patrick.net
An Antidote to Corporate Media
1,192,756 comments by 13,872 users - Onvacation, RayAmerica, Stout online now
Linda Tripp Breaks 20-Year Silence, Condemns Hillary Clinton Candidacy
invite response
2016 May 9, 8:42pm 15,742 views 39 comments
« First « Previous Comments 16 - 39 of 39 Search these comments
elliemae
2016 May 17, 8:12pm
Linda Tripp is a fat, ugly opportunistic bitch who is wasting good air. She should stop breathing - that would cure it.
turtledove
2016 May 17, 8:19pm
Linda Tripp is a fat, ugly opportunistic bitch who is wasting good air. She should stop breathing - that would cure it.
Well, if that ain't the truth. Can you imagine, confiding in an older woman who you think is helping you only to learn that she's the one who sold you out and made you the infamous devil-in-a-blue-dress-with-a-cum-stain.
Y
2016 May 17, 9:19pm
wow. look at all the people that can't handle the truth...
tripp speaks the truth...
HydroCabron
2016 May 17, 9:21pm
Are yous going to vote for Hillary?
Why? Are you enforcing political conformity?
Seems as if the biggest PC-enforcing comment-thread policemen are self-described libertarians.
Here's a secret: Anyone can dislike BOTH Hillary and Linda Tripp! Amazing but true!
indigenous
2016 May 17, 9:26pm
Here's a secret: Anyone can dislike BOTH Hillary and Linda Tripp! Amazing but true!
Yea but that doesn't seem to be the implication.
HydroCabron
2016 May 17, 9:28pm
Yea but that doesn't seem to be the implication.
What does it matter? Both sides are the same to a Libertarian - two wings of the same evil vulture.
Or are you a liar?
indigenous
2016 May 17, 9:30pm
Hillary is a sociopath, if she wins we will have more war. Not totally in favor of Trump he is not as fucked up
HydroCabron
2016 May 17, 9:33pm
Not totally in favor of Trump he is not as fucked up
Translation: Both sides are not the same.
So you're leaning Trump. Because you're a religious fanatic, but ashamed to admit it?
What are the reasons you have supported mostly Republicans your whole life? Do the lies you tell yourself and others vary between elections?
indigenous
2016 May 17, 9:36pm
So you're leaning Trump. Because you're a religious fanatic, but ashamed to admit it?
Nope just agin Hillary
What are the reasons you have supported mostly Republicans your whole life?
The Libertarians have no chance of winning.
HydroCabron
2016 May 17, 9:45pm
What are the reasons you have supported mostly Republicans your whole life?
The Libertarians have no chance of winning.
How convenient for you.
What's interesting about the evangelicals this year is that Trump is a complete heathen adulterer, and anti-Christian in many other ways. Yet they're falling into line because they're racists.
In your case, Trump is actually to the left of Hillary - but only for white people - so it's particularly funny that you'd choose him.
You can't even come up with the same excuses to always vote Republican. I'm guessing it goes something like this:
- In 2000: "Gore's too environmentalist - big government all around"
- In 2004, after Bush demonstrated he was warmongering trash who spent like crazy without taxing: "I hate deficits, but Bush means well in his heart, and somehow it's not so bad when a Republican starts a stupid war."
- In 2008: "Can't trust that Obama. Better get behind McCain. Don't like Obama's veep choice much."
- In 2012: "Well, Romney is clearly more warlike that Obama, but that's a good thing, because he's a Republican."
Amazing.
Ceffer
2016 May 17, 11:37pm
I always wondered if Linda Tripp was snarfing Bill's nads under the desk in the Oval Office and was jealous of Lewinsky, and it was scorned woman's revenge to blow the whistle.
Heh, heh! I said blow the whistle!
Things would have been much different if Tripp and Lewinsky had a three way clam slurp with IHLlary instead of wasting time on Goat Bill.
IHLlary a psychopath? I thought that's the first thing politicians put on their resumes in capital letters.
zzyzzx
2016 Jul 30, 7:49pm
Hillary's whooping cough is about to much worse.
