▲
6
0
▼

Now Democrats have a Russia problem


 invite response                
2017 Oct 24, 1:45pm   7,570 views  64 comments

by MrMagic   ➕follow (2)   💰tip   ignore  

Lefty cheers for Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian meddling in US politics may soon fade now that he’s reportedly looking into a top Democratic lobbyist.

NBC reports that Tony Podesta (the brother of Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman, John Podesta) and his firm are the subjects of a criminal investigation by the special prosecutor.

Team Hillary has long denied that she was a target of the spy ring, but an FBI source told The Hill: “There is not one shred of doubt from the evidence that we had that the Russians had set their sights on Clinton’s inner circle.”

All this, of course, follows reports the Obama administration knew Russia was engaged in a campaign of bribery and extortion — yet allowed a deal to go through giving Moscow control of one-fifth of America’s uranium.

Yes, there’s something to investigate here. But it goes way beyond Donald Trump.

http://nypost.com/2017/10/23/now-democrats-have-a-russia-problem/

« First        Comments 34 - 64 of 64        Search these comments

34   anonymous   2017 Oct 25, 9:00am  

Just a quick question. What's the difference between paying money for dirt and paying for dirt with favors and influence to a foreign power? Does anyone who voted for Trump know the answer?
36   anonymous   2017 Oct 25, 9:03am  

Prove it! Post the links.

Here's one quote from Business Insider 4/19/2017

"The FBI reportedly used the explosive, unverified dossier detailing President Donald Trump's alleged ties to Russia to bolster its case for a warrant that would allow it to surveil Carter Page, an early foreign-policy adviser to Trump's campaign."
37   anonymous   2017 Oct 25, 9:06am  

You're finished Joey - get a new job, sir!
38   MisdemeanorRebel   2017 Oct 25, 9:08am  

anonymous says
"The FBI reportedly used the explosive, unverified dossier detailing President Donald Trump's alleged ties to Russia to bolster its case for a warrant that would allow it to surveil Carter Page, an early foreign-policy adviser to Trump's campaign."


Wow, so the Clinton Campaign paid for a fake salacious dossier that was then used by the Obama DOJ to get a FISA to spy on Trump.

Dirty and Dangerous to Democracy! Steele is filing like a mad man in the UK, where the defamation laws are much tougher. Paging Michael Cohen.

I bet when Steele dropped fake news anonymously, it was reported as a "HIgh Ranking Intelligence Source."
39   FuckTheMainstreamMedia   2017 Oct 25, 9:15am  

TwoScoopsMcGee says
anonymous says
"The FBI reportedly used the explosive, unverified dossier detailing President Donald Trump's alleged ties to Russia to bolster its case for a warrant that would allow it to surveil Carter Page, an early foreign-policy adviser to Trump's campaign."


Wow, so the Clinton Campaign paid for a fake salacious dossier that was then used by the Obama DOJ to get a FISA to spy on Trump.

Dirty and Dangerous to Democracy! Steele is filing like a mad man in the UK, where the defamation laws are much tougher. Paging Michael Cohen.

I bet when Steele dropped fake news anonymously, it was reported as a "HIgh Ranking Intelligence Source."


Yep. The leftists on Pat.net don’t seem to care. Hmmm.
40   joeyjojojunior   2017 Oct 25, 9:17am  

anonymous says
Just a quick question. What's the difference between paying money for dirt and paying for dirt with favors and influence to a foreign power? Does anyone who voted for Trump know the answer?


One is legal and the other isn't?
41   joeyjojojunior   2017 Oct 25, 9:19am  

TwoScoopsMcGee says
Wow, so the Clinton Campaign paid for a fake salacious dossier that was then used by the Obama DOJ to get a FISA to spy on Trump.


Nope.. The Clinton campaign paid for oppo research. Said research was independently verified and showed potential crimes by one of the candidates. The FBI learned of this evidence and investigated as it's their job to investigate potential crimes.
42   joeyjojojunior   2017 Oct 25, 9:20am  

Fucking White Male says
Yep. The leftists on Pat.net don’t seem to care. Hmmm.


Actually smarter people understand what this really means and aren't triggered by Breitbart and zerohedge.
43   MisdemeanorRebel   2017 Oct 25, 9:21am  

Maggie Haberman of the NYT says Hilllary Campaign Lawyer Elias personally lied to her about paying for the dirty dossier
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5016865/A-YEAR-Clinton-lies-dirty-dossier-exposed.html


joeyjojojunior says
One is legal and the other isn't?

One is a tort, the other there's no evidence for. Start putting aside money for the Elias and Steele Legal Defence Funds.
47   anonymous   2017 Oct 25, 9:31am  

Just as I thought - anonymous intelligence sources consider Steele to be credible. Wonderful proof! Some email from Trump Jr. "parallel the unverified dossier." Iron clad!
49   zzyzzx   2017 Oct 25, 9:38am  

WHY ARENT’ I 50 INDICTMENTS AHEAD HILLARY MIGHT ASK
51   zzyzzx   2017 Oct 25, 11:55am  

Obligatory:
52   MrMagic   2017 Oct 25, 1:23pm  

anonymous says
Just as I thought - anonymous intelligence sources consider Steele to be credible. Wonderful proof! Some email from Trump Jr. "parallel the unverified dossier." Iron clad!


Amazing how the Liberal mind works?????
54   joeyjojojunior   2017 Oct 25, 6:59pm  

TwoScoopsMcGee says

One is a tort, the other there's no evidence for. Start putting aside money for the Elias and Steele Legal Defence Funds


I can't wait for Trump to sue!

So, if there is no suit, that must mean it's true, right?
57   MrMagic   2017 Oct 27, 1:04pm  

Funny how things change.

What a difference one word can make...

59   WookieMan   2017 Oct 27, 6:51pm  

Booger dropping the bombs on all of these Russian threads. Drives home the point how many duplicate threads there are on the same topic and how the same people piss on each other over and over.
60   anonymous   2017 Oct 27, 6:55pm  

Republicans apparently have no idea what the word collusion means anymore.
61   WookieMan   2017 Oct 27, 6:58pm  

anonymous says
Republicans apparently have no idea what the word collusion means anymore.

What are you talking about? Explain.
63   MrMagic   2017 Oct 28, 7:15am  

anonymous says
Republicans apparently have no idea what the word collusion means anymore.


Yes, because it's been spewed Ad nauseam by the Dems for over a year without a single shred of evidence.

« First        Comments 34 - 64 of 64        Search these comments

Please register to comment:

api   best comments   contact   latest images   memes   one year ago   random   suggestions