going to have another beer.

DieBankOfAmericaPhukkingDie says

Did Linda Tripp have a secret lesbian affair with Hillary and she did all that hoping Hillary would leave Bill. But 20 yrs later, Hillary is still with Bill and so she is mad??

Yes

I think I have a new weapon. Once Hillary becomes President, she, Linda Tripp, Janet Reno, Madeline Albright and Rosie O'Donnell will get together to have a giant orgy. Once I get the video of this orgy and the "lovely" ladies screaming in a giant orgasm-that will be the greatest weapon of all.

The tape can be used to turn lesbian women straight and straight men gay. Just imagine if a jihadi is locked for 12 hours and forced to watch these ladies having sex for 12 hrs, with the threat that if he does not disclose all his secrets, he will be locked in a room with all those women for ever!! Nobody can withstand that kind of torture!

indigenous says

Some men spent their days tracking and killing animals to BBQ at night

The only truth in what indigenous says is that conservatives have a Stone Age mentality. That mentality is not suited for the modern age.

Dan8267 says

The only truth in what indigenous says is that conservatives have a Stone Age mentality. That mentality is not suited for the modern age.

Says the millennial...

Let me get this straight you said all that matter is peer review studies on more educated people are smarter than dimrods?

Is there fart sniffing and cheese tasting at these reviews?

Dan8267 says

Polls mean nothing. What matters are scientific, peer-reviewed studies.

Psychology!

Call it Crazy says

Major publisher retracts 43 scientific papers amid wider fake peer-review scandal

Hmm maybe a priori axioms are a little closer to the truth after all?

this is particularly damning evidence...

Dan says

Yes, peer-reviewed studies are so truthful and reliable.

Call it Crazy says

Major publisher retracts 43 scientific papers amid wider fake peer-review scandal

I really believe in studies performed in liberal dominated and tyrannized organizations when they praise liberals.

SoftShell says

this is particularly damning evidence...

Dan says

Yes, peer-reviewed studies are so truthful and reliable.

Call it Crazy says

Major publisher retracts 43 scientific papers amid wider fake peer-review scandal

...that people who think science is bullshit are idiots.

Science got us to the moon, eliminated smallpox, created supersonic aircraft and the Internet. 'Nuff said.

Dan8267 says

Science got us to the moon, eliminated smallpox, created supersonic aircraft and the Internet. 'Nuff said.

Not enuff. The hard sciences do no apply to economics and many other fields. You are saying that in order to prove the Pythagorean theorem we need to test a thousand right triangles? Bullshit a priori is the ONLY reasonable method to prove economic matters.

indigenous says

Bullshit a priori is the ONLY reasonable method to prove economic matters.

A priori logic covers one of the three types of knowledge. The other two require observation and the scientific method. See Immanuel Kant.

Dan8267 says

A priori logic covers one of the three types of knowledge. The other two require observation and the scientific method. See Immanuel Kant.

The point is that the empirical method does not work with economics.

indigenous says

The point is that the empirical method does not work with economics.

Your statement, like Reagonomics, is empirically false. Of course, a Republican would want people to believe that economic theory is not answerable to historical facts given the consistent failures of their theories.

jvolstad says

Tripp tore into both Clintons, but saved her harshest rhetoric for the former first lady, calling her a power-hungry monster who would do anything to get elected.

How the hell would she even know? Tripp was a mid-level DoD employee, I'm sure she was never in the same room as Hillary, much less ever met her. Just because she recorded her conversations with Monica doesn't mean she ever had any kind of White House access.

Dan8267 says

Your statement, like Reagonomics, is empirically false. Of course, a Republican would want people to believe that economic theory is not answerable to historical facts given the consistent failures of their theories.

Reaganomics is irrelevant to what I'm talking about. I'm not a Republican.

Dan8267 says

Of course, a Republican would want people to believe that economic theory is not answerable to historical facts given the consistent failures of their theories.

Economics is NOT a hard science. It is understood by a priori. E.G. you would not prove a statement like, all unmarried men are bachelors, you would consider it to be self evident.

At any one time any economic event has 29 things going on. It is NOT a controlled experiment as in the empirical method. To claim so is ridiculous.If it were susceptible to the empirical method the economy would be predictable but it is not, look at how the majority of the experts get it wrong.

Dan8267 says

...that people who think science is bullshit are idiots.

Science got us to the moon, eliminated smallpox, created supersonic aircraft and the Internet. 'Nuff said.

Not Science, it was people, who figured out complex processes to achieve those milestones.

Not every asshole in a lab coat is a person capable of changing the world.

I akin it to, you like to think everyone with a guitar is a great musician just because they know a few chords.
Even people who are good musicians at playing covers and parroting what they've heard others play.
Sure they sound great, but you'll never get a world changing moment out of them. Just great reproduction of previous musical pieces.
Then there's those who want to play smoke on the water so bad, but buzz out on every fret and can't stay on beat if their life depended on it.
Then you've got folks who write symphonies in their sleep.

Dan you and assholes like you, expect America to believe that any asshole who makes any assertion in the name of science, is doing so on a Stradivarius.
When most of you sons of bitches are just blowing a cheap crappy kazoo.

CaptainShuddup says

Not Science, it was people, who figured out complex processes to achieve those milestones.

WTF are you mumbling about? Science is people figuring out complex processes. Keep on posting, I need the laughs.

Dan8267 says

that people who think science is bullshit are idiots.

Science got us to the moon, eliminated smallpox, created supersonic aircraft and the Internet. 'Nuff said.

I wouldn't lump "Psychology" in with the hard sciences.

this is a damning comeback....

Call it Crazy says

finehoe says

How the hell would she even know? Tripp was a mid-level DoD employee, I'm sure she was never in the same room as Hillary, much less ever met her.