Supposedly, it is Syphilis:
https://i.sli.mg/8gad3T.png
Organized crime in the US. Organized crime in Russia. Trump University scam.
If they could have used it convincingly they would have done so by this point
You can't even come up with the same excuses to always vote Republican. I'm guessing it goes something like this:
- In 2000: "Gore's too environmentalist - big government all around"
- In 2004, after Bush demonstrated he was warmongering trash who spent like crazy without taxing: "I hate deficits, but Bush means well in his heart, and somehow it's not so bad when a Republican starts a stupid war."
- In 2008: "Can't trust that Obama. Better get behind McCain. Don't like Obama's veep choice much."
- In 2012: "Well, Romney is clearly more warlike that Obama, but that's a good thing, because he's a Republican."Amazing.
Not sure about indy, but I think there are many Libertarians and Conservatives who are not committed to voting the party line, probably more-so than Democrats these days. I supported Gore (begrudgingly but didn't want Bush) and Obama in 2008 (not in 2012).
indigenous
2016 Jul 31, 8:58am
If I had to choose I would pick Trump, I'm thinking about not choosing.
Voting is a tacit acknowledgment of the system, which is FUBAR.
Cabron will choose to call this dithering, but that is the way he rolls...
HydroCabron
2016 Jul 31, 10:51am
what is your point?
That you repeatedly sell out your declared principles, because you don't really hold them as principles. You identify with the Republican party racially and demographically, and find an excuse to support them, no matter how different the excuse is each time.
When Trump first appeared, you expressed alarm at his authoritarian anti-market leftism. I was amazed, but figured you'd find a way to rationalize him as the lesser of two evils.
And here we are. You call yourself libertarian but are supporting the most constitutionally-ignorant, power-centralizing authoritarian candidate ever nominated.
Save yourself, and everyone else, time and energy: Call yourself a "die hard, dead-ender steadfastly loyal Republican" and be done with it.
What's wrong with honesty?
indigenous
2016 Jul 31, 10:58am
Save yourself, and everyone else, time and energy: Call yourself a "die hard, dead-ender steadfastly loyal Republican" and be done with it.
Because my dumb ass friend, I'm staunchly against war. The bulk of the Rs are necons. Hillary is a hawk/neocon.
Unlike the Rs I am socially liberal, I don't care about LGBTs I want to legalize drugs. However I am pro life.
I do care about government growth which is the ultimate hypocrisy of the Rs albeit their's is war spending the D's is a legacy of debt and starting wars. Which Hillary aligns perfectly with.
I guess you would call me an almost pure Libertarian?
HydroCabron
2016 Jul 31, 11:14am
I'm staunchly against war.
I'd enjoy seeing an actual argument between you and someone on this site who calls Democrats pussies for not being warlike enough. Funny: I don't think it's ever happened.
If you believe that Trump, who can't back down or let any perceived slight go unanswered, will bring our troops home and not start more wars (while getting much tougher on ISIS), I'd direct you the wealth of evidence to the contrary. Trump can't even let remarks from the family of a Muslim soldier go - he's still tweeting attacks on them. Hillary, meanwhile, was attacked by families of Benghazi victims, as well as families of 9-11 survivors (interesting, 9-11 happened under W), and she turned the other cheek.
Trump is a narcissistic soulless man-baby who never backs down - he has openly stated this as a core tenet. You really believe he'll close our bases, bring our boys home, and not start wars while being tougher on Islamic extremism than all who have come before? Did you also believe W when he said he was against "nation building" during the 2000 election?
I think you have real principles, but not the ones you state. You support the candidate from the whitest, most Christian, most male party, and work backward from there to fill in how this jibes with your pretend libertarianism.
Let me guess: you believed W to be less warlike than Al Gore or John Kerry, McCain to be less warlike than Obama in 2008, and Romney to be less warlike than Obama in 2012? Such a coincidence that the Republican is always less warlike! What are the odds?
Yet it must be so: you are "staunchly" against war, so it must be your main voting criterion.
indigenous
2016 Jul 31, 11:30am
Hillary has demonstrated a propensity for war. Trump has not, albeit that will probably change if Pence has any input.
