« First « Previous Comments 70 - 109 of 143 Next » Last » Search these comments
Is that a question or a statement?
Are we trying to say the owner isn't Republican? Any proof?
TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce saysIsn't Federal Personal Income Tax the largest single contributor to Federal Revenue ?
Why yes it is! I wonder if illegal aliens pay it.
TwoScoopsOfSpaceForce saysSIsn't Federal Personal Income Tax the largest single contributor to Federal Revenue ?
I thought we were just talking about tax. Because most welfare services that illegals would receive are local/state and not paid with Federal money.
Is that what Republicans think? Maybe that's why Trump won't show his tax returns.
Democrats think Immigration laws are optional. That's literally the idea behind Sanctuary Cities.
Are you suggesting the good law abiding christian trump voters are breaking the law by paying illegals under the table? I know, pelosi/obama made them do it.
That is absolutely NOT the idea behind Sanctuary Cities.
Are illegals living in sanctuary cities breaking the law or not?
Bonus question, what exactly IS the idea behind them?
Once again-that's a strawman. Anytime you tell us what Dems believe, it's ALWAYS a strawman.
"Leaders of sanctuary cities want to reduce the fear of deportation and possible family break-up among people who are in the country illegally, so that such people will be more willing to report crimes, use health and social services, and enroll their children in school."
Democrats think Immigration laws are optional.
The idea behind Sanctuary cities is to make immigration enforcement difficult.
More Teaching and Social Work Jobs = More Dem Voters. Plus the grateful Immigrants. All paid for by suburban taxpayers, who are citizens or legal residents.
I hope that's a joke.
Do you think these two statements are identical?
What about Federal Cannabis Prohibition?
So you think some folks are Republicans until they get a job teaching and then they somehow morph into a Dem?
LeonDurham saysOnce again-that's a strawman. Anytime you tell us what Dems believe, it's ALWAYS a strawman.
The idea behind Sanctuary cities is to make immigration enforcement difficult.
Frankly, it's insulting to people's intelligence to act like Sanctuary City policies aren't put in place to make immigration enforcement difficult.
It is always a strawman. Most sanctuary city policies (there are a few outliers. are to make local law enforcement easier by engendering trust between illegals and local law enforcement. If that makes federal immigration enforcement more difficult then that is not the local officials problem.
FortWayne saysNo they don’t. They are all cash and food stamps here.
I live here, I see it.
They pay for gas with food stamps? Amazing. Rent too?
https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/democracy/reports/2018/04/14/449461/americas-electoral-future-2/
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/05/trump-2016-election/528519/
Dems back illegal immigration and oppose any restrictions on it
Straw Man. However, teachers are notoriously dedicated democrat voters and Teachers Unions are rabid funders of Democrats.
Complete BS. That is a 100% lie. It's patently absurd. Once again I'm reminded that the next election is about truth vs. fiction. Lies vs. honesty.
I don't think you know what a strawman is. The point is that more teaching jobs doesn't create more Dems. Having babies creates Dems. More teachers just means there are jobs for those babies.
They pay for gas with food stamps? Amazing. Rent too?
You realize that trading Food Stamps for smokes and booze is quite common, yes?
"Hey Mister, If you buy me a 40, I'll buy ya $10 of stuff on my Oregon Trail Card. Whatta deal, Mister, c'mon."
100% True.
eachers don't overwhelmingly vote Democrat? Teachers Unions don't disproportionally give to Democrats? This is an extraordinary claim, please provide some evidence.
Tens of millions of Great Americans are taking a big fat dump on Trumps face with his ridiculous drug laws
Nonsense. They're there to keep illegals in the country. When Brown lowered the maximum penalty for misdemeanors from 365 to 364 days, that was a deliberate attempt to avoid triggering a Federal automatic deportation statute (anybody who serves a year in jail for a crime).
The whole "cooperate with local law enforcement" is a red herring excuse.
Folks who go into teaching are typically college educated, who valuereinterpreting everything within the context of race/gender/sexual orientation/all whites are racist/recycling
reinterpreting everything within the context of race/gender/sexual orientation/all whites are racist/recycling
LeonDurham saysFolks who go into teaching are typically college educated, who valuereinterpreting everything within the context of race/gender/sexual orientation/all whites are racist/recycling
You realize that nobody is trading food stamps for rent or gas, right?
P N Dr Lo R saysLeonDurham saysFolks who go into teaching are typically college educated, who valuereinterpreting everything within the context of race/gender/sexual orientation/all whites are racist/recycling
As opposed to reinterpreting everything within the context of race/gender/sexual orientation all muslims are terrorists, all mexicans are rapists, all blacks are on welfare, women belong int the kitchen or bedroom serving their man fags are all molesting boys?
You realize that nobody is trading food stamps for rent or gas, right?
You also realize it's possible for the mother and kids to be on welfare, but the father who lives with them to be an undeclared co-habitant who works off the books for cash-only, yes?
Because you say so? It's true because I believe it should be true. Illegals could be all gone in la very short time. All that has to happen is to direct the Justice department to prosecute employers until no one will hire an illegal. But those libruls in the oval office and controlling both houses of congress don't seem to want to take that step. There is only one group keeping illegals in the country. Conservative who block every attempt to eliminate the jobs they are here for.
You also realize it's possible for the mother and kids to be on welfare, but the father who lives with them to be an undeclared co-habitant who works off the books for cash-only, yes?
What does this have to do with illegals not being able to collect most forms of welfare? And that the little they do collect is mostly from local and State sources, where they DO pay taxes.
How does a man working off the books pay taxes on cash off the books?
reinterpreting everything within the context of race/gender/sexual orientation/all whites are racist/recycling
Tyranny is the deliberate removal of nuance.
Right, but I'm supposed to true that Democrats aren't pandering to illegals by not reporting them to ICE, attempting to legalize their citizenship, and letting them vote in local elections.
« First « Previous Comments 70 - 109 of 143 Next » Last » Search these comments
Trending on Facebook news and over 300,000 comments on twitter today.
What do you think these people are discussing? How they will vote for pro-illegal politicians in November?