...."Tripp's office was directly adjacent to Hillary's second floor West Wing office for the entire time she served at the Clinton White House, with the exception of the first three months during which she sat directly outside the Oval office. Her position offered her unparalleled access to, and a unique perspective on, both the couple and the administration."

that people who think peer-reviewed studies are gospel are 2 years short of your favorite time server.....

Dan8267 says

SoftShell says

this is particularly damning evidence...

Dan says

Yes, peer-reviewed studies are so truthful and reliable.

Call it Crazy says

Major publisher retracts 43 scientific papers amid wider fake peer-review scandal

...that people who think science is bullshit are idiots.

indigenous says

Dan8267 says

Your statement, like Reagonomics, is empirically false. Of course, a Republican would want people to believe that economic theory is not answerable to historical facts given the consistent failures of their theories.

Reaganomics is irrelevant to what I'm talking about. I'm not a Republican.

Correction, whether or not you subscribe to Reaganomics is irrelevant. The failure of Reaganomics is empirical proof that economics is answerable to empirical demonstration.

Isn't Linda Tripp the Broad with the cum-stained dress fetish?

as long as the 'peers' reviewing the subject matter are equally represented from both sides of the issue.

Dan8267 says

What matters are scientific, peer-reviewed studies.

Call it Crazy says

It's not that science is bullshit, it's the scientists that report false data and narratives that are bullshitters...

Bullshit is always caught and exposed by the peer-review process. Scientists have an enormous incentive to point out any flaw in someone else's paper.

Call it Crazy says

Translation: You scratch my back and I'll scratch yours.... What ever it takes to keep the grants, funding and narrative going!!

The fact that you actually think this is how science works proves that you don't know jack shit. The behavior you describe is what happens to studies funded by corporations due to the corrupting effects of capitalism. Your criticism applies to capitalism, not the scientific method. And that you refuse to acknowledge this demonstrates extreme hypocrisy.

georgeliberte says

Isn't Linda Tripp the Broad with the cum-stained dress fetish?

That's Monica. Tripp is the hideous she-beast who wanted to further her career by creating a sex scandal involving the president, and in doing so, derailed efforts to make a more stable Middle East and paved the way for 9/11 and ISIS.

socal2 says

I wouldn't lump "Psychology" in with the hard sciences.

Nor would I, but the fact that you had to modify science with the adjective hard tacitly admits that psychology is a science.

SoftShell says

as long as the 'peers' reviewing the subject matter are equally represented from both sides of the issue.

There aren't always too sides to an issue. Counter-examples in which the later is complete bullshit:
1. Evolution vs. Creationism
2. Smoking causes cancer vs. Our cigarettes are roasted
3. Climate change is real vs. Why can't you just let us continue to pollute
4. Astronomy vs. Astrology
5. Nuclear Physics and Chemistry vs. Alchemy
6. Round Earth vs. Flat Earth
7. Moon Landing vs. Sound Stage
8. History vs. Everything posted by bgamall4
9. Housing Bubble vs. Irrational Exuberance
10. Picard vs. Kirk

georgeliberte says

Isn't Linda Tripp the Broad with the cum-stained dress fetish?

Yes. She's the right wing wacko that told Monica to NOT have the dress cleaned. Why Monica was telling Tripp that she had a Presidential cum stain on her dress ? We all know that some women talk to their friends about everything. But how was LInda Tripp that kind of friend to the young intern ? Monica must not have had the usual kind of close friends.

Dan8267 says

That's Monica. Tripp is the hideous she-beast who wanted to further her career by creating a sex scandal involving the president, and in doing so, derailed efforts to make a more stable Middle East and paved the way for 9/11 and ISIS.

Ha ha! MOAR WAR ON WOMEN. Trip is responsible for 9/11 AND ISIS?!

Dan has lost his mind again.

It wasn't Bill Clinton's serial philandering and sexual harassment that was the problem, it was those damn women who had the temerity to go public about Clinton's abuses.

https://screen.yahoo.com/linda-tripp-monica-lewinsky-cold-000000087.html

What a shock to find out that Linda Tripp is every bit as much a right wing, democrat hating bitch, now as she was back then. This is what the NY Post and Fox news call news.

Linda Tripp is so confused. She told the National Enquirer that Bill screwed Hillary while he was President. Horrible as it sounds, everybody knows that is not true.

The only reason Chelsea is here is that they shared bathwater once.

bob2356 says

WTF are you mumbling about? Science is people figuring out complex processes. Keep on posting, I need the laughs.

Maybe i will you beaker mishap you.

Ceffer says

The only reason Chelsea is here is that they shared bathwater once.

I thought Janet Reno was Chelsea's father?

socal2 says

Ha ha! MOAR WAR ON WOMEN. Trip is responsible for 9/11 AND ISIS?!

Dan has lost his mind again.

Well, who could argue with such in great analysis?

Idiots like socal2 don't get that things in the world are interconnected. You change something locally and eventually distance things react. He's world view is overly compartmentalized and localize. Nothing but direct cause and effect is acknowledged. This simply isn't how the real world operates.

The Monica Lewinsky scandal took an enormous amount of President Clinton's time, effort, and resources during critical Middle East peace talks. Had these peace talks succeeded, the entire arc of history would have been altered. Al Qaeda and other terrorist organizations would have weakened as relationships between the U.S. and the Middle East improved, not immediately, but progressively. And as life in the Middle East improved due to trade, fewer men and women would become extremists. Yes, this is enough to alter events so that 9/11 never happens, and the USA Patriot Act is never passed, and Bush is never elected president, and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan never happen, and millions of civilians including children don't die, and ISIS doesn't rise to power.

The actions of big policies have a ripple effect throughout history. This ripple effect never ceases and has significant influences even thousands of years after those policies were enacted.