patrick.net

Hillary is the Liar Trump nuetered New York Times early on, do they want a FRESHONE? (Trump's pimp hand sqrung back)

They are the least read publication on the planet. George Soros is the only thing supporting them.

Enjoy the last few articles from them, too bad they'll go out on a legacy of lies and propaganda.

Go easy NYT shhhh shhh shhh.

tovarichpeter says

Does Trump ever tell the truth?

Twice as much as Hillary ... but who's counting?

Speaking of Zampolits and the Correct Line.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/09/us/politics/hillary-clinton-donald-trump-putin.html

This isn't in the opinion section.

"He's Red down to his underpants!"

This was after America's Pravda had a mini-campaign to warn about cosmopolitans connect Trump to Roy Cohn, and thereby Joseph McCarthy.

Meanwhile, out of 1000s of lazy, tendentious journalists and media people reporting on the campaign, "яркий", translated as Bright which is kind of correct, it's really more like Bright as in "Vivid" or "Colorful" and is not a remark on intelligence, but personality.

Fact checkers:

"Obama is a lightweight"

"Trump is lying. At 175lb, Obama would actually qualify in the heavier classes in Boxing and Wrestling..."

"Obama and Hillary founded ISIS!"

"Liar! We fact checked and it turns out Obama and Hillary didn't actually found ISIS, which was done by al-Baghdadi..."

I would love to see moderators hold his feet to the fire created by a year of outsized whoppers. The first question should go like this:
"Donald, you have publicly lied more than any candidate to run for the office of the President. You are the most secretive candidate as well, as the only candidate to refuse to release his tax returns in 40 yrs and have produced a questionable doctors note even though you are the oldest person ever to run for the office. Why should anybody overlook these problems?"

The follow up should be: "You have made many completely ridiculous claims, such as knowing more than the generals and having a secret plan to get rid of ISIS. These statements clearly were not supposed to be taken literally. How is somebody supposed to interpret these statements?"

Let's talk about Hillary's Health.

(NOOO!!!!)

Fine. Let's talk about her Emails.

(NOOO!!!!!)

More "Factchecking". CNN's Brooke Baldwin who called in the instant fact-checker, skeptical of "Hammering Devices" claim, thought 4Chan was a person.

"Who is this 4chan?"

Journalists are lazy and not very well informed.