Kerry is a hawk, McCain is actually a sales rep for the defense industry, Obama hasn't stopped any wars only exacerbated the situation.
I guess because you are computer guy you can only understand binary?
HydroCabron
2016 Jul 31, 11:46am
Hillary has demonstrated a propensity for war. Trump has not, albeit that will probably change if Pence has any input.
And someone who thinks Linda Tripp's opinion matters is not a Republican. Sad.
Linda Tripp, the woman who exposed Monica Lewinsky as Bill Clinton’s mistress but has remained silent the last twenty years about what she knew about Bill and Hillary Clinton, gave an exclusive interview to The Daily Mail in which she offered what she knew about Hillary Clinton that makes her unfit for the presidency.
Tripp sat outside the Oval Office the first three months of the Clinton Administration, then moved to an office directly adjacent to Hillary’s second floor West Wing office until Tripp left the administration. She told the Daily Mail that to Hillary, her election as president would “be part of a coronation instead of an election,†adding, “I think the most compelling thing about Hillary is that she will stop at nothing to achieve her end and that she views the public as plebeians easily seduced into believing her point of view.â€
Tripp continued, “Hillary Clinton ruled the White House even as early as 1993 and every scandal that originated in the Clinton administration was the brainchild of Hillary. When I think of Hillary Clinton I think of a lingering taint of scandal and wrongdoing and, in my opinion, possible criminal activity.â€
Tripp pointed out, “As is widely acknowledged, Hillary took care of all the ‘bimbo eruptions’ of which there were thousands in order to present to the world an electable candidate. In this endeavor she was ruthless. She destroyed women so that their stories never saw the light of day.†She noted that Hillary orchestrated the marginalizing of Gennifer Flowers, who said in 1992 that she and Bill Clinton had been lovers for 12 years.
Tripp, of course, was quite familiar with the Monica Lewinsky affair, and stated, “Hillary was not only aware of Monica Lewinsky, she ensured that Monica was removed from the White House and in the end went from being a lackluster First Lady with unimpressive approval numbers to wronged wife. Literally within the blink of an eye she propelled herself to First Victim status. This turned the corner for Hillary.â€
Tripp pointed out that Hillary’s later career was predicated on her reaction to the Lewinsky affair. She said, “Women across the world could certainly understand her position of standing by her man, finding it admirable that she was working on her marriage, unaware that it was a charade. She has that particular scandal to thank for her Senate candidacy and election and for everything that followed.â€
Still, Tripp insisted that the “bimbo issues†of Bill Clinton obscured the most important issue. She asserted, “In the case of Monica Lewinsky the story was never really about Monica or Linda Tripp. It was about subornation of perjury and obstruction of justice and a true abuse of power on the part of a sitting president. That should have been the story. It never was. And so it gave Monica her much needed fifteen minutes and it took the rest of us along with it but the actual crux of the entire issue escaped most. And now the very person who orchestrated that cover up and all the other cover ups over the years including those surfacing today is running for president of the United States.â€
Tripp took time to discuss the Whitewater scandal, which broke in 1994 and revolved around real-estate purchases involving the Clintons in 1978 when Bill was attorney general of Arkansas. Tripp said what she saw the Clintons do in 1994 “was not spin. It was lying to the American people knowingly and doing it routinely.â€
In 2001, Tripp told CNN Host Larry King that Hillary Clinton pressured the late Vince Foster, former deputy White House counsel, to resolve the Waco standoff problem in 1993. Former House Waco investigator T. March Bell charged that Hillary pressured Attorney General Janet Reno through Deputy Attorney General Webb Hubbell to initiate the attack on the Waco compound in 1993 that left 86 people dead, including children. Bell charged that Hillary orchestrated the action because the Waco standoff was dominating the news.
Tripp concluded about Hillary Clinton, “I watched her on countless occasions blatantly lie to the American people and knowingly lie.â€
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/07/29/linda-tripp-breaks-20-year-silence-condemns-hillary-clinton-candidacy/