patrick.net

Ask Comey--probably he'll reveal them in the closed door session this afternoon. But, I wouldn't think it would be too difficult to guess--unless you are implying that Comey is lying?

Stupid fuck Republicans let G.W.Bush & Republicans kill Americans based on a LIE.
We need to investigate Lynch to find out how many Americans she killed.
Hope Republican's children in the military are captured & tortured.
ISIS response: What goes around,comes around!
Republican love crimes against humanity.

Bush & his Republican Admin. should have been tried in the Hague &
if found guilty,EXECUTED.

BOYCOTT ALL Republicans.

How many Rep/Con patnetters are Communist sympathizers buying
China exports?

APOCALYPSEFUCK_is_ADORABLE says

They can't find a cell she would fit into!

Probably right.

joeyjojojunior says

Nope. And, in fact, other senior officials at the FBI disputed Comey's statement that Trump wasn't under investigation per today's testimony.

Please provide a credible link to your allegation. And, no, a CNN attributed "unamed source" is not a credible link.

Blurtman says

Please provide a credible link to your allegation. And, no, a CNN attributed "unamed source" is not a credible link.

With Names, Dates, Time, Position and Title please! :-)

So we can confirm - so much #FakeNews out there.

Journalism 2017:
"We don't need no stinkin' supporting evidence, we can just run a story wholly based on anonymous sources. To say otherwise is Old Fart Journalism, legacy, outdated."

Journalism 1957:
"We can't run stories wholly based on anonymous sources, Bill. Otherwise our three other competitors will clean our clock for sloppy reporting and we'll lose influence, prestige, and subscribers to ALL the other newspapers."

Blurtman--it was in Comeys testimony

Goran_K says

joeyjojojunior says

"The funny thing is it has completely blown up in the face of CNN and its Democrat allies. Some of the lies CNN/NYT/MSNBC have been exposed completely"

Complete BS. Nobody ever wrote that Trump was under investigation.

They didn't try to imply it?

CNN is fuckin' fake news.

This is why no one should trust the media anymore.

They are not objective in the least. They have a completely one-sided political agenda and are squandering their credibility daily to push it.

Goran_K says

Of course I'm waiting for Jake Tapper to now call Comey completely unreliable, a liar, and a Trump supporter.

No, first thing they do is selectively quote, call it a victory, and hope no one who they cant call racist notices.

Comey leaked info to the media-nice-he certainly was the leaker in chief. That shows his character-what a tool-what other stuff did he do to defend his empire?

I didn't watch the whole thing. But looks like one of the things Comey admitted to leaking was classified???????

Which thing?

lostand confused says

I didn't watch the whole thing. But looks like one of the things Comey admitted to leaking was classified???????

He did. He admitted to leaking Memos. He also admitted that Lynch pressured him to forget the Hillary investigation and due to that he was forced to publicly announce the investigation to keep it from getting buried.

Lynch should go to prison, and probably be bunk mates with Comey.

Not all memos are classified.

joeyjojojunior says

Not all memos are classified.

Ah, the Hillary Clinton defense. I like it.

joeyjojojunior says

Not all memos are classified.

Yes, but there is a lot of talking that one of the memos or docuemnt was classified. His behavior clearly justifies the firing-Director of FBI -LOL..

"Yes, but there is a lot of talking that one of the memos or docuemnt was classified. His behavior clearly justifies the firing-Director of FBI -LOL.."

Which one?

joeyjojojunior says

Which one?

That is what I am asking. leaking memos shows his unfitness for this type of job. But if he leaked classified stuff-he needs to go to jail-that si what I am trying to find out.

lostand confused says

I didn't watch the whole thing. But looks like one of the things Comey admitted to leaking was classified???????

I didn't watch the entire thing either. I heard the part where Comey admitted to leaking his memo. Isnt a conversation w the president classified?

Goran_K says

How is Loretta Lynch not in jail for Obstruction of Justice?

Back to the thread...

Is moderating public phrasing from your underlings Obstruction? It certainly seems more manipulative than anything Trump did.

I think both situations are far from evidence of obstruction. Didn't Lynch plead the 5th? We need her in a hearing

Lynch should be forced to talk to a Congressional Committee about possible collusion between Obama, Clinton's, and the Obama DOJ. Put her in front of Trey Gowdy. I'd pay money to view that.

Uh, the underlying intent was not to "change a word", that's the dishonest leftist interpretation of Comey's words. The actual reality was Lynch was telling Comey to "bury this investigation or else". Comey himself said he publicly outed the investigation into Hillary's e-mails because he felt that Lynch was pressuring him to bury the whole thing.

1. Comey admitted under oath that Loretta Lynch was attempting to get Comey to characterize the investigation as a "matter" to more closely align with the Clinton Campaign's narrative of the issue.

Comey said that when he asked Lynch if she was going to authorize him to confirm the existence of the Clinton email investigation, her answer was, “Yes, but don’t call it that. Call it a matter.” When Comey asked why, he said, Lynch wouldn’t give him an explanation. “Just call it a matter,” she said.

Comey added later that he was concerned about that direction as it was false. He was further concerned because it aligned with the Clinton campaign’s spin on the investigation.

Lynch’s order, Comey said, “concerned me because that language tracked the way the campaign was talking about the FBI’s work and that’s concerning.”

“I don’t know whether it was intentional or not but it gave the impression that the attorney general [Lynch] was looking to align the way we talked about our work with the way the political campaign was describing the same activity, which was inaccurate,” Comey added.

2. Comey admitted under oath that Loretta Lynch used her power to try and help Clinton in a CLEAR conflict of interest.

When asked by Texas Sen. John Cornyn if it would be fair to say Lynch had a “conflict of interest” in the Clinton email investigation, Comey answered in the affirmative. “That’s fair,” he said.

3. Comey admitted under oath that the "secret meeting between" Bill Clinton and Lynch is why he decided to go public about the true nature of the investigation into Clinton's e-mail and servers because he wanted to seperate the FBI from the actions of Loretta Lynch.

Comey cited Lynch’s secret tarmac meeting with Bill Clinton as a reason he chose to hold the press conference, he said, as he was concerned about preserving the independence of the FBI.

This is about as CLEAR as it gets when it comes to an appointed official attempting to use their power to influence, not only the investigation, but also to mislead the public at large to the true nature of the investigation into Hillary Clinton's e-mails.

Goran_K says

The actual reality was Lynch was telling Comey to "bury this investigation or else".

The dichotomy of perspective is all in the subtext.

I don't think there can be a resolution of the different perspectives. Can we get Lynch into a hearing? Or do we have to indict her for that to happen, considering she pled the 5th?

Goran_K says

3. Comey admitted under oath that the "secret meeting between" Bill Clinton and Lynch is why he decided to go public about the true nature of the investigation into Clinton's e-mail and servers because he wanted to seperate the FBI from the actions of Loretta Lynch.

Can we bring Bill into a fucking hearing? This tarmac meeting is at the center of a lot narratives

Left caught red handed.

CBOEtrader says

Goran_K says

The actual reality was Lynch was telling Comey to "bury this investigation or else".

The dichotomy of perspective is all in the subtext.

I don't think there can be a resolution of the different perspectives. Can we get Lynch into a hearing? Or do we have to indict her for that to happen, considering she pled the 5th?

At this point it really doesn't matter in all honesty. The Comey testimony has pretty much confirmed everything most honest people in the public already believed.

1) Trump and Russia was a big nothing. Completely invented fairytale by the democrats who are still stunned and reeling from the horrible campaign run by Hillary Clinton that cost them the Presidency and then the SCOTUS.

2) Comey made himself far too disruptive in an attempt to satisfy his corrupt bosses, and also to maintain the integrity of the FBI. He should have picked one side or the other, but his behavior showed that he deserved to get fired (as the Democrats wanted in November 2016, then all of sudden "didn't want" in May 2017 ).

3) The straw that broke the camels back is that Comey admitted 3 times to Trump that he was not under investigation, and all Trump wanted was for Comey to publicly say this and he would have kept his job, Comey did not do this. I believe this ultimately sealed Comey's fate since it infuriated Trump.

4) Trump wanted Comey to "wrap up" the Flynn investigation for better or worse, but not let it linger for 1-2 years as it seemed it might do. It was becoming a distraction since the media was using it to beat Trump over the head with, and the evidence of wrong doing was paper, translucently thin. Certainly LESS than the evidence that Hillary Clinton transferred classified data through the use of a private server, yet Comey let this shit nugget hang around for months instead of saying what everyone knows (and what will eventually be publicly concluded), Flynn is not guilty of any wrong doing.

CBOEtrader says

Can we bring Bill into a fucking hearing? This tarmac meeting is at the center of a lot narratives

Rapist Bill and Loretta Lynch literally have no single non-criminal reason for having a private meeting during the investigation of his wife by the FBI. None. Most Democrats won't even defend the action, instead they choose to ignore it.

Entitlemented says

Cant you just accept that it was pure coincidence that Bill and Loretta were there at the same time?

Fuck no.

Bill and AG Lynch somehow being in the "same area" at the same time while the public fervor around his wife, who is under investigation by the FBI for mishandling classified information, has grown to an earth shattering roar. yeah that just randomly happened.

That's about as "random" as Obama handing the Iranians hundreds of millions of dollars and the Iranians releasing U.S prisoners literally weeks apart, but "no Obama didn't give money for prisoners". Random.

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/06/08/gregg-jarrett-comey-exonerates-trump-so-much-for-obstruction.html

nbsp;None of that is alleged by Comey. Instead, the fired FBI Director recounts how President Trump expressed compassion for the man he dismissed as his National Security Adviser, calling Michael Flynn a good guy who has been through a lot.

Goran_K says

Bill and AG Lynch somehow being in the "same area" at the same time while the public fervor around his wife, who is under investigation by the FBI for mishandling classified information,

So if HRC would have won, then people would be ranting LRE (Lynch Rigged Election), rather than PRE (Putin Rigged Election).

In reality - could have either rigged the election? If so please explain.

Entitlemented says

So if HRC would have won, then people would be ranting LRE (Lynch Rigged Election), rather than PRE (Putin Rigged Election).

In reality - could have either rigged the election? If so please explain.

Rigged is a strong word. Team hillary stole the primary from bernie, sent fake bernie supporters to troll trump events in a dirty maneuver to make them both look bad, okeefe documented democrats colluding to hack the election, we have this phony Russian narrative, and yes everything about lynch.

There is no question the DNC/Team Hillary tried to jack the elections.

As per Brennans testimoney, the Russians always attempt to influence our affairs, as I'm sure we do theirs.

Trump was not involved in any of this madness. Hillary on the other hand...?

Entitlemented says

Goran_K says

Bill and AG Lynch somehow being in the "same area" at the same time while the public fervor around his wife, who is under investigation by the FBI for mishandling classified information,

So if HRC would have won, then people would be ranting LRE (Lynch Rigged Election), rather than PRE (Putin Rigged Election).

In reality - could have either rigged the election? If so please explain.

What? Whether she lost or not is irrelevant.

Being an influential former POTUS meeting with the AG of the United States while your wife is under FBI investigation is not.

But to entertain the question, no, neither Putin or Lynch could rig the election. The Democrats effectively "rigged the election" by calling white people the devil for 8 years.

Goran_K says

The Democrats effectively "rigged the election" by calling white people the devil for 8 years.

Is your name gehran O King? I have connection on LinkedIn by that name.

CBOEtrader says

Goran_K says

The Democrats effectively "rigged the election" by calling white people the devil for 8 years.

Is your name gehran O King? I have connection on LinkedIn by that name.

Wharton Business?

just any guy says

Use the right words because it matters. Per Comey, Trump said "I need loyalty. I expect loyalty." Why shouldn't he expect loyalty if he's the POTUS who isn't under investigation of anything and has been told that by Comey himself even though the media is crucifying Trump? Why shouldn't every federal employee be loyal to the POTUS? That's like saying that every US citizen should be loyal to our country. Well of course...what does the pledge of ALLEGIANCE even mean?

We've already talked about how threatening with "tapes" doesn't make sense. Tapes would prove the truth, as evidence. Saying you're going to provide evidence of something isn't a threat unless it's to disprove a lie or untruth, which would be Comey's lie or untruth in this case, so why not expose it?

That's just way too logical. The only real theory is that Comey was talking about grabbing pussy on tape, and Trump was going to nail him on it.

Goran_K says

The Democrats effectively "rigged the election" by calling white people the devil for 8 years

Exactly! They cleverly rigged it against themselves by being the most amazing douchebags imaginable!

The President can stop any investigation, he has that power. "Comey, I command you to stop investigating Flynn."He didn't stop the investigation into Flynn.

www.youtube.com/embed/Ovlo8hehqh8

Goran_K says

Being an influential former POTUS meeting with the AG of the United States while your wife is under FBI investigation is not.

That's it right there. You've got the boss of the man leading the Investigation, meeting with the subject's husband and a former POTUS himself, just before the investigation wraps up. Fishier than Fulton Street on a hot day.

Goran_K says

Wharton Business?

Me? No I went to Washington and Lee. Gehran went to UTSA

CBOEtrader says

Me? No I went to Washington and Lee. Gehran went to UTSA

Ah, wrong guy then.

Doesn't mean we can't be friends. :)

Tag